ExiledInIllinois Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Its not fair to mention the Chicago murders, just pretend they dont exist in ones little narrative. And more legal guns will help? Making them legal will just create more chaos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 It’s funny all I’ve heard is how white guys commit all these mass shootings. Funny thing is since they changed the definition of a mass shooting to 3 people shot with one killed its gang shootings leading the surge in those types of shootings Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 And more legal guns will help? Making them legal will just create more chaos. The restrictions continue to be quite effective. Maybe some strongly worded signs declaring gun free zones will help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 The restrictions continue to be quite effective. Maybe some strongly worded signs declaring gun free zones will help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Who cares if Kim Jung Un gets a nuke. Nukes don't kill people. People kill people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Who cares if Kim Jung Un gets a nuke. Nukes don't kill people. People kill people. You found an internet meme. Yay! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Who cares if Kim Jung Un gets a nuke. Nukes don't kill people. People kill people. This is a bad argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 This is a bad argument.Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Why? Indeed why? Any reasonable person should be able to make a direct and compelling comparison between 2nd amendment gun ownership of American citizens and North Korean nuclear armament. In fact, please expound upon this further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Why? I thought that even as a liberal you were at least smart enough to avoid this kind of schit. We, as a country have a 100x capability (could be 1000 or 10000) more than NK. Are we more dangerous to the world than NK? Game, set, match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 This is a serious question. Do any of the people here who don't think there should be more gun laws or regulations think there is anything wrong whatsoever, or anything done whatsoever, about a guy who buys 33 guns in one year? Many of them semi automatics plus the bump stocks, etc? I'm genuinely curious. https://www.wsj.com/articles/girlfriend-of-las-vegas-gunman-back-in-u-s-1507124805 not one issue with it. Hitler had more guns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Who cares if Kim Jung Un gets a nuke. Nukes don't kill people. People kill people. I care if mad men who intend to harm people get nukes. I also care if mad men who intend to harm people get guns. Silly goose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Some Republicans open to discussing Democrats’ proposal to ban device used in the Vegas attack Sen. Dianne Feinstein unveiled a bill that bans “bump stocks” — devices that can be purchased online for $200 to make semiautomatic weapons fire more like automatic weapons. Some in the GOP said such a ban would make sense, including Sen. Ron Johnson, who told reporters, “I have no problem banning those.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 This is a serious question. Do any of the people here who don't think there should be more gun laws or regulations think there is anything wrong whatsoever, or anything done whatsoever, about a guy who buys 33 guns in one year? Many of them semi automatics plus the bump stocks, etc? I'm genuinely curious. https://www.wsj.com/articles/girlfriend-of-las-vegas-gunman-back-in-u-s-1507124805 If that doesn't set off an alarm at ATF something is very wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 It’s funny all I’ve heard is how white guys commit all these mass shootings. Funny thing is since they changed the definition of a mass shooting to 3 people shot with one killed its gang shootings leading the surge in those types of shootings Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk In fairness, what we tend to think of as a "mass shooting" and those mass shootings that are gang-related are very different with regard to motive/thinking behind them. Some Republicans open to discussing Democrats’ proposal to ban device used in the Vegas attack Sen. Dianne Feinstein unveiled a bill that bans “bump stocks” — devices that can be purchased online for $200 to make semiautomatic weapons fire more like automatic weapons. Some in the GOP said such a ban would make sense, including Sen. Ron Johnson, who told reporters, “I have no problem banning those.” "Never let a good crisis go to waste." Feinstein has her pile of bodies to stand on, she's happy. If that doesn't set off an alarm at ATF something is very wrong. What, that Americans are exercising their 2nd amendment right to keep and bear arms? Also, if someone repeatedly blogs about "resisting" and "fighting against" the current government and that doesn't set off an alarm at the NSA, something is very wrong. Right? Just as long as we're "alarmed" by people exercising their rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 I thought that even as a liberal you were at least smart enough to avoid this kind of schit. We, as a country have a 100x capability (could be 1000 or 10000) more than NK. Are we more dangerous to the world than NK? Game, set, match. How does that address the question? It doesn't at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 maybe his Mom made him eat all his vegetables before he got dessert? oooooooooooooooooh.... time for more Freudian rehashing, been a few BLISSFUL decades without it, so it's the perfect time to resurrect it on CNN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 How does that address the question? It doesn't at all. So, thinking people know that it is people who kill, not guns, and you try to correlate this to letting NK have nukes? I think I'm going to start calling you Kelly the Obtuse Dog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 They don't get hurricanes in Nevada. It was a corner suite, I think... So he was flashing around the cash and they were falling all over him most likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts