Jump to content

Backintheday544

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,785
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Backintheday544

  1. Thats no what happened. If you followed it the judge on the first day of the trial said he didn’t do that “"I specifically said in the summary-judgment decision, I'm not valuating properties," Engoron said on October 2, the first day of the trial. "Please, press, stop saying I'm valuing it at $18 million. There was a tax assessment in that range." You can read all about it here: https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/16/politics/read-ruling-donald-trump-civil-fraud-trial-new-york/index.html The $18 million was a tax assessment, not the judges assessment on the value. The judges main issue with the fraud was that the Trump Organization did conservation easements in perpetuity. These easements made it so that the club could only be used as a social club. However, knowing this, the Trump organization still valued the property as a private residence. In 2020, the Trump organization also appealed that a $26.6 million tax appraisal was too high. They later rescinded their appeal and agreed with this valuation. The court also points out that a billion dollar valuation on the property would be 400 percent higher than the next highest valued property in the country. In order to appeal the decision, Trump will have to pay the fine. It’s dubious that will happen. But you’re welcome to donate to his GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/f/stand-with-trump-raise-the-settlement
  2. Admin filed for proposed rule making to get forgiveness under HEA: https://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/2023/negregpublichearingannouncement.pdf could lead to all federal student debt erased.
  3. Wait is the blackmail employing their family members? Like vote for me or I’ll hire your nephew. The House was much better run by George Santos. He probably just doesn’t want to run because he won so many times already.
  4. I saw one that was Republicans finally found a way to re-do an election and they still can’t win. Cracked me up.
  5. He’s so insecure he needs to tell people he’s an alpha male in his handle!! Haha. If you have to say you’re an alpha male, you’re not an alpha male.
  6. Plus for his illegal use of charitable funds, had to pay $2,000,000, admit to stealing the charitable funds for personal use (including that he used it to buy Tebow stuff), and is no longer allowed to run a NY charity. https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2019/donald-j-trump-pays-court-ordered-2-million-illegally-using-trump-foundation Plus all the other people in Trump orbit like Cohen who are in jail.
  7. You realize the only people who need to worry about Venmo reporting are people who are receiving taxable income via Venmo and not reporting it as income right? The Trump case here deals with fringe benefits and it’s pretty egregious. The fine was what was allowed under NY law. However, the bigger impact is 1) US banks are less likely to loan Trump Org money, which isn’t a good thing in real estate and 2) the guilty verdict brings a lot of facts on things like Trump signing documents, which starts to lay the evidence for the NY civil suit, which would lead to the Trump posse now being able to be officers of companies in NY anymore and other large fines.
  8. Trump Org convicted of criminal state tax fraud: https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/06/politics/trump-organization-fraud-trial-verdict/index.html Biggest thing is it will take away a lot of funding the Trump Org would be able to get going forward.
  9. Complaint filed against Republican senate candidate Walker: https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A85bcc52e-609a-3470-aa08-97e90c5f8bf8&viewer!megaVerb=group-discover#pageNum=3 The gist, he is claiming a homestead exemption on his TX property. To do so, he needs to be a TX resident. However, he used his wife’s GA address to vote. Either he committed tax fraud in TX or he illegally voted in GA.
  10. Complaint filed against Republican senate candidate Walker: https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A85bcc52e-609a-3470-aa08-97e90c5f8bf8&viewer!megaVerb=group-discover#pageNum=3 The gist, he is claiming a homestead exemption on his TX property. To do so, he needs to be a TX resident. However, he used his wife’s GA address to vote. Either he committed tax fraud in TX or he illegally voted in GA.
  11. So Walker is worse off than Joe? They continue to try to fool you that they are helping you out. But they’re not. Because a lot of money it’s going to trees. Don’t we have enough trees around here?” - Walker on climate change Weren’t you one of the people saying Fetterman shouldn’t win due to his medical issues?
  12. Imagine if Biden said in a speech: “I don’t know if you know, but vampires are some cool people, are they not? But let me tell you something that I found out: a werewolf can kill a vampire. Did you know that? I never knew that. “So, I don’t want to be a vampire any more. I want to be a werewolf.” With all our right wing friends thinking Biden has dementia and wouldn’t vote for him, I’m sure they wouldn’t vote for Walker with his CTE issues. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/nov/17/herschel-walker-republican-georgia-werewolf-vampire
  13. It accrued in Income based repayment plans and in the past could get negative amortization, but once repayment does start, the new Biden admin rule will do away with negative amortization.
  14. As expected, Biden has extended the student loan payment pause through June 30, 2023.
  15. Didn't Trump also promise a 10 percent tax cut for the middle class right before the 2018 mid-term elections to try buying votes?
  16. Good break down on issues with the Trump judges ruling:
  17. Trump running is also dumb from a political perspective. If he wins, big if, if can only get 1 term, and it’s highly likely the Dems would get the next President just based on history. Running someone like Haley could allow for 2 terms.
  18. Lol. Dude couldn’t beat a 100 year old guy who wouldn’t come out of his basement who was probably the worst Dem candidate since John Kerry(? maybe, Biden was a worse candidate). Dems can now pick anyone they want as President and know they’ll win, assuming Trump gets the nomination.
  19. From a Reddit poster tracking races: House races to keep an eye on: (update every 2 hours) Since last update - no updates Cali 47: 1,3% D at 77% counted - it was 3% D at 72% counted - it was 3% D at 70% - it was 2% D at 64% counted. Bad batch of vote for the Dems. Cali 49: 5% D at 84% counted - it was 5% D at 79% counted - it was 5% D at 71% counted - it was 4% D at 64% counted Cali 13: 0,75% D at 78% counted - it was 0,11% R at 61% counted - it was 0,35% R at 58% (just recently flipped blue but there are still a lot of votes left) That is 3 races that D have a small lead that they need to keep. They also have to flip the R lead in all 4 of these races to get the house. Cali 22: 5% R at 53% counted (trending D since it was 8% R when it was 43% counted) 55% of the remaing votes from Kern county needs to go D and/or D need to limit the expected losses in Tulare county. Cali 27: 9% R at 70% counted - it was 11% R at 67% counted - it was 12% R at 61% at counted (this is unlikely to flip to D but hopefully mail ballots can make up the difference) Cali 3: 6% R at 53% counted (this race is unlikely to flip) Co 3: 0,35% R at 99% counted (next vote dump is Thursday) Most to least likely D 211 safe D 212 - Cali 49 - 95% chance 213 - Cali 47 - 80% chance - down from 95% 214 - Cali 13 - 70% chance - up from 60% 215 - Cali 22 - 40% chance - down from 50% 216 - Co 3 - 30% chance (allegedly) 217 - Cali 27 - 10% chance 218 - Cali 3 - 1% chance These percentages with the exception of co 3 are done by me from what I remember, if I am wrong about some of them then please let me know Current house prediction: R 221 - D 214
  20. False and misleading title there. The appeals court issued an injunction while the case is decided. The appeals court has not made a determination on if the program is constitutional or not. It simply said the program needs to be on hold until a decision could be made because not granting an injunction could be detrimental to a party. If you would like to read the opinion, it is here: https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/22/11/223179P.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...