Jump to content

California (again)


Recommended Posts

https://www.yahoo.com/news/california-moves-outlaw-stealthing-removing-182749429.html

 

I want to be very clear that guys that do this are scumbags but how do you prosecute? This seems like a law with good intentions that will be used mainly by pissed off one night stands. How do you prove he removed it vs it broke? Scumbag guys will never admit it and good guys would never do it to start 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

I just read the in California you can print out your own ballot, without any version of verification? This recall is as crooked as a Saddam Hussein election

 

 

 

Oh no........it's all good. 

 

The NY Times is telling us the claims of fraud are all false.  They know with certainty...no rooting interest at all!

 

 

 

 

Screenshot_20210912-205732_One UI Home.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

Oh no........it's all good. 

 

The NY Times is telling us the claims of fraud are all false.  They know with certainty...no rooting interest at all!

 

 

 

 

Screenshot_20210912-205732_One UI Home.jpg

Well the NYT is reliable like in 2016 when they discussed Russian disinformation but somehow never realized the Steele dossier was 100% Russian disinformation. They peddle so many lies they certainly should know them when they see them.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://ktla.com/news/local-news/san-fernando-valley-residents-have-trouble-casting-recall-ballots/

 

 

 

RECALL: San Fernando Valley residents have trouble casting recall ballots.

 

At El Camino Real Charter High School in Woodland Hills, some voters say they were told the computers showed them as already having voted, even though they had not.

 

West Hills resident Estelle Bender, 88, said she was far from the only person who was being told incorrectly that they had already voted.

 

In addition to friends of hers who experienced the issue and two other women outside the polling place, Bender said that inside, “the man next to me was arguing the same thing.”

 

Bender said she filled out a provisional ballot and “left really angry.”

 

Bender added that, to her knowledge, many of those affected by this issue are self-identified Republicans, and she’s suspicious.

 

“I’d still like to know how I voted,” Bender said.

 

 

I have a guess.

 

  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/frustrated-la-voters-given-provisional-011200032.html

 

I do not think these are the same precincts as previous post. This is proof of fraud and I don't know how you could argue otherwise.


“The voters who experienced this issue were offered and provided a provisional ballot, the fail-safe option to ensure no one is turned away from voting. After troubleshooting the issue, the equipment at the locations was replaced and voting continued," the office said in a statement.

 

They’re able to vote. All the righties on here were pro-GA election laws and Texas election laws. So why would they have an issue with a provisional ballot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


“The voters who experienced this issue were offered and provided a provisional ballot, the fail-safe option to ensure no one is turned away from voting. After troubleshooting the issue, the equipment at the locations was replaced and voting continued," the office said in a statement.

 

They’re able to vote. All the righties on here were pro-GA election laws and Texas election laws. So why would they have an issue with a provisional ballot?

Can you explain how it was that these people voted without voting? I am impressed you realized that this kind of shenanigans will not happen in GA again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Can you explain how it was that these people voted without voting? I am impressed you realized that this kind of shenanigans will not happen in GA again.


Computer error. Other processing errors. There are provisional ballots just for this sort of thing. They have submitted there’s and their vote will count.

 

Plus you’ve provided no proof of fraud. Just some old people complaining.

 

Where in the GA law stops computer errors? Where does it stop old people from being confused?

Polifact already has this:

 

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/sep/14/breitbart/snafu-one-polling-site-did-not-target-gop-voters-c/

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


Computer error. Other processing errors. There are provisional ballots just for this sort of thing. They have submitted there’s and their vote will count.

 

Plus you’ve provided no proof of fraud. Just some old people complaining.

 

Where in the GA law stops computer errors? Where does it stop old people from being confused?

Polifact already has this:

 

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/sep/14/breitbart/snafu-one-polling-site-did-not-target-gop-voters-c/

Quoting Politifacts is one step higher than Alex Jones but I know fraud is never the culprit when Dems do it, simply incompetence. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


Point to actual fraud. There hasn’t been any.

 

Every person that had an error on their account was allowed to do a provisional ballot.

When many people who have not voted is informed that they voted the only two reasons are either gross incompetence or fraud. But proof is the man arrested with 300 ballots that is fraud. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/8/2021 at 8:40 PM, dpberr said:

I fully expect Biden will do something stupid tomorrow with his "six point plan" that will twist the screws.  Newsom will enthusiastically follow it and it'll tip the scale a little more.

 

 

Mandated Masks AND a loin cloth on the outside of your pants.


 

 

Well, Trumpism loses badly again. This has got to be a bit worrying now. 
 

Who can step in and stop these crazy people from running? They aren’t electable.
 

Doesn’t look like McCarthy will/can do it.

 

Mitch will/can to some extent in the senate. 
 

Mitch did say that he will be finding the most electable candidates to run.

 

That was a shot at Trump.

 

Those internal party battles should be interesting.

Edited by Governor
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

Yah, you afraid bro

 


Love the shift from a Republican is going to be CA governor to it means nothing or Dems cheated.

 

When I was like 5 and watched the Bills game and the Bills lost, I’d often say it’s because the other team cheated.  So I guess Republicans are just a bunch of 5 year olds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


Just look at this thread. Many hopeful posts of a recall.

 

As for the last one just look at your own excrement, I mean posts of cheating without proof.

 

 

 

The ballots mailed to everybody is all the proof you need.  Deep blue ***t holes will have no problem with "turnout."  

 

 

 

 

......President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, portrayed the campaign to oust the governor as a “life and death” battle against “Trumpism” and far-right anti-vaccine activists.

 

 

https://news.yahoo.com/photos-californians-stream-polls-recall-235042804.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

 

 

Anti flu vaccine mandates.  Label these people correctly please.  Thank you.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


Just look at this thread. Many hopeful posts of a recall.

 

 

 

That is not what you said.

 

I have looked at the posts, in both threads since the results were announced.

 

Could you please link to someone who said that the only reason the dems won was because they cheated................as you claimed was said.

 

or are you Back in the Excrement ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

That is not what you said.

 

I have looked at the posts, in both threads since the results were announced.

 

Could you please link to someone who said that the only reason the dems won was because they cheated................as you claimed was said.

 

or are you Back in the Excrement ?

 

 


 

I just read the in California you can print out your own ballot, without any version of verification? This recall is as crooked as a Saddam Hussein election

——-

Oh no........it's all good. 

 

The NY Times is telling us the claims of fraud are all false.  They know with certainty...no rooting interest at all!
——-

RECALL: San Fernando Valley residents have trouble casting recall ballots.
———

https://www.yahoo.com/news/frustrated-la-voters-given-provisional-011200032.html

 

I do not think these are the same precincts as previous post. This is proof of fraud and I don't know how you could argue otherwise
 

That’s just from the last page… unless those posters are saying there’s fraud but good job Dems for winning without fraud.

 

Republicans can B word about imaginary fraud all they want, maybe if you look at the Name a Right Wing Position thread and you can see why Republicans can’t win elections instead of all these people complaining about fraud that’s not real or meaningful.

Edited by Backintheday544
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/15/2021 at 7:31 PM, Backintheday544 said:


 

I just read the in California you can print out your own ballot, without any version of verification? This recall is as crooked as a Saddam Hussein election

——-

Oh no........it's all good. 

 

The NY Times is telling us the claims of fraud are all false.  They know with certainty...no rooting interest at all!
——-

RECALL: San Fernando Valley residents have trouble casting recall ballots.
———

https://www.yahoo.com/news/frustrated-la-voters-given-provisional-011200032.html

 

I do not think these are the same precincts as previous post. This is proof of fraud and I don't know how you could argue otherwise
 

That’s just from the last page… unless those posters are saying there’s fraud but good job Dems for winning without fraud.

 

Republicans can B word about imaginary fraud all they want, maybe if you look at the Name a Right Wing Position thread and you can see why Republicans can’t win elections instead of all these people complaining about fraud that’s not real or meaningful.

Do you think election security is important? If you think it is important then how can you allow people print their ballots without any confirmation? Please tell me how you can have a secure election where you can print your own ballots, but I notice you quoted me but missed my comment about the dude arrested with 300 ballots, amazing how you personally challenged me for evidence of fraud but somehow missed it. It almost as if you are a dishonest hack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Do you think election security is important? If you think it is important then how can you allow people print their ballots without any confirmation? Please tell me how you can have a secure election where you can print your own ballots, but I notice you quoted me but missed my comment about the dude arrested with 300 ballots, amazing how you personally challenged me for evidence of fraud but somehow missed it. It almost as if you are a dishonest hack.


Fraud involves intent. The guy passed out in the car had thousands of pieces of mail, which included 300 ballots. Mail fraud probably but zero evidence of election fraud.

 

As to the printing out ballots there are several confirmations. For example, anyone can’t just go print a ballot, you need to go through CAs system to request the ballot and confirm you can vote. After you are done you sign the ballot and it goes through the same confirmations as a normal mailed in ballot.

 

The only dishonest hack here is you for spreading half truths that promote false claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fraud has been going on in CA elections for years. about 15 years ago  in the local election, the guy ahead of me in line went to sign the register and someone had already signed and voted as him. this was for town offices,. no fed or state seats were up for election.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:


Fraud involves intent. The guy passed out in the car had thousands of pieces of mail, which included 300 ballots. Mail fraud probably but zero evidence of election fraud.

 

As to the printing out ballots there are several confirmations. For example, anyone can’t just go print a ballot, you need to go through CAs system to request the ballot and confirm you can vote. After you are done you sign the ballot and it goes through the same confirmations as a normal mailed in ballot.

 

The only dishonest hack here is you for spreading half truths that promote false claims.

You are proud liberal, I make factual statements and you make excuses for them but I am the "half truth" guy. I will admit one thing I have not been able to confirm either way- are the ballots printed with voters name on them? Basically can I print off 40 of them and just sign 40 different names on 40 different ballots? All the sample ballots show no spot for name of voters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...