JAMIEBUF12 Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 25 minutes ago, mead107 said: Giants make more sense Giants make sense if the bills want darnold.browns will probably take barkley at one.If Bills want Darnold they trade up to #2.If they want Josh Rosen they trade to #3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreboding Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 25 minutes ago, Awwufelloff said: Colts make more sense. Luck is still young, Eli is on his last legs. I agree. People keep saying Giants, seems they might take this chance to set themselves up for the next 10 years as well. Colts need players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domdab99 Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 9 minutes ago, BuffAlone said: I absolutely agree! Darnold at 12 wouldn't be horrible, but these are the prizes this year imo Darnold at 12 would be fine - I said Darnold would be awful at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macaroni Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 IMHO it would be dumb to trade to the #3 pick before the Browns make their #1 pick ... if we are sitting at #3 the Browns know we may take the QB that they have targeted and would be forced to pick their QB at #1. As it sits now ... the Browns can safely take a running back or edge rusher at #1 and wait until #4 for their QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, Domdab99 said: Darnold at 12 would be fine - I said Darnold would be awful at 3. I’m not sure I agree. A QB is either worth it or he isn’t when you are talking picks that high. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBean Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 If we trade to #3, they will be thrilled with either Rosen, Darnold, or Mayfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIZ Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, macaroni said: IMHO it would be dumb to trade to the #3 pick before the Browns make their #1 pick ... if we are sitting at #3 the Browns know we may take the QB that they have targeted and would be forced to pick their QB at #1. As it sits now ... the Browns can safely take a running back or edge rusher at #1 and wait until #4 for their QB. Not dumb if they have 3 QBs rated close to the same, and want to guarantee they get 1 of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickelCity Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 It would be interesting for sure. I feel good about Rosen and Mayfield, and I've fluctuated on Darnold. Interestingly, my assessment of Darnold has increased over the past week or so (rewatched some of his games). If they take any of the three, I've got to give it to them. Heck of an offseason and it's early March. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, McBean said: If we trade to #3, they will be thrilled with either Rosen, Darnold, or Mayfield. This Is The Plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real McClappy Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, Buffalo Barbarian said: This Is The Plan. I'm good with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEraBills Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 26 minutes ago, Buffalo Barbarian said: Perfect guarantees one of the top 3 and more likely Mayfield, who I want anyway. I hope it's Baker, but I'm suspecting Rosen or Darnold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, macaroni said: IMHO it would be dumb to trade to the #3 pick before the Browns make their #1 pick ... if we are sitting at #3 the Browns know we may take the QB that they have targeted and would be forced to pick their QB at #1. As it sits now ... the Browns can safely take a running back or edge rusher at #1 and wait until #4 for their QB. Except the Browns don’t for a second think that the Bills (or another team) doesn’t trade in front of them at 4 to get their guy. The only way that the Browns take Barkley is if they have 3 QBs rated closely and are comfortable taking the guy that is 3rd on their list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 It's entirely possible Cleveland has told them the guy they want, or at least they know within two guys and the Giants have told them they are set on Barkley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 1 minute ago, NewEraBills said: I hope it's Baker, but I'm suspecting Rosen or Darnold. I refuse to believe it's not Mayfield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffAlone Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Domdab99 said: Darnold at 12 would be fine - I said Darnold would be awful at 3. Ok...i didnt mean to quote you. This is MY opinion.sorry Edited March 12, 2018 by BuffAlone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEraBills Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 We will be trading 12, 22, a second and a third most likely. That's pretty close to the Philly Deal from a couple of years ago. This will leave us with 1 pick in each of the first three rounds at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadLandsMeanie Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 17 minutes ago, Canadian Bills Fan said: I don't think ok i know how to process all this positive news. Not used to this I am finding that there is such a thing as a bit too much excitement in the offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFunPolice Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, Chuck Wagon said: It's entirely possible Cleveland has told them the guy they want, or at least they know within two guys and the Giants have told them they are set on Barkley. I think so too... Maybe the Browns sweetened the Tyrod deal a little in order to get an assurance from the Bills that if they were able to trade into the top 3 they wouldn't take _________ QB. That helps the Browns and in return they give the Bills a little extra for Tyrod 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wppete Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 NFL Draft #1 pick - Sam Darnold (Cleveland) #2 pick - - Saquon Barkley (New York Giants) #3 pick - Josh Rosen (Buffalo Bills) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallskiWallski83 Posted March 12, 2018 Share Posted March 12, 2018 I dont understand why you would trade up to 3 right now when theres a possibility two teams jump up to 1 and 2 respectively and snag QB1 and QB2 on your board and youre left picking with the guys you didnt really want Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts