Jump to content

Do the Bills Under Appreciate Gabe Davis?


Chaos

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Jay_Fixit said:

It is a bad comparison. Shaw’s

last few posts are just him writing words.

 

you know, I can 100% be on board with someone who disagrees, but if you don't buy in to Gunner and Shaw's Mike Williams comparison - give it its propers that theyr'e trying to craft a comparison, it's not just "writing words".

2 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

Mike williams also got  a ton more catches on the same number of targets. He's much more reliable. The yardage is mostly imo due to chargers offense not targeting him as deep as Allen does Davis. 

 

Your #2 guy needs to be reliable

 

But that kind of gets to my point about, "what are the Bills ASKING Davis to do?"

 

If they're asking him to be their chain mover....he's failing

 

If they're asking him to be their lower percentage "deep guy", then maybe he's doing what's asked and the real problem is the lack of a reliable "chain mover", which the Bills weren't asking Davis to be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

you know, I can 100% be on board with someone who disagrees, but if you don't buy in to Gunner and Shaw's Mike Williams comparison - give it its propers that theyr'e trying to craft a comparison, it's not just "writing words".

 

But that kind of gets to my point about, "what are the Bills ASKING Davis to do?"

 

If they're asking him to be their chain mover....he's failing

 

If they're asking him to be their lower percentage "deep guy", then maybe he's doing what's asked and the real problem is the lack of a reliable "chain mover", which the Bills weren't asking Davis to be

As I posted previously, the Mike Williams comparison was bad. Only because it was though.

 

My original post about Davis is all this thread needs. He needs to do more. It’s not hard to comprehend.

 

 

16 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

Mike williams also got  a ton more catches on the same number of targets. He's much more reliable. The yardage is mostly imo due to chargers offense not targeting him as deep as Allen does Davis. 

 

Your #2 guy needs to be reliable

GoBills always gets it.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

you know, I can 100% be on board with someone who disagrees, but if you don't buy in to Gunner and Shaw's Mike Williams comparison - give it its propers that theyr'e trying to craft a comparison, it's not just "writing words".

 

But that kind of gets to my point about, "what are the Bills ASKING Davis to do?"

 

If they're asking him to be their chain mover....he's failing

 

If they're asking him to be their lower percentage "deep guy", then maybe he's doing what's asked and the real problem is the lack of a reliable "chain mover", which the Bills weren't asking Davis to be

I don't know what the Bills are asking him to do but I have to imagine they're expecting more out of the position. Mike Williams is actually the third option in that offense behind Keenan Allen and Ekeler, so by comparing Davis' stats to Williams it actually more of a case that Davis is better suited to a WR3 role.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

I don't know what the Bills are asking him to do but I have to imagine they're expecting more out of the position. Mike Williams is actually the third option in that offense behind Keenan Allen and Ekeler, so by comparing Davis' stats to Williams it actually more of a case that Davis is better suited to a WR3 role.

 

And that’s a fair assessment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

I don't know what the Bills are asking him to do but I have to imagine they're expecting more out of the position. Mike Williams is actually the third option in that offense behind Keenan Allen and Ekeler, so by comparing Davis' stats to Williams it actually more of a case that Davis is better suited to a WR3 role.

All that needs to be said is in the top 30 WR's last season by ADOT,  Gabe is

 

top 6 in drop%

bottom 13 in passer rating

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

Also anecdotally it seemed like a lot of Allen's picks were Davis targets but don't quote me on that

Even more startling, Bills specifically:

 

The only Bills players that Josh had a worse passer rating than Gabe when targeting were Moss, Cook, Gentry (1 target), and Crowder.

 

Josh had 6 picks targeting Gabe. 8 to the rest of the team COMBINED.

 

Gabe had one more drop than Diggs on 60 less targets.

