Jump to content

Lil dirty update - McKenzie released


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I think it’ll be 

Diggs

Davis

Harty

Shakir

WR drafted rds 1-3.

 

this WR class isn’t very good and the guys that we’ll be selecting will have a hard time beating out gabe. Maybe they’ll slot in over shakir, but they plan to utilize Harty.  Mcdermotts reluctance to give big minutes to draft picks also factors in imo

 

 

I see the rookie WR being an outside guy who will replace Davis next year.  As the primary outside depth guy, he can get a lot of snaps.

Spelling Diggs and Davis alone probably gives him 30%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conflicted on this and not because of the personality. He had some gaffes and Harty made him redundant so I get it, but he was still valuable, productive, and added some variety to the offense. I really hope this is not the case of coaches’ inability to get the best out of him resulting in a release. Just can’t help but think if that 11 catch, 125 yard, 1 TD game against NE* and wonder if we should have been utilizing his skill set more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sad McKenzie is leaving.  He's such a great guy and it was so much to watch him in that Pats games a couple seasons ago.

 

But this past season, he wasn't able to shine in a bigger role.  Maybe the talent wasn't quite there.  Maybe Dorsey misused him.  I'm not sure.  But we all know it didn't work out the way anyone had hoped.    

 

Edited by hondo in seattle
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JohnBonhamRocks said:

Conflicted on this and not because of the personality. He had some gaffes and Harty made him redundant so I get it, but he was still valuable, productive, and added some variety to the offense. I really hope this is not the case of coaches’ inability to get the best out of him resulting in a release. Just can’t help but think if that 11 catch, 125 yard, 1 TD game against NE* and wonder if we should have been utilizing his skill set more.


If we’re simply sticking with Diggs-Davis-Shakir-Harty, then yea.. I might agree.. why not keep McKenzie as WR5. 
 

But that’s not a Championship caliber WR room, imo, and I hope this signals that - at the very least - Shakir and Harty are getting bumped down a slot in the WR room pecking order.  
 

If that’s the case, McKenzie not playing ST’s, at a 2.5M cap hit, doesn’t make a ton of sense as WR6. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillsFanMike said:

Lil’ Dirty will be back.

Lol.  I agree.  Maybe not this offseason, but at some point in the next 5 years I expect him to be a Bill again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GETTOTHE50 said:

 

gabe only had 6 more receptions with 28 more passes his way. 

 

only knock on mckenzie was his muffs imo

I am on record stating relative to expectation, Gabe Davis was the biggest disappointment this year.  Regardless, Gabe Davis is largely irrelevant in the McKenzie discussion.

 

And the only knock on him being the miffs is a pretty damn important knock, especially since we have Hines on the team now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I think it’ll be 

Diggs

Davis

Harty

Shakir

WR drafted rds 1-3.

 

this WR class isn’t very good and the guys that we’ll be selecting will have a hard time beating out gabe. Maybe they’ll slot in over shakir, but they plan to utilize Harty.  Mcdermotts reluctance to give big minutes to draft picks also factors in imo

 

Looks like a mediocre WR room.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I don’t see my as a fit. They have wandale robinson, parris Campbell and Hodgins. All three are best in the slot- their other WR is Sterling IRpard.  Maybe Daboll loves him that much that he’ll add a 4th midget WR, but I think he can be used better on other teams

That's a good point. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you listen closely to what Beane says, they have "receiver roles." Right or wrong, it's what he says. 

 

Diggs is 1 - outside

Davis is 2- outside

Shakir is 3 (this is designated for their slot position)

Harty is 4 (He said specifically that what they look for in a 4 is a guy who plays inside and out. I think Harty gets more snaps than Shakir, but he is the "4" role...imo this was like Emmanuel Sanders' role for a bit)

 

Their 5 is a receiver who is also a gunner. This has been Jake Kumerow since 2021. Before it was Andre Holmes, Brandon Tate, Damari Scott. If they don't bring back Kumerow, Mack Hollins or Justin Watson makes sense to me. Can play outside as well

 

The 6 is the depth guy who probably doesn't dress on game day. 

 

So essentially, imo, any addition going forward is either taking Davis' or Shakir's job. 

 

This structure, right or wrong, is why Isaiah Hodgins is gone. They didn't think he was better than the slots we had, and he couldn't play outside or on special teams. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's understandable as a football decision, but sorry to see him go. One of my favorite stories about the connection between the Bills and its fans is the one about him tweeting about dinner on Xmas eve 2021, then being invited into a home by a fan, and he went. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:

Conflicted on this and not because of the personality. He had some gaffes and Harty made him redundant so I get it, but he was still valuable, productive, and added some variety to the offense. I really hope this is not the case of coaches’ inability to get the best out of him resulting in a release. Just can’t help but think if that 11 catch, 125 yard, 1 TD game against NE* and wonder if we should have been utilizing his skill set more.

Seemed like an outlier game.

Coaches can’t teach hand skills.

We need guys who are consistent 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JohnBonhamRocks said:

Conflicted on this and not because of the personality. He had some gaffes and Harty made him redundant so I get it, but he was still valuable, productive, and added some variety to the offense. I really hope this is not the case of coaches’ inability to get the best out of him resulting in a release. Just can’t help but think if that 11 catch, 125 yard, 1 TD game against NE* and wonder if we should have been utilizing his skill set more.

No doubt.  One off games by receivers/returners have to be treated exactly that, one off.  Microcosm of McKenzie's career here, incredibly exciting one game, fraught with peril the next.  

 

 Look at the raging post season success Gabe Davis had two years ago and what he did this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SCBills said:


If we’re simply sticking with Diggs-Davis-Shakir-Harty, then yea.. I might agree.. why not keep McKenzie as WR5. 
 

But that’s not a Championship caliber WR room, imo, and I hope this signals that - at the very least - Shakir and Harty are getting bumped down a slot in the WR room pecking order.  
 

If that’s the case, McKenzie not playing ST’s, at a 2.5M cap hit, doesn’t make a ton of sense as WR6. 


Yep, and I do get the numbers game and allocation of money to the position. That’s why I’m conflicted and not full stop against the move. 


But I think I’d prefer: (A) Diggs as “WR1”, rotating Davis/Round 1 or 2 Draft Pick as “WR2”, and rotating Shakir/Harty/McKenzie as “WR3” similar to the keeping legs fresh on the DL theory; and (B) ST contribution from a different, defensive, position or positions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Looks like a mediocre WR room.

Which could be enough if we can find a way to get better OL play, a better offensive scheme and a healthy Josh Allen arm 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...