IDBillzFan Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 3 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said: That is hilarious. Kamala Harris would piss all over her father if the price was right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 22 minutes ago, DC Tom said: The Democrats have learned nothing from losing to Trump. They can't even put a tenth the energy the expend in outrage in to introspection. Exceptionally true. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: Kamala Harris would piss all over her father if the price was right. I would have gone with "blown", but dossier talk is all the rage right now, so I get it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 5 hours ago, B-Man said: Hey look, it's Communist Grampa 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 34 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Doesn't matter. She appeals inside the DNC. And they mistakenly believe what appeals to them in their little bubble should appeal to everyone, and those that don't find her appealing can be ignored for being racist misogynistic deplorables only suitable for reeducation. The Democrats have learned nothing from losing to Trump. They can't even put a tenth the energy the expend in outrage in to introspection. Agreed. The newsflash for them should be that a centrist Dem who could survive the primary process could win. Biden is kind of in that centrist mold but he has a ton of baggage. Maybe that wacky Beto and Klobachar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 hour ago, BeginnersMind said: What states would be in play that Trump can win in 2020 that he lost in 2016? I’m not sure there are a lot of ways for him to expand his margin...But.. the Ds have to pick someone who can appeal in the battleground states. Harris, Booker, Warren, Bernie are all coastal candidates. They won’t help in Michigan and Ohio. It would be funny to see the Ds screw it up again. Minneosta, Nevada, New Hampshire. Maybe Colorado and Virginia, but if either of those are tight Trump has already won Ohio and Florida and is ahead in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 4 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Minneosta, Nevada, New Hampshire. Maybe Colorado and Virginia, but if either of those are tight Trump has already won Ohio and Florida and is ahead in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin Maybe. The point for the Dems is that they need to be strategically smart with respect to those states or they will lose again. The coastal candidates don’t play in all the states you mentioned (with exceptions of some Florida and Virginia). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 https://twitter.com/TitaniaMcGrath/status/1098324271347175427 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 8 minutes ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/TitaniaMcGrath/status/1098324271347175427 I like her moxy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 13 minutes ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/TitaniaMcGrath/status/1098324271347175427 I can think of some people who would embraces 2 and 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 12 minutes ago, DC Tom said: I can think of some people who would embraces 2 and 4. let me guess... @The_Dude? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 2 hours ago, LABillzFan said: Kamala Harris would piss all over her father if the price was right. Especially after her father all but disowned her for her Jamaican pot comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 6 hours ago, BeginnersMind said: What states would be in play that Trump can win in 2020 that he lost in 2016? I’m not sure there are a lot of ways for him to expand his margin...But.. the Ds have to pick someone who can appeal in the battleground states. Harris, Booker, Warren, Bernie are all coastal candidates. They won’t help in Michigan and Ohio. It would be funny to see the Ds screw it up again. maybe someone that will campaign in Wisconsin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: maybe someone that will campaign in Wisconsin? Or those 6 other battleground states she was too uppity to visit 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 25 minutes ago, row_33 said: Or those 6 other battleground states she was too uppity to visit or lazy or over confident or too lacking in stamina or all of the above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 1 hour ago, B-Man said: . Don't get me started...Oregon lawmakers seek to lower voting age in state to 16, so teens can ‘protect their future’https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/2019/02/oregon-lawmakers-seek-to-lower-voting-age-in-state-to-16-so-teens-can-protect-their-future.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 after they all destroy themselves before Christmas 2019, who is going to ride in and take the nomination? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 13 minutes ago, row_33 said: after they all destroy themselves before Christmas 2019, who is going to ride in and take the nomination? I still think that she wants in and it is killing her that others are getting the media attention. I think that her "advisors" are telling her to wait out the Kamala-Warren phase of this cycle and to this point she is listening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 15 minutes ago, row_33 said: after they all destroy themselves before Christmas 2019, who is going to ride in and take the nomination? I can see her riding in on this: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 10 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: I still think that she wants in and it is killing her that others are getting the media attention. I think that her "advisors" are telling her to wait out the Kamala-Warren phase of this cycle and to this point she is listening. she is brilliant (mostly) and is getting those Keith RIchards transfusions and blood setasides to stockpile for her run starting the week before NH (or is it Iowa??) 2020... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 12 minutes ago, row_33 said: she is brilliant (mostly) and is getting those Keith RIchards transfusions and blood setasides to stockpile for her run starting the week before NH (or is it Iowa??) 2020... California Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Uncle Joe said: Don't get me started...Oregon lawmakers seek to lower voting age in state to 16, so teens can ‘protect their future’https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/2019/02/oregon-lawmakers-seek-to-lower-voting-age-in-state-to-16-so-teens-can-protect-their-future.html How else are they going to have a broader base of names to forge on absentee ballots? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 26 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: California Perrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrfect.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 18 hours ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/TitaniaMcGrath/status/1098324271347175427 Sad testament to the world we live in where I really have to double take to be sure this is satirical. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 9 hours ago, RochesterRob said: I still think that she wants in and it is killing her that others are getting the media attention. I think that her "advisors" are telling her to wait out the Kamala-Warren phase of this cycle and to this point she is listening. I think the right misses its boogeyman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 4 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: I think the right misses its boogeyman. Please. We miss the stair-challenged money-launderer, but the left has done a bang up job filling that spot with AOC, Omar, Warren, Harris and Booker. Together, they're the "Laverne and Shirley" to Clinton's "Happy Days." They're "The Jeffersons" to Clinton's "All In The Family." They fill the batschittttcrazy nutbag stupidity, but in Technicolor. In front of a live studio audience. I haven't had this fun watching nutbag leftists go crazy since MSNBC had to call it for Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 And now Harris is suggesting reparations for African Americans as compensation for slavery. She is Obama II. She's right out of his school. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/430999-warren-harris-back-reparations-for-black-americans-affected-by-slavery The article is wrong in saying Obama didn't support the policy. Obama talked about it at length before he was a US Senator. He just didn't have the stones to run on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 22 hours ago, keepthefaith said: or lazy or over confident or too lacking in stamina or all of the above. The media and polls and libs told her she was the greatest candidate ever until she lost and all these snivelling cowards now claim she was the worst never heard a peep of her being lousy right up to the second she lost... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 (edited) 24 minutes ago, row_33 said: The media and polls and libs told her she was the greatest candidate ever until she lost and all these snivelling cowards now claim she was the worst never heard a peep of her being lousy right up to the second she lost... There were some exceptions. Here's a Washington Post article explaining how flawed a candidate she was the January before the election. At some point, you cannot blame the national mood or a poor staff or a brilliant opponent for Hillary Clinton’s campaign woes. The latest Des Moines Register/Bloomberg Politics poll shows that Clinton, who once led Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) by double digits, is only 2 points ahead of Sanders. Clinton is down 9 points since the DMR/Bloomberg’s December 2015 poll. That means the race is within the margin of error (4.4 percent). Clinton responds as she usually does — poorly. Her attack on Sanders from the left on guns makes sense. She actually has his record to work with, on an issue about which the base is engaged. Her attack over health care makes no sense whatsoever. Clinton is dinging Sanders for a universal health-care plan that she says would require a big tax hike. Huh? This is Sanders, the darling of the left, who has always wanted true, single-payer health care. The idea that Sanders — “the democratic socialist” — would be coming up with a dastardly plan to undermine or take away universal health care, from the left’s perspective, is inconceivable. Left-wing Salon has this to say: After years of the right wing trying one scheme