Jump to content

LeSean McCoy allegations


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, The Red King said:

 

I hate to be the one to tell you this, but at this point I think you're being actively trolled.  They're seeing how far they can wind you up, and you're taking the bait.

 

It's okay...it's what I do.  I consider it an opportunity to work on new and creative ways to insult idiots.  (My cereal box comment, for example...that was pretty good.)

 

Some people juggle geese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CuddyDark said:

 

They have a rental contract. McCoy and this woman made a home. If he had a contract with her the sheriff would have removed her.

 

Okay...that's three statements that contradict each other.  So which is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wants her out.  She won't leave.  I think she is lying.  Here is her public filing.  Reveals no excuse for her being there.  An alleged beating would delay her eviction.  However, as said, if he did it he should (and probably will), be prosecuted.  I don't believe it.  Here

 

https://deadspin.com/police-lesean-mccoys-ex-girlfriend-was-the-victim-of-a-1827490589

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Red King said:

 

I hate to be the one to tell you this, but at this point I think you're being actively trolled.  They're seeing how far they can wind you up, and you're taking the bait.

Shhhhh!  It's fun!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

He's been trying to evict her from a house that he owns.

 

But he doesn't own it, because it's a family home, not a shared home, because she said they were married, and you can't evict a spouse unless you have a rental agreement with the spouse!

 

:lol:

  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CuddyDark said:

 

They have a rental contract. McCoy and this woman made a home. If he had a contract with her the Sharif would have removed her.

Now you've gone and done it. First--tenet, then--Sharif? I can see why we should listen to you on legal matters.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CuddyDark said:

Yeah I'm gonna say you don't know what you're talking about.

 

Then post some citations.   I've been Googling and I find nothing in U.S. state law that supports your claim.  I'll keep searching but don't expect to find anything...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MarlinTheMagician said:

He wants her out.  She won't leave.  I think she is lying.  Here is her public filing.  Reveals no excuse for her being there.  An alleged beating would delay her eviction.  However, as said, if he did it he should (and probably will), be prosecuted.  I don't believe it.  Here

 

https://deadspin.com/police-lesean-mccoys-ex-girlfriend-was-the-victim-of-a-1827490589

More crap. She just got the court date pushed back 30 days. Why would she beat herself up when she is clearly doing a fine job of delaying the eviction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

But he doesn't own it, because it's a family home, not a shared home, because she said they were married, and you can't evict a spouse unless you have a rental agreement with the spouse!

 

:lol:

The eviction was the other poster talking about Threes Company. He said in my world they would never get evicted. I told him they have a rental agreement so they have a contract that can lead to eviction. Keep up. Get your lawyer wife to read it to you. LMAO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CuddyDark said:

I have made zero contradictions.

 

 

1: "They have a rental contract."

2: "McCoy and this woman made a home.

3: "If he had a contract with her the sheriff would have removed her."

 

1 and 3 contradict each other: if they had a rental contract, the sheriff would have removed her (3).  The sheriff didn't remove her, so they did not have a rental contract.  But they had a rental contract (1).  

1 and 2 contradict each other: McCoy and this woman made a home (2).  They had a rental contract. (1)  But if they had a rental contract, she was a tenant and they didn't make a home.

 

Also, if they had a contract, the sheriff COULDN'T REMOVE HER, because she would be a tenant with rights under the contract, requiring eviction.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, C.Biscuit97 said:

This is awful story but it’s funny the way some fans defend let’s just say questionable guys like McCoy or Incognito.  I’m sure if they were on NE it would be the same.

EXACTLY.  He seems to be a dirtbag. Great RB but not so great a person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

 

1: "They have a rental contract."

2: "McCoy and this woman made a home.

3: "If he had a contract with her the sheriff would have removed her."

 

1 and 3 contradict each other: if they had a rental contract, the sheriff would have removed her (3).  The sheriff didn't remove her, so they did not have a rental contract.  But they had a rental contract (1).  

1 and 2 contradict each other: McCoy and this woman made a home (2).  They had a rental contract. (1)  But if they had a rental contract, she was a tenant and they didn't make a home.

 

Also, if they had a contract, the sheriff COULDN'T REMOVE HER, because she would be a tenant with rights under the contract, requiring eviction.  

Threes Company have a rental contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

 

1: "They have a rental contract."

2: "McCoy and this woman made a home.

3: "If he had a contract with her the sheriff would have removed her."

