DOJ Appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel - Jerome Corsi Rejects Plea Deal

[SectionC3]

1 minute ago, GG said:

 

I asked the same question 3 times.  What do Trump's lies have to do with the January 4, 2017 White House meeting?

 

You’re so confused.  Your last question was about whether Trump wrote notes with respect to that meeting.  Unfortunately this is a good example of why you’re on the Fluffer List. 

[GG]

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

 

You’re so confused.  Your last question was about whether Trump wrote notes with respect to that meeting.  Unfortunately this is a good example of why you’re on the Fluffer List. 

 

It was the same question, rephrased.

 

Go ahead and be the imbecilic man child.  i think we're understanding the real reason you hate Trump.  He stole your shtick.  Do you paint your face orange too?

[SectionC3]

1 minute ago, GG said:

 

It was the same question, rephrased.

 

Go ahead and be the imbecilic man child.  i think we're understanding the real reason you hate Trump.  He stole your shtick.  Do you paint your face orange too?

 

Actually if it was rephrased it wasn’t the same question and in fact was a variant of the original question.  Another gem from the apparently self-styled intellectual standard bearer of the alt-wrong community on this message board.  

[GG]

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Actually if it was rephrased it wasn’t the same question and in fact was a variant of the original question.  Another gem from the apparently self-styled intellectual standard bearer of the alt-wrong community on this message board.  

 

I take it you won't address the main point.

 

Enjoy what's coming to you and your ilk.

[SectionC3]

1 minute ago, GG said:

 

I take it you won't address the main point.

 

Enjoy what's coming to you and your ilk.

 

What is the main point?  And what is “coming to [me] and [my] ilk?”  That seems rather ominous.  I hope that the foundering member of the Fluffer List isn’t threatening me.  

[GG]

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

What is the main point?  And what is “coming to [me] and [my] ilk?”  That seems rather ominous.  I hope that the foundering member of the Fluffer List isn’t threatening me.  

 

Only if you think that a Trump re-election is a threat.  Which wouldn't be surprising.

[SectionC3]

Just now, GG said:

 

Only if you think that a Trump re-election is a threat.  Which wouldn't be surprising.

 

Thank you for confirming that you have not threatened me. 

[Buffalo_Gal]

 

[snafu]

16 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Still didn’t answer the question about what you do for a living.  I’ll take a whack at a response.  
 

You’re a moderately educated  lower middle class white guy who blames somebody else for the fact that, despite your hard and honest work at your relatively menial job, you never quite reached the station in life you think you deserved.  This is mostly due to the fact that you didn’t work quite as hard as you thought you did, you didn’t prioritize education early in life, and the hard work in which you engaged was directed toward the wrong things. 
 

Deep down, you know you’re a loser and you put others down to try to make yourself feel better.  Basically the classic narrative of the white lowlife southerner who dumps on minorities and others not because he hates but because putting others down means he doesn’t have the shittiest life of the bunch.  
 

I’ll assume I nailed it until I hear otherwise. 

 

You answered your own loaded question with this?

I was given good advice long ago. It was never to ask what someone’s nationality or religion is, or what they do for a living because we all have pre-conceived notions that attach to the answers. You didn’t get an answer, so you made up a “loser” story of your own. 

 

 

[SectionC3]

5 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

You answered your own loaded question with this?

I was given good advice long ago. It was never to ask what someone’s nationality or religion is, or what they do for a living because we all have pre-conceived notions that attach to the answers. You didn’t get an answer, so you made up a “loser” story of your own. 

 

 

 

That has yet to be refuted.  He denigrates and insults the intelligence of those who disagree with his trash point of view.  Apparently he can’t take it when somebody turns up the heat a bit and points out a few common characteristics of those with his point of view.  So far, it looks like the “shoe” fits here. 

 

[snafu]

3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

That has yet to be refuted.  He denigrates and insults the intelligence of those who disagree with his trash point of view.  Apparently he can’t take it when somebody turns up the heat a bit and points out a few common characteristics of those with his point of view.  So far, it looks like the “shoe” fits here. 

 

 

I know what he’s reported many times that he does for a living.  I have no reason not to take him at his word. You have probably run across his many posts about his job if you’re active in these threads, which you are. Even so, you didn’t actually guess at his job, did you?  No, you went off with some pop-psychologist put-down. Disingenuous at best on your part.

 

 

 

[Tiberius]

4 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Actually if it was rephrased it wasn’t the same question and in fact was a variant of the original question.  Another gem from the apparently self-styled intellectual standard bearer of the alt-wrong community on this message board.  

