Dr. Who Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 50 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Kirk > Picard I don't think this is the progressive default position. Also, I'm not really comfortable with you being correct about something. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 Correct: If America liked that type or person, Hillary would be president. Thankfully for the world, she never will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: Love it. A Trump supporter complaing about corruption. Did you get a degree at Trump U? Are you a Libertarian? not that it matters, but Ivy League. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Ten bucks says Guy Reschenthaler thinks Jerry Sandusky was unfairly convicted. What a fratbro douche. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 #Boomerang 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 I'd like to take this moment to congratulate Ben Cline for placing third on his high school debate team tonight... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: #Boomerang So, it's now guilty until proven innocent? Ok, got it. Pelosi has to lay off the freaking bottle. Being drunk with loose dentures is no way for an old person to go into their twilight years. 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: No it's more like trying to teach imbeciles 2+2=4 and the Trump supporters just answer, No! 2x2 =4 so Trump can't be guilty These Democrats think 1 and 1 is 57, so what's the fvcking difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 I gotta give credit to the Dems for this again. They have singe handedly exposed two professions as frauds: federally elected officials and the bureaucracy AND overeducated useless people kudos!! ? the longer this continues, the more people are waking up. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 ...probably another senior moment, but wasn't there an unwritten rule that children of a President were "off limits" as far as criticism?....yet this Harvard skank (perhaps with her wife's approval) decides to attack Trump's kid Barron?.....no wonder IT was invited to testify with her strong Obama ties.....fair and balanced..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 10 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...probably another senior moment, but wasn't there an unwritten rule that children of a President were "off limits" as far as criticism?....yet this Harvard skank (perhaps with her wife's approval) decides to attack Trump's kid Barron?.....no wonder IT was invited to testify with her strong Obama ties.....fair and balanced..... Payback will make this seem like a walk in the park Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 5 minutes ago, row_33 said: Payback will make this seem like a walk in the park ...LMAO....not an 'effin chance.....they will twist the need to delve into the children to expose the root cause of Trump's dirty deeds, misgivings, failed family life/child upbringing to arrive as the dastardly SOB we're dealing with today..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 I was going to post the other day, when I heard that Jonathan Turley was going to appear, that he's an excellent and balanced law prof and that they made a mistake inviting him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Gomer Pyle couldn’t get a word in at the end there? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 (edited) 42 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...LMAO....not an 'effin chance.....they will twist the need to delve into the children to expose the root cause of Trump's dirty deeds, misgivings, failed family life/child upbringing to arrive as the dastardly SOB we're dealing with today..... No... trump will win in 2020 and with a GOP house will rain a total ***** storm on the Dems in revenge Edited December 4, 2019 by row_33 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, row_33 said: No... trump will win in 2020 and with a GOP house will rain a total ***** strol in the Dems in revenge 1945: the Statue of Liberty is kaput! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 hour ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...probably another senior moment, but wasn't there an unwritten rule that children of a President were "off limits" as far as criticism?....yet this Harvard skank (perhaps with her wife's approval) decides to attack Trump's kid Barron?.....no wonder IT was invited to testify with her strong Obama ties.....fair and balanced..... No, not what happened. Again: she attacked Trump for naming him "Barron" and violating the Constitutional prohibition against titles of nobility, which is not only not "attacking Trump's kid," but is infinitely stupider than that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 I'm disappointed that Godzilla did not once make an appearance during any of those B-rated video clips. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 45 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You know who the real winners are in all this? Her law students, who probably had a couple classes canceled so she could attend this. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/Peoples_Pundit/status/1202373800781893634 https://mobile.twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1202373882960908293 https://mobile.twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1202355721473601536 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Author Share Posted December 4, 2019 Trump election team statement on today: https://mobile.twitter.com/parscale/status/1202373811515142156 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 2 hours ago, Dr. Who said: I don't think this is the progressive default position. Also, I'm not really comfortable with you being correct about something. I know. I feel dirty, dumb and am really rethinking my position on this debate. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 8 hours ago, dubs said: that’s not true. At best it’s unclear. There is precedent for impeachment of district judges for conduct before he was in office. If Dems thought they had him on that, we’d have seen this charade last year. Point is they don’t, and Tibs still can’t point to a single “crime” committed by this president. No one can. He abused the power of his office to extort a foreign ally at war with an adversary to dig up dirt on a political rival at home that would benefit his reelection campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: So... personally hearing things third-hand is no longer the correct legal standard for 'personal knowledge'? 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: From what little I have seen of this, it doesn't appear these idiots have much courtroom/appellate experience. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 14 minutes ago, jrober38 said: He abused the power of his office to extort a foreign ally at war with an adversary to dig up dirt on a political rival at home that would benefit his reelection campaign. Wow, quite literally none of this is true. Amazing. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 3 hours ago, Albwan said: No matter how miserable and messed up it might be at home, today I'm so thankful for what I have and thankful I don't have to come home to or interact with this woman. This kook was thought to be a possible replacement for Scalia by some!? She did not make the short list, but for someone, anyone, to think she was an appropriate candidate for the Supreme Court ... Oy. And here's an article from 2009 with the hopin' and wishin' for her to replace Souter. Makes me wonder if she'd have been on Hillary's list? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transplantbillsfan Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 Seems there's nothing to get ahead of... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 42 minutes ago, jrober38 said: He abused the power of his office to extort a foreign ally at war with an adversary to dig up dirt on a political rival at home that would benefit his reelection campaign. haha. None of this is true. None. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 54 minutes ago, DC Tom said: No, not what happened. Again: she attacked Trump for naming him "Barron" and violating the Constitutional prohibition against titles of nobility, which is not only not "attacking Trump's kid," but is infinitely stupider than that. That’s not the way the game is played by either side. Any mention of any child in any capacity automatically triggers the “Children are off limits” clause. Righteous indignation follows. In the testimony provided today by Phyllis from The Office, she’s part of the resistance and invoking the boy’s name in the impeachment hearing was scripted, intentional, and designed to intimidate him and send a clear message to DJT—no one is off limits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 28 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Wow, quite literally none of this is true. Amazing. You beat me to it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 30 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Wow, quite literally none of this is true. Amazing. He nailed Trump’s preferred pronoun, and we’ll always have that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevbeau Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: You know who the real winners are in all this? Her law students, who probably had a couple classes canceled so she could attend this. Probably near exam time. She’s gonna be all worked up grading now. Edited December 5, 2019 by Kevbeau Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Durham says no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 43 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: Seems there's nothing to get ahead of... The article you linked to is behind a paywall. That's frowned upon here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 Was this posted? If so, mea culpa 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: The article you linked to is behind a paywall. That's frowned upon here. Only if you're triggered. Thanks transplant for the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts