Jump to content

What is better, no guns, or more guns?


Recommended Posts

So, thinking people know that it is people who kill, not guns, and you try to correlate this to letting NK have nukes? I think I'm going to start calling you Kelly the Obtuse Dog.

No, I want to know what is the difference between guns don't kill people, people kill people - cluster bombs don't kill people, people kill people - and nukes don't kill people, people kill people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could they be trying to spook others out if he had help?

No, I want to know what is the difference between guns don't kill people, people kill people - cluster bombs don't kill people, people kill people - and nukes don't kill people, people kill people.

You know what the difference is? I want my guns and I don't give a phuck about anybody else. I got a 2nd right to have them and I want them...

 

 

 

...Oh, prayers for Vegas.

 

Chicago Bad!

 

:-/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmmmm..........

 

 

Stephen Paddock Booked 2 Chicago Hotel Rooms Overlooking Lollapalooza 2 Months Before #LasVegas Massacre

 

http://www.tmz.com/2017/10/05/stephen-paddock-booked-hotel-lollapalooza-music-festival-chicago-vegas/

 

 

That "snapped Gambler" narrative continues to crumble.

Obviously this was well planned out and he had an escape plan according to investigative reports I've read. Isis really wants responsibility for this one as if they can get an older white rich male in the US they can get anybody. I don't know if they'll ever find motive, but I wouldn't be surprised if Isis brainwashed the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmmmm..........

 

 

Stephen Paddock Booked 2 Chicago Hotel Rooms Overlooking Lollapalooza 2 Months Before #LasVegas Massacre

 

http://www.tmz.com/2017/10/05/stephen-paddock-booked-hotel-lollapalooza-music-festival-chicago-vegas/

 

 

That "snapped Gambler" narrative continues to crumble.

 

Psychiatrists , FBI profilers and brain autopsy if enough left have their work cut out for them on this very sad case.

 

High functioning psychopath is looking possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That "snapped Gambler" narrative continues to crumble.

 

At least until someone finds his phone running apps to hook up with gay men, and they start explaining how it really all started with a 67-year-old dude conflicted with his desires to bob the knob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I want to know what is the difference between guns don't kill people, people kill people - cluster bombs don't kill people, people kill people - and nukes don't kill people, people kill people.

Do we knowingly allow mental patients to have guns? By our standards Kim is a nutjob, as were his predecessors. You already know that though. You can't prove your stupid premise so you resort to even more stupid reasoning?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could they be trying to spook others out if he had help?

 

You know what the difference is? I want my guns and I don't give a phuck about anybody else. I got a 2nd right to have them and I want them...

 

 

 

...Oh, prayers for Vegas.

 

Chicago Bad!

 

:-/

I care so much about you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we knowingly allow mental patients to have guns? By our standards Kim is a nutjob, as were his predecessors. You already know that though. You can't prove your stupid premise so you resort to even more stupid reasoning?

Then substitute Putin for nutjob. That doesn't enter into the equation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, thinking people know that it is people who kill, not guns, and you try to correlate this to letting NK have nukes? I think I'm going to start calling you Kelly the Obtuse Dog.

Yes ....and opiates don't kill 40.000 people year....its people.....

 

Of course in our country where the NRA and Big Pharma run the narrative.....I guess they are right...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes ....and opiates don't kill 40.000 people year....its people.....

 

Of course in our country where the NRA and Big Pharma run the narrative.....I guess they are right...

I think that's a weak comparison. The NRA doesn't own politicians as their contributions are relatively minor compared to other groups. In 2016 they spent $1.1 million on campaign contributions and about $3 million on lobbying. http://nypost.com/2017/10/05/the-true-secret-of-the-nras-success/ .

 

Meanwhile, Opioid drugmakers spent on average $89 million per year on lobbying and campaign contributions from 2006-2015. http://www.range365.com/big-pharma-lobbying-for-opioids-spends-8-times-as-much-as-nra

 

By the way, guess which politician got the bulk of that big pharma money in 2015.......

 

6274529_orig.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's a weak comparison. The NRA doesn't own politicians as their contributions are relatively minor compared to other groups. In 2016 they spent $1.1 million on campaign contributions and about $3 million on lobbying. http://nypost.com/2017/10/05/the-true-secret-of-the-nras-success/ .

 

Meanwhile, Opioid drugmakers spent on average $89 million per year on lobbying and campaign contributions from 2006-2015. http://www.range365.com/big-pharma-lobbying-for-opioids-spends-8-times-as-much-as-nra

 

By the way, guess which politician got the bulk of that big pharma money in 2015.......

 

6274529_orig.jpg

This kind of post is what Tiberius and Baskin refer to add obfuscation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's a weak comparison. The NRA doesn't own politicians as their contributions are relatively minor compared to other groups. In 2016 they spent $1.1 million on campaign contributions and about $3 million on lobbying. http://nypost.com/2017/10/05/the-true-secret-of-the-nras-success/ .

 

Meanwhile, Opioid drugmakers spent on average $89 million per year on lobbying and campaign contributions from 2006-2015. http://www.range365.com/big-pharma-lobbying-for-opioids-spends-8-times-as-much-as-nra

 

By the way, guess which politician got the bulk of that big pharma money in 2015.......

 

6274529_orig.jpg

you're a good addition to this forum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been wondering what tactics the people on the ground could have used to defend themselves. A high intensity spot light to shield the view? Laser pointer? A decent handgun or riffle to take shots back allowing cover?

 

Defensive tactics are obvious but I wonder what could have been done to take an offensive possession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been wondering what tactics the people on the ground could have used to defend themselves. A high intensity spot light to shield the view? Laser pointer? A decent handgun or riffle to take shots back allowing cover?

 

Defensive tactics are obvious but I wonder what could have been done to take an offensive possession.

 

Literally nothing barring some equipment that you can't just carry into a concert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...