GG is an idiot 

[SectionC3]

8 minutes ago, snafu said:

 

I know what he’s reported many times that he does for a living.  I have no reason not to take him at his word. You have probably run across his many posts about his job if you’re active in these threads, which you are. Even so, you didn’t actually guess at his job, did you?  No, you went off with some pop-psychologist put-down. Disingenuous at best on your part.

 

 

 

 

Hoax.  There’s nothing disingenuous about what I did.  He had a few things to say that had no bearing on the conversation.  The bully then was given a taste of his own medicine.  Tough beans for him.  Perhaps I struck a nerve. 

[Reality Check]

8 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

GG is an idiot 

 

[snafu]

30 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Hoax.  There’s nothing disingenuous about what I did.  He had a few things to say that had no bearing on the conversation.  The bully then was given a taste of his own medicine.  Tough beans for him.  Perhaps I struck a nerve. 

 

Not with me. 

 

[Buffalo_Gal]

 

 

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

5 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

 

 

...uh oh...Arkancide could be mobilizing............stay tuned.................

 

"In December 2019, Nader was charged in U.S. federal court with violating campaign finance laws by allegedly also using over three and half million dollars to reach out to Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign for the U.S. Presidency, through a front."

[Foxx]

21 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

 

https://twitter.com/DawsonSField/status/1276558103891369991

 

[Nanker]

For the life of me, I don’t get why some of you continue to engage with the earthworms and maggots that infest this place from time to time. You can’t be thinking that you’ll get an honest dialogue, yet alone an honest answer from the   
 

[BillsFanNC]

2 hours ago, Nanker said:

For the life of me, I don’t get why some of you continue to engage with the earthworms and maggots that infest this place from time to time. You can’t be thinking that you’ll get an honest dialogue, yet alone an honest answer from the   
 

 

A -freakin'-men. There's honest back and forth dialog between people who don't share a common view...and then there's the  "discussion" you find with the trolls here while they plug their ears, blindfold their eyes and drool all over themselves.  A pointless exercise in futility. 

[Hedge]

 

 

[dubs]

23 minutes ago, Hedge said:

 

 

I haven’t been following her but the simple fact that CBS is allowing this tells me the rats are jumping ship. 
 

Expect more chaos and quarantine between now and November. This is going to get ugly. 

[3rdnlng]

38 minutes ago, dubs said:

I haven’t been following her but the simple fact that CBS is allowing this tells me the rats are jumping ship. 
 

Expect more chaos and quarantine between now and November. This is going to get ugly. 

Are you familiar with Catherine Herridge?

[BillStime]

Barr/Trump is the most corrupt AG/admin in our lifetime. 
 

Inside Barr’s Effort to Undermine Prosecutors in N.Y.

 

 

Thank you Trump voters 

[dubs]

8 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Are you familiar with Catherine Herridge?

not really, why?

[3rdnlng]

2 minutes ago, dubs said:

not really, why?

She's one of the few real journalists out there. She called things as she saw them regardless of political ramifications. Back maybe a year ago she switched from Fox News to CBS. There was another real journalist that did the same thing about that moment in time (I forget who) but I can remember thinking that maybe CBS was trying to become more objective. 

[dubs]

23 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

She's one of the few real journalists out there. She called things as she saw them regardless of political ramifications. Back maybe a year ago she switched from Fox News to CBS. There was another real journalist that did the same thing about that moment in time (I forget who) but I can remember thinking that maybe CBS was trying to become more objective. 

I recall her name but have been boycotting the news for so long I guess I’ve missed her. 
 

good to know, thanks!  
 

 

[Hedge]

 

 

 

[realtruelove]

17 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

She's one of the few real journalists out there. She called things as she saw them regardless of political ramifications. Back maybe a year ago she switched from Fox News to CBS. There was another real journalist that did the same thing about that moment in time (I forget who) but I can remember thinking that maybe CBS was trying to become more objective. 

Who is the other real journalist that jumped to another network?

[Hedge]

1 minute ago, realtruelove said:

Who is the other real journalist that jumped to another network?

 

I was wondering this as well. Maybe it was John Solomon who left The Hill to start his own venture?

[realtruelove]

1 minute ago, Hedge said:

 

I was wondering this as well. Maybe it was John Solomon who left The Hill to start his own venture?

That could be it.  Let's see if anyone else chimes in.  Maybe one of the trolls knows....

[BillsFanNC]

 

[B-Man]

 

KIMBERLEY STRASSEL: Judging FBI Conduct: The D.C. Circuit becomes the first court to acknowledge the FBI’s 2016 abuse.

House Judiciary Committee Democrats were back at their “politicized Justice Department” theme this week, calling a disgruntled former lieutenant of special counsel Robert Mueller to accuse the department of giving special treatment to President Trump’s allies. Too bad the testimony came on the very day a federal court confirmed that Mr. Mueller’s team and the Federal Bureau of Investigation engaged in misconduct.

 

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit did so via an order requiring Judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss charges against former national security adviser Mike Flynn. Most of the focus has been on the legal merits of the ruling. Judge Neomi Rao’s compelling opinion rebuked Judge Sullivan for ignoring the department’s call to drop the case and instead setting himself up as both prosecutor and jury. This was a win for the separation of powers, even as it was a step toward justice for Mr. Flynn.

 

Largely overlooked was the decision’s rebuke of the FBI and the Mueller team. The D.C. Circuit became the first federal court to acknowledge the misconduct that Attorney General William Barr is trying to bring to light. Most of the courts that oversaw Mr. Mueller’s prosecutions were asked to do no more than rubber-stamp a plea deal or sign off on a jury verdict. But Mr. Flynn, backed by tenacious lawyer Sidney Powell, fought the charges—forcing the Justice Department to review its actions, acknowledge its bad acts, and move to dismiss its case. Democrats and the press cast this outcome as evidence of Mr. Barr’s “politicization.” The circuit court begs to differ.

 

The Justice Department’s credibility was at stake here. Judge Sullivan bought into the same Democratic conspiracy theories, which is why he refused Justice’s motion to dismiss and appointed retired judge John Gleeson to act as shadow prosecutor. He argued the Justice Department wasn’t entitled to the usual “presumption of regularity.” And if the circuit judges thought there was anything to claims that Mr. Barr was playing political favorites, it could have allowed the process to continue.

 

Instead they bluntly noted that there was no “legitimate basis” to question the department’s behavior. They even slapped Mr. Gleeson for relying on “news stories, tweets and other facts outside the record.” By contrast, Judge Rao’s opinion notes: “The government’s motion includes an extensive discussion of newly discovered evidence casting Flynn’s guilt into doubt.” It points out that this includes “evidence of misconduct by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.” It finishes by noting that each government branch must be encouraged to “self correct when it errs.”

 

The court’s conclusion is obvious. All it had to do was look at the voluminous evidence the Justice Department supplied. Its briefs proved the FBI had improperly pursued Mr. Flynn, keeping open an investigation that produced no evidence, ginning up a “violation” of the seldom-enforced Logan Act, sandbagging Mr. Flynn with an interview that had no “legitimate investigative basis.” It even provided new FBI notes this week suggesting that then-President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden were improperly engaged in the investigation. The department’s filings showed that the Mueller team had consistently denied defense attorneys exculpatory information. And it explained the straightforward process by which it had reached its decision to withdraw: Mr. Barr in February appointed veteran U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen to review the case, and in May Mr. Jensen concluded dismissal was “the proper and just course.”

 

 

 

 

 

But Nadler will run interference for this, with the media’s help, because they’re all on the same OrangeManBad team.

 

 

 

 

[keepthefaith]

4 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

 

Bongino cracks me up. 

4 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

 

And Twitter hasn't banned him after tweeting this dozens of times so it must be true.  Twitter approved!

[BillsFanNC]

21 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

 

Bongino cracks me up. 

 

And Twitter hasn't banned him after tweeting this dozens of times so it must be true.  Twitter approved!

 

I'm sure it gets shadow banned, but that's precisely why he posts it every morning like clockwork.

[Unforgiven]

Where is DR, did the tarts on this site get soros to cough up enough

dough to bribe the mods to cancel him from ppp

Edited June 28, 2020 by Unforgiven

[TakeYouToTasker]

8 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

Where is DR, did the tarts on this site get soros to cough up enough

dough to bribe the mods to cancel him from ppp

He was banned for one month.

[Buffalo_Gal]

 

(more in the thread)
 

 

[Unforgiven]

Wow. and i'm guessing even talking about it is a ban.

God bless America, and big brother.

Edited June 28, 2020 by Unforgiven

[Buffalo_Gal]

8 minutes ago, Unforgiven said:

Wow. and i'm guessing even talking about it is a ban.

God bless America, and big brother.

There are two threads about it ... look on page 2 or 3.