Jump to content

McD not ruling out bringing in Hyde: “You know he we feel about Micah”


Big Blitz

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

While it would be interesting to see what Hyde has left (watching a 250 lb 30 year old Henry outsprint our young safeties last night was painful), McD shouldn't put him in the position of risking his neck (literally) to play a few more games....

It's not McD’s call on his injury, its up to Docs and the player. If he's cleared medically then he's good to go as far as the coach is concerned

Edited by uticaclub
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, uticaclub said:

Hyde at 20% is better than Rapp or Hamlin at 100%

Couldn’t afford Simmons because we spent $$$ on Samuel & MVS

What a travesty. Paying Samuel more than what we could've signed Simmons for. I believe we're paying Samuel 8 per, and Simmons is getting 7. If I'm not mistaken.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

While it would be interesting to see what Hyde has left (watching a 250 lb 30 year old Henry outsprint our young safeties last night was painful), McD shouldn't put him in the position of risking his neck (literally) to play a few more games....

McD wouldn’t be putting him in position.  He’s a grown man and would be making this decision on his own. McD has nothing to do with it

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NewEra said:

McD wouldn’t be putting him in position.  He’s a grown man and would be making this decision on his own. McD has nothing to do with it

 

Hyde isn't on the roster.  He would have to be called...by someone like McD or Beane, to see if he wanted to come back.

 

That would be McD or Beane "putting him in that position", as opposed to, say, not calling him up at all.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

Hyde isn't on the roster.  He would have to be called...by someone like McD or Beane, to see if he wanted to come back.

 

That would be McD or Beane "putting him in that position", as opposed to, say, not calling him up at all.

 

 

 

I won't claim to know who makes the call, but I would expect it comes from Beane - or Micah's agent. 

 

No clue who Alex Brasky is but I think it's odd that he paraphrases that McD "likes what they have" and then quotes "You know how we feel about Micah.” Makes me question whether the quote and paraphrase came from the same 'interview' and whether I should care what he posted anymore than the speculative posts we get on 2BD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 0017 said:

Bishop and Hyde could be pretty sweet! A half speed Hyde is twice as good as a full speed Hamlin!!! 

 

I sometimes wonder if Damar is getting a bit of preferential treatment, I wonder if he hadn't had the incident that happened to him if he would still be with the team ? I know he knows this D better than the new recruits but is his ability where it needs to be or is he truly a back up elevated because of what happened ?

 

I'm very happy that he is back playing football and his health looks to be great, but i can't help but wonder about the hole situation sometimes . Or am i missing his developmental potential at his position ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Allen2Moulds said:

What a travesty. Paying Samuel more than what we could've signed Simmons for. I believe we're paying Samuel 8 per, and Simmons is getting 7. If I'm not mistaken.

 

Two clichés apply here:

 

1.  Timing is everything

2.  Hindsight is 20-20

 

At the time the Bills signed Samuel, WR help was a huge need.  Given what guys like Gabe Davis make, Samuel's contract looks like a bargain.  He's hasn't been very productive so far, but there's a lot of season left.  I don't know if the turf toe is the issue, or if it's just the plays the Bills are calling.  I was expecting to see more carries, jet sweeps and other creative plays with Samuel.

 

Also, Simmons almost certainly ended up settling for a relatively cheap 1 year deal after holding out for a lot more and not getting the offers he wanted.  He wasn't going to take a 1-year, $7M deal at the time the Bills signed Samuel.  I don't know if he'd have taken a 3-year $21M deal at that time.  I'm guessing not.  Would I love to have Simmons on the roster?  Of course, but the timing did not work out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, First Round Bust said:

Edwards...Bishop...Cine...please...because this is not the same Micah who we know and love and will be 34 in two months...no training camp or practices as well...and most importantly his neck-cervical injury is significant that there is no way we want him to stick his upper body into D Henry and other runners going full-speed into our secondary...safety first...

Pun intended?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, uticaclub said:

Hyde at 20% is better than Rapp or Hamlin at 100%

Couldn’t afford Simmons because we spent $$$ on Samuel & MVS


Yeah, at this point I don’t understand signing Samuel for so much.  He doesn’t even start because the coaching staff finally realized Shakir is best in the slot and he’s been like just a gadget player so far, and not that effective. Wasn’t he supposed to have 4.3 speed?  If so, it isn’t being utilized properly.  He’s not that elusive on those WR screens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, msw2112 said:

 

Two clichés apply here:

 

1.  Timing is everything

2.  Hindsight is 20-20

 

At the time the Bills signed Samuel, WR help was a huge need.  Given what guys like Gabe Davis make, Samuel's contract looks like a bargain.  He's hasn't been very productive so far, but there's a lot of season left.  I don't know if the turf toe is the issue, or if it's just the plays the Bills are calling.  I was expecting to see more carries, jet sweeps and other creative plays with Samuel.

 

Also, Simmons almost certainly ended up settling for a relatively cheap 1 year deal after holding out for a lot more and not getting the offers he wanted.  He wasn't going to take a 1-year, $7M deal at the time the Bills signed Samuel.  I don't know if he'd have taken a 3-year $21M deal at that time.  I'm guessing not.  Would I love to have Simmons on the roster?  Of course, but the timing did not work out.

 

I think this is more than fair and accurate, but will say that the safety market and how it was trending, was easy to read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if the Steelers go on a losing streak, wonder if Fitzpatrick is available?  A lot of "ifs" there.  

 

I'm thinking McD does not say this unless Hyde has some interest in a return.  Hyde wants to wait until later in the season, however.  

13 hours ago, BobbyC81 said:


Yeah, at this point I don’t understand signing Samuel for so much.  He doesn’t even start because the coaching staff finally realized Shakir is best in the slot and he’s been like just a gadget player so far, and not that effective. Wasn’t he supposed to have 4.3 speed?  If so, it isn’t being utilized properly.  He’s not that elusive on those WR screens.

 

I have no clue wtf is going on with Samuel.  I thought he would have a down the field deep threat role.  Shakir would do the typical slot thing that he is doing very well, Coleman deep balls, TEs in the middle and Kincaid can stretch the seam.  it just looks like chaos now, however.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...