Jump to content

Milano and Daquan to IR. Klein signed.


Gambit

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, boyst said:

rapp is a better tackler and angle pursuer than any LB on our active team.

 

we aren't winning the superbowl. this is a 4-6 loss team and not build for the playoffs.

having williams play in downs and in mixed coverage is worthwhile, same with spector. but both of them are likely lifetime special teamers

 

klein played sam in carolina with mcdermott, sam and will in new orleans, mike and will in buffalo.

I’m not sure what ‘not built for the playoffs’ means in this context…who is the afc playoff team that looks like the total package and doesn’t have exploitable weaknesses on the defensive side?  
 

Miami certainly does, KC the defense has improved at the expense of the offense, cincy hasn’t looked the same since Jessie bates left who is playing great in Atlanta, the chargers defense is historically terrible. 
 

maybe if the browns came out of the north they could give us some trouble but I’m not seeing a lot of other teams that would.

Super Bowl you’ve gotta assume will be the niners or eagles which is not a great matchup but it’s a single game at that point and anything can happen. If we were in the nfc I’d agree with you cuz there’s a good chance you’re seeing two of Dallas/philly/SF in a playoff run then whoever you get in the superbowl 

Edited by Generic_Bills_Fan
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

Klein actually played his best football for us replacing Milano. People think it was when he replaced Edmund’s, it was actually when he replaced Milano. Milano missed a lot of time in 2020.

Yes, but he was 3 years younger.  He was slow to begin with and I can’t imagine he is any faster now.  There is a reason they let him go.  McD has a real puzzle to figure out here in terms of run support from that position vs pass coverage.  Klein may be the best option, but let’s not kid ourselves - this is a big problem - especially with Jones gone as well.  I will be interested to see how McD approaches this.  At least they do not have a passing game to worry about against the Giants.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

I’m not sure what ‘not built for the playoffs’ means in this context…who is the afc playoff team that looks like the total package and doesn’t have exploitable weaknesses on the defensive side?  
 

Miami certainly does, KC the defense has improved at the expense of the offense, cincy hasn’t looked the same since Jessie bates left who is playing great in Atlanta, the chargers defense is historically terrible. 
 

maybe if the browns came out of the north they could give us some trouble but I’m not seeing a lot of other teams that would.

Super Bowl you’ve gotta assume will be the niners or eagles which is not a great matchup but it’s a single game at that point and anything can happen. If we were in the nfc I’d agree with you cuz there’s a good chance you’re seeing two of Dallas/philly/SF in a playoff run then whoever you get in the superbowl 

I agree with our current AFC lineup we would/could be ok but historically we aren't. And this maybe the weakest afc in recent times. Anything is possible. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, boyst said:

 

see, and you're not wrong. i 100% agree. we could, we could definitely do so because we have a lot of great players but as a team we are not what the Eagles were last year, what the Bengals were 2 years ago, what the Chiefs were the last few years =  complimentary units.

 

we could run the table, could win lots of big games but we can do that and still be fatally flawed. we could limp by with terrible wounds and survive to the superbowl and pull that off... but we still have gaping weaknesses.  parity being what it is then we have to simply wait and see if we can outlast other teams with our wounds.

 

hopefully, it's just a flesh wound!

 

I don't think we're in too much disagreement - but I think some of the characterizations like "fatally flawed" and "gaping weaknesses" are too extreme.  Anytime a team loses a great player it leaves a hole, but our defense is so good that we basically just need the replacement to be solid.  I think Williams can be that, w/ Klein maybe filling in on run downs.  

 

Like I said - I don't see a team in the AFC that's better, even today.  I think we're right on par w/ the top teams, who I consider to be the Chiefs and Dolphins.  I also think this Bills team is less flawed, and has fewer weaknesses, than any team in the JA era.  Losing Milano hurts, but I think there has been a pretty strong overreaction to how it affects our chances to contend for a title this year.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Success said:

 

I don't think we're in too much disagreement - but I think some of the characterizations like "fatally flawed" and "gaping weaknesses" are too extreme.  Anytime a team loses a great player it leaves a hole, but our defense is so good that we basically just need the replacement to be solid.  I think Williams can be that, w/ Klein maybe filling in on run downs.  

 

Like I said - I don't see a team in the AFC that's better, even today.  I think we're right on par w/ the top teams, who I consider to be the Chiefs and Dolphins.  I also think this Bills team is less flawed, and has fewer weaknesses, than any team in the JA era.  Losing Milano hurts, but I think there has been a pretty strong overreaction to how it affects our chances to contend for a title this year.

 

Most teams do not run as complex and specific defense as we do. Most have somet sort of level where the average FA could contribute. We do not have that defense of the next guy up being as capable because of how complex we are.  And it's a fatal flaw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, boyst said:

and fwiw i'm not 100% sold on bernard right now. i think he is a scheme player fitting well to McD's defense and time will tell. he is better than i thought by a mile but i cannot believe the team trusted him to start. they partially got lucky. call it the Tom Brady outcome - the Patriots got lucky with him, too.

 

This is a really weird take.

 

The Bills made a good pick in Bernard, which you hated at the time... and so now, because he's good, he's simply a "scheme fit" and they "got lucky" ...

 

hmm...

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, boyst said:

@sunshynman care to elaborate on your emotional response?

You were a bit melodramatic with your no longer a SB team. We peaked to early last year, and we were looking that way again this year. So now we get to get straight in time for the playoffs. We will be firing on all cylinders by then. We can beat any team if our offense executes. And Dorsey adjusts when the run is being stuffed.  So, I don't see D injuries as the windows closing. Now if (god does hate us) and Allen misses significant time. Then I'll be right there with you!

 

I agree with your view on Klien. Let the rookies learn, let him teach. Bring him in on run downs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, sunshynman said:

You were a bit melodramatic with your no longer a SB team. We peaked to early last year, and we were looking that way again this year. So now we get to get straight in time for the playoffs. We will be firing on all cylinders by then. We can beat any team if our offense executes. And Dorsey adjusts when the run is being stuffed.  So, I don't see D injuries as the windows closing. Now if (god does hate us) and Allen misses significant time. Then I'll be right there with you!

 

I agree with your view on Klien. Let the rookies learn, let him teach. Bring him in on run downs. 

i am not being meldramatic because of the injuries. i am concerned with all things being put together.

 

our coaches let Elam keep playing despite being ineffective. he looked unprepared, uncoached, and confused. i go back to last year in his relief.  for 3 or 4 games he played very good at the least.

 

our coaches thought williams would be suitable to come in and replace milano. it was obvious very quickly that he was not. he, like elam, was beched in the 2nd half. one of the only adjustments made.

 

i get it, it's hard to win with backups playing. but it's just another excuse for McDermott this year that i don't want to hear.

 

thank you for reply, sincerely. i sought you out because you generally have good takes and just getting the emogies was no fun without hearing your thoughts.

21 minutes ago, Rigotz said:

 

This is a really weird take.

 

The Bills made a good pick in Bernard, which you hated at the time... and so now, because he's good, he's simply a "scheme fit" and they "got lucky" ...

 

hmm...

i didn't hate bernard as a player. i didn't like an mlb as the pick, though

 

i'm not sold on him just because of 5 games, either.

 

and he is a good scheme fit thus far and we got lucky. we haven't correctly evaluated most of our LB's.

 

2018 Edmunds

2019 Vosean Joseph - (5)

2022 Bernard (3), Spector (7)

2023 Williams (3)

 

our free agents havent' been great either.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, boyst said:

i am not being meldramatic because of the injuries. i am concerned with all things being put together.

 

our coaches let Elam keep playing despite being ineffective. he looked unprepared, uncoached, and confused. i go back to last year in his relief.  for 3 or 4 games he played very good at the least.

 

our coaches thought williams would be suitable to come in and replace milano. it was obvious very quickly that he was not. he, like elam, was beched in the 2nd half. one of the only adjustments made.

 

i get it, it's hard to win with backups playing. but it's just another excuse for McDermott this year that i don't want to hear.

 

thank you for reply, sincerely. i sought you out because you generally have good takes and just getting the emogies was no fun without hearing your thoughts.

 

I'm not going to make proclamations about Elam and Williams when Elam has been inactive for 4 weeks and then gets put on an island against Calvin Ridley over in London.  Same for Dorian Williams, thrown into action, in London.

 

That entire game, from start to finish, from jump.. travel included.. was a dumpster fire. 

 

Let me see what they look like over these next few weeks.  

 

To claim we can't win a Super Bowl when our Defense still consists of Von, Rousseau, Oliver, Floyd and Epenesa on the DL is a take that I refuse to buy into.  We had a chance to be 49ers East.  That isn't the case now.. but you can't convince me that the Chiefs, Bengals, Dolphins, Ravens etc., have more talent on their Defenses than we do.  

 

Therefore, to conclude we are no longer a Super Bowl team, imo, means you don't have faith in our Offense.  Because if our Offense wasn't so high variance and inconsistent, we'd be 5-0 and feeling confident we can overcome these injuries. 

 

And honestly, I wouldn't argue with that.  I am extremely frustrated with our Offense..  and they are nowhere near consistent enough to get the 1 seed, let alone give me the confidence that they can perform at a high level for consecutive games needed to get to the Super Bowl.    Thankfully, they are the healthy side, and that can certainly change as we progress further into the season. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FrenchConnection said:

It’s like people don’t remember two flawed 4 seeds playing in the SB just two seasons ago. The Bengals were a 7-loss team that got hot and found some luck down the stretch. They were a drive away from a Lombardi. Heck, the Bills were an injury-riddled 6-loss team that was 13 seconds away from hosting the AFC championship game. 


 

That was missing White and had a vastly inferior D AND O line.   
 

Our corners with a healthy Benford are arguably significantly better than the group from that game.  

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Klein is underrated as I've said before. Yes, he has limitations....but he is a very physical player and violent blitzer 
 

https://x.com/SalSports/status/1712098476077564090?s=20

 

Most players are square pegs and defenses need to be adjusted when players are substituted.

When Klein was originally substituted defense remained the same until Frazier adjusted it which resulted in Klein getting AFC Defense Player of the week award. 

Frazier said "he's gotten more comfortable in our system" but the system changed but in beginning it was a straight substitution.

 

A DC needs to adjust his defense to fit the experience and skills of personnel. 

Wade Phillips was a great DC and the perfect example - there were multiple injuries and he changed defense formation between weeks to adjust for personnel.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

🙏

 

 

That's actually extremely encouraging.  It sounds like there is NOT any significant ligament damage for Milano, and that the recovery is for the fracture. 

 

If we get him back for the playoffs - what a boost that would be for the team & our chances.

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Success said:

 

That's actually extremely encouraging.  It sounds like there is NOT any significant ligament damage for Milano, and that the recovery is for the fracture. 

 

If we get him back for the playoffs - what a boost that would be for the team & our chances.

 

I wonder what the chances are he passed initial ACL tests but the surgery will reveal damage like with Von. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, boyst said:

i would put him in at WLB, Rapp at SLB, Bernard at SLB.

Huh?   Two strong side linebackers and Klein at WILL LB.  Since when do Bills play a 4-3 as base D?  
 

and where does Taron Johnson figure in your new scheme?
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FLFan said:

Yes, but he was 3 years younger.  He was slow to begin with and I can’t imagine he is any faster now.  There is a reason they let him go.  McD has a real puzzle to figure out here in terms of run support from that position vs pass coverage.  Klein may be the best option, but let’s not kid ourselves - this is a big problem - especially with Jones gone as well.  I will be interested to see how McD approaches this.  At least they do not have a passing game to worry about against the Giants.  

Color me intrigued how McD adjusts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

You can’t put Dodson in for Milano. We will get lit up. If you are going to tell me it’s Dorian Williams and Bernard in there with Bedford and Dane Jackson…it’s bad but it’s not really that bad. There’s a small chance we might even be dangerous on defense with the youthful legs. We have some guys that give you a chance to be a still very high level defense. You can bogg it down with old slow legs out there. Let 42 learn on the fly here and run around and hammer some people.

We have a better chance of them getting lit up by a good offense. I have little faith in Dane Jackson as the starting cb. 
A Lb crew of Bernard and Dodson scared no one. They will get lit up. I didn’t like our backup CB going into this season and I don’t have much expectations of them stopping any good WR. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...