Jump to content

Bills in on Gerald Everett (Gronk considered an offer from us)


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

That strategy brings you Knox, Lonnie Johnson, Shawn Nelson, Bobby Collins, Derek Fine, Dan O'Leary, Tim Euhus,  Nick O'Leary, Derek Schouman, Chris Gragg, Sheldon Jackson, Tommy Sweeney.....

Also brings you Travis Kelce, George Kittle, Jimmy Graham, Darren Waller, Antonio Gates (undrafted), Dallas Goedirt...

 

Just because WE haven't hit on a mid-rd TE, doesn't mean it doesn't happen...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

He was and is my top FA target at TE on the market.  Yes I had him ranked higher than both Hunter Henry and Jonnu Smith.  
 

I would love to sign him.

Just wondering Why?  He can’t block and is basically a WR, similar to knox. He and knox in 2 TE sets doesn’t create much of a threat  for our run game.  DCs can still focus on the pass.  I don’t see why we would want another move TE.  I’d prefer a TE that can be an asset in the run game and pass game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

That strategy brings you Knox, Lonnie Johnson, Shawn Nelson, Bobby Collins, Derek Fine, Dan O'Leary, Tim Euhus,  Nick O'Leary, Derek Schouman, Chris Gragg, Sheldon Jackson, Tommy Sweeney.....

You realize the free agent option we are talking about is Gerald Everett right? We are not talking about signing Travis Kelce vs a mid round pick. Obviously I'd love a stud TE. I'm not paying Everett $12M to come in and be slightly better than Knox. A draft pick is a better option. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Process said:

I wanted Everett going into FA but if he's going to get crazy money like some of these other guys then forget it. Would rather spend a little more and get someone like Samuel or Fuller, and then spend a mid-late rd pick on a TE.

Agreed on Samuel. I think he's going to get crazy money from someone, but Curtis Samuel would be an outstanding weapon and a perfect fit on the Bills. He would be an upgrade/replacement for John Brown and Isiah McKenzie and provides some rushing ability as well (41 carries in 2020). 

 

I know our cap space is somewhat tight, but I'm sure we could find a way to make it work. Still some money that could be freed up by restructures and a possible Lee Smith retirement. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dont Stop Billeiving said:

Agreed on Samuel. I think he's going to get crazy money from someone, but Curtis Samuel would be an outstanding weapon and a perfect fit on the Bills. He would be an upgrade/replacement for John Brown and Isiah McKenzie and provides some rushing ability as well (41 carries in 2020). 

 

I know our cap space is somewhat tight, but I'm sure we could find a way to make it work. Still some money that could be freed up by restructures and a possible Lee Smith retirement. 

I’d MUCH rather pay Samuel or Golladay big bucks that gerald frigin Everett. Ugh.  I’d be ill if we pay that dude 10m + aav.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NewEra said:

I’d MUCH rather pay Samuel or Golladay big bucks that gerald frigin Everett. Ugh.  I’d be ill if we pay that dude 10m + aav.  

 

8 minutes ago, Process said:

You realize the free agent option we are talking about is Gerald Everett right? We are not talking about signing Travis Kelce vs a mid round pick. Obviously I'd love a stud TE. I'm not paying Everett $12M to come in and be slightly better than Knox. A draft pick is a better option. 

What if we get him in at  $6-8 million? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NewEra said:

Just wondering Why?  He can’t block and is basically a WR, similar to knox. He and knox in 2 TE sets doesn’t create much of a threat  for our run game.  DCs can still focus on the pass.  I don’t see why we would want another move TE.  I’d prefer a TE that can be an asset in the run game and pass game.  


Everett is a significant upgrade to Knox in the passing game.  Pairing his athleticism with Allen would be a mismatch all over the field.  
 

He’s not a dynamic blocker, but he’s also not as bad as advertised.  We can always sign a blocking TE for more run game support.

 

And given Daboll is back, I’m not expecting the offense to be a lot different in philosophy next year, so I think the fact he’s got potential to a major threat for Allen in the passing game is more important attribute.  

5 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I’d MUCH rather pay Samuel or Golladay big bucks that gerald frigin Everett. Ugh.  I’d be ill if we pay that dude 10m + aav.  


I don’t think Beane will pay any TE that kind of money this year.

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

We'll see I guess.

 

 

Joe B article in the Athletic

 

Strengths:

 

Weaknesses:

 

Slender frame? 6'3" 240. Guess thats not huge for a TE but ive always thought he looked pretty damn big on the field.  Seems like the Rams were always on national tv for 2 years, seen him play alot.  Hes criminally under used IMO.  Withh mcvay there youd think they could scheme him in more, but maybe Dabs can do better?  I could be wrong here, i like the player a lot but the TE market is a little inflated right now, i dont think we have any chance at him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

 

What if we get him in at  $6-8 million? 

As long as we can still add one of the top pass rushers.  
 

I’m just not a fan of spending our resources on a TE similar to the one we have.  I’d like to add a TE we can pair with knox on 2TE sets so we can be more multidimensional.  I don’t think running the ball with both of those guys blocking will help our run game in the least.  
 

don’t get me wrong, I think Everett is dangerous as a pass catcher and with the ball in his hand....i was just hoping for more.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Reed83HOF changed the title to Bills in on Gerald Everett (Gronk considered an offer from us)
22 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:


Everett is a significant upgrade to Knox in the passing game.  Pairing his athleticism with Allen would be a mismatch all over the field.  
 

He’s not a dynamic blocker, but he’s also not as bad as advertised.  We can always sign a blocking TE for more run game support.

 

And given Daboll is back, I’m not expecting the offense to be a lot different in philosophy next year, so I think the fact he’s got potential to a major threat for Allen in the passing game is more important attribute.  


I don’t think Beane will pay any TE that kind of money this year.

I hope our offense runs more 2TE sets because I don’t think that our OL will be able to run block very well and our RBs are just ok.  I feel that we’ll have to manufacture a better run game with confusion and some 2TE rpos 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewEra said:

I hope our offense runs more 2TE sets because I don’t think that our OL will be able to run block very well and our RBs are just ok.  I feel that we’ll have to manufacture a better run game with confusion and some 2TE rpos 

🤔 

 

I think you are on to something

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, glazeduck said:

Also brings you Travis Kelce, George Kittle, Jimmy Graham, Darren Waller, Antonio Gates (undrafted), Dallas Goedirt...

 

Just because WE haven't hit on a mid-rd TE, doesn't mean it doesn't happen...

Just means it happens, but not to us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I hope our offense runs more 2TE sets because I don’t think that our OL will be able to run block very well and our RBs are just ok.  I feel that we’ll have to manufacture a better run game with confusion and some 2TE rpos 

 

Me too, and the he duo of Everett as TE1 and Knox as TE2 would be a nightmare matchup in terms of athleticism.  Add in having to cover Beasley out of the slot and Diggs, not to mention spying Allen and that’s a lot of pressure from a 2 TE set you can put on the defense.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Me too, and the he duo of Everett as TE1 and Knox as TE2 would be a nightmare matchup in terms of athleticism.  Add in having to cover Beasley out of the slot and Diggs, not to mention spying Allen and that’s a lot of pressure from a 2 TE set you can put on the defense.


They’d just play dime because there is no running game threat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Me too, and the he duo of Everett as TE1 and Knox as TE2 would be a nightmare matchup in terms of athleticism.  Add in having to cover Beasley out of the slot and Diggs, not to mention spying Allen and that’s a lot of pressure from a 2 TE set you can put on the defense.

It would be a matchup problem in terms of athleticism and in the pass game....but defenses will still be able to gameplan to stop the pass in those situations because neither of them are good blockers. Chances are, one of them will miss their blocks and that’s all it takes.  That’s what happened to us all season. One guy misses the block and the play is blown.

 

I do like the thought of Everett and knox in the run after the catch.  TE screens and even TE jet sweeps. I don’t hate the player....I’m just worried that spending 8-10M on a TE that can’t block will keep us from adding in other areas.  I’d rather have Patrick Peterson and/or a pass rusher. Let’s hope we can get both a TE and help in D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


They’d just play dime because there is no running game threat. 


Good luck covering Everett with a small DB.  

2 minutes ago, NewEra said:

It would be a matchup problem in terms of athleticism and in the pass game....but defenses will still be able to gameplan to stop the pass in those situations because neither of them are good blockers. Chances are, one of them will miss their blocks and that’s all it takes.  That’s what happened to us all season. One guy misses the block and the play is blown.

 

I do like the thought of Everett and knox in the run after the catch.  TE screens and even TE jet sweeps. I don’t hate the player....I’m just worried that spending 8-10M on a TE that can’t block will keep us from adding in other areas.  I’d rather have Patrick Peterson and/or a pass rusher. Let’s hope we can get both a TE and help in D


Don’t get me wrong, I’m not willing to over pay Everett.  I’d be cool with $8M, but I don’t really want to hit double digits just because of cap reasons.

 

But, if you want a TE to block, you don’t have to put both Knox and Everett out there.  You can sign a TE who is more of a pass blocker for those situations, they are cheap.

 

But releasing both Knox and Everett on the play would be tough to defend.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


He’s smaller than Knox. 


He’s a beast, athletic beast.  A small DB isn’t going to cover Garrett effectively.  Trust me, I loved him out of college and Rams are my second team.  I’ve watched a lot of him, he’s better than you think.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Me too, and the he duo of Everett as TE1 and Knox as TE2 would be a nightmare matchup in terms of athleticism.  Add in having to cover Beasley out of the slot and Diggs, not to mention spying Allen and that’s a lot of pressure from a 2 TE set you can put on the defense.

I like the idea, but it doesn’t work with Beasley being a key piece in the offense. A slot receiver just doesn’t fit a 2 TE set. 
 

Perhaps if it’s something they run from time to time, but I can’t see them having Cole on the sidelines observing too often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

I don’t think Beane will pay any TE that kind of money this year.

 

Rumor says Gronkowski had a "similar offer" from the Bills (eg $8M with incentives to $10) before he decided to re-up with Tampa

 

Translation IMO: he used us to inflate his contract with them, but anyway, may shed light on Beane's thinking of his market price for a TE

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TOboy said:

I like the idea, but it doesn’t work with Beasley being a key piece in the offense. A slot receiver just doesn’t fit a 2 TE set. 
 

Perhaps if it’s something they run from time to time, but I can’t see them having Cole on the sidelines observing too often.


Daboll is very creative, I can see him having Beasley out there as well.  They don’t always line him in the slot and move him around a lot.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:


Good luck covering Everett with a small DB.  


Don’t get me wrong, I’m not willing to over pay Everett.  I’d be cool with $8M, but I don’t really want to hit double digits just because of cap reasons.

 

But, if you want a TE to block, you don’t have to put both Knox and Everett out there.  You can sign a TE who is more of a pass blocker for those situations, they are cheap.

 

But releasing both Knox and Everett on the play would be tough to defend.  

I don’t think it works like that.  We had that last year with Lee Smith.  We still weren’t able to or were reluctant to run.  When the blocking TE is out there, the D will just leave him alone, like they did with Smith (and sometimes even knox).  
 

I want to run 2TE sets so we can keep the D off balance and be multidimensional.  Having the ability to run and pass.  When we have a TE out there who is useless in the pass game, it doesn’t keep them off balance.   
 

jmo

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Rumor says Gronkowski had a "similar offer" from the Bills (eg $8M with incentives to $10) before he decided to re-up with Tampa

 

Translation IMO: he used us to inflate his contract with them, but anyway, may shed light on Beane's thinking of his market price for a TE


Yeah I’m thinking he’s targeting $8m range with incentives personally, and I’m cool with that.  I could stomach $10m, but I doubt he goes over $10m for any TE out there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Alphadawg7 said:


He’s a beast, athletic beast.  A small DB isn’t going to cover Garrett effectively.  Trust me, I loved him out of college and Rams are my second team.  I’ve watched a lot of him, he’s better than you think.  


I don’t have much of opinion on him, I’m fine giving it a shot, just saying replacing a WR with a tweener TE isn’t scaring anyone. If he is and upgrade to knox, then go for it and knox can ride the bench. 
 

what’s  this noise about small hands btw?? 😆 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NewEra said:

I don’t think it works like that.  We had that last year with Lee Smith.  We still weren’t able to or were reluctant to run.  When the blocking TE is out there, the D will just leave him alone, like they did with Smith (and sometimes even knox).  
 

I want to run 2TE sets so we can keep the D off balance and be multidimensional.  Having the ability to run and pass.  When we have a TE out there who is useless in the pass game, it doesn’t keep them off balance.   
 

jmo


I don’t think there is anything wrong with your opinion, and mostly agree with it too.

 

But there are not a lot of guys who fit that description, and for me, my higher priority is the TE being a weapon given Dabolls system.  

1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


I don’t have much of opinion on him, I’m fine giving it a shot, just saying replacing a WR with a tweener TE isn’t scaring anyone. If he is and upgrade to knox, then go for it and knox can ride the bench. 
 

what’s  this noise about small hands btw?? 😆 


Im not sure I follow that he’s a tweener though, he’s not small.  He doesn’t have say the weight of a good blocking TE, but we wouldn’t be signing him to for that role.

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...