after another to take away Obamacare, it jars the senses to watch Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton accuse her primary rival, Bernie Sanders, of wanting to take away Obamacare. Sanders, she now insists, would do so from the left by instituting a program — single-payer healthcare — that would be more progressive than the Affordable Care Act. It did not help that the campaign sent out the wooden Chelsea Clinton to attack Sanders. (“It’s a typical Clinton campaign move. Have a bad week at the polls? Overreact with a terrible, transparent attack that anyone with an IQ north of negative can see through. The fact that this move might alienate the Sanders supporters she’ll need later on if she wins the nomination does not seem to enter the calculation.”) Over at U.S. News & World Report, Clinton elicits more hisses and boos. “A single-payer system, like it does in many other countries, would cover everybody, period. To say otherwise is either willfully misunderstanding how it would work or simple scaremongering. . . . he’s sliming Sanders with the accusation that he wants to take health insurance away from people. It’s a garbage attack, and makes even less sense considering that she’s going to need Sanders’ supporters come November when she (as is still very likely) becomes the Democratic nominee. (Democrats, incidentally, really like single-payer, as do independents.)” The Nation, in endorsing Sanders, sounds like right-wing talk show hosts whining about establishment Republicans: [T]he limits of a Clinton presidency are clear. Her talk of seeking common ground with Republicans and making deals to “get things done” in Washington will not bring the change that is so desperately needed. . . . She rejects single-payer healthcare and refuses to consider breaking up the big banks. We also fear that she might accept a budgetary “grand bargain” with the Republicans that would lock in austerity for decades to come. In short, at a time the left — like the right — wants to fight against compromise and corruption, Clinton is fighting the beloved Sanders in just the same terms the GOP would. It’s baffling why she thinks this would help when she is at risk now of losing both Iowa and New Hampshire. Her loyalists say it’s good for her to get a challenge in the primary. In theory that is right, but if it comes at the expense of further depressing the left-wing base (which hasn’t liked the Clintons for years), it’s a really bad thing. So we come back to Hillary Clinton, the candidate. At some point, even Democrats might concede she is unlikable, regarded as dishonest and untrustworthy and, to boot, politically tone-deaf. In the Clinton marriage, Bill got all the political talent, it seems. One can speculate that as the Clinton circle got smaller out of fear and paranoia, the number of people willing to level with her shrank dramatically or disappeared altogether. When she has a dumb idea or gets panicked and starts flailing away — as she did in 2008 — it appears there is no one to stop her. Left to her own devices, she’s a poor candidate. Maybe VP Joe Biden should have gotten in after all. Edited February 22, 2019 by Doc Brown 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 43 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: I haven't had this fun watching nutbag leftists go crazy since MSNBC had to call it for Trump. Good times. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 That was way early, the last six months it was a love fest for her without any negative remarks allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 1 hour ago, /dev/null said: Good times. Rachel Maddow at 3:44 is downright prophetic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kamala-harris-dad-says-parents-are-turning-in-their-grave-over-her-comments-on-weed-and-being-jamaican?fbclid=IwAR3j1HYoiGclXatRVxENDYO4YTCfWbESIRbGbjGJBc_-E27j_Bu0xRBYEUw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 23 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: oh Bernie, please don't run as a third party independent even though most resentful people think a third party will bring instant Utopia don't throw us into the briar patch, Bernie, and drain away Dem votes in 2020 and (may you live forever...) 2024 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 (edited) 15 hours ago, /dev/null said: Good times. The only thing that could have made that clip better was if it was set to the Benny Hill theme song. And to follow that video of greatness, I'm going to drop this old one in too. With all that we know now, listen to this, and be amazed at both the truth bombs President Trump dropped on us early on, and that he is still in the fight. Sometimes the right man turns up at the right time. Edited February 22, 2019 by Hedge 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: 1.) It's Newsweek - they're idiots. Edit: So is this Twitter dumbass. The article is from last June. 2.) This rule change was enacted some months ago; this isn't new. 3.) The Vermont Democrat Party has declared that Bernie is a member of the state Democrat party, regardless of whether he officially joins. 4.) The rule has been skirted. Edited February 22, 2019 by Koko78 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 So the Dems don't want Schultz and they don't want Bernie. Those would two AWESOