Jump to content

2nd Half Defense: What Happened


RyanC883

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, Jobot said:

So Ben had to sacrifice his body and put his season at risk to put up 16 points in a week 1 game... The Steeler's season or any bid at the playoffs is unofficially over because he's not lasting close to 17 games.

 

I would MUCH rather have played them in the back half of the season. Much like last year, I think they will start fast and fade as Ben does. I won’t say they can’t make the playoffs, but Ben is not aging like Brady because he’s never been that committed. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, BillsVet said:

 

Hence why investing in more high dollar defenders other than at CB and DE is often a bad investment.  One would hope the HC's defensive pedigree would slowly retreat toward accepting this, but it has not. 

Milano was the best cover guy on the field yesterday, fwiw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Bills defense will be more like the second half defense we saw yesterday.  Once Pittsburgh started pushing the ball somewhat down field more and putting pressure on our secondary they crumbled.  Levi Wallace is a major liability.  

Edited by CaptnCoke11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RobbRiddick said:

To be honest there were a lot of plays where Pitt just made a great play. There was one where White had great coverage and they still managed to complete it. Sometimes things just go that way.

This was pretty much how I saw it.  There were quite a few plays where the Pittsburgh receiver managed to come down with the ball despite extremely good coverage.  That or they drew a flag.  I lost count of the number of those plays that allowed a drive to continue -- I'm sure it was only just a few, but they were critical and led directly to points, and they were also kind of flukey.  I can't say that I'm concerned at all about the defense after yesterdays game, except maybe for CB2 but that's not why we lost. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

I would MUCH rather have played them in the back half of the season. Much like last year, I think they will start fast and fade as Ben does. I won’t say they can’t make the playoffs, but Ben is not aging like Brady because he’s never been that committed. 

 

Agreed, they'll be in the wild-card hunt, I can see that falling either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaptnCoke11 said:

I think the Bills defense will be more like the second half defense we saw yesterday.  Once Pittsburgh started pushing the ball somewhat down field more and putting pressure on our secondary they crumbled.  Levi Wallace is a major liability.  

 

Ben had one wide open big play that I can remember... he evaded pressure and hit Friermuth for a big gain.

 

Other than that, Claypool made a great contest catch for a big gain.  They got an iffy, but earned PI on Levi for a big play.  Diontae Johnson made a great play for a TD that was well defended.  Juju made a contested catch to basically seal the game.  

 

I think our Defense has Top 10 potential.  You can have a bad taste in your mouth from 16 second half points, but they still held them to 16 total offensive points.  Good teams make plays.... they did.  Only one of their big second half plays resembled a "crumbling" defense...and when QB's evade pressure, sometimes guys pop open....like on the Freiermuth play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

D wasn’t a problem they got a gift in that defensive holding call and Claypool running back into Wallace drawing a PI and also  got great field position just about every drive in the second half cause the bills went for it twice 

 

I think this is largely correct, if we can take a dispassionate view.  The Bills left way too much on the table yesterday, between bad decisions (Daboll, if you want a crack at a HC gig, stop being too clever by half) and poor execution, this was a game they probably should have won, but ultimately got beat by a better team who were better prepared

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Tight end seem route, and whoever Levi Wallace was supposed to cover seemed to be where they attacked with success. 

Yep, another season with just above average Wallace. I’ve always liked the guy, and an incredible UDFA story, but he hasn’t ever once given reason why his spot cannot be improved upon. A lot of our secondary issues were clouded by the DL conversation in the off-season and somehow needing to drastically improve a pass rush that ranked 5th in pressure rate last season… Holding them to 16 points is a great showing, but that offense wasn’t close to being the best we’ll see this season either.

 

Not much to be done about it at this point, but I’m just waiting for our first round DB/S pick next year given how much room there is to improve here. Dane is also a great promising depth guy, and both are worth keeping on the roster, but DB2 has room to be improved dramatically.

Edited by ctk232
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, SCBills said:

 

Ben had one wide open big play that I can remember... he evaded pressure and hit Friermuth for a big gain.

 

Other than that, Claypool made a great contest catch for a big gain.  They got an iffy, but earned PI on Levi for a big play.  Diontae Johnson made a great play for a TD that was well defended.  Juju made a contested catch to basically seal the game.  

 

I think our Defense has Top 10 potential.  You can have a bad taste in your mouth from 16 second half points, but they still held them to 16 total offensive points.  Good teams make plays.... they did.  Only one of their big second half plays resembled a "crumbling" defense...and when QB's evade pressure, sometimes guys pop open....like on the Freiermuth play. 

Overall the defense was solid. However, how much of it was due to the Pittsburgh offense? Pitt has lots of new faces and changes. New coordinator, rookie rb, and an average Oline. Ben on the road isn't nearly as good either. We still lacked a consistent pass rush, failed to get sacks or turnovers. Couldn't stop them when it counted at the end of the game. With that said, the offense, poor coaching, preparation, game plan, play calling, and one special teams play lost the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 78thealltimegreat said:

D wasn’t a problem they got a gift in that defensive holding call and Claypool running back into Wallace drawing a PI and also  got great field position just about every drive in the second half cause the bills went for it twice 

I will disagree wit yam  mundane morn armchair qb style, cuz when it was crunch time, the D let the Steelers move the ball, get first downs and eat clock and kick some FGs, a championship caliber D will make a stand, hold the line, get the ball back to the O for a chance to win the game, the D did not pick up the O...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

3 hours ago, RyanC883 said:

I thought it was bad, but it was like 2 different halves.  Per NFL.com, "The Steelers scored 23 points after trailing 10-0 at halftime.  On their last four drives, they generated 231 yards and 13 first downs after opening the game with 22 yards and three first downs on their first 14 plays (6 drives)."  

 

I have no idea, wondering what everyone else thinks.  

 

The Steelers are not an elite offense by any means (Ben did not hit anyone over 20 air yards), and they started 4 new offensive lineman.  

 

As much as Daboll is rightfully taking flack for his game planning, what happened to the D?

 

 

I have been saying it for years there is two different types of philosophy on defense.  There is Frazier's way which is awful and it is like playing prevent defense every down and by the players reaction to it they don't want to play in it  they always look lost in it will average 2 sacks or none at all.  McDermott, way is a aggressive style without alot of blitzing but they stunt all over the line causing confusion with the opposing qb players love this and seem to be around the ball every down it averages about 6 sacks and more a game. I just wish McDermott would just call the defensive plays and stop covering for Frazier who the game has passed him by.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RyanC883 said:

I thought it was bad, but it was like 2 different halves.  Per NFL.com, "The Steelers scored 23 points after trailing 10-0 at halftime.  On their last four drives, they generated 231 yards and 13 first downs after opening the game with 22 yards and three first downs on their first 14 plays (6 drives)."  

 

I have no idea, wondering what everyone else thinks.  

 

The Steelers are not an elite offense by any means (Ben did not hit anyone over 20 air yards), and they started 4 new offensive lineman.  

 

As much as Daboll is rightfully taking flack for his game planning, what happened to the D?

 

 


defense allowed 16 pts.

 

Pittsburgh TD was helped with a questionable PI call and they started the drive from around the 45.

 

the offense missed on a few plays that would have been the difference

 

then There was Tre phantom penalty that negated the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CincyBillsFan said:

I think two opposing things can be true at the same time:

 

1) The Bills D was not the main reason they lost.  They only gave up 16 points.

 

2) The 2nd half performance by the Bills D did contribute greatly to the loss.

 

The D allowed Pittsburgh to score 13 points on their first 3 drives of the 2nd half.  All three drives were long, time consuming drives that robbed the Bills of at least one and possibly two offensive possessions.

 

Now if the offense was firing on all cylinders it wouldn't have mattered.  But given the type of game it was the D's let up in the 2nd half combined with the blocked punt TD were major contributors to the loss.

 

Over the course of a long season the offense will win some games 38 - 31 but there are going to be times when the O is misfiring and we'll have to win a game 16 - 13.  Yesterday was a prime example of this.  And this thread is correct to point it out.

 

 

 

Not completely untrue, but some major things to consider.

 

1. 1st half our defense played way better than expected. To shut out a team with as many weapons as Steelers have is not easy.

 

2. Giving up 16 points in a single half, on paper seems below average.   But consider that Steelers were given great field position on 3 separate occasions (turnover and 2 4th down missed conversions).  Also, a couple key penalties provided them and extended drives/points.  Both penalties (White holding and Wallace PI) were questionable at best

 

3.  3 FGs and just 1 TD.  That's what our defense surrendered to a team with a HOF QB, a top 5 skille position group, and a new off coordinator that brings challenges to prepare for

 

Bottom line, nobody should be questioning the defense or its performance.  This was all on the offense/poor execution, poor pass protection by oline, 1 ST blunder, and 2-3 very bad playcalls that gave Pitt the momentum back.

 

We should have been leading by 14+ points after our 1st half defensive performance, and the great return by Isaih to start the game. 

 

On to week 2.  Up to the coaches and players to learn from these mistakes and become a better team from it.  Sometimes these losses can be the catalyst needed, or the measuring stick, to adjust future gameplans or personnel.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...