 

1 and 3 contradict each other: if they had a rental contract, the sheriff would have removed her (3).  The sheriff didn't remove her, so they did not have a rental contract.  But they had a rental contract (1).  

1 and 2 contradict each other: McCoy and this woman made a home (2).  They had a rental contract. (1)  But if they had a rental contract, she was a tenant and they didn't make a home.

 

Also, if they had a contract, the sheriff COULDN'T REMOVE HER, because she would be a tenant with rights under the contract, requiring eviction.  

 

not sure if this complicates things further for you guys, but....

   "The home is owned by LKM Trust Agreement — LKM are McCoy’s initials — which is listed with a Buffalo, NY, address.:"

https://www.sbnation.com/2018/7/10/17553550/lesean-mccoy-abuse-accusations-home-invasion-georgia-ex-girlfriend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CuddyDark said:

Threes Company have a rental contract.

 

So did Lesean McCoy beat up Janet or Chrissy?  

 

Excuse me, he was in Miami.  Did Lesean McCoy hire Mr. Roper to beat up Janet or Chrissy?

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, C.Biscuit97 said:

This is awful story but it’s funny the way some fans defend let’s just say questionable guys like McCoy or Incognito.  I’m sure if they were on NE it would be the same.

53 pages and not one person has mentioned that McCoy encouraged his bodyguards to rough up the stripper on the bus while he was still in Philly. 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Oh, it's going over.  I can easily go 100 pages just abusing CuddyDark on his ignorance of...everything, really.

 

I haven't had this much fun since Holcomb'sLaw argued you could roll 3.5 on a single die.

 

DC, I think he is starting to get it.

 

in playing catch up I was just hoping he was going to stop.  Those holes start to get pretty deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said:

Sorry, I haven't followed every bit of this story. But has there been a police report on this incident or did it just go straight to Instagram?

Police report in progress.  The sheriff was called to the scene at 330 am. but shady was accused a state away on Instagram, by a friend of the victim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MarlinTheMagician said:

No sir.  You don't know the facts.  No one said she beat herself up.  So far, all we have is her hearsay, self-serving statement that a home intruder, who she admits is not McCoy, demanded things he gave her.  That is miles from "he did it" and no evidence of anything without more.  

You said the timing was curious because she had court, which isn’t true. Her lawyer got it delayed. If you want to speculate it makes more sense that McCoy lost his patience and got involved with something stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wiskibreth said:

 

not sure if this complicates things further for you guys, but....

   "The home is owned by LKM Trust Agreement — LKM are McCoy’s initials — which is listed with a Buffalo, NY, address.:"

https://www.sbnation.com/2018/7/10/17553550/lesean-mccoy-abuse-accusations-home-invasion-georgia-ex-girlfriend

 

It doesn't.  The trust holds it, the trustee begins eviction on the trust's behalf.  It complicates the legalities...but not much.  

 

Private individuals holding real property in trust is actually pretty common, as a way of protecting assets.  If she sues him, for example...she still can't get the house.

 

No, CuddyDink, she doesn't have a right to LKM Trust Agreement property because she "made a home" with McCoy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Commonsense said:

53 pages and not one person has mentioned that McCoy encouraged his bodyguards to rough up the stripper on the bus while he was still in Philly. 

I actually just posted all of his “incidents” from TMZ.  Obviously this is a different level but at the very least, he has some issues with women.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Police report indicates a single male intruder in a home break in.  Victim claims they asked for specific items.  Police say break-in appears targeted and not random.  That is mile from McCoy did it.  For example, could be an angry family member a la Janoris Jenkins.  Could be she is full of ****.  Could be he did it.  But give the man the presumption he is entitled to absent more evidence of misconduct by him - as right now there is none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

It doesn't.  The trust holds it, the trustee begins eviction on the trust's behalf.  It complicates the legalities...but not much.  

 

Private individuals holding real property in trust is actually pretty common, as a way of protecting assets.  If she sues him, for example...she still can't get the house.

 

No, CuddyDink, she doesn't have a right to LKM Trust Agreement property because she "made a home" with McCoy.

Cuddy thinks this, because Nick Bosa told it to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

So did Lesean McCoy beat up Janet or Chrissy?  

 

Excuse me, he was in Miami.  Did Lesean McCoy hire Mr. Roper to beat up Janet or Chrissy?

Larry Dallas......

 

 

200_s.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...