Jump to content

A flag would have been nice too


Draconator

Recommended Posts

Just now, Steptide said:

Would've rather had a flag for illegal motion on the Kelce td in OT 


i posted this like 5 minutes after the game. It was plain as day to see how they didn’t re-set. Just a really clear penalty. 

Just now, Success said:

 

 

I thought the officials actually did a great job the whole game.

 


Agreed. They let them play. Refs were a non-factor, which is what I prefer. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Miyagi-Do Karate said:

Would the TD have counted? He technically taunted while the play was occurring and before he reached the endzone. If called, would it have negated the play? 

I think the answer is "YES" even though everyone around here seems to be treating it as a dead ball foul.


It wouldn't have been; it's just that normally taunting is a dead ball foul b/c it occurs after the TD is scored.

 

The TD would have been negated and LOS moved back 15 yards.

 

 

  • Disagree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

I think the answer is "YES" even though everyone around here seems to be treating it as a dead ball foul.


It wouldn't have been; it's just that normally taunting is a dead ball foul b/c it occurs after the TD is scored.

 

The TD would have been negated and LOS moved back 15 yards.

 

 

Nope

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TD would have counted and the 15 yards would've been enforced on either the PAT or the kickoff 

 

ARTICLE 9. DEAD BALL FOUL AND FOUL BETWEEN DOWNS

A Dead Ball Foul is a foul that occurs in the continuing action after a down ends, or a taunting foul that occurs at any time. The penalty for a Dead Ball Foul is enforced from the succeeding spot, and the down counts.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the taunting penalty is dumb for a bunch of reasons. One is that it’s football. The other is that is is subjectively enforced differently in the same game. 
 

But this one makes me really mad. The penalty literally exists because of Tyreek and the peace sign. If you don’t flag him for that, WTF is the point of ever throwing a flag. 
 

In this instance, really want the flag because of TH history with the rule. But I also want the rule to go away. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, f0neguy said:

A possible reason to care is the extra point would have been backed up 15 yards.   If the extra point was missed then KC would not have been able to tie the game with a field goal.   So yeah, I kind of cared about the non call…

This is an excellent point and yet another possible twist in this game on the lack of call. I appreciated that the refs took a step back in this game and didnt call the usual BS or ticky tack calls for EVERYTHING. But this was textbook taunting and definitely should have been called as it was ALL season. If KC misses the subsequent extra point then the Bills score their TD then all of a sudden its a 4 pt lead, we kick it deep through the endzone and play the same defense that we did (now actually appropriate to the situation) and its game over.  So many what ifs in this game!

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...