Jump to content

Diggs cryptic comments - 2024 edition


Einstein

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


Was any more detail provided besides working on a trade with Houston?  Thanks 

 

Oh joy! You've found your ErieCountyBulls for this season and he's a poster on this board. Wonderful. I can't wait to hear "BuffaloBaumer said" up until the Draft, like it's some sort of proof positive smoking gun to this nonsense.

 

Houston makes very little sense. They have Nico Collins, Tank Dell, John Metchie, and Robert Woods. They've spent a 2nd and two 3rds over the past 3 Drafts to acquire them and are in really good shape in that room. Now they're going to pay for Diggs' massive bag of money and spend a 1st as well on top of all of that, when their room is already very good and growing/developing?

 

Now let's look at the next part of it that makes no sense - why would we help Houston? They, like us were one of the final 4 teams in the AFC. We're in direct competition with them. So now we're going to give them a final piece to help push them over the top? In our own path? In exchange for a lottery ticket and paying money out of pocket to do so? No f'n way.

 

Even if you were to entertain the idea that trading him is possible or likely, which it absolutely isn't - we wouldn't trade him to an AFC contender.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Oh joy! You've found your ErieCountyBulls for this season and he's a poster on this board. Wonderful. I can't wait to hear "BuffaloBaumer said" up until the Draft, like it's some sort of proof positive to this nonsense.

 

Houston makes very little sense. They have Nico Collins, Tank Dell, John Metchie, and Robert Woods. They've spent a 2nd and two 3rds over the past 3 Drafts to acquire them and are in really good shape in that room. Now they're going to pay for Diggs' massive bag of money and spend a 1st as well on top of all of that, when their room is already very good and growing/developing?

 

Now let's look at the next part of it that makes no sense - why would we help Houston? They, like us were one of the final 4 teams in the AFC. We're in direct competition with them. So now we're going to give them a final piece to help push them over the top? In our own path? In exchange for a lottery ticket and paying money out of pocket to do so? No f'n way.

 

Even if you were to entertain the idea that this is possible or likely, which it absolutely isn't - we wouldn't trade him to an AFC contender.


Honestly, while I have no idea if this rumor has merit, identifying Houston as a landing spot isn’t crazy at all:

 

1). Nico Collins is on the last year of his rookie deal in 2024.  He’s going to want 1a WR money. Is that the WR you want to pair with Stroud and pay 1a money to? I would be questioning that. 
 

2) Tank Dell is a 5’8” 165-pound slot receiver on a rookie contract coming off a major injury. It’s irrelevant to whether you want to bring in an expensive WR1 to pair with Stroud.

 

3) Metchie is one year removed from leukemia with two years left on a rookie deal.  He caught 16 balls this year for 160 yards. I mean, WR4 perhaps?

 

4) Robert Woods will be 32 next year coming off a 40-catch season with one year left on his contract. He’s maybe a JAG, at best, at this point in his career.

 

5) If I’m Houston, I’m trying to find my Jamar Chase, Tyreek Hill, Ceedee Lamb, or dare I say, Steph Diggs to pair with my franchise QB. A Ferrari at WR1 that I’m willing to pay.  Tee Higgins fits the bill but he is probably going to get franchised, and then you have to outbid other suitors after 2024. You can go the draft, but you have to hit the pick correctly.

 

I don’t view that WR room as loaded at all and Diggs makes a lot of sense there, particularly if the WR1 is not in the building.  Niko Collins may not be the guy you want to pay top 10 WR money to after next season. 
 

They have the room because Collins and Stroud are on rookie contracts.

 

I mean, it’s not a crazy rumor at all from Houston’s side. 
 

If you are Beane/Bills, you make the deal because you think Houston believes Diggs is still a top 10 WR while you are convinced he’s on the decline with a massive contract.

 

Seems like a reasonable rumor to me. 

 

Edited by Tim Tindale
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tim Tindale said:


Honestly, while I have no idea if this rumor has merit, identifying Houston as a landing spot isn’t crazy at all:

 

1). Nico Collins is on the last year of his rookie deal in 2024.  He’s going to want 1a WR money. Is that WR you want to pair with Stroud and pay 1a money to? I would be questioning that. 
 

2) Tank Dell is a 5’8” 165-pound slot receiver on a rookie contract coming off a major injury. It’s irrelevant to whether you want to bring in an expensive WR1 to pair with Stroud.

 

3) Metchie is one year removed from leukemia with two years left on a rookie deal.  He caught 16 balls this year for 160 yards. I mean, WR4 perhaps?

 

4) Robert Woods will be 32 next year coming off a 40-catch season with one year left on his contract. He’s maybe a JAG, at best, at this point in his career.

 

5) If I’m Houston, I’m trying to find my Jamar Chase, Tyreek Hill, Ceedee Lamb, or dare I say, Steph Diggs to pair with my franchise QB. A Ferrari at WR1 that I’m willing to pay.  Tee Higgins fits the bill but he is probably going to get franchised, and then we have to outbid other suitors. You can go the draft, but you have to hit the pick correctly.

 

I don’t see that WR room as loaded at all and Diggs makes a lot of sense there, particularly if my WR1 is not in the building.  Niko Collins may not be the guy you want to pay top 10 WR money to after next season. 
 

They have the room because Collins and Stroud are on rookie contracts.

 

I mean, it’s not a crazy rumor at all from Houston’s side. 
 

If you are Beane/Bills, you make the deal because you think Houston believes Diggs is still a top 10 WR while you are convinced he’s on the decline. 

 

Seems like a reasonable rumor to me. 

 

 

Nico Collins was 8th in the league in yardage last year and was Stroud's go to guy. They're growing together. I see no way that they'd not keep a 25 year old Top 10 WR who may be just scratching the surface with Stroud in favor of a guy that, as good as he is, will be 31 years old this year.

 

Even in a Down Year Stefon Diggs, he was 7th in the league in Receptions and just out of the Top 10 in Yards. 

 

Beane himself said he needs to get weapons to take pressure off of him, which partly resulted in the Down Year.

 

Even if he thinks he might be on the decline, he's still a difference maker. If there's a question as to whether or not that's the case, Houston wouldn't give up what's being talked about to get him.

 

And Beane can't possibly be so sure he isn't a difference maker anymore that he's going to risk handing them a weapon that could come back to bite us. There's zero way he can be positive that would happen.

 

Again, if he were to be traded, which I just don't see - as we still have to replace half of our WR core as is - there's zero possibility it would be to an AFC contender like Houston. There's zero chance he'd risk even the possibility of having to answer why he handed Houston the piece that beat us in the Playoffs. 

 

That's setting himself up for a fireable offense. Beane is too judicious for that.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Nico Collins was 8th in the league in yardage last year and was Stroud's go to guy. They're growing together. I see no way that they'd not keep a 25 year old Top 10 WR who may be just scratching the surface with Stroud in favor of a guy that, as good as he is, will be 31 years old this year.

 

Even in a Down Year Stefon Diggs, he was 7th in the league in Receptions and just out of the Top 10 in Yards. 

 

Beane himself said he needs to get weapons to take pressure off of him, which partly resulted in the Down Year.

 

Even if he thinks he might be on the decline, he's still a difference maker. If there's a question as to whether or not that's the case, Houston wouldn't give up what's being talked about to get him.

 

And Beane can't possibly be so sure he isn't a difference maker anymore that he's going to risk handing them a weapon that could come back to bite us. There's zero way he can be positive that would happen.

 

Again, if he were to be traded, which I just don't see - as we still have to replace half of our WR core as is - there's zero possibility it would be to an AFC contender like Houston. There's zero chance he'd risk even the possibility of having to answer why he handed Houston the piece that beat us in the Playoffs. 

Hear me out here… maybe Beane is such a wizard that he’s pumping up Diggs value so that he can trade him to an AFC rival and watch him light the league on fire at a record pace with Eric Moulds and Peerless Price for the first half of the season until he turns into Frankenstein’s pumpkin and plays the rest of the season like his feet have been cast into the concrete of the foundation of the stadium… wait, I think I have some of the details confused… 🤔

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


Harty*

 

No fair! I had the idea with Houston first!

 

Seriously though, a person claimed he knew Diggs reached out to a former Texans WR about the city and organization

 

Texans have a lot of cap space and putting Diggs with Collins and Tank Dell gives them a really nice group for Stroud

So Houston wants to bring in a guy who has forced his way out of two organizations to mentor their young, talented WRs?  Not buying that.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Billl said:

So Houston wants to bring in a guy who has forced his way out of two organizations to mentor their young, talented WRs?  Not buying that.

 

That's just one of the million things about this hairbrained idea that doesn't make sense.

 

But hey, some guy, who supposedly knows a guy, who was supposedly talking to Sherfield and Harty and just volunteering trade secrets to him, says it's in the works. 

 

So, you know, logic be damned. That's some stone cold, believable, lock it in stuff right there.

 

The Diggs posts that were a waste of time last year were insane. I guess we're just going for next level crazy this offseason.

Edited by BillsFanForever19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The media has turned this into the NFLs version of Prince Harry and Megan Markle versus the Royal Family where people just make sh!t up and treat it as facts then basically create stories out of thin air and just go with them.

 

It's beyond ridiculous by now.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tim Tindale said:


Honestly, while I have no idea if this rumor has merit, identifying Houston as a landing spot isn’t crazy at all:

 

1). Nico Collins is on the last year of his rookie deal in 2024.  He’s going to want 1a WR money. Is that the WR you want to pair with Stroud and pay 1a money to? I would be questioning that.

 

So lemme get this straight. 

 

You're saying that the Texans would trade something of significant value (to make up for the cap hit we'd take) for Diggs (age 30, 13th in receiving yards), in order to pay Diggs $18.5M this year, $18 next year, and $19M in 2026, because they still have Collins (age 24, 8th in receiving yards) on a cheap contract through 2024 and they might have to franchise tag him (last year WR franchise tag was $19.7M) if they can't reach agreement on a deal?

 

4 hours ago, Tim Tindale said:

5) If I’m Houston, I’m trying to find my Jamar Chase, Tyreek Hill, Ceedee Lamb, or dare I say, Steph Diggs to pair with my franchise QB. A Ferrari at WR1 that I’m willing to pay.  Tee Higgins fits the bill but he is probably going to get franchised, and then you have to outbid other suitors after 2024. You can go the draft, but you have to hit the pick correctly.

 

I don’t view that WR room as loaded at all and Diggs makes a lot of sense there, particularly if the WR1 is not in the building.  Niko Collins may not be the guy you want to pay top 10 WR money to after next season.

 

So the Texans may not want to go to the draft for a top WR because you have to hit the pick correctly, but the Bills (who lack the cap $$ to sign a top FA) should trade away Diggs and put themselves in a position where they absolutely MUST go to the draft and hit the pick correctly?

 

Make it make sense

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don’t see how Diggs gets traded. Can’t see any team offering anything worthwhile. If any team was offering mid 1st round draft pick for Diggs. I would do that trade in a heartbeat if I was Beane. Mid first round pick probably gives you enough ammo to get one of the top 3 WRs in this class. 

Edited by billieve420
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, billieve420 said:

I just don’t see how Diggs gets traded. Can’t see any team offering anything worthwhile. If any team was offering mid 1st round draft pick for Diggs. I would do that trade in a heartbeat if I was Beane. Mid first round pick probably gives you enough ammo to get one of the top 3 WRs in this class. 


Absolutely. Unfortunately, I think you’d be lucky to get a third for him at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

So lemme get this straight. 

 

You're saying that the Texans would trade something of significant value (to make up for the cap hit we'd take) for Diggs (age 30, 13th in receiving yards), in order to pay Diggs $18.5M this year, $18 next year, and $19M in 2026, because they still have Collins (age 24, 8th in receiving yards) on a cheap contract through 2024 and they might have to franchise tag him (last year WR franchise tag was $19.7M) if they can't reach agreement on a deal?

 

 

So the Texans may not want to go to the draft for a top WR because you have to hit the pick correctly, but the Bills (who lack the cap $$ to sign a top FA) should trade away Diggs and put themselves in a position where they absolutely MUST go to the draft and hit the pick correctly?

 

Make it make sense


First, I’m not saying it will happen. My point was more pushing back against the hyperbolic “it would NEVER happen”.  I think it can make sense for both sides.
 

The post mentioned that Houston’s WR room is loaded. It’s not - Nico is a nice receiver, but he really hadn’t done much before Stroud arrived this year and Houston could come to the conclusion his big year was a product of Stroud.  Just because he is young and put up a big year, it doesn’t follow he’s an alpha 1a that can command double-teams, you can count on for 100 catches per year going forward, etc.  There are plenty examples of young WR’s who put up big years with great QB’s as the WR1, but weren’t really top 10 WR’s and you wouldn’t want to pay him as such (e.g. a 22-year old JuJu Smith Schuster in 2018 comes to mind, or 24-year-old Steve Smith for the Giants, who went for 107-1220-7 with Eli and never cracked 600 thereafter).  Just because average fan says “Nico is young and put up a big year” doesn’t mean Houston will come to the conclusion that he should be paid WR1 money in 2025.  
 

Or, Houston could come to a different conclusion - we won’t have to pay Stroud for a few years. That allows us to tie up Collins and another established WR with a big contract to pair with Stroud for three years. That’s a luxury when you have a top 5-7 QB on a rookie deal. Maybe they decide to go “all in” in 2024 given how cheap and young that roster is.  They certainly can worry about how many established playmakers they have around Stroud, especially after Dell broke his fibula late in the year.  You may wonder what you are going to get from guy who relies on speed prospectively.
 

I push back on “Houston would never do that and especially because that WR room is loaded.” It’s not, and they have plenty of wiggle room given they aren’t paying anyone on the offensive side of the ball.  It really not crazy at all from their side. 

 

As for Beane, I’m struck by Diggs’ comment that, and I’m paraphrasing, “we will see how this offseason goes, it’s a business, and I hope I’m in Buffalo”.  I know it’s Diggs and he stirs the pot, but that sounded like he’s preparing for the possibility that he could be elsewhere. The facts are the Bills are way over the cap, you have Diggs on a massive deal, is it so unreasonable that Beane decides to get out from under that contract to a team that has maximum cap flexibility? 
 

You can’t act like it’s the craziest thing you have ever heard when a few years ago, Minnesota was us (mercurial WR, unload contract) and we were Houston (young QB, cheap, flexible roster).  
 

Again, I’m not saying it’s going to happen, but I certainly can understand both sides (more so than the standard “it’s crazy and it will never happen”.) And, if that’s true, I won’t feign absolute shock when it does.  
 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Beck Water said:

You're saying that the Texans would trade something of significant value (to make up for the cap hit we'd take) for Diggs (age 30, 13th in receiving yards), in order to pay Diggs $18.5M this year, $18 next year, and $19M in 2026, because they still have Collins (age 24, 8th in receiving yards) on a cheap contract through 2024 and they might have to franchise tag him (last year WR franchise tag was $19.7M) if they can't reach agreement on a deal?

 

This sounds so stupid that I could see the Texans doing it.


Really poorly run franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Oh joy! You've found your ErieCountyBulls for this season and he's a poster on this board. Wonderful. I can't wait to hear "BuffaloBaumer said" up until the Draft, like it's some sort of proof positive smoking gun to this nonsense.

 

Houston makes very little sense. They have Nico Collins, Tank Dell, John Metchie, and Robert Woods. They've spent a 2nd and two 3rds over the past 3 Drafts to acquire them and are in really good shape in that room. Now they're going to pay for Diggs' massive bag of money and spend a 1st as well on top of all of that, when their room is already very good and growing/developing?

 

Now let's look at the next part of it that makes no sense - why would we help Houston? They, like us were one of the final 4 teams in the AFC. We're in direct competition with them. So now we're going to give them a final piece to help push them over the top? In our own path? In exchange for a lottery ticket and paying money out of pocket to do so? No f'n way.

 

Even if you were to entertain the idea that trading him is possible or likely, which it absolutely isn't - we wouldn't trade him to an AFC contender.

I'm not saying that I think this is going to happen, but maybe they're sick of his childish BS, the attendant headaches, and the friction with the boss (Josh Allen), and Houston is one of few available destinations for him with the contract. The other possibility, of course, is that he's such a toxic butthole behind the scenes that sending him to a rival might be addition by subtraction for us and subtraction by addition for them. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2024 at 10:41 PM, SCBills said:


I’m clearly talking about how Josh answers when asked about Diggs. 
 

If my girlfriend and I are in weird point in our relationship and she asks me about how I feel about us, should I answer like Diggs if I truly want to be with her long term?  
 

Because the only way I’m answering like that is if I want to be in a toxic relationship where I constantly gaslight her. 

If you already answered her saying you love her and want to be with her for rest of life and she continued to ask the same questions over and over again like you already didn’t answer them, yes. I’d leave because she’s nuts, insecure and needs constant reassurance. That wears on people.
 

But Diggs can’t leave the media if he wants to be an NFL player as stupid as their requirement to talk to them is. He has already answered these questions. They keep asking him trying to piss him off and get a quote they can run with and get clicks to their page 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’s too expensive to move period. Would it be wrong to go get a complimentary rookie that becomes 1a by seasons end with Diggs Shakir Kincaid Cook out of the backfield ? Brady can have a worse stable of receivers to work the offense for sure.

point is Diggs goes nowhere.

 

Edited by 26TrapDraw
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest issue with Diggs is that he pulled a Houdini last season.  Is that really what a WR1 does?  
 

We’ve seen no evidence of injury so it’s either attitude or he’s on an age related slide.

 

Personally I’m looking to move on from him just based on the last part of the season. Roster evolution doesn’t bother me a lick.  It’s never hurt KC.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, PayDaBill$ said:

My biggest issue with Diggs is that he pulled a Houdini last season.  Is that really what a WR1 does?  
 

We’ve seen no evidence of injury so it’s either attitude or he’s on an age related slide.

 

Personally I’m looking to move on from him just based on the last part of the season. Roster evolution doesn’t bother me a lick.  It’s never hurt KC.

 

Indeed he did pull a Houdini.

 

Houdini

 

But not in a good way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know there are other ways to get there with releases and extensions, but I am wondering if Beane will need to do the simple restructure of Diggs' contract to get under the cap this offseason and have limited space to sign and re-sign free agents.  $13 million in cap savings for a restructure (according to Over the Cap) is significant when the team is $50 million plus over the cap and the only other easy restructure is Allen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

Oh joy! You've found your ErieCountyBulls for this season and he's a poster on this board. Wonderful. I can't wait to hear "BuffaloBaumer said" up until the Draft, like it's some sort of proof positive smoking gun to this nonsense.

 

Houston makes very little sense. They have Nico Collins, Tank Dell, John Metchie, and Robert Woods. They've spent a 2nd and two 3rds over the past 3 Drafts to acquire them and are in really good shape in that room. Now they're going to pay for Diggs' massive bag of money and spend a 1st as well on top of all of that, when their room is already very good and growing/developing?

 

Now let's look at the next part of it that makes no sense - why would we help Houston? They, like us were one of the final 4 teams in the AFC. We're in direct competition with them. So now we're going to give them a final piece to help push them over the top? In our own path? In exchange for a lottery ticket and paying money out of pocket to do so? No f'n way.

 

Even if you were to entertain the idea that trading him is possible or likely, which it absolutely isn't - we wouldn't trade him to an AFC contender.

 

Who would trade a 1st at this point for Diggs and his contract?

 

One answer is certainly not a team that clearly knows how to draft WRs....

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Tim Tindale said:


Honestly, while I have no idea if this rumor has merit, identifying Houston as a landing spot isn’t crazy at all:

 

1). Nico Collins is on the last year of his rookie deal in 2024.  He’s going to want 1a WR money. Is that the WR you want to pair with Stroud and pay 1a money to? I would be questioning that. 
 

2) Tank Dell is a 5’8” 165-pound slot receiver on a rookie contract coming off a major injury. It’s irrelevant to whether you want to bring in an expensive WR1 to pair with Stroud.

 

3) Metchie is one year removed from leukemia with two years left on a rookie deal.  He caught 16 balls this year for 160 yards. I mean, WR4 perhaps?

 

4) Robert Woods will be 32 next year coming off a 40-catch season with one year left on his contract. He’s maybe a JAG, at best, at this point in his career.

 

5) If I’m Houston, I’m trying to find my Jamar Chase, Tyreek Hill, Ceedee Lamb, or dare I say, Steph Diggs to pair with my franchise QB. A Ferrari at WR1 that I’m willing to pay.  Tee Higgins fits the bill but he is probably going to get franchised, and then you have to outbid other suitors after 2024. You can go the draft, but you have to hit the pick correctly.

 

I don’t view that WR room as loaded at all and Diggs makes a lot of sense there, particularly if the WR1 is not in the building.  Niko Collins may not be the guy you want to pay top 10 WR money to after next season. 
 

They have the room because Collins and Stroud are on rookie contracts.

 

I mean, it’s not a crazy rumor at all from Houston’s side. 
 

If you are Beane/Bills, you make the deal because you think Houston believes Diggs is still a top 10 WR while you are convinced he’s on the decline with a massive contract.

 

Seems like a reasonable rumor to me. 

 

At least then he would be in close proximity to his annoying ass brother

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...