The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection

[Tenhigh]

On 7/22/2021 at 4:15 PM, SectionC3 said:

I think you meant the Capitol.  You also might want to brush up on that thing called circumstantial evidence.  Or not.  Either way it’s fine with me. 

A pleasant afternoon to you as well.  

It’s sad that Chef Jim Crow, DoQ, and that Deek guy hate America so much that they don’t see a problem

with an attempt to defeat the will of the voters and to overthrow the government.  Maybe you guys could try Myanmar for awhile and see how it goes.  

What's up with the name calling?  

19 hours ago, Doc said:

 

Great Gibbons, you admit that Waters, Booker, Castro and even Pelosi told people to riot.  One lasted 8 months, led to more crime nationally and has a great chance of happening over and over.  The other lasted 8 hours, was self-limited and will never happen again.

 

And the last sentence is silly.  The Capitol police officers at the Capitol had no control over how much security was provided that day.  Again they should be directing their anger at those who rebuffed requests for significantly more security that day, as things likely wouldn't have gotten to the point they did.

 

19 hours ago, 716er said:

 

What's the point of this response?  What did he say that's idiotic?  

[BillStime]

Idiots - this will fail, too... no chance in hellll the Democrats will vote to dethrone Pelosi.

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

                                                        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pelosi gets her puppets for partisan Jan. 6 commission

by David Zukerman

 

The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold, even for The New York Times. This observation refers to the July 22 New York Times story on the Pelosi ban on two Republican congressmen from her Jan. 6 select committee, which now will consist of eight Pelosi puppets.

 

(snip)

 

Let's pause a sec for an instant translation. The "conduct" at issue alluded to apparent concern that the banned representatives would not go along with the biased findings of Pelosi's eight committee puppets, but would insist on issuing a minority (that is to say, dissenting) report, and in Pelosi-world, dissent is not acceptable.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/07/pelosi_gets_her_puppets_for_partisan_jan_6_commission.html

 

 

 

“Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.” - Confucius. 

 

 

 

 

 

[BillStime]

14 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

                                                        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pelosi gets her puppets for partisan Jan. 6 commission

by David Zukerman

 

The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold, even for The New York Times. This observation refers to the July 22 New York Times story on the Pelosi ban on two Republican congressmen from her Jan. 6 select committee, which now will consist of eight Pelosi puppets.

 

(snip)

 

Let's pause a sec for an instant translation. The "conduct" at issue alluded to apparent concern that the banned representatives would not go along with the biased findings of Pelosi's eight committee puppets, but would insist on issuing a minority (that is to say, dissenting) report, and in Pelosi-world, dissent is not acceptable.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/07/pelosi_gets_her_puppets_for_partisan_jan_6_commission.html

 

 

 

“Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.” - Confucius. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Did the GQP not have a chance to vote for a bi partisan commission?

 

So, what are you biching about?

 

 

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

1 hour ago, reddogblitz said:

 

To me this is the crux of the biscuit.

 

Really the only part I care about.  As you say everyone knew something was going to happen.  Why the failure in security?  Normally to try to take over America you need an F15 and a couple of nukes.  But on this day a mob waltzed right in. Got into the chamber and the Speaker's office.

 

I won't go as far as you on the fire thing, but Democrats have made and will continue to make massive hay off of it.  A great fund raising tool.

 

Not convinced democrats were not involved or at least complicit in the riot of 1/6/21.

It is an important question.  Along with a question I posed a couple weeks ago which is given there was no defense in place against "the plot" what actually stopped the "insurrectionists" from taking more serious and damaging actions? 

 

What happened is consistent with looters breaking into a store with no cops in sight and just stealing the gum and candy near the register while leaving the flat screens and home entertainment equipment behind.  It would appear to make no sense and require some level of explanation.

[Frat-Train]

7 hours ago, Bidens_basement said:

These are not Democrats, they are radical left wing marxists who want the country to burn. 

This!  I’m a “Kennedy” Crat.  Personal accountability and serve your country.  What’s happened is a progressive needle has moved so far left that it no longer represents anything close to that anymore.  Today’s liberal (the exact ones Malcolm warned us ALL about 50 years ago), have taken the party hostage.  It’s really showed in spades after the election and it breaks my heart.  Everyone is now focused outward on the problem and nobody is looking inward on the bigger problem.  The good Democrats (Tulsi for example) can’t advance because of their party’s in-fighting and other nefarious things.

 

These aren’t Democrats.  These are liberals.  They’re a different breed.  Mostly white, emotionally unstable and their only perspective is what they’re led to understand through their capitalist-provided, but non-capitalist labeled trough of stupidity.  When every powerful business and wealthy person backs a single side the way we’re seeing…. That’s not a side I’m dumb enough to stand on.  That’s called communism.  And the idiots here that spew their stupidity day in and out just to get a rise are the same idiots leading us into that exact future.  They’re truly too blind to see that they’ve been fooled.  Kennedy saw all of this coming, too and shared it in his great vague speech before he was killed.  Truly unfortunate what my party has become.  Kennedy and Dr King would be disgusted by this.  

Edited July 23, 2021 by Frat-Train

[SoCal Deek]

Huge political miscalculation by Nancy here. With each rejection of a dissenting voice she pounds another nail into the coffin that’ll make anything this committee says or does look totally partisan. I honestly thought she was smarter than that. She’ll get her moment at the microphone and lose the argument.

[BillStime]

18 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Huge political miscalculation by Nancy here. With each rejection of a dissenting voice she pounds another nail into the coffin that’ll make anything this committee says or does look totally partisan. I honestly thought she was smarter than that. She’ll get her moment at the microphone and lose the argument.

 

Nah, this backfired on McCarthy - his cult voted against the bi partisan commission with equal subpoena power.  Enough with the faux outrage.

 

Nancy for the win:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Doc]

In addition to the above stuff (why security was so light that day, whether FBI was involved/egged-on others), the only other thing I care about is whether Trump actually told them to break into the Capitol.  Failing that, it's a dog-and-pony show and a complete waste of time.

[John Adams]

2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Huge political miscalculation by Nancy here. With each rejection of a dissenting voice she pounds another nail into the coffin that’ll make anything this committee says or does look totally partisan. I honestly thought she was smarter than that. She’ll get her moment at the microphone and lose the argument.

The Republicans should request a bipartisan commission with equal numbers of reps from each side and a bunch of other request, get the Dems to agree to that commission. Then back out of that arrangement. 
 

Oh ***** they already did that in the Senate. The Reps are getting exactly what they wanted, which is not a bipartisan inquiry. They want a one sided affair that they can say is biased and fake. 

4 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

                                                        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pelosi gets her puppets for partisan Jan. 6 commission

by David Zukerman

 

The partisan political propaganda is stunning to behold, even for The New York Times. This observation refers to the July 22 New York Times story on the Pelosi ban on two Republican congressmen from her Jan. 6 select committee, which now will consist of eight Pelosi puppets.

 

(snip)

 

Let's pause a sec for an instant translation. The "conduct" at issue alluded to apparent concern that the banned representatives would not go along with the biased findings of Pelosi's eight committee puppets, but would insist on issuing a minority (that is to say, dissenting) report, and in Pelosi-world, dissent is not acceptable.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/07/pelosi_gets_her_puppets_for_partisan_jan_6_commission.html

 

 

 

“Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.” - Confucius. 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright infringement. 

[SoCal Deek]

11 hours ago, John Adams said:

The Republicans should request a bipartisan commission with equal numbers of reps from each side and a bunch of other request, get the Dems to agree to that commission. Then back out of that arrangement. 
 

Oh ***** they already did that in the Senate. The Reps are getting exactly what they wanted, which is not a bipartisan inquiry. They want a one sided affair that they can say is biased and fake. 

Copyright infringement. 

You’re correct. And that’s why I said it’s a huge mistake on Nancy’s part. She’s smarter than that, or at least once was. It’s all a big game of chicken. Nobody will remember how the committee was formed….but the optics of a partisan witch hunt will live on. The findings are doomed for the dumpster fire of history. 

[ALF]

'Almost giddy': Author describes Trump during Capitol riot

 

Carol Leonnig, a co-author of the book "I Alone Can Fix It," describes how former President Donald Trump reacted while he was watching the January 6 Capitol riot unfold on TV from inside the White House.

 

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/07/23/carol-leonnig-trump-capitol-riot-tv-sot-vpx-newday.cnn

[Beach]

26 minutes ago, ALF said:

'Almost giddy': Author describes Trump during Capitol riot

 

Carol Leonnig, a co-author of the book "I Alone Can Fix It," describes how former President Donald Trump reacted while he was watching the January 6 Capitol riot unfold on TV from inside the White House.

 

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/07/23/carol-leonnig-trump-capitol-riot-tv-sot-vpx-newday.cnn

i cant even imagine what " almost giddy" would look like.  "almost anything" means nothing to me.

[SectionC3]

12 hours ago, Doc said:

In addition to the above stuff (why security was so light that day, whether FBI was involved/egged-on others), the only other thing I care about is whether Trump actually told them to break into the Capitol.  Failing that, it's a dog-and-pony show and a complete waste of time.

Looks like you read one of my recent posts and decided to join the literalists. 

[Chef Jim]

26 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Looks like you read one of my recent posts and decided to join the literalists. 

 

You give yourself way too much credit counselor.

 

Besides your words were "Storm the Capitol".

 

Literalists.  

Edited July 24, 2021 by Chef Jim

[Unforgiven]

8 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Looks like you read one of my recent posts and decided to join the literalists. 

By the literalists do you mean how your dear leader says we are in the middle of a civil war, literally, or no?

Edited July 24, 2021 by Unforgiven

[All_Pro_Bills]

21 hours ago, Doc said:

In addition to the above stuff (why security was so light that day, whether FBI was involved/egged-on others), the only other thing I care about is whether Trump actually told them to break into the Capitol.  Failing that, it's a dog-and-pony show and a complete waste of time.

Wasn't Trump acquitted of this in the 2nd impeachment trial?  Of course some might use the fact it was a Republican Senate that rendered a not guilty verdict without acknowledging the fact the current House "Committee" is stacked with Democrats that have already expressed their view the former President is complicit.

 

So what's the moral here?  Politics and impartial justice are mutually exclusive.    

[BillStime]

 

[Chef Jim]

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

 

 

The last people in the world that should be investigating anything to get to the truth are politicians.  Those that think otherwise have been incredibly duped.   They like their little tools all lined up in their toolsheds.  

[LeGOATski]

1 hour ago, Chef Jim said:

 

The last people in the world that should be investigating anything to get to the truth are politicians.  Those that think otherwise have been incredibly duped.   They like their little tools all lined up in their toolsheds.  

Just a bunch of theater. "When duty calls, I will always answer." Wtf is that?

[Buffalo716]

Clearly the majority of protesters were not violent anarchists

 

When an inside man tries to stir up violence to storm the capital... he gets rebuked, and called a Fed .. a group of violent anarchists would rally behind him

 

Because the majority were going there to peaceful protest..  

 

Its already been proven that Capital police let in people at points.. why couldn't they have plants in the crowd to stir up violence? 

 

It's a tactic that's been used around the world forever. Blame your enemies 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited July 25, 2021 by Buffalo716

[Big Blitz]

1 hour ago, Buffalo716 said:

Clearly the majority of protesters were not violent anarchists

 

When an inside man tries to stir up violence to storm the capital... he gets rebuked, and called a Fed .. a group of violent anarchists would rally behind him

 

Because the majority were going there to peaceful protest..  

 

Its already been proven that Capital police let in people at points.. why couldn't they have plants in the crowd to stir up violence? 

 

It's a tactic that's been used around the world forever. Blame your enemies 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Buffalo716]

1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Literally the same guy from the video I posted trying to incite violence 

 

he was 100% an inside Man... he was not there to protest

[Beach]

there were plenty of people urging others to do this or that, at the time i just thought they were to scared to do it themselves.  after i was in my hotel and saw the footage i started thinking they were phonies

[Chef Jim]

21 minutes ago, Beach said:

there were plenty of people urging others to do this or that, at the time i just thought they were to scared to do it themselves.  after i was in my hotel and saw the footage i started thinking they were phonies

What “this and that” were they urging others to do?

[Beach]

50 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

What “this and that” were they urging others to do?

at first we were told to go right up to the steps and thats where "the speakers would be, the booms are just fireworks and the smoke is just smoke bombs".  another guy was yelling from the top of the stairs for more people to get up there, they needed more numbers.  another guy yelling "take the building if you want to keep your country."  there were others but those stuck with me.  they all had positioned themselves to guide people but not do anything themselves.

 

 

i went to where the "smoke bombs" were and quickly found out what tear gas is like.  i was confused because thats where i thought we were supposed to be and wasnt sure why the police did that.  it sucked because we had been standing and listening to the speeches for hours and i wanted to sit in the chairs we found in that area.  

[Beach]

i didnt see any cops being treated badly, but any media in the area  was ran off really quickly with threats of violence.

[ALF]

Carl Bernstein: Trump is a 'war criminal'

 

In labeling Trump a war criminal, Bernstein specifically pointed to his administration's response to the Covid-19 health crisis and the January 6 Capitol riot. The journalist said it's important to look at the "tens of thousands of people who died because of his homicidal negligence in the pandemic" and his "fomenting a coup to hold on to office."

 

Trump put his own electoral interest above the health of Americans "as they were slaughtered in this pandemic," Bernstein added.
Bernstein has been a very vocal critic of Trump. In February, following the Capitol riot, he told CNN's Anderson Cooper that he considered the ex-president to be the "first seditious president in our history."

 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/25/business/bernstein-trump-reliable/index.html

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

9 hours ago, ALF said:

Carl Bernstein: Trump is a 'war criminal'

 

In labeling Trump a war criminal, Bernstein specifically pointed to his administration's response to the Covid-19 health crisis and the January 6 Capitol riot. The journalist said it's important to look at the "tens of thousands of people who died because of his homicidal negligence in the pandemic" and his "fomenting a coup to hold on to office."

 

Trump put his own electoral interest above the health of Americans "as they were slaughtered in this pandemic," Bernstein added.
Bernstein has been a very vocal critic of Trump. In February, following the Capitol riot, he told CNN's Anderson Cooper that he considered the ex-president to be the "first seditious president in our history."

 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/25/business/bernstein-trump-reliable/index.html

They did this with W Bush and Liz Cheney’s old man.   War for oil, manufactured evidence, young people being sent to Iraq for profit.  
 

Our prez that replaced him, and his VP at the time were all in on that dealio.  Next thing you know, the war for oil president and his accuser were thick as thieves, and the VP—who supported that war is president.  
 

When does one sit back and think “Gee, this is weird?”. 
 

 

Edited July 26, 2021 by leh-nerd skin-erd

[John Adams]

14 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

Clearly the majority of protesters were not violent anarchists

 

When an inside man tries to stir up violence to storm the capital... he gets rebuked, and called a Fed .. a group of violent anarchists would rally behind him

 

Because the majority were going there to peaceful protest..  

 

Its already been proven that Capital police let in people at points.. why couldn't they have plants in the crowd to stir up violence? 

 

It's a tactic that's been used around the world forever. Blame your enemies 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Suspected under cover FBI agent" 

 

You eat this ***** like it's filet mignon. 

 

The guy is from Arizona and is just a kook. 

 

https://amp.azcentral.com/amp/6624406002

 

The usual morans loving your Twitter investigation skills though. 

 

15 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

They did this with W Bush and Liz Cheney’s old man.   War for oil, manufactured evidence, young people being sent to Iraq for profit.  
 

Our prez that replaced him, and his VP at the time we’re all in on that dealio.  Next thing you know, the war for oil president and his accuser were think as thieves, and the VP—who supported that war is president.  
 

When does one sit back and think “Gee, this is weird?”. 
 

 

 

Are you the lead conspiracy guy here now? 

Edited July 26, 2021 by John Adams

[All_Pro_Bills]

19 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

"Suspected under cover FBI agent" 

 

You eat this ***** like it's filet mignon. 

 

The guy is from Arizona and is just a kook. 

 

https://amp.azcentral.com/amp/6624406002

 

The usual morans loving your Twitter investigation skills though. 

 

 

Are you the lead conspiracy guy here now? 

Given the government has proven absolutely nothing to this point and that after 6 months there is still a lack of facts and evidence pushed into the public domain I think its acceptable for posters to throw out theories from all angles.  As facts become available those facts can either support or not support the various scenarios.   And we can dismiss those that are invalidated over time.  These range from suggestions the entire thing was a government set up to the participants were traitors.  I don't see how any of us can conclude we know for sure what did and didn't happen along with motives and intent.  We're still in the discovery phase.  

 

I'm certainly open to the idea I might be dead wrong here and I would hope other posters can take that position too.  it seems the sensible thing given what we don't know.  And what we don't know seems like more than what we do know.  And while I have my biases and inclinations when it comes to a government I see as demonstrating a consistent pattern of abuse of power and a bigger threat to our freedoms than any demonstrations we've witnessed on the left or on the right  I could be wrong here.  And so could the conclusions to this point of anyone else be wrong here too. 

[BillStime]

10 hours ago, Beach said:

at first we were told to go right up to the steps and thats where "the speakers would be, the booms are just fireworks and the smoke is just smoke bombs".  another guy was yelling from the top of the stairs for more people to get up there, they needed more numbers.  another guy yelling "take the building if you want to keep your country."  there were others but those stuck with me.  they all had positioned themselves to guide people but not do anything themselves.

 

 

i went to where the "smoke bombs" were and quickly found out what tear gas is like.  i was confused because thats where i thought we were supposed to be and wasnt sure why the police did that.  it sucked because we had been standing and listening to the speeches for hours and i wanted to sit in the chairs we found in that area.  

 

Your story is truly amazing and... evolving.

  

On 5/30/2021 at 8:38 PM, Beach said:

twisting words again.  i said there were false flags in the mix.  my proof is my own account of what i saw and heard.  we had no idea people even went in the building while we were there.  our phones had no service because of amount of people.  

 

 

On 6/30/2021 at 9:37 PM, Beach said:

nope, and i had no idea that anyone had went in until i got back to the hotel.  phones werent really working because of the amount of people, so i was really surprised what a few idiots did.

 

 

[Westside]

15 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Your story is truly amazing and... evolving.

  

 

 

 

 

Oh the irony…….

[Chef Jim]

16 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Your story is truly amazing and... evolving.

  

 

 

 

 

So wait you’re listening to someone who was actually there vs the “we saw

something on TV” crowd?  
 

His story is not the only thing that’s evolving. 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

39 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

"Suspected under cover FBI agent" 

 

You eat this ***** like it's filet mignon. 

 

The guy is from Arizona and is just a kook. 

 

https://amp.azcentral.com/amp/6624406002

 

The usual morans loving your Twitter investigation skills though. 

 

 

Are you the lead conspiracy guy here now? 

Hard to say—-Elections aren’t until the end of August.  I’m running on the “Rile a liberal simpleton” platform and early returns are promising. 
 

 

[John Adams]

37 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Given the government has proven absolutely nothing to this point and that after 6 months there is still a lack of facts and evidence pushed into the public domain I think its acceptable for posters to throw out theories from all angles. 

 

Oh cool. This seems like a fun way to go through life. 

 

I saw a Tweet where the hedgehogs were behind the attack. Discuss. 

 

37 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

 And we can dismiss those that are invalidated over time. 

 

Invalidate my hedgehog theory. 

 

37 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

These range from suggestions the entire thing was a government set up to the participants were traitors.  I don't see how any of us can conclude we know for sure what did and didn't happen along with motives and intent.  We're still in the discovery phase.  

 

Oh, you're a moran.

 

7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Hard to say—-Elections aren’t until the end of August.  I’m running on the “Rile a liberal simpleton” platform and early returns are promising. 
 

 

 

You're not even in the Troll Pre-School. 

[BillStime]

12 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

So wait you’re listening to someone who was actually there vs the “we saw

something on TV” crowd?  
 

His story is not the only thing that’s evolving. 

Was he there?

 

Why are you purposely failing to acknowledge his previous quotes on the subject?

 

Of course you’re never honest when presented with indisputable evidence - Beach’s own “story”

 

Carry on Jimmy

[Unforgiven]

1 hour ago, John Adams said:

 

"Suspected under cover FBI agent" 

 

You eat this ***** like it's filet mignon. 

 

The guy is from Arizona and is just a kook. 

 

https://amp.azcentral.com/amp/6624406002

 

The usual morans loving your Twitter investigation skills though. 

 

 

 

Yea because the fbi has no history of unusual behavior cough cough conintelpro cough cough

[All_Pro_Bills]

54 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

Oh cool. This seems like a fun way to go through life. 

 

I saw a Tweet where the hedgehogs were behind the attack. Discuss. 

 

 

Invalidate my hedgehog theory. 

 

 

Oh, you're a moran.

 

 

You're not even in the Troll Pre-School. 

For somebody with a lot to say you say a lot of nothing.