Jump to content

What is better, no guns, or more guns?


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

Guess this fellas thinks Trump should be convicted 

 

Image result for gun rights rally richmond

  This is a grade F observation for even you.  A pro 2nd Amendment guy against Trump makes no sense.  The same guy saying Biden, Clinton, etc. makes perfect sense and is consistent in terms of philosophical outlook.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  This is a grade F observation for even you.  A pro 2nd Amendment guy against Trump makes no sense.  The same guy saying Biden, Clinton, etc. makes perfect sense and is consistent in terms of philosophical outlook.  

Duh! Irony 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

Tibs isn't posting something he found on his own because he's not trying to make a point. He's trying to make a living.

 

He's paid to post lies and link to misleading stories and photos to advance a leftist narrative. He's the guy who spams the comments sections of Fox News and other right-leaning site.

 

 

You may be on target with this.

There is a certain Pittsburgh Steelers forum which also has it's own leftist village idiot who went by the same screen name.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Hedge said:

 

You may be on target with this.

There is a certain Pittsburgh Steelers forum which also has it's own leftist village idiot who went by the same screen name.

 

 

No surprise. Given he never posts on the football side of the board, maybe he's a Steelers fan who came to TBD one day when the Bills were going to play Pittsburgh, found the PPP and decided to earn a few extra bucks by polluting the Bills political board with his copy/paste nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His Dec. 23rd FB post is definitely Tiberius. Trump in a coffin, surrounded by smiling Obamas and Clintons and Bushes.

 

He uses laughing emojis.

 

Who loves dead Americans more than Tiberius?

 

Damn. 

 

5 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said:


his post wishing trump would die on Xmas is ?????

 

Everyone knows @Tiberius loves him some dead Americans.

 

 

Edited by IDBillzFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

For better or for worse, it just doesn't work like that on this board. 

 

Everyone knows Tibs is a paid poster, and most of us have him on ignore. A few like to play with him, though I'm not sure why because it just gives him more opportunities to post easily debunked links.

 

But again, ignore and move along. It's not like people here are stupid enough to believe the garbage that he posts.

 

I figured he was just stupid. 

 

Who the eff pays for this?  They're getting ripped off!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IDBillzFan said:

His Dec. 23rd FB post is definitely Tiberius. Trump in a coffin, surrounded by smiling Obamas and Clintons and Bushes.

 

He uses laughing emojis.

 

Who loves dead Americans more than Tiberius?

 

Damn. 

 

 

Everyone knows @Tiberius loves him some dead Americans.

The liar is back. And not a clever a liar at all. In fact, LADitz doesn't lie because he is smart, its because he is an idiot first class. He can't make truthful arguments, because he is too stupid to. Pathetic! 

 

He probably looks a lot like this guy: Image result for moron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Virginia Democrats Push Legislation to Make Criticism of Government Officials a Criminal Offense

... “If any person, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, shall use a computer or computer network to communicate obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threaten any illegal or immoral act, he is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor,” the legislation reads. ...

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Foxx said:

Virginia Democrats Push Legislation to Make Criticism of Government Officials a Criminal Offense

... “If any person, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, shall use a computer or computer network to communicate obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threaten any illegal or immoral act, he is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor,” the legislation reads.

Not content with just the Second Amendment, Leftists are going after The First

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems pretty sexist to me

 

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

Virginia Democrats Push Legislation to Make Criticism of Government Officials a Criminal Offense

... “If any person, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, shall use a computer or computer network to communicate obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threaten any illegal or immoral act, he is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor,” the legislation reads. ...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

Virginia Democrats Push Legislation to Make Criticism of Government Officials a Criminal Offense

... “If any person, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, shall use a computer or computer network to communicate obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language, or make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or threaten any illegal or immoral act, he is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor,” the legislation reads. ...

Threats and harassment are illegal and not protected by the first amendment 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Threats and harassment are illegal and not protected by the first amendment 

we are talking about words on the electronic medium.

 

however, lets just assume you are correct here, why is it only a crime against the elite? should not it apply to everyone if your supposition is right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Foxx said:

we are talking about words on the electronic medium.

 

however, lets just assume you are correct here, why is it only a crime against the elite? should not it apply to everyone if your supposition is right?

You always should 

 

And, It already does.You cannot legally threaten to kill or harm anyone electronically. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

You always should 

 

And, It already does.You cannot legally threaten to kill or harm anyone electronically. 

moving the goalposts again i see. who said anything about threatening to kill or harm anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

moving the goalposts again i see. who said anything about threatening to kill or harm anyone?

“If any person, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person, 

 

You don't see threats to kill or harm someone as being the way people do that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

.You cannot legally threaten to kill or harm anyone electronically. 

Why is it limited to doing it electronically? There are other ways you know. I could shoot them, or poison them, or gas them or even kill them with kindness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...