 

Gabe only had a better YAC/R than McKenzie, Smoke (1 catch), Beasley.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoBills808 said:

Also anecdotally it seemed like a lot of Allen's picks were Davis targets but don't quote me on that

 

No anecdote needed.  It’s factually documented by pro-football-reference

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/buf/2022_advanced.htm

6 while targeting Davis, 3 targeting Knox, 2 targeting McKenzie

 

But, is that on Davis, or on Allen for forcing the ball in there?  Or somewhat on Dorsey for not realizing that play ha been ing nosed by D’s and he needed to put it in the back of the playbook?  I’m going with most were more on some combination of Allen and Dorsey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

No anecdote needed.  It’s factually documented by pro-football-reference

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/buf/2022_advanced.htm

6 while targeting Davis, 3 targeting Knox, 2 targeting McKenzie

 

But, is that on Davis, or on Allen for forcing the ball in there?  Or somewhat on Dorsey for not realizing that play ha been ing nosed by D’s and he needed to put it in the back of the playbook?  I’m going with most were more on some combination of Allen and Dorsey.

I mean, it may be on Allen. But that’s because he probably expects more of Davis. And he’s consistently underwhelming. So in essence, it’s on Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

No anecdote needed.  It’s factually documented by pro-football-reference

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/buf/2022_advanced.htm

6 while targeting Davis, 3 targeting Knox, 2 targeting McKenzie

 

But, is that on Davis, or on Allen for forcing the ball in there?  Or somewhat on Dorsey for not realizing that play ha been ing nosed by D’s and he needed to put it in the back of the playbook?  I’m going with most were more on some combination of Allen and Dorsey.

It's almost certainly more on Davis

 

Forcing throws to wideouts is part of an NFL quarterback's repertoire.  They shouldn't be ending up as INTs at an anomalous rate 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jay_Fixit said:

None of those things matter. None of them.

 

A #2 WR and all the expectations that go with it has nothing to do with draft position or contract. 
 

Davis could have been undrafted for all that matters. The fact of the matter is he’s just not really good at being a #2 and an upgrade should be considered.

My point was why is anyone comparing the expectations of Davis to Williams? There’s a reason he’s a 4th round pick and made less than $4 million total in 4 yrs. If he was undrafted, my expectations would be even less. Again, a 4th round pick brought in to supplement our #1 wr vs a guy drafted #7 overall to be the #1. That’s what I was talking about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Dopey said:

My point was why is anyone comparing the expectations of Davis to Williams? There’s a reason he’s a 4th round pick and made less than $4 million total in 4 yrs. If he was undrafted, my expectations would be even less. Again, a 4th round pick brought in to supplement our #1 wr vs a guy drafted #7 overall to be the #1. That’s what I was talking about. 

Because he’s supposed to be a #2 receiver. That’s why. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BananaB said:

Mike Williams is another inconsistent WR. The thing is, he has more highs than he does lows and Gabe is the opposite. Mike has 5 games under 70 yards to Gabes 10, 5 games under 50 yards to Gabes 9, and 5 games under 40 to Gabes 8…. Mike wasn’t held for under 70 yards in back to back weeks all season where Gabe was held under 50 in back to back games numerous times. At the end of the season he had was held under 60 yards for 6 straight weeks, and he only eclipsed 40 twice over that stretch. To be honest, looking this over this is just another poor comparison. 

 

He is. Like most WR2s. That is the point. His highs are higher. His lows are lower. That is the point. Most of them have significant varience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

He is. Like most WR2s. That is the point. His highs are higher. His lows are lower. That is the point. Most of them have significant varience.

I don’t understand your point because Williams is still more consistent and more productive. Are you trying to say it’s ok for Gabe because Mike has a few bad games as well? Its not. Williams has a handful of bad games during the season while Gabe has a handful of good ones. They are basically opposites. Still a very bad comparison 

Edited by BananaB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll concede Davis is a low-end 2. Before last season, lot of folks thought the KC playoff game presaged a breakout season. I wanted to trade up for Jameson Williams because I thought Davis was injury prone and too erratic. I don't know how much the injury to Josh's elbow altered game plans. Conjecture all you wish to justify Davis as an adequate 2. There are a few here who think he is fine or at least acceptable. What I think should not be debatable is somewhere you need to find a more consistent, dominant threat to compliment Diggs. Maybe that's Knox or a running game that incorporates the pass catching abilities of a fella like Cook. Maybe it's much better play out of the slot, but it has to come from somewhere so that you can't just focus on Diggs as the single dangerous weapon -- and yes, a subpar oline and rookie OC surely contributed. The fix involves sufficient remedy for all that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BananaB said:

I don’t understand your point because Williams is still more consistent and more productive. Are you trying to say it’s ok for Gabe because Mike has a few bad games as well? Its not. Williams has a handful of bad games during the season while Gabe has a handful of good ones. They are basically opposites. Still a very bad comparison 

 

My point is very simple - high levels of variance are common among #2 wide receivers.... that point is proven. Add to that 3 out of 4 100 yard games Williams had were when he was the #1 in Keenan Allen's absence. 

 

I am not arguing Gabe is better than Williams. Or that the Bills shouldn't be trying to upgrade Gabe. But your point on consistency only makes sense if Gabe is considerably less consistent than his peers and he is not. He isn't as good as a lot of other #2s.... but that is a different point. His inconsistency is common among #2 receivers because their usage is so dependant on other factors - game plan, opposition coverage assignments etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, GoBills808 said:

It's almost certainly more on Davis

 

Forcing throws to wideouts is part of an NFL quarterback's repertoire.  They shouldn't be ending up as INTs at an anomalous rate 

 

Having watched a bunch of those throws, I disagree.

 

One INT, in the Jets game, Josh threw to a spot where Davis wasn't.  Josh took responsibility, and clearly one of them was wrong about where Davis should be, but I don't think we can know who it was.

Steelers game - DB was between Davis and the ball, in perfect position to jump it - could argue that Josh expected Davis to run his route differently, one of them wrong

 

The other 4, were balls that should not have been thrown. 

GB game - Josh dirted the ball yards short of Davis on one, on the other made an off-target throw back to the middle of the field, intercepted miles before it got to Davis.  Two bad throws that shouldn't havebeen made.

Vikings game - Bad throw way short of Davis with defender between Davis and the ball.  Defender jumped the route.

NE game -  dangerous throw intercepted by McCourty way short of Davis, should not have been thrown, nothing Davis could have done

 

There are two reasons why INTs are occuring at an anomalous rate.  One is that the WR is making mistakes or not being sure-handed with the ball, like the ball that bounced off Beasley's chest into a defender's hands in the MIA playoff game.  The others are that the QB is making bad decisions or bad throws, or that the team's self-scouting on what plays they call in different situations is poor, and defenders anomalously know what's coming.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Having watched a bunch of those throws, I disagree.

 

One INT, in the Jets game, Josh threw to a spot where Davis wasn't.  Josh took responsibility, and clearly one of them was wrong about where Davis should be, but I don't think we can know who it was.

Steelers game - DB was between Davis and the ball, in perfect position to jump it - could argue that Josh expected Davis to run his route differently, one of them wrong

 

The other 4, were balls that should not have been thrown. 

GB game - Josh dirted the ball yards short of Davis on one, on the other made an off-target throw back to the middle of the field, intercepted miles before it got to Davis.  Two bad throws that shouldn't havebeen made.

Vikings game - Bad throw way short of Davis with defender between Davis and the ball.  Defender jumped the route.

NE game -  dangerous throw intercepted by McCourty way short of Davis, should not have been thrown, nothing Davis could have done

 

There are two reasons why INTs are occuring at an anomalous rate.  One is that the WR is making mistakes or not being sure-handed with the ball, like the ball that bounced off Beasley's chest into a defender's hands in the MIA playoff game.  The others are that the QB is making bad decisions or bad throws, or that the team's self-scouting on what plays they call in different situations is poor, and defenders anomalously know what's coming.

 

I'd add that the pick on the Beasley throw in the playoff game was perfectly defended (deflected at the point of reception too) and on the QB. As you'll recall, on the play before Allen missed Beasley badly in the middle of the field. I turned to my wife and son and said, "he's going to force the next pass to Beasley come hell or high water." It's a thing he does. I love the faith he has in his receivers and his desire to do right by them, but clearly, the Dolphins saw it coming too. 

Edited by dave mcbride
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

I'd add that the pick on the Beasley throw in the playoff game was perfectly defended (deflected at the point of reception too) and on the QB. As you'll recall, on the play before Allen missed Beasley badly in the middle of the field. I turned to my wife and son and said, "he's going to force the next pass to Beasley come hell or high water." It's a thing he does. I love the faith he has in his receivers and his desire to do right by them, but clearly, the Dolphins saw it coming too. 

 

We'll have to agree to disagree there.  I think Beasley was being held before the ball got there, and should have played the ball differently - extended his hands for the catch instead of trying to body-catch it, possibly taken a step towards the throw - both of which might have made the holding more obvious to the refs.  Josh was forcing it a bit, but not outrageous like some of his other INTs.

 

But, IMHO, the majority of Josh's INTs were far more on Josh than on the WR, poor decisions or poor throws.  And I don't say this because I'm historically easy on WR and hard on Josh - to the contrary.

Edited by Beck Water
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

Having watched a bunch of those throws, I disagree.

 

One INT, in the Jets game, Josh threw to a spot where Davis wasn't.  Josh took responsibility, and clearly one of them was wrong about where Davis should be, but I don't think we can know who it was.

Steelers game - DB was between Davis and the ball, in perfect position to jump it - could argue that Josh expected Davis to run his route differently, one of them wrong

 

The other 4, were balls that should not have been thrown. 

GB game - Josh dirted the ball yards short of Davis on one, on the other made an off-target throw back to the middle of the field, intercepted miles before it got to Davis.  Two bad throws that shouldn't havebeen made.

Vikings game - Bad throw way short of Davis with defender between Davis and the ball.  Defender jumped the route.

NE game -  dangerous throw intercepted by McCourty way short of Davis, should not have been thrown, nothing Davis could have done

 

There are two reasons why INTs are occuring at an anomalous rate.  One is that the WR is making mistakes or not being sure-handed with the ball, like the ball that bounced off Beasley's chest into a defender's hands in the MIA playoff game.  The others are that the QB is making bad decisions or bad throws, or that the team's self-scouting on what plays they call in different situations is poor, and defenders anomalously know what's coming.

 

Yes I watched them too. He didn't 'dirt' the ball short of Davis in the GB game, he threw him low in scramble drill like you're supposed to and Davis gave up on the play while the ball was in the air allowing Jaire Alexander to get around him.

 

We don't have to go this far to justify Davis' below average play. He needs to get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoBills808 said:

Yes I watched them too. He didn't 'dirt' the ball short of Davis in the GB game, he threw him low in scramble drill like you're supposed to and Davis gave up on the play while the ball was in the air allowing Jaire Alexander to get around him.

 

We don't have to go this far to justify Davis' below average play. He needs to get better.

 

I don't disagree that Davis needs to get better.

 

Josh stated after the game that he was trying to "dirt" the ball to throw it away.  Why would he say that if it were a "normal" low throw?

 

We will have to agree to disagree on your interpretation of what happened on that play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beck Water said:

 

I don't disagree that Davis needs to get better.

 

Josh stated after the game that he was trying to "dirt" the ball to throw it away.  Why would he say that if it were a "normal" low throw?

 

We will have to agree to disagree on your interpretation of what happened on that play.

Because he isn't going to come out and say Davis needs to fight for that pass. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

Because he isn't going to come out and say Davis needs to fight for that pass. 

It appears that Allen is by far the best “teammate” in Bills history.  He is like 10 wins above replacement but never ***** about crap protection , second rate offensive weapons and HC/DC/defense choking.  So he becomes a lightning rod for ridiculous criticisms. He is the only player in the NFL judged against “perfect”

on a regular basis. 

Edited by Chaos
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it’s all said and done Davis will have an Emmanuel Sanders type of career. He’ll string together a few 1000+ yard seasons, but I think he will consistently hover around that 800-900 mark w/ an annual 6-8 TDs which is NOT bad. I definitely think he is under appreciated on this board. The Diggs/Davis combo is one of the statistical bests in the league. No, he is no Jaylen Waddle or Tee Higgins. If Buffalo can find a guy of that caliber then pull the trigger. For now I am happy w/ Davis. I don’t think the book is closed on career and I expect a nice bounce back season along w/ Dawson Knox. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

But, IMHO, the majority of Josh's INTs were far more on Josh than on the WR, poor decisions or poor throws.  And I don't say this because I'm historically easy on WR and hard on Josh - to the contrary.

 

Was there ever an explanation on the first INT in the first Jets game? That one still has me baffled. 

10 minutes ago, Dopey said:

With Edmunds gone, I think you guys found your new whipping boy. Have at it. 

 

Davis has been at least Edmunds equal as whipping boy since around mid-season last year. Top two whipping boys currently are Davis and Dorsey. 

Edited by Sammy Watkins' Rib
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Chaos said:

It appears that Allen is by far the best “teammate” in Bills history.  He is like 10 wins above replacement but never ***** about crap protection , second rate offensive weapons and HC/DC/defense choking.  So he becomes a lightning rod for ridiculous criticisms. He is the only player in the NFL judged against “perfect”

on a regular basis. 

 

In fairness one of Josh's great strengths and probably the reason he is who he is - he judges HIMSELF against perfect. Nobody needs to tell Josh when he has screwed up. If anything at times I think he is too hard on himself. Certainly earlier in his career he would beat himself up after mistakes to the extent he would press too much. It still happens occasionally but he has got much better at moving on to the next play. But Josh expects perfection from himself and he isn't satisfied when he doesn't attain it.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

In fairness one of Josh's great strengths and probably the reason he is who he is - he judges HIMSELF against perfect. Nobody needs to tell Josh when he has screwed up. If anything at times I think he is too hard on himself. Certainly earlier in his career he would beat himself up after mistakes to the extent he would press too much. It still happens occasionally but he has got much better at moving on to the next play. But Josh expects perfection from himself and he isn't satisfied when he doesn't attain it.

Fortunately the GM and Coach both found time and occassion in the off season to callout Allen for his aggressive running style. Because that is why the Bills can't get past the division round of playoff games.  

Edited by Chaos
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, gonzo1105 said:

He’s the type of WR who will be a 2 here, have a good year. Some team will pay him to be a 1 and he’ll be a failure 

 

That's what could have happened.

 

He's the modern Alvin Harper type for sure.

 

Back in the early 90's very few teams had 2 solid CB's...........the Bills made it to 4 straight SB's with only 1 of them..........so if you had a stud RB and stud WR1 your WR2 could EAT.    Which Alvin Harper did and he then got PAID to be WR1 in Tampa and to this day remains their worst UFA signing ever.

 

Today,  there are a lot more dudes in the secondary........and all those stud offensive players gotta' be receiving targets in order for the 3rd best offensive player to get the favorable matchups in the secondary.

 

Davis moving to WR2 by his lonesome doubly exposed him because he often had to face CB1's as teams chose to double Diggs with CB2.    If Davis had hit free agency after the 2021 season he would likely have surpassed the Christian Kirk contract numbers and been a Harper-esque bust.

 

If he had hit UFA after getting fully exposed this past season he would have been lucky to get the deal Marques Valdes-Scantling got in KC.

 

 

295134.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
5 hours ago, Commish said:

Great analysis by Locked On Bills of Gabe Davis just released. Bottom line, he lacks the skill set needed to get open on short and intermediate route, and he's got poor hands:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DuKno8cC2E

Fair, balanced assessment: he's best at longer routes because it takes him time to build up speed. He's a "horizontal clapper" as a catcher which is inherently going to end up with more drops than if he set up a "catching diamond" to nestle the ball. He is good at putting himself in position to catch the ball, which is probably why folks get frustrated when it results in a relatively high drop rate. Marino thinks Davis is a great WR4 in a high volume passing offense. He's a mixed quality WR2 and most of his deficiencies are probably not going to be fixed just by Davis being healthy.

 

Aside: Marino really does look like Josh Allen's pudgy brother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/31/2023 at 11:29 AM, Beck Water said:

 

We'll have to agree to disagree there.  I think Beasley was being held before the ball got there, and should have played the ball differently - extended his hands for the catch instead of trying to body-catch it, possibly taken a step towards the throw - both of which might have made the holding more obvious to the refs.  Josh was forcing it a bit, but not outrageous like some of his other INTs.

 

But, IMHO, the majority of Josh's INTs were far more on Josh than on the WR, poor decisions or poor throws.  And I don't say this because I'm historically easy on WR and hard on Josh - to the contrary.

I agree, but let's be careful on this board. I don't think we're allowed to criticize Josh. 🤷‍♂️

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/20/2023 at 9:46 AM, GunnerBill said:

Do the Bills? No. Do Bills fans? Yes, some. He is a lower end #2 receiver but there are folks on here saying he is a #3 or a #4 and that is plain wrong. Spotrac's projections are not always my cup of tea but Michael Gallop as a comparator for Gabe makes a ton of sense. Similar level of player. A lower end #2 who makes big plays but has a low catch rate. 

50% catch rate, BIG long drops in hands, can't blame ankle for that, he was there and catch's were easy.

 

He blocks well but is 1 dimensional route runner WR. Not saying get rid of him but Shakir and the two other WR's picked up should be complete open competition for 2,3,4.

 

Shakir, Harty, Sherfield offer run after catch too.

 

I see Sherfield winning this out after Miami campaign.

 

The end, I see Diggs, Sherfield as main guys with Shakir at Slot. Davis in on run downs to block as number 2 guy. Going deep, Harty comes in slot 3rd and long with TE out there.

We have SPEED now in WR's and RB's. Teams will not be able to pack 8 in box anymore. Look for a lot more inside plays with many more run after catch TD's

 

 

 

 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/1/2023 at 1:51 PM, BADOLBILZ said:

 

That's what could have happened.

 

He's the modern Alvin Harper type for sure.

 

Back in the early 90's very few teams had 2 solid CB's...........the Bills made it to 4 straight SB's with only 1 of them..........so if you had a stud RB and stud WR1 your WR2 could EAT.    Which Alvin Harper did and he then got PAID to be WR1 in Tampa and to this day remains their worst UFA signing ever.

 

Today,  there are a lot more dudes in the secondary........and all those stud offensive players gotta' be receiving targets in order for the 3rd best offensive player to get the favorable matchups in the secondary.

 

Davis moving to WR2 by his lonesome doubly exposed him because he often had to face CB1's as teams chose to double Diggs with CB2.    If Davis had hit free agency after the 2021 season he would likely have surpassed the Christian Kirk contract numbers and been a Harper-esque bust.

 

If he had hit UFA after getting fully exposed this past season he would have been lucky to get the deal Marques Valdes-Scantling got in KC.

 

 

295134.jpeg

Bills in the 90's always had great Safeties and Nickles. Bills to date just got two great CB's possible. few teams can pay for two Top CB's.

 

No difference except use of running back.

 

Bills had Reed, Lofton, Beebe outside. TE's, McKellar and Metzelaars. Add Thomas, that TEAM would destroy today's defenses.

 

Kelly would use Thomas screens and draws cause no one could stay in the box with WR/TE talent. Cut back runner is the key, can't tackle Thomas in the open. Stout enough to run inside for 4 yards. One of the best ever catch RB's too. Tied Jim Brown years in a row all Purpose Yards in NFL.

 

Now, Josh is a different breed than anyone but maybe Elway early on. But even Josh is a much better Athlete. Young and Mahomes a lot alike.

 

You have to incorporate running game. You get up, you need to run out the clock and maintain possession. Bad weather, need to RUN. Team with good pass defense, need Play Action, screens.

 

Bills are set up for this now with Cook/Harris. Let's see how SMART Dorsey is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/30/2023 at 9:23 AM, Dr. Who said:

What do you make of the argument that deficiencies at slot were what really caused more problems? If so, are you satisfied Shakir and Harty, perhaps, sufficiently address that issue? I surmise Downs could be a superior slot receiver (he's my fourth wr, but the only one likely to be available for the Bills to select imo.) What do you think about grabbing a fella like Kayshon Boutte later in the draft as a possible wr2 candidate down the road?

No rookie in this draft class is beating out Sherfield, Shakir, Harty or Davis. Even if drafted 1st round, McDermott doesn't view Rookies that way unless a MUST. We have plenty of WR options, speed and run after the catch. Also proof what we have can play in NFL except for really Shakir. Shakir has a year in NFL though and knows now what it takes.

 

Sherfield is the GUY. 6'1" fast, great hands and can run after the catch. He will be Hybrid slot/long WR that Andre Reed was. That also will free Diggs long cause the best CB will be on Diggs alone.  Sherfield will get safety, have to watch cause of the run after catch.

 

Shakir and Davis will fight for WR three.

 

Harty will have WR4 no matter what, he is a smaller but faster Sherfield and will reek havoc like Hill on the field.

 

People are underestimating what Beane has done here. All 3 RB's have speed and can take it to the Top. So can Sherfield, Harty and Shakir.

 

With the Middle shored up, Josh can deliver quick screens, Tackles are good enough to HOLD for 3 secs.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...