Warren Zevon Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Who is fattest - Huber, Trump, or Barr? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Close! And good morning SC, hope you have a wonderful Trump day Thanks Tibs ...same to you Should be sunny and rather mild here in the Land of the Homeless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Ohhhh I know! Let's take the word of Devlin Barrett of the Washington Post ? lead FBI media leaker for 2½ years for McCabe, Comey, Strzok and the rest of the deep-state-scum at the FBI as gospel the week before the OIG report comes out. I honestly have no idea what is in the upcoming OIG report. Horowitz is not the prosecutor, he is the investigator. There is a criminal investigation going on via Durham. Who is being indicted? I could not tell you. But, this report must be something else for the hard spinning being put out by WaPo and the NYT. 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Durham didn’t expand his scope and travel back and forth to Europe conducting interviews for no reason. He found something . 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 16 minutes ago, B-Man said: Durham didn’t expand his scope and travel back and forth to Europe conducting interviews for no reason. He found something . And Barr did not come out of retirement just to get ***** on by the press. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 24 minutes ago, B-Man said: Durham didn’t expand his scope and travel back and forth to Europe conducting interviews for no reason. He found something . "He was sent to Europe by Giuliani, at Trump's orders, to manufacture evidence for this political hit job! Trump weaponized the DOJ and the IG! Impeach!" [/Democrats] 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Barr’s Disagreement With Horowitz Is How It’s Supposed to Work Reports are beginning to float to the surface that Attorney General Bill Barr — who has been overseeing U.S. Attorney John Durham’s investigation into the origins of the Russia collusion investigation — does not agree with DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s conclusion in his forthcoming report that the FBI had sufficient evidence to open the investigation. That’s a mouthful, I know. But it’s pretty simple, really. According to the Washington Post, Barr is basically saying that Horowitz, confined as he is to examining issues related to the DOJ, doesn’t have the information he and Durham have uncovered as to what other agencies (such as the CIA) and entities may have been doing during the investigation. He doesn’t have all the information, Barr says, so his conclusion might be appropriate within the limited parameters he had to work with, but there’s more to the story. That’s it. It’s not a slam against Horowitz, nor is it a slam against the report necessarily. Simply an acknowledgment — and a necessary one, given the spin-doctoring that’s been happening in the lead up to the report’s release next week — that Horowitz was limited in the scope of his investigation. The behavior is actually how governing is supposed to work, with the players showing respect for each other’s roles and taking care not to step on toes. The Obama administration had a different view of how the intelligence agencies were supposed to work, and Barr seems to be hearkening back to a time before “supersharing” (just made that word up) between agencies was a thing. But don’t take my word for it. South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham warned that if you believe Horowitz and Barr are at odds with each other in their respective upcoming reports, you’re buying into the spin. “Be wary of the Washington Post and the New York Times reporting on what is coming up with Horowitz. They have been trying overtime to spin this thing to diminish its effect, to downplay it,” Graham said Monday. “I can tell you without any hesitation Attorney General Barr has every confidence in the world in Mr. Horowitz,” Graham added. “He believes that he has done a good job, a professional job, and he appreciates the work and the effort he has put into disclosing abuse at the Department of Justice.” https://www.redstate.com/slee/2019/12/03/barrs-disagreement-horowitz-supposed-work/ . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Let's just say that there are 3 entities that are being investigated and Horowitz is investigating only one. Keep things in perspective, people. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: And Barr did not come out of retirement just to get ***** on by the press. Brett Bavre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Trump is so beyond corrupt this gang belongs in jail, not in charge of the greatest republic in history. The fact we will survive this crisis is a testimony to the strength of our country but these people need and deserve punishment. Trump belongs in jail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: Let's just say that there are 3 entities that are being investigated and Horowitz is investigating only one. Keep things in perspective, people. Watching you all brace for the possible good news that no one did something near-treasonous is sad. But amusing too. Keep the narrative alive at all costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Proving again he’s dishonest and hasn’t paid attention to anything said by anyone in these threads. But that’s who he is and what he does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 25 minutes ago, John Adams said: Watching you all brace for the possible good news that no one did something near-treasonous is sad. But amusing too. Keep the narrative alive at all costs. Treason, seriously? Are you picking up Gary's mantle in this thread? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 1 minute ago, GG said: Treason, seriously? Are you picking up Gary's mantle in this thread? you say that as if they are two different people. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 "treason" - definition I didn't like the result of an election, so I'm going to lay down and scream like a 5-year old denied a candy bar in the grocery check-out line for 8-12 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 No one committed any treason, or near-treason. The worst thing anyone did was...racketeering? Jesus, I'd love to see either party hit with a RICO bomb. Or even better: the Clinton Foundation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Just to highlight his hypocrisy and dishonesty — find a single post of him decrying against the MULTIPLE years worth of every media pundit and elected official calling Trump a traitor. You won’t find one. Now, go find any post of mine laying out exactly what Horowitz was going to do — a year before anyone in the media knew he was investigating — and see how that is still in line with what’s happening now. Horowitz = evidence into the public sphere which is undeniable and referrals. Durham, once he was appointed, = indictments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 19 minutes ago, DC Tom said: No one committed any treason, or near-treason. The worst thing anyone did was...racketeering? Jesus, I'd love to see either party hit with a RICO bomb. Or even better: the Clinton Foundation. RICO bomb????? Since when is Gardner Minshew (Uncle RICO) political? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 5 minutes ago, njbuff said: RICO bomb????? Since when is Gardner Minshew (Uncle RICO) political? ? You're an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted December 3, 2019 Share Posted December 3, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: You're an idiot. You would know a thing or two about being an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Just to highlight his hypocrisy and dishonesty — find a single post of him decrying against the MULTIPLE years worth of every media pundit and elected official calling Trump a traitor. You won’t find one. "The Dem impeachment is absurd and not warranted (yet, if ever)." "I have said the impeachment is stupid because there is a lack of info." "I've been saying the impeachment is dumb from the beginning." Took about 15 seconds to find 3 of my posts saying impeachment is dumb. There are more but I only used one search term. I've credited Trump where credit is due (China, judiciary). Unlike you, I can see the other side's good points. Life isn't black and white like a simple movie script. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 More dishonesty. "Multiple years worth of every media pundit and elected official calling Trump a traitor" was in referenced to 3 years of Russia not impeachment. You know... all those years where you were silent when 45 was repeatedly called a literal traitor by sitting members of our government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 6 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: More dishonesty. "Multiple years worth of every media pundit and elected official calling Trump a traitor" was in referenced to 3 years of Russia not impeachment. You know... all those years where you were silent when 45 was repeatedly called a literal traitor by sitting members of our government. So you really want me to link where I said Trump didn't collude with Russia? Because I can and will. You can keep moving the goal posts. I'll still make the kick dumbo. Your belief in your narratives clouds your ability to think critically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/RobertPLewis/status/1202244082199740417 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: "The White House declined the invitation to question the witnesses." ***** you, Nadler. The White House declined because you scheduled the hearing to conflict with an overseas NATO trip. well, i dunno... that is a weak excuse. the President wouldn't be the one questioning but rather White House council. i do however agree that they shouldn't even recognize this sham, in it's current iteration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Karlan's now arguing Trump is guilty of the 1792 definition of "bribery." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 26 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Karlan's now arguing Trump is guilty of the 1792 definition of "bribery." They're just working their way back towards a witch trial. Tomorrows hearing is in a place called Salem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 5 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: They're just working their way back towards a witch trial. Tomorrows hearing is in a place called Salem. better hide Hillary if that's the case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transplantbillsfan Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 1 minute ago, transplantbillsfan said: This is better put here... Explain to me in your own words who Joseph Mifsud is and why he matters. (if you wouldn't mind of course) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 3 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: So he wrote this prequel just because? On 11/19/2019 at 10:14 AM, Deranged Rhino said: Just dropped: https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2019/a20009.pdf 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 10 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Explain to me in your own words who Joseph Mifsud is and why he matters. (if you wouldn't mind of course) What really happened on 9-11 and who was behind it? Dance for me, dance I say! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 18 hours ago, DC Tom said: Karlan's now arguing Trump is guilty of the 1792 definition of "bribery." ...she does look like George......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 2 hours ago, John Adams said: What really happened on 9-11 and who was behind it? Dance for me, dance I say! What is so bad in your real world that you seem compelled to aspire to insufferable prick status here? You're perilously close to being renamed johnAdamSchiff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 ...and this is the type of garbage Stanford employs and Nadless invites to testify?....SMH....... Pamela Karlan says she once crossed the street to avoid a Trump hotel in DC By Danielle Wallace | Fox News The Stanford Law School professor who sparked backlash from the White House Wednesday after invoking the president’s minor son during the first day of the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry previously stated that she once crossed the street just to avoid passing one of President Trump's hotels. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pamela-karlan-trump-hotel-cross-street-impeachment-eric-swalwell-barron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 15 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...and this is the type of garbage Stanford employs and Nadless invites to testify?....SMH....... Pamela Karlan says she once crossed the street to avoid a Trump hotel in DC By Danielle Wallace | Fox News The Stanford Law School professor who sparked backlash from the White House Wednesday after invoking the president’s minor son during the first day of the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry previously stated that she once crossed the street just to avoid passing one of President Trump's hotels. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pamela-karlan-trump-hotel-cross-street-impeachment-eric-swalwell-barron Awwe...,she no like the corrupt President, boo hoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 2 hours ago, John Adams said: What really happened on 9-11 and who was behind it? Dance for me, dance I say! Nothing happened. It was all magic and special effects. The World Trade Center is still there. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts