Royale with Cheese Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 2 hours ago, Livinginthepast said: Of all the moves yesterday, this one had me puzzled. Trubisky looked so bad last year with the Steelers. Why not sign a rookie instead of this retread. Is this just a move to make Josh feel comfortable? Like theres no competition whatsoever for the starting job? What's the logic here? What are you trying to get at here? Unless I'm taking this wrong but you want to bring a back up that could compete with Allen for the starting job? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 14 minutes ago, Logic said: The entire Steelers offense stunk last year. Their offensive coordinator was fired midseason after fans openly chanted "Fire Canada!" at games. The best Trubisky has looked in his career, arguably, was when he was wearing Bills blue. Sometimes certain offenses, styles, and locker rooms fit certain players better. I think Trubisky thrived here. Moreover, I'm just not sure who people would prefer at backup QB. The REALLY good backups in the league -- of which there are very few to begin with -- command more money and likely want a chance to compete to start. The types of guys that are willing to sign cheap contracts to be a guaranteed backups are not generally "starting caliber". That's why they're backups. So I guess my question is: what backup that's willing to come here on a cheap deal and know for sure that he can't compete to be the starter is better than Trubisky? Who should the Bills have signed instead? Because the Bills have great looking uniforms and he didn't have to play. You're correct though. If a backup is any good he's probably starting 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royale with Cheese Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 29 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said: I agree....clearly the dumbest move yesterday. Here we go again, another overpriced scrub vet who will never see the field for 2.7M. We should've just drafted a late development guy for the rookie minimum. You want a late round rookie to be Allen's right hand man? Why doesn't every team do that? I mean, every top QB has a vet as their back up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChronicAndKnuckles Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 18 hours ago, Roundybout said: Better than Kyle Allen IMO Ew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 He is a great pickup. Very happy w this decision. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArdmoreRyno Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 He's a solid QB. When he was here, I wasn't totally terrified (just 95%, instead of 100%) if Josh had to come out. Trubisky has some of similar traits as Josh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Einstein Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Just now, ArdmoreRyno said: He's a solid QB. He's really not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NastyNateSoldiers Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 4 hours ago, John from Riverside said: One of the better back up QB in the league Not everyone can be a starter Is certainly worth back up money U mean 3rd string or practice squad QB! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArdmoreRyno Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 2 minutes ago, Einstein said: He's really not. Cool, thanks for chiming in. I disagree 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 $5.25m over 2 years. $2.7m guaranteed. Looks right about where I pegged it. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo03 Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 (edited) Am I the only one that thinks that, if God forbid he has to play here, that he actually wouldn't be THAT bad? I feel like we are probably the most talented team he has been a part of and he was a #2 overall pick. There could be way worse options Edited March 7 by Buffalo03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 why is everyone describing him as solid? What is solid about him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ngbills Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 6 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: $5.25m over 2 years. $2.7m guaranteed. Looks right about where I pegged it. Honestly why waste anything more than $1M on a back up QB? KC paid Gabbert $1M or CIN had Browning at $750K to be a back up which is a much better use of $. If we need Trubisky to play more than a few games the season is in trouble no matter what. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColoradoBills Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 13 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: $5.25m over 2 years. $2.7m guaranteed. Looks right about where I pegged it. It's fair for both sides. I like the idea that he will be the backup for 2 years running. Backup QBs do more than thrown the ball when the starter is out. I think what he brings to the table there is worth the little extra $s. Wouldn't mind a rookie to go to the PS if Beane has any leftover 6th rounders. Get the QB room stable with 3 QBs for the next few years. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaw66 Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 I really like this. I wonder if Trubisky has reached the conclusion that his future now is journeyman backup. If so, this is great. He might have a three-four-five-year run in Buffalo. He has the size, arm, running style, and brains to be a JA backup. A good fit in the QB room and a decent guy to put on the field if the need arises. I assume he and Josh get along, or else the Bills wouldn't have done this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Stampede Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Beane and McDermott really like what they know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColoradoBills Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 1 minute ago, Shaw66 said: I really like this. I wonder if Trubisky has reached the conclusion that his future now is journeyman backup. If so, this is great. He might have a three-four-five-year run in Buffalo. He has the size, arm, running style, and brains to be a JA backup. A good fit in the QB room and a decent guy to put on the field if the need arises. I assume he and Josh get along, or else the Bills wouldn't have done this. Agree. I said so in the post above yours. I'd add a 6th rounder QB with some potential (and some Josh type traits) for the PS too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentEdwardsCheckDownOn4th Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Trubisky seriously looked like one of the worst qbs in the league last year. He looked like a guy that wanted to be a backup and hold a clipboard , and when his number was called did not seem remotely prepared or motivated. For a team that has cap issues , I don't understand this signing at all . We would have been better served to use a late round pick on a QB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie Joe Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 I resent every dollar over the minimum that they pay this guy … Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 2 hours ago, BillsVet said: It is absurd to think the HC (who didn't have the time to figure out the QB position 3 months from the draft in 2017) could assess during that time how the 2018 QB class would fare AND that Buffalo would get into position to draft one. A new HC who needed help to draft a WR from the new position coach and then got intel from Carolina to jump up and take an OT in RD2. The problem McD had in the 2017 off-season was he didn't prioritize the QB or offense in general and defaulted to what he knew: secondary and defense. It was a strategic decision made by him, the dominant voice in the room (and still is) to go down that road. You well know that rebuilding teams don't have a chance in back to back years to find a veritable franchise QB. Missed opportunities don't typically have happy endings for those teams, of which there are a few notables across the NFL right now. Delaying the decision to draft a QB is often how new GMs and HC's wind up among the unemployed. The trade for Tre, on its face was bad then but is seen as worse not because we have hindsight on Mahomes. It was bad investing a 1st round pick at a position that, from a positional value standpoint, features zone corners who aren't top picks or big dollar UFAs. McD has demonstrated he can get adequate play from lesser value picks/UFAs. McD has and probably always will be stubborn to a fault by not acquiescing to the fact the NFL is offense-driven and his vision does not align with that. He just started demonstrating that really early in 2017. The 2018 QB draft was WIDELY speculated to be an all-time great draft. That was known at least a year out. You can go back through the archives here (at least I think) prior to the 2017 draft and see how many advocated for a QB in 2018. I was one of them. The person that should get lots of credit is @thebandit27 for banging the table for Mahomes pre-draft. He LOVED him. 2 1sts will almost always afford you the opportunity to obtain a high end QB prospect. That holds especially true in a year, where your team was carrying the HIGHEST DEAD CAP NUMBER IN NFL HISTORY. The Bills knew that they weren’t going to be very good in 2018. Their pick was going to be, at worst, the middle of the round. That coupled with an additional 1st was going to be enough to get you in striking range for Rosen, Allen, Baker, Darnold, Lamar or Rudolph (depending on how the 2017 college season played out). I am in agreement that McDermott’s allocation of assets is backwards. Helping Josh is priorities 1-5. I saw this on Twitter: Since 2018 (Josh draft) the Bills have spent 2739.8 draft value pts on 6 DL; they’ve allocated 144.1 draft value points to 7 WR. If you include Diggs that’s 924.1 points. That’s an average DL draft spot of pick 44. It’s an average WR spot of 177 (96 w Diggs). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.