whatdrought Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 28 minutes ago, B-Man said: ........................... The photograph of RBG that the New York Times used in their report yesterday about RBG returning to the Supreme Court was actually taken last November. We've still seen no current photo. Makes me wonder if she looks even more dead than she has... it’s not likely they could lie about that unless everyone involved with SCOTUS is willing to lie. So they either don’t have a picture from her return (seems unlikely?) or the picture they have is straight outta walking dead level stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 I still believe that she is alive. I do not believe that she is in any condition, or ever will be, to be a working justice on the Supreme Court. . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Well, darn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 (edited) Well so much for the conspiracy theories. On 2/17/2019 at 10:55 PM, B-Man said: I still believe that she is alive. I do not believe that she is in any condition, or ever will be, to be a working justice on the Supreme Court. . That’s a baseless opinion. Edited February 19, 2019 by Crayola64 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 1 minute ago, Crayola64 said: Well so much for the conspiracy theories. Or is it the longest cloning process ever? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 13 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: That’s a baseless opinion. I have been in the medical field for over 40 years, I have helped manage a Senior Center for over the last 10. I have helped countless elderly females after a fall and orthopedic surgery................and how the average person recovers. Did I examine Justice Ginsberg ?......................of course not, but your dismissal of my (rather straightforward) reply above as baseless.............................is (sadly) all too typical. . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 On 2/17/2019 at 11:55 PM, B-Man said: I still believe that she is alive. I do not believe that she is in any condition, or ever will be, to be a working justice on the Supreme Court. . The clerks do almost all the work anyway 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 49 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Or is it the longest cloning process ever? Someone on Twitter today referred to her body being modified and altered to it could continue to exist, and she now goes by the name Ruth Vader Ginsburg. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 47 minutes ago, B-Man said: I have been in the medical field for over 40 years, I have helped manage a Senior Center for over the last 10. I have helped countless elderly females after a fall and orthopedic surgery................and how the average person recovers. Did I examine Justice Ginsberg ?......................of course not, but your dismissal of my (rather straightforward) reply above as baseless.............................is (sadly) all too typical. . You working in the medical field only makes it more ridiculous for you to weigh in on someone’s ability to be a judge, when you know you have zero information about her condition. you shouldn’t have an opinion on her ability to judge, it’s baseless and ridiculous. ”I have medical experience, I have seen people with similar conditions, and based on these facts I have an opinion on someone’s ability to do their job (despite having no personal facts).” Get out of here with your nonsense. i hate to break it to you, but just like the board has crazy liberals that lack any rational and are always anti-conservative, you are the same type of poster with different views. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 On 2/17/2019 at 10:55 PM, B-Man said: I still believe that she is alive. I do not believe that she is in any condition, or ever will be, to be a working justice on the Supreme Court. . Which if you're right begs the question who can take action on her retirement if she can't or is unwilling? Roberts? It's ridiculous that someone of her age and in her health would not have retired on their own already. She must be as miserable a person as she seems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 4 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: You working in the medical field only makes it more ridiculous for you to weigh in on someone’s ability to be a judge In all fairness, you don't need a lot of experience being around 30-pound, 85-year-old post-op lung cancer patients to have a pretty good sense that she most likely has all the mental and physical stamina of a Jello pudding cup. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 Justice Marshall snored throughout most of his last half dozen years sitting there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 16 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: You working in the medical field only makes it more ridiculous for you to weigh in on someone’s ability to be a judge, when you know you have zero information about her condition. you shouldn’t have an opinion on her ability to judge, it’s baseless and ridiculous. ”I have medical experience, I have seen people with similar conditions, and based on these facts I have an opinion on someone’s ability to do their job (despite having no personal facts).” Get out of here with your nonsense. i hate to break it to you, but just like the board has crazy liberals that lack any rational and are always anti-conservative, you are the same type of poster with different views. On the one hand, I think no one should ever sit in judgement of another. But on the other hand, I think, wait, something just feels wrong here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 1 hour ago, LABillzFan said: In all fairness, you don't need a lot of experience being around 30-pound, 85-year-old post-op lung cancer patients to have a pretty good sense that she most likely has all the mental and physical stamina of a Jello pudding cup. Lol, I genuinly think the conspiracy stuff has been funny. And I don’t mind stuff like this (it’s a joke!), but we really don’t know that. She’s an extremely sharp and witty person, and might be just as she was before the surgery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 36 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: She’s an extremely sharp and witty person, and might be just as she was before the surgery I know a couple of ways we can all find out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 45 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: Lol, I genuinly think the conspiracy stuff has been funny. And I don’t mind stuff like this (it’s a joke!), but we really don’t know that. She’s an extremely sharp and witty person, and might be just as she was before the surgery It's true. She MIGHT be as mentally acute now as she was prior to her surgery. There's even media reports of her being seen in a very public forum just a few weeks ago. Though there is no video/photographic evidence of it that has been publicly released. IF she really is still competent to be on the Supreme Court, why not just appear in public & dispel the rumors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 Just now, Taro T said: It's true. She MIGHT be as mentally acute now as she was prior to her surgery. There's even media reports of her being seen in a very public forum just a few weeks ago. Though there is no video/photographic evidence of it that has been publicly released. IF she really is still competent to be on the Supreme Court, why not just appear in public & dispel the rumors? Why in the world should a Supreme Court justice answer to conspiracy theories? She had surgery for cancer, she doesn’t need to prove her brain isn’t mush three months later... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 Just now, Taro T said: IF she really is still competent to be on the Supreme Court, why not just appear in public & dispel the rumors? Because if she really is okay, then the left can play it to their advantage. Look, Melania is out of the scene for two weeks, and CNN has a Melania Watch while others in the media begin to speculate that the reason she isn't around is because Trump beats her. RVG is out of the scene for months, and to compensate for the left's handling of Melania, the right starts to demand to know where Vader is. The longer they wait, the louder the calls become until everyone on the right is wondering where Vader is, and THEN the left rolls her out for an interview and the left explains how the right is full of conspiracy theorists. Notice how the left's latest rage is how the right has jumped all over Obama's daughter for underage wine drinking. A couple of left-leaning pubs are chastising the right for their response to the photo, but literally no one on the right has said anything about Obama's daughter. Even when they don't do anything, the left blames the right. And that's okay because the only other message they have is "Socialism is great, open borders are needed, cows must die, airplanes are not needed, and AOC is their leader." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 hadn't heard a thing about O's kids until i read this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: Why in the world should a Supreme Court justice answer to conspiracy theories? She had surgery for cancer, she doesn’t need to prove her brain isn’t mush three months later... wait... a 85yr old Supreme Court Justice who just had cancer surgery doesn't need to prove she is viable? *****in' bizarro world..... 12 minutes ago, Nanker said: Edited February 19, 2019 by Foxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 Just now, Foxx said: wait... a 85yr old Supreme Court Justice who just had cancer surgery doesn't need to prove she is viable? *****in' bizarro world..... Not to the public she doesnt *****in’ real world... what a weird take man. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 11 minutes ago, row_33 said: hadn't heard a thing about O's kids until i read this PM Boyst. He'll fill you in. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 1 minute ago, Crayola64 said: Why in the world should a Supreme Court justice answer to conspiracy theories? She had surgery for cancer, she doesn’t need to prove her brain isn’t mush three months later... 1st off, never said she has to answer anything. But she supposedly was seen out in public & in relatively good health (considering her age and having survived cancer surgery 2 months prior) a couple of days prior to the SotU address. For some reason, she didn't seem to find attending that to be worthy of her. Which is all within her perogative but does raise questions. But, when an octogenarian that just had cancer surgery goes completely off the grid (minus apparently a single public appearance of which there has been no corroborating evidence presented), questioning whether her competence might be compromised isn't outlandish nor evil. Was she at the SC last week or today? The court's winter break is now over. If she is back on the job, either at the court or wherever she is recovering, the citizens deserve to know. If she isn't, we deserve to know when she's anticipated to return to duty. And should she appear in public & be ok, questions go away. And it will be a 'good for her' moment. Hopefully she is ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 32 minutes ago, Foxx said: wait... a 85yr old Supreme Court Justice who just had cancer surgery doesn't need to prove she is viable? *****in' bizarro world..... Shocked, yes shocked I am that she might wear the same outfit twice in a lifetime! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 It seems like both sides would agree that some form of retirement age ought to be imposed on SCOTUS members... It's downright impossible to believe that the most important decisions in American history can be made by someone who might not be fit to get out of bed... (and I don't just mean this in regards to RBG) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 26 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Shocked, yes shocked I am that she might wear the same outfit twice in a lifetime! good on you for keeping it real. i managed track down both and it is plainly evident by her bodyguards that these are two different videos. this is from April 11, '18 http://www.tmz.com/videos/0_4ssy2zgc/ (won't embed, apologies) this is the (claimed) newest one from Feb 18, '19 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fr52RLByloU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 She's looked good yesterday https://thehill.com/homenews/news/430590-ginsburg-smiles-speaks-in-clear-voice-in-return-to-supreme-court-bench Ginsburg smiles, speaks in clear voice in return to Supreme Court bench BY LYDIA WHEELER - 02/19/19 12:21 PM EST Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stood tall and smiled as she stepped up to the bench for her first oral argument following a surgery in December. The 85-year-old member of the court’s liberal wing was forced to miss arguments in 11 cases during the month of January after two cancerous nodules were removed from her lower left lung on Dec. 21 It was the first time in more than 25 years on the court that her health has kept her from the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 36 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Shocked, yes shocked I am that she might wear the same outfit twice in a lifetime! I have a jacket from the '90's that I still wear from time to time with a "Compaq" logo on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 49 minutes ago, Foxx said: good on you for keeping it real. Or maybe...they even cloned her clothes! WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 2 hours ago, Foxx said: wait... a 85yr old Supreme Court Justice who just had cancer surgery doesn't need to prove she is viable? *****in' bizarro world..... Thems her traveling pants obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 2 hours ago, LABillzFan said: Because if she really is okay, then the left can play it to their advantage. Look, Melania is out of the scene for two weeks, and CNN has a Melania Watch while others in the media begin to speculate that the reason she isn't around is because Trump beats her. RVG is out of the scene for months, and to compensate for the left's handling of Melania, the right starts to demand to know where Vader is. The longer they wait, the louder the calls become until everyone on the right is wondering where Vader is, and THEN the left rolls her out for an interview and the left explains how the right is full of conspiracy theorists. Notice how the left's latest rage is how the right has jumped all over Obama's daughter for underage wine drinking. A couple of left-leaning pubs are chastising the right for their response to the photo, but literally no one on the right has said anything about Obama's daughter. Even when they don't do anything, the left blames the right. And that's okay because the only other message they have is "Socialism is great, open borders are needed, cows must die, airplanes are not needed, and AOC is their leader." I find your lack of faith... disturbing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Shocked, yes shocked I am that she might wear the same outfit twice in a lifetime! Well it's obvious she' hasn't been shopping with Kamala Harris lately. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 Bad news for the Ruthie worshipers. OTOH, this does lend some credence to the tin foil hat crowd who suspect the left will do everything possible to keep her body alive, even if her mind is incapacitated in the future:Supreme Court: Dead judges can't issue rulings </snip>“Federal judges are appointed for life, not for eternity,” the court ruled in an unsigned opinion. </snip> 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted February 27, 2019 Share Posted February 27, 2019 On 1/31/2019 at 3:14 PM, LABillzFan said: If Trump flips the 9th circuit, it will be just the tasty meltdown nugget the world needs from the left to keep them babbling until word about RBG is released. Because that's when the real crazy will be released by the left. The Senate on Tuesday confirmed President Trump's nominee to be a judge on the liberal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a party-line vote -- and, in a historic snub, the White House ignored the input of the judge's two Democratic home-state senators in the process. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 27, 2019 Share Posted February 27, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Hedge said: The Senate on Tuesday confirmed President Trump's nominee to be a judge on the liberal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a party-line vote -- and, in a historic snub, the White House ignored the input of the judge's two Democratic home-state senators in the process. Outstanding. I look forward tomorrow to reading how Kristol and Rubin are changing parties. Edited February 27, 2019 by LABillzFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bray Wyatt Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 (edited) Just got an update saying she is being treated for a malignant tumor on her pancreas.... Edit: here is one of the links https://www.npr.org/2019/08/23/753699013/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-underwent-another-round-of-cancer-treatment-this-sum Edited August 23, 2019 by Bray Wyatt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 2 hours ago, Bray Wyatt said: Just got an update saying she is being treated for a malignant tumor on her pancreas.... Edit: here is one of the links https://www.npr.org/2019/08/23/753699013/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-underwent-another-round-of-cancer-treatment-this-sum Best of luck to her with the treatments. Maybe she's gotten lucky and the PC was caught early enough due to her having been treated for lung cancer, but it is rare to have a good prognosis with it. Wondering if she regrets not retiring 4-5 years ago? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 I lost my Mom to Cancer several years ago and from what we went thru with her, when the Cancer returns it returns with a vengeance. And it spreads to other areas. And it keeps spreading 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted August 23, 2019 Share Posted August 23, 2019 ...sad...pancreatic is an uphill battle.....operation alternative is rarely available if tumor is near the major artery....nick it and she'll bleed out.....it is a very aggressive form with minimal results...cousin lost her husband to it......my late mother lost her cousin and well as cousin's daughter and granddaughter to it..... 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts