Backintheday544 Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 (edited) 59 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: You are proud liberal, I make factual statements and you make excuses for them but I am the "half truth" guy. I will admit one thing I have not been able to confirm either way- are the ballots printed with voters name on them? Basically can I print off 40 of them and just sign 40 different names on 40 different ballots? All the sample ballots show no spot for name of voters. Yes, half truth guy fits well. You say a guy was found with 300 ballots. Well he was also found with thousands of pieces of mail. There was been no hint it’s election related. And there is no election fraud charges. As you said there, you supplied the half truth on the ballots. You can see how their vote online process works here: You request it’s use through your voter account. You sign in through your personal information. You sign off with your personal signature on the envelope like vote by mail. Edited September 18, 2021 by Backintheday544 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 3 hours ago, Backintheday544 said: Yes, half truth guy fits well. You say a guy was found with 300 ballots. Well he was also found with thousands of pieces of mail. There was been no hint it’s election related. And there is no election fraud charges. As you said there, you supplied the half truth on the ballots. You can see how their vote online process works here: You request it’s use through your voter account. You sign in through your personal information. You sign off with your personal signature on the envelope like vote by mail. So your argument is that he had 300 ballots but he is doing other crimes so we can assume he is not doing election fraud? And I ask again- what is stopping a dishonest person from simply printing a ballot 40 times and just signing it with 40 different names? Even if 20 get caught how do you catch others? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: So your argument is that he had 300 ballots but he is doing other crimes so we can assume he is not doing election fraud? And I ask again- what is stopping a dishonest person from simply printing a ballot 40 times and just signing it with 40 different names? Even if 20 get caught how do you catch others? No he happened to have 300 ballots. To have fraud you need to have intent. There is nothing showing intent to commit election fraud, therefore there cannot be election. It’s more likely he was doing some mail scheme that occurred during an election. Hence why there was thousands of pieces of mail and only 300 ballots. For the printing multiple, each registered voter has an account that they verified themselves that they sign into and request to do online voting. The QR code on the ballot is tied to your sign in with your verified info. You can see this at around 1:11 on the video. Edited September 18, 2021 by Backintheday544 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 19 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said: No he happened to have 300 ballots. To have fraud you need to have intent. There is nothing showing intent to commit election fraud, therefore there cannot be election. It’s more likely he was doing some mail scheme that occurred during an election. Hence why there was thousands of pieces of mail and only 300 ballots. For the printing multiple, each registered voter has an account that they verified themselves that they sign into and request to do online voting. The QR code on the ballot is tied to your sign in with your verified info. You can see this at around 1:11 on the video. I do see the QR code so that does make sense. Your insistence that that guy was not going to commit election fraud just shows how unreasonable you are, the guy has a felon with weapons, drugs and multiple IDs but election fraud is beneath him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 36 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: I do see the QR code so that does make sense. Your insistence that that guy was not going to commit election fraud just shows how unreasonable you are, the guy has a felon with weapons, drugs and multiple IDs but election fraud is beneath him? Obviously a democrat, so there is no way there could be voter fraud.😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 35 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: I do see the QR code so that does make sense. Your insistence that that guy was not going to commit election fraud just shows how unreasonable you are, the guy has a felon with weapons, drugs and multiple IDs but election fraud is beneath him? I didn’t say it’s beneath him, I’m saying there’s been no proof or evidence other than your conjecture that it’s fraud. If it was election it wouldn’t make sense. 1) the people wouldn’t receive their mail in ballot and would just request a new one, 2) he was found in Torrence and the stories seem like that’s where the mail from which is super liberal. 3) all mail ballots are tracked so you can see online where it’s gone and what’s going on with it so fraud would be easily noticed by any of the 300. Ochams razor says this guy was committing some kind of mail fraud or ID theft ring, hence the credit cards. Theres an ongoing investigation going on. We will see after that what the intent was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 1 hour ago, Buffalo Timmy said: I do see the QR code so that does make sense. Your insistence that that guy was not going to commit election fraud just shows how unreasonable you are, the guy has a felon with weapons, drugs and multiple IDs but election fraud is beneath him? And we can take it one step further. Let’s assume this is election fraud. What new law in GA or TX or any other state right now would prevent this type of fraud of stealing mail ballots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted September 18, 2021 Share Posted September 18, 2021 3 hours ago, Backintheday544 said: And we can take it one step further. Let’s assume this is election fraud. What new law in GA or TX or any other state right now would prevent this type of fraud of stealing mail ballots. One thing is that in GA and TX you will have to request a mail in ballot. There is no permanent mail in situation in them, making people aware that they are recieving ballots. Secondly is that hopefully they are actively trying to stop it, which in California is clearly not the priority Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 CA is run by commie democrats. Haven't lived there since 2014 and can bet I have voted in every election since. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 12 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said: One thing is that in GA and TX you will have to request a mail in ballot. There is no permanent mail in situation in them, making people aware that they are recieving ballots. Secondly is that hopefully they are actively trying to stop it, which in California is clearly not the priority So to summarize our chat , you think you found 1 case of election fraud for 300 ballots that would have been that was corrected. You have no definitive proof of it being actual election fraud, but it is being investigated. The GA and TX election reform laws just passed would not have fixed the only election fraud you believe to have found as GA and TX already did not automatically mail out forms prior to the laws. (not sure the hate for mailing everyone a ballot. CO does that and all the right wing people on here were saying how great CO is during the MLB GA election discussion) Your secondly is dumb. From your research you’ve discovered CAs current election laws resulted in only 1 possible election fraud. If proven to be fraud it had the potential to affect around 300 liberal ballots out of 10,500,000ish votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Backintheday544 said: So to summarize our chat , you think you found 1 case of election fraud for 300 ballots that would have been that was corrected. You have no definitive proof of it being actual election fraud, but it is being investigated. The GA and TX election reform laws just passed would not have fixed the only election fraud you believe to have found as GA and TX already did not automatically mail out forms prior to the laws. (not sure the hate for mailing everyone a ballot. CO does that and all the right wing people on here were saying how great CO is during the MLB GA election discussion) Your secondly is dumb. From your research you’ve discovered CAs current election laws resulted in only 1 possible election fraud. If proven to be fraud it had the potential to affect around 300 liberal ballots out of 10,500,000ish votes. So to summarize your point, all the people who stated they showed up to polls and were told they already voted is not evidence of fraud since they were all given provisional ballots. Basically if I can't tell you committed the fraud it is not fraud, and even a career criminal with 300 ballots is not fraud. The fact that Newsome probably wins without any fraud does not change the fact that I want a clean election. Lastly I was very much in the MLB conversation and I was told by lefties how great CO was, not the conservative people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Buffalo Timmy said: So to summarize your point, all the people who stated they showed up to polls and were told they already voted is not evidence of fraud since they were all given provisional ballots. Basically if I can't tell you committed the fraud it is not fraud, and even a career criminal with 300 ballots is not fraud. The fact that Newsome probably wins without any fraud does not change the fact that I want a clean election. Lastly I was very much in the MLB conversation and I was told by lefties how great CO was, not the conservative people. Please stop spreading fake news. The ones who said they already voted has been looked at and is fine: https://kmph.com/newsletter-daily/some-people-went-to-vote-but-were-told-theyd-already-cast-ballots-heres-why A career criminal with 300 ballots out of THOUSANDS of pieces of mail doesn’t show fraud. CA was mailing all their ballots at the time so if he was committing mail fraud Ofcourse there are ballots in it. The best course of action is to investigate, which they are. I’m sure if it comes out he was just in some ID theft ring you would still call it election fraud. Do yourself a favor and read this 2017 article: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/debunking-voter-fraud-myth The Brennan Center’s seminal report on this issue, The Truth About Voter Fraud, found that most reported incidents of voter fraud are actually traceable to other sources, such as clerical errors or bad data matching practices. The report reviewed elections that had been meticulously studied for voter fraud, and found incident rates between 0.0003 percent and 0.0025 percent. Given this tiny incident rate for voter impersonation fraud, it is more likely, the report noted, that an American “will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls.” They also have many many studies you can read that show it’s just not the problem you make it out to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted September 19, 2021 Share Posted September 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Backintheday544 said: Please stop spreading fake news. The ones who said they already voted has been looked at and is fine: https://kmph.com/newsletter-daily/some-people-went-to-vote-but-were-told-theyd-already-cast-ballots-heres-why A career criminal with 300 ballots out of THOUSANDS of pieces of mail doesn’t show fraud. CA was mailing all their ballots at the time so if he was committing mail fraud Ofcourse there are ballots in it. The best course of action is to investigate, which they are. I’m sure if it comes out he was just in some ID theft ring you would still call it election fraud. Do yourself a favor and read this 2017 article: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/debunking-voter-fraud-myth The Brennan Center’s seminal report on this issue, The Truth About Voter Fraud, found that most reported incidents of voter fraud are actually traceable to other sources, such as clerical errors or bad data matching practices. The report reviewed elections that had been meticulously studied for voter fraud, and found incident rates between 0.0003 percent and 0.0025 percent. Given this tiny incident rate for voter impersonation fraud, it is more likely, the report noted, that an American “will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls.” They also have many many studies you can read that show it’s just not the problem you make it out to be. Voter fraud is almost impossible to prove, especially who did it. I do not find clerical errors on a large scale acceptable either. The primary in NYC where 20% of the ballots were tossed is not acceptable. I actually wonder what it would take for you to believe fraud if someone who did not voted has already been recorded as voting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 10, 2021 Share Posted October 10, 2021 ● California moves toward ban on gas lawnmowers and leaf blowers. https://www.yahoo.com/news/california-moves-toward-ban-gas-013200302.html ● California mandates gender-neutral toy aisles for large retailers. https://www.axios.com/california-gender-neutral-toy-aisles-large-retailers-372e29cc-b530-4a6d-9406-40cf183e6179.html ● California drivers react to the most expensive gas prices in America. https://www.foxla.com/news/california-drivers-react-to-the-most-expensive-gas-prices-in-america ● Tesla’s Elon Musk suggests Texas HQ move inspired by tweet from California Democrat. https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/elon-musk-texas-hq-move-lorena-gonzalez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted October 20, 2021 Share Posted October 20, 2021 Just read separate stories of how San Fran is protecting unvaccinated criminals while stealing but shutting down In and Out burger because they are are not stopping paying customers who are not vaccinated. Seems kind of messed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 Gang of EIGHTY crowbar-wielding looters in ski masks ransack California Nordstrom and fill 25 cars with designer goods in raid lasting less than one minute Approximately 80 thieves wearing ski masks stormed the Nordstrom store in Walnut Creek, California around 9pm Saturday night Witnesses say the large group raided the Bay Area store in under a minute Two employees were attacked by looters who punched and kicked them while another was pepper sprayed All three were treated for their injuries on scene At least three suspects were arrested in connection to the raid, with one even taken into custody at gunpoint Police say the raid is not connected to the string of nationwide riots that took place over the weekend in wake of the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10226929/Gang-80-thieves-ransacks-California-Nordstrom-store-organized-raid-lasted-just-one-minute.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 3 hours ago, B-Man said: Gang of EIGHTY crowbar-wielding looters in ski masks ransack California Nordstrom and fill 25 cars with designer goods in raid lasting less than one minute Approximately 80 thieves wearing ski masks stormed the Nordstrom store in Walnut Creek, California around 9pm Saturday night Witnesses say the large group raided the Bay Area store in under a minute Two employees were attacked by looters who punched and kicked them while another was pepper sprayed All three were treated for their injuries on scene At least three suspects were arrested in connection to the raid, with one even taken into custody at gunpoint Police say the raid is not connected to the string of nationwide riots that took place over the weekend in wake of the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10226929/Gang-80-thieves-ransacks-California-Nordstrom-store-organized-raid-lasted-just-one-minute.html Tomorrow AG Garland will open an investigation which will clearly determine that White Supremist's are responsible regardless of the identity of the suspects arrested. And as result recommend tighter gun control laws. But my suspicion is the perpetrators are among members of one group of victims or another doing some early holiday looting, looking to lesson the effects of inflation (by getting free stuff), and getting a jump on reparation payments. 3 looters were arrested. And will be out without charges or bail. The good news is that with every passing demonstration of civil lawlessness and a lack of response by Democratic officials their chances of maintaining a majority in Congress post-November 2022 fades further into oblivion. It goes without saying the MSM will ignore this event, their specialty, while social media platforms block or remove references to "California+flash mobs+looting". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 Ban crowbars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 19 hours ago, B-Man said: Gang of EIGHTY crowbar-wielding looters in ski masks ransack California Nordstrom and fill 25 cars with designer goods in raid lasting less than one minute Approximately 80 thieves wearing ski masks stormed the Nordstrom store in Walnut Creek, California around 9pm Saturday night Witnesses say the large group raided the Bay Area store in under a minute Two employees were attacked by looters who punched and kicked them while another was pepper sprayed All three were treated for their injuries on scene At least three suspects were arrested in connection to the raid, with one even taken into custody at gunpoint Police say the raid is not connected to the string of nationwide riots that took place over the weekend in wake of the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10226929/Gang-80-thieves-ransacks-California-Nordstrom-store-organized-raid-lasted-just-one-minute.html I have become so cynical that I barely react to this. Soon most business will move out of those areas and then be called racist. The cycle is so obvious and predicable it is hard to care, so long as my area is safe, when liberals allow it to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 #STOPASIANHATE: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted November 25, 2021 Share Posted November 25, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 25, 2021 Share Posted November 25, 2021 Must be all those Trump supporters in California… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 Superspreader events in Walnut Creek and SF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 Well I finally heard back from one of the CA politicians i emailed regarding our gas prices. So the conclusion is our prices are higher because we charge more. 🤦🏻♂️ 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 17 hours ago, Chef Jim said: Well I finally heard back from one of the CA politicians i emailed regarding our gas prices. So the conclusion is our prices are higher because we charge more. 🤦🏻♂️ Seeing the screenshot is hard to read I wanted to copy and paste it here. I highlighted the part in the email that made me laugh. Gotta love our government. Dear Jim: Thank you for writing to share your concerns regarding gasoline prices. I appreciate the time you took to write, and I welcome the opportunity to respond. I understand the frustration that many Californians have with spikes in gasoline prices, as well as the difficulties these high prices bring to everyday life. Please know that I have consistently advocated for more oversight of the gasoline market. The American Automobile Association tracks retail gasoline price and, according to their estimates, Californians pay over $1.00 per gallon more than the national average. Because of this disparity, Governor Gavin Newsom directed the California Energy Commission to perform an analysis of the state’s gas prices, which found that “the primary cause of the residual price increase is simply that California’s retail gasoline outlets are charging higher prices.” In response, Governor Newsom wrote to the California Attorney General requesting an investigation into the high prices, and in May 2020, the California Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the oil companies Vitol and SK Energy Americas for price gouging California gas customers. UC Berkeley researchers believe that from February 2015 to October 2018, the alleged price gouging cost California residents more than $17 billion, equivalent to about $1,700 for a family of four. I share your concerns about the burden of high gas prices on hard-working Americans. I will be sure to keep your concerns in mind as I continue to monitor this situation closely. Once again, thank you for writing. Should you have any other questions or comments, please call my Washington, D.C., office at (202) 224-3841 or visit my website at feinstein.senate.gov. You can also follow me online at YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. Best regards. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 37 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Seeing the screenshot is hard to read I wanted to copy and paste it here. I highlighted the part in the email that made me laugh. Gotta love our government. Dear Jim: Thank you for writing to share your concerns regarding gasoline prices. I appreciate the time you took to write, and I welcome the opportunity to respond. I understand the frustration that many Californians have with spikes in gasoline prices, as well as the difficulties these high prices bring to everyday life. Please know that I have consistently advocated for more oversight of the gasoline market. The American Automobile Association tracks retail gasoline price and, according to their estimates, Californians pay over $1.00 per gallon more than the national average. Because of this disparity, Governor Gavin Newsom directed the California Energy Commission to perform an analysis of the state’s gas prices, which found that “the primary cause of the residual price increase is simply that California’s retail gasoline outlets are charging higher prices.” In response, Governor Newsom wrote to the California Attorney General requesting an investigation into the high prices, and in May 2020, the California Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the oil companies Vitol and SK Energy Americas for price gouging California gas customers. UC Berkeley researchers believe that from February 2015 to October 2018, the alleged price gouging cost California residents more than $17 billion, equivalent to about $1,700 for a family of four. I share your concerns about the burden of high gas prices on hard-working Americans. I will be sure to keep your concerns in mind as I continue to monitor this situation closely. Once again, thank you for writing. Should you have any other questions or comments, please call my Washington, D.C., office at (202) 224-3841 or visit my website at feinstein.senate.gov. You can also follow me online at YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. Best regards. I'm glad you shared this Chef. My elderly father would often contact Senator's Feinstein and Boxer. He tells me Feinstein's office would always respond with a word salad like you received. Boxer's office would never respond at all. Carry on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 3 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: I'm glad you shared this Chef. My elderly father would often contact Senator's Feinstein and Boxer. He tells me Feinstein's office would always respond with a word salad like you received. Boxer's office would never respond at all. Carry on! Prices are higher in CA because they charge more. Well now isn't that some deep investigative work. Notice they (I know she didn't write that) didn't say anything about CA having some of (if not the) highest has taxes in the country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 Just now, Chef Jim said: Prices are higher in CA because they charge more. Well now isn't that some deep investigative work. Notice they (I know she didn't write that) didn't say anything about CA having some of (if not the) highest has taxes in the country. That's your Senator at work Chef! Like I said, my dad was always amazed that her office would respond at all...but every single time it was a total non-response! SHe must have hundreds of people cranking out these non-response letters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 SOP for Fineswine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 7, 2021 Share Posted December 7, 2021 Liberals are mentally ill THE WAR ON FAMILIES: California School Bribes Boy to Get COVID Vaccine and Not Tell His Parents. https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/12/07/california-school-bribes-boy-to-get-covid-vaccine-and-not-tell-his-parents-n1539538 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 14, 2021 Share Posted December 14, 2021 It’s Official: Generator Ban Passes in California. “ The California Air Resources Board (CARB) passed a regulation aimed at “Small Off-Road Engines” on Thursday that will ban the sale of portable generators in the state — which includes generators mounted in recreational vehicles. The ruling bans the sale of gas-powered leaf blowers and lawnmowers in the state beginning in 2024. Portable generators will be required to meet more stringent standards in 2024 and meet zero-emission standards starting in 2028. In the 2024 model year, portable generators will have to improve their efficiency by somewhere between 40% and 90%, which seems unrealistic in such a short period of time, so the reality is, it will be very hard to find a generator in Calfornia in two years.” https://rvmiles.com/california-generator-ban/ I’m opening a generator superstore just across the line in Nevada. Who’s in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 14, 2021 Share Posted December 14, 2021 1 minute ago, B-Man said: It’s Official: Generator Ban Passes in California. “ The California Air Resources Board (CARB) passed a regulation aimed at “Small Off-Road Engines” on Thursday that will ban the sale of portable generators in the state — which includes generators mounted in recreational vehicles. The ruling bans the sale of gas-powered leaf blowers and lawnmowers in the state beginning in 2024. Portable generators will be required to meet more stringent standards in 2024 and meet zero-emission standards starting in 2028. In the 2024 model year, portable generators will have to improve their efficiency by somewhere between 40% and 90%, which seems unrealistic in such a short period of time, so the reality is, it will be very hard to find a generator in Calfornia in two years.” https://rvmiles.com/california-generator-ban/ I’m opening a generator superstore just across the line in Nevada. Who’s in? So let me get this straight. Our power grid is ***** up and because of that we get rolling blackouts but can't use portable generators for when YOU shut off our power? Will they not deliver?? https://www.amazon.com/iPower-SUA12000E-000-Watt-Gasoline-Generator/dp/B00HVF3JGO/ref=sr_1_4?crid=1ZBG45LZ4RJWO&keywords=gas+generators+for+home+use&qid=1639516975&sprefix=gas+generator%2Caps%2C281&sr=8-4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 https://www.wsj.com/articles/california-makes-bacon-expensive-commerce-clause-supreme-court-pork-prices-ballot-12-11640892337 Quote The law establishes minimum space requirements for farm animals and prohibits the sale of meat from animals raised in housing that doesn’t meet its specifications. State regulators will inspect out-of-state farms to ensure they are in compliance. A business owner or operator—including supermarkets, restaurants and meat processors—found to be violating the law could be charged with a misdemeanor punishable with fines up to $1,000 or as many as 180 days in jail, as well as civil penalties. This in a state where shoplifting is rarely prosecuted. CA tax dollars hard at work, making sure Orville had a nice home in Arkansas before making it to your ham sandwich in San Bernardino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Precision Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 4 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said: https://www.wsj.com/articles/california-makes-bacon-expensive-commerce-clause-supreme-court-pork-prices-ballot-12-11640892337 CA tax dollars hard at work, making sure Orville had a nice home in Arkansas before making it to your ham sandwich in San Bernardino I suspect many states and local communities will ban inspectors from CA. Legally I could see where the law could also infringe on interstate commerce. Imagine other states passing laws that require farm produce not processed by illegal immigrants and send inspectors to ensure compliance. CA would be screwed Practically, once a few inspectors come up "missing" I think the rest will think twice before visiting the backwoods of America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted January 11, 2022 Share Posted January 11, 2022 Wow, that’s a bunch of more taxes… https://www.wsj.com/articles/single-payer-medicine-makes-a-california-comeback-gavin-newsom-xavier-becerra-healthcare-11641853914?st=hwkr0gv80ov3hke&reflink=article_copyURL_share 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted January 15, 2022 Share Posted January 15, 2022 Thieves in LA are looting freight trains filled with packages from UPS, FedEx and Amazon https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/14/economy/la-freight-railroad-theft/index.html The picture looks grim, lack of jail time for those caught. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 15, 2022 Share Posted January 15, 2022 Awesome. Simply, awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Precision Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 I guess some of the fine citizens of CA heard all the talk about "supply chain" and someone thought they said "supply train" so they went and looted the train! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10401353/amp/Charges-filed-against-4-slaying-duty-LA-cop.html How is this guy still the da? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 10 hours ago, Precision said: I guess some of the fine citizens of CA heard all the talk about "supply chain" and someone thought they said "supply train" so they went and looted the train! It is actually at a point that I look at where a package is coming from before I order now. If it is coming from LA or further west I look to see if there is another similar priced option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts