Jump to content

Global warming err Climate change HOAX


Recommended Posts

 

What a surprise.

 

 

Davos: John Kerry Says Only Way to Stop Global Warming is ‘Money, Money, Money, Money…’

 

GettyImages-1246295584-2-640x480.jpg

 

 

The only way of preventing global warming is “money, money, money”, former failed presidential contender John Kerry said at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos on Tuesday.

 

US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry said that the world is not acting with enough urgency to “save the world” and prevent what he calls a climate crisis from occurring. The 79-year-old Democrat opened his remarks by questioning how “allegedly wise adult human” such as CEOs and Senators could, as he put it, “ignore our science and want to ignore mathematics and want to ignore physics and somehow cannot bring themselves to do what we need to do.”

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

6 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

What a surprise.

 

 

Davos: John Kerry Says Only Way to Stop Global Warming is ‘Money, Money, Money, Money…’

 

GettyImages-1246295584-2-640x480.jpg

 

 

The only way of preventing global warming is “money, money, money”, former failed presidential contender John Kerry said at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos on Tuesday.

 

US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry said that the world is not acting with enough urgency to “save the world” and prevent what he calls a climate crisis from occurring. The 79-year-old Democrat opened his remarks by questioning how “allegedly wise adult human” such as CEOs and Senators could, as he put it, “ignore our science and want to ignore mathematics and want to ignore physics and somehow cannot bring themselves to do what we need to do.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eat more ketchup...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Precision said:

It's like Billy Graham asking for donations!

 

"Just send me a small offering so I can defeat the devil of climate change and bring righteousness back to the environment."

 

What a clown!

Bigger than all those clowns who say science never did nothing? 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Bigger than all those clowns who say science never did nothing? 

Who are you referring to? I am not sure what your point is when the insult is directed at a guy who preaches "environmentalism" while he flies all over the world on private jets and has a larger carbon footprint every month then my family has in a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Bigger than all those clowns who say science never did nothing? 

No, just a lying hack fooling fools with snake oil.  

 

For someone so esteemed in science he must have an advanced science degree, worked for years in industry, perhaps with a patent or publications?

 

No, John Kerry is a leading climatologist because he studied political science at Yale!  Ha ha ha ha!

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

 

 

Sea Level Is Stable Around the World… The Good News the Media Don’t Want Us to Hear

By P Gosselin

 

No accelerating sea level rise”… “no correlation between CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere and sea level rise”.

Dr. Jay Lehr, Dennis Hedke 

 

We have been studying climate change and potentially associated sea level changes resulting from melting ice and warming oceans for a half century. In the 1970s our primary concern was global cooling and an advancing new ice age. Many believe that increasing quantities of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere could result in rising levels of the sea in general. The record does not show this to be true. There is no evidence whatever to support impending sea-level-rise catastrophe or the unnecessary expenditure of state or federal tax monies to solve a problem that does not exist.

 

The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has updated its coastal sea level tide gauge data which continue to show no evidence of accelerating sea level rise. These measurements include tide gauge data at coastal locations along the West Coast, East Coast, Gulf Coast, Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico, as well as seven Pacific Island groups and six Atlantic Island groups, comprising more than 200 measurement stations.

 

{snip}

 

In contrast to the steady but modest rise in sea level, revealed in long-term measurements, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) speculates that sea level will almost immediately begin rising significantly more than in the past and present. NOAA records contradict such claims. This pattern of steady but modest sea level rise extends throughout the world, throughout times of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, and throughout periods of accelerated warming and cooling.

 

The IPCC and global warming activists have a difficult time scientifically supporting speculation about accelerating sea level rise, as warming temperatures have yet to push sea level rise beyond one foot per century. Current sea level trends are not significantly different from what they were seven to nine decades ago, when atmospheric CO2 levels were 310 parts per million by volume (ppmv) or less.[1] Dire predictions made decades ago of dramatically accelerating polar ice loss, and an ice-free Arctic Ocean have not come to pass.[2] As Dr. Steven E. Koonin, former Undersecretary for Science for the Obama administration, noted in 2014, “Even though the human influence on climate was much smaller in the past, the models do not account for the fact that the rate of global sea-level rise 70 years ago was as large as what we observe today.”[3]

 

Fortunately, we don’t need to wonder who is right and who is wrong in the debate over future sea-level rise. We can test the rising-seas hypothesis with real data collected from 10 coastal cities with long and reliable sea level records. Those cities are Ceuta, Spain; Honolulu, Hawaii; Atlantic City, New Jersey; Sitka, Alaska; Port Isabel, Texas; St. Petersburg, Florida; Fernandina Beach, Florida; Mumbai/Bombay, India; Sydney, Australia; and Slipshavn, Denmark.

 

More at the link: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/02/07/sea-level-is-stable-around-the-world-the-good-news-the-media-dont-want-us-to-hear/

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2023 at 10:00 AM, B-Man said:

 

 

Sea Level Is Stable Around the World… The Good News the Media Don’t Want Us to Hear

By P Gosselin

 

No accelerating sea level rise”… “no correlation between CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere and sea level rise”.

Dr. Jay Lehr, Dennis Hedke 

 

We have been studying climate change and potentially associated sea level changes resulting from melting ice and warming oceans for a half century. In the 1970s our primary concern was global cooling and an advancing new ice age. Many believe that increasing quantities of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere could result in rising levels of the sea in general. The record does not show this to be true. There is no evidence whatever to support impending sea-level-rise catastrophe or the unnecessary expenditure of state or federal tax monies to solve a problem that does not exist.

 

The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has updated its coastal sea level tide gauge data which continue to show no evidence of accelerating sea level rise. These measurements include tide gauge data at coastal locations along the West Coast, East Coast, Gulf Coast, Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico, as well as seven Pacific Island groups and six Atlantic Island groups, comprising more than 200 measurement stations.

 

{snip}

 

In contrast to the steady but modest rise in sea level, revealed in long-term measurements, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) speculates that sea level will almost immediately begin rising significantly more than in the past and present. NOAA records contradict such claims. This pattern of steady but modest sea level rise extends throughout the world, throughout times of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, and throughout periods of accelerated warming and cooling.

 

The IPCC and global warming activists have a difficult time scientifically supporting speculation about accelerating sea level rise, as warming temperatures have yet to push sea level rise beyond one foot per century. Current sea level trends are not significantly different from what they were seven to nine decades ago, when atmospheric CO2 levels were 310 parts per million by volume (ppmv) or less.[1] Dire predictions made decades ago of dramatically accelerating polar ice loss, and an ice-free Arctic Ocean have not come to pass.[2] As Dr. Steven E. Koonin, former Undersecretary for Science for the Obama administration, noted in 2014, “Even though the human influence on climate was much smaller in the past, the models do not account for the fact that the rate of global sea-level rise 70 years ago was as large as what we observe today.”[3]

 

Fortunately, we don’t need to wonder who is right and who is wrong in the debate over future sea-level rise. We can test the rising-seas hypothesis with real data collected from 10 coastal cities with long and reliable sea level records. Those cities are Ceuta, Spain; Honolulu, Hawaii; Atlantic City, New Jersey; Sitka, Alaska; Port Isabel, Texas; St. Petersburg, Florida; Fernandina Beach, Florida; Mumbai/Bombay, India; Sydney, Australia; and Slipshavn, Denmark.

 

More at the link: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/02/07/sea-level-is-stable-around-the-world-the-good-news-the-media-dont-want-us-to-hear/

 

 

Ask them why they still live at the beach and in urban areas along the coasts if they know and believe sea levels are rising?   

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They don't call it global warming anymore because it was debunked similar to the global cooling from the 70's. Now they call it "climate change" because it's all encompassing and they need to keep this lie going so they can spend more money and gain more power. They act like we are going to forget how they called it global warming for the past 30 years. Ridiculous 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Vomit 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:

They don't call it global warming anymore because it was debunked similar to the global cooling from the 70's. Now they call it "climate change" because it's all encompassing and they need to keep this lie going so they can spend more money and gain more power. They act like we are going to forget how they called it global warming for the past 30 years. Ridiculous 

No they changed it to try and help idiots and conspiracy theorists try to comprehend it better.   It was to try and combat utter imbeciles who can't distinguish climate and weather. 

 

Oh there were a couple unusually cold days global warming is BS!  Those toolbags. 

Edited by L Ron Burgundy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was watching an episode of Planet Earth (great photography) the other night and they showed how the Sahara Desert was once home to the world’s largest lake, surrounded by a lush forest.  There are still petrified trees there to this day. All of this was long long long time before man invented the internal combustion engine. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I was watching an episode of Planet Earth (great photography) the other night and they showed how the Sahara Desert was once home to the world’s largest lake, surrounded by a lush forest.  There are still petrified trees there to this day. All of this was long long long time before man invented the internal combustion engine. 

Wait that doesn't fit the narrative 🙈

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, L Ron Burgundy said:

No they changed it to try and help idiots and conspiracy theorists try to comprehend it better.   It was to try and combat utter imbeciles who can't distinguish climate and weather. 

 

Oh there were a couple unusually cold days global warming is BS!  Those toolbags. 

The BS part is all these experts deluding themselves into believing they can control anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/17/2023 at 6:34 PM, Tiberius said:

Bigger than all those clowns who say science never did nothing? 

Who are you referring to with this statement? Are you arguing against the Luddites of 100 years ago? At least you might win against people who have dead for 80 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/9/2023 at 1:52 PM, L Ron Burgundy said:

No they changed it to try and help idiots and conspiracy theorists try to comprehend it better.   It was to try and combat utter imbeciles who can't distinguish climate and weather. 

 

Oh there were a couple unusually cold days global warming is BS!  Those toolbags. 

Hey remember when hurricanes were caused by climate change and then we had the longest period in history without one in FL and suddenly hurricanes were not climate change? Yeah I do, but now that hurricanes are back they are climate change again. I don't know how old you are but this mularkey has been going on since I was in high school 30 years ago and nothing has really changed except some people got rich on the grift.

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Precision said:

Interesting article..... 

 

Seeing Gold in Spinning Turbines: Why Texas Is Winning U.S. Renewable Race

 

"Texas and other majority Republican states are leading the U.S. in both wind and solar power, despite polls showing Republican voters rank tackling climate change as a far lower priority than Democrats do."

Maybe, just maybe it has something to do with WEATHER.  you know. those turbines and solar farms probably are more efficient in say texas than NYS.

 

Maybe those states are actually having all the funds to green energy, actually going to the equipment.  vs investments in carbon credits, ESG, and groups to study (jobs) future builds and technologies.

 

or a mixture of all the above and other factors.

 

The biggest beef I hear about NY move to electric is they are not improving the source or backbone to keep up with the demand an electric grid/transportation would need.

 

 

 

 

Also, Anyone else notice the voices screaming about Climate change, green energy also supports weapons to Ukraine.

 

Wonder how those shipments to ukraine, those weapons impact the climate?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 3/1/2023 at 9:17 AM, Chris farley said:

Maybe, just maybe it has something to do with WEATHER.  you know. those turbines and solar farms probably are more efficient in say texas than NYS.

 

Maybe those states are actually having all the funds to green energy, actually going to the equipment.  vs investments in carbon credits, ESG, and groups to study (jobs) future builds and technologies.

 

or a mixture of all the above and other factors.

 

The biggest beef I hear about NY move to electric is they are not improving the source or backbone to keep up with the demand an electric grid/transportation would need.

 

 

 

 

Also, Anyone else notice the voices screaming about Climate change, green energy also supports weapons to Ukraine.

 

Wonder how those shipments to ukraine, those weapons impact the climate?

 

 

Apologies for the late response!

 

I think a lot of the problems are dealing with permitting, regulations, taxes and paying off NYS officials.  

 

Some quotes from Kevin O'Leary since he has been in the news recently....

"I don't put companies here in New York anymore, or in Massachusetts, or in New Jersey, or in California. Those states are uninvestable. The policy here is insane, the taxes are too high."  “I had a project in upstate New York behind the grid in Niagara Falls for electricity — a global data center we were building. Eventually it got so bad with the politicians in the local region and the state policy, we moved it to Norway and all the jobs,” O'Leary said. “That's New York."

 

On a personal note, Canisteo Wind started in 2003 (highlight from the web site below).  I'm not a fan of the project and it's just another example of NY pooping on the Southern Tier (who wants to live among 100+ turbines, someone who has never been around them).  Having said that, it's unbelievable that the project is 20 years old without a single turbine erected.

 

About Canisteo Wind

Invenergy began development of the Canisteo Wind Farm in 2003 and has monitored wind speeds in the area since this date. It is now developing the project with the goal to begin construction in 2019. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 1/17/2023 at 10:27 AM, B-Man said:

 

What a surprise.

 

 

Davos: John Kerry Says Only Way to Stop Global Warming is ‘Money, Money, Money, Money…’

 

GettyImages-1246295584-2-640x480.jpg

 

 

The only way of preventing global warming is “money, money, money”, former failed presidential contender John Kerry said at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos on Tuesday.

 

US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry said that the world is not acting with enough urgency to “save the world” and prevent what he calls a climate crisis from occurring. The 79-year-old Democrat opened his remarks by questioning how “allegedly wise adult human” such as CEOs and Senators could, as he put it, “ignore our science and want to ignore mathematics and want to ignore physics and somehow cannot bring themselves to do what we need to do.”

 

 

 

 

 

Sell your F'n plane and yacht .

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Like the rest of the world knows something the west doesn't. Look at where the Nuke plants are being scheduled. it's all Asia, Russia, India.

 

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/plans-for-new-reactors-worldwide.aspx

 

While North America and the EU keep decommissioning them.

 

https://energypost.eu/200-400-nuclear-reactors-to-be-decommissioned-by-2040/

 

 

  • Angry 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

It's important to note that this map measures generated energy as opposed to consumed energy. California, for example, prides itself on data such as this. Guess who is the largest "consumer" of the energy generated in the Rocky Mountains?

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Remember that before the Olympics, the air in Beijing was so polluted that the blue sky couldn't be seen. They did cleat up for the games, but it is probably dirtier than before.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wacka said:

Remember that before the Olympics, the air in Beijing was so polluted that the blue sky couldn't be seen. They did cleat up for the games, but it is probably dirtier than before.

 

yeah. its the first time I read the major news talk about cloud seeding on a massive scale to impact the climate.

 

by releasing aluminum aerosol into the atmosphere.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...