Jump to content

LeSean McCoy allegations


Recommended Posts

People are calling this “BS” and that she is “lying”. I don’t think so. A woman wouldn’t do this to her own face. There was indeed a home invasion. 

 

Now, did Shady ask these guys to go get his stuff? They did ask for very specific items - so this won’t be a tough egg to crack. If he did, he’s toast, regardless of what he did or did not ask them to do. If he did, he sent the scum of the Earth to get his items. There’s implications here. First, never send scum to do the job of a gentleman. Second, since these creatures are lower than pond scum, they’ll just say Shady told them to do it. Either way, he’ll be guilty. 

 

As for her removing camera around around the house...wouldn’t you? If you were squatting in your Ex’s house, you wouldn’t want him/her peeping on you. Camera feeds are accessible from anywhere. Heck, this could’ve been what triggered the event. Couldn’t have been a better time to send you scum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

So did Lesean McCoy beat up Janet or Chrissy?  

 

Excuse me, he was in Miami.  Did Lesean McCoy hire Mr. Roper to beat up Janet or Chrissy?

No, Im thinking Mr Furley. He was real dramatic when he was a Deputy in his younger years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

The eviction was the other poster talking about Threes Company. He said in my world they would never get evicted. I told him they have a rental agreement so they have a contract that can lead to eviction. Keep up. Get your lawyer wife to read it to you. LMAO.

Actually I was making fun of you. You claim to know the law but can't even spell tenant and Sheriff correctly.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Heitz said:

DhyDF2QWAAIqNd_.jpg

 

All we know to date, in one place - a press release.  

 

Every thing I've read from that attorney makes me wonder if she's ever done a Chicago Sunroof...

1 minute ago, JoeF said:

Larry Dallas......

 

 

200_s.gif

 

You know...looking at the background there...it really was a nice apartment...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

It doesn't seem that you know it.  She's not a wife in any way from a legal perspective and has no property rights as such. 

They have a shared home. They were cohabitating. Why do you think he can't get her out? It's not that hard. He will win, but he has to go through the court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe this.  I hope I am right.

1 minute ago, MarlinTheMagician said:

Not what I meant.  Not necessarily that she delays a single court date - that she alters the eviction process.  Changes the weight on the scales, which is clearly against her right now.

 

This is in response to Commonsense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Saint Doug said:

People are calling this “BS” and that she is “lying”. I don’t think so. A woman wouldn’t do this to her own face. There was indeed a home invasion. 

 

Now, did Shady ask these guys to go get his stuff? They did ask for very specific items - so this won’t be a tough egg to crack. If he did, he’s toast, regardless of what he did or did not ask them to do. If he did, he sent the scum of the Earth to get his items. There’s implications here. First, never send scum to do the job of a gentleman. Second, since these creatures are lower than pond scum, they’ll just say Shady told them to do it. Either way, he’ll be guilty. 

  

As for her removing camera around around the house...wouldn’t you? If you were squatting in your Ex’s house, you wouldn’t want him/her peeping on you. Camera feeds are accessible from anywhere. Heck, this could’ve been what triggered the event. Couldn’t have been a better time to send you scum.  

 

I think you are VERY much underestimating what a golddigger will do when she about to lose the lifestyle she is accustomed to.

Edited by LikeIGiveADarn
  • Like (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi. I read so much legal disinformation in this thread that it motivated me to join your community. ? I am an attorney licensed to practice law in Georgia and I do landlord-tenant work. Here's how our law works. If she was living in the home as his girlfriend she became a tenant-at-will. In order to kick her out of the house, he has to give her sixty days notice. Once the 60 day period expires, if she hasn't left the house he can file an eviction proceeding. Eviction hearings are easy to schedule in Fulton County; you can typically get one within a week. Personally, I would never use the Marshall's Office to get her served; I would use one of my private investigators to do it.

 

The hearing would take about 5 minutes. I would have to show my client owned the house, that he gave the 60 days notice, that there was no lease and that she refused to leave. I would get an eviction order on the spot and arrange with the sheriff's office to have her stuff put out on the street.

 

It's easy and straight forward. I hope that clears up some of the confusion.

Edited by brandon_cox
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Commonsense said:

So her removing the cameras was another lie or oversight by the defenders of everything Buffalo.

Yeah looks that way - mccoy took the cameras out and replaced them, not her. Obviously so she couldn’t access the feed anymore after she dimed on his bros trying to empty the house.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Commonsense said:

So her removing the cameras was another lie or oversight by the defenders of everything Buffalo.

in fairness, there was an earlier cited source that stated she had them removed.

"According to his attorney, Jacoby Hudson, McCoy claimed that Cordon had surveillance cameras removed from the home."

https://nypost.com/2018/07/10/lesean-mccoy-recently-tried-to-evict-ex-girlfriend-from-his-home/

 

Conflicting stories on the camera issue.

Edited by wiskibreth
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

They have a shared home. They were cohabitating. Why do you think he can't get her out? It's not that hard. He will win, but he has to go through the court.

 

 

89257_h.jpg?itok=QquhGMjI

 

 

Cuddy, come over here and sit on my lap, while I try to explain how cohabitation and marriage laws work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CuddyDark said:

They have a shared home. They were cohabitating. Why do you think he can't get her out? It's not that hard. He will win, but he has to go through the court.

 

Yes...it's called EVICTION, and has ****-all to do with marital status.  Cohabitation is not marriage.  Let me repeat that: COHABITATION IS NOT MARRIAGE. 

 

What cohabitation does establish in this case, under Georgia state law, is TENANCY.  It does not establish a "family home" or a "shared home."  Legally, he is a lessor and she a lessee, and he must evict her as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Saint Doug said:

People are calling this “BS” and that she is “lying”. I don’t think so. A woman wouldn’t do this to her own face.

 

Women do, surprisingly enough.  Not often, not by a long shot, and I don't think this is such a case.  But it does happen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Fadingpain said:

Tenet...Tenant.


For all intensive purposes we know what the man meant!  

 

I could care less if his spelling is off.  

 

Here Here I say!  

 

 

 

 

Dilly dilly, I say!

 

seriously, Gents, if any of this is close to being true he is toast.

 

If...

 

 

Edited by dollars 2 donuts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wiskibreth said:

in fairness, there was an earlier cited source that stated she had them removed.

"According to his attorney, Jacoby Hudson, McCoy claimed that Cordon had surveillance cameras removed from the home."

https://nypost.com/2018/07/10/lesean-mccoy-recently-tried-to-evict-ex-girlfriend-from-his-home/

 

Conflicting stories on the camera issue.

It’s possible she removed (or tried to remove) the replacement cameras that mccoy installed in June? Her attorney seems to imply they were still in the house last night, but her attorney also can’t spell mccoy’s name correctly so who knows what’s true in that letter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does her attorney need to put out a press release?  This is a move (I say as a litigator), that usually accompanies a hold-up for money, not serious litigation.  The police can handle it.  And if she has a real civil claim she should file it.  Press releases are made to exert pressure.  I could be dead wrong, and staunchly oppose violence against any person, especially women or children, but my bull **** meter is sounding off.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, brandon_cox said:

Hi. I read so much legal disinformation in this thread that it motivated me to join your community. ? I am an attorney licensed to practice law in Georgia and I do landlord-tenant work. Here's how our law works. If she was living in the home as his girlfriend she became a tenant-at-will. In order to kick her out of the house, he has to give her sixty days notice. Once the 60 day period expires, if she hasn't left the house he can file an eviction proceeding. Eviction hearings are easy to schedule in Fulton County; you can typically get one within a week. Personally, I would never use the Marshall's Office to get her served; I would use one of my private investigators to do it.

 

The hearing would take about 5 minutes. I would have to show my client owned the house, that he gave the 60 days notice, that there was no lease and that she refused to leave. I would get an eviction notice on the spot and arrange with the sheriff's office to have her stuff put out on the street.

 

It's easy and straight forward. I hope that clears up some of the confusion.

 

Then why has the eviction process taken a year and counting? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LikeIGiveADarn said:

 

I think you are VERY much underestimating what a golddigger will do when she about to lose the lifestyle she is accustomed to.

I don’t think a woman who looked like that, and who routinely put that face out on the internet, would purposely put a cut right down the middle of her face.  She’s going to be downright disfigured.  Even when women commit suicide, it’s done in a non-disfiguring manner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Yes...it's called EVICTION, and has ****-all to do with marital status.  Cohabitation is not marriage.  Let me repeat that: COHABITATION IS NOT MARRIAGE. 

 

What cohabitation does establish in this case, under Georgia state law, is TENANCY.  It does not establish a "family home" or a "shared home."  Legally, he is a lessor and she a lessee, and he must evict her as such.

Why is this so hard for people to understand, Tom?!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cornette's Commentary said:

Why is this so hard for people to understand, Tom?!!!

 

Because it can be, in certain states if certain other conditions are met.

 

But none of those conditions are met in this case.  And arguments to ambiguous fictions of "family home" and "shared home" don't change that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MPT said:

 

Then why has the eviction process taken a year and counting? 

 

Because he didn't hire a real attorney and have it done right. It's a very simple procedure if you follow the law. I've done hundreds of them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MPT said:

 

Then why has the eviction process taken a year and counting? 

Because it appears that the two have reconciled repeatedly and he probably put it off. I mean he was still giving her expensive gifts just this past may.

1 minute ago, brandon_cox said:

 

Because he didn't hire a real attorney and have it done right. It's a very simple procedure if you follow the law. I've done hundreds of them 

Or what Brandon said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would he remove and install cameras he controlled if he is sending in thugs?  That is her story.  If you are LeSean, is it not safer to just go with no cameras?   As I understand it, his version is she pulled the cameras out.  She would not want cameras watching her she could not control, true?   I am having trouble with her story.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that her lawyer put out a press release.  As I stated above, that is a red flag for me.  In my experience, not what real victims do.  The rely on the police, and if they have enough to state a claim they file a civil action.  As a general rule:  Press release = hold-up for money.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read the attorney press release.

 

Sounds like Meathead McCoy hired thugs to break into his house and take property from the woman that he felt was rightly his own.

 

If this story is not made up, there are some crimes being committed here, and they should extend to Meathead McCoy.

 

Will be interested to see how the Bills handle this with regard to McCoy.  He may be done as as Bill, regardless of any criminal proceedings that may or may not be brought against him long term.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, brandon_cox said:

 

Because he didn't hire a real attorney and have it done right. It's a very simple procedure if you follow the law. I've done hundreds of them 

 

Thanks.  I know the broad strokes, but thanks for filling in the local details.

 

I know in the DC region, evictions can take a stupid-long time, depending on the situation (I've known some foreclosure evictions in this area to drag out a couple years, on the legal argument of "banks are evil.")  Didn't know if GA leaned tenant or landlord.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fadingpain said:

Read the attorney press release.

 

Sounds like Meathead McCoy hired thugs to break into his house and take property from the woman that he felt was rightly his own.

 

If this story is not made up, there are some crimes being committed here, and they should extend to Meathead McCoy.

 

Will be interested to see how the Bills handle this with regard to McCoy.  He may be done as as Bill, regardless of any criminal proceedings that may or may not be brought against him long term.

 

 

Let me guess: you're wearing a "Make America Great Again" hat right now, aren't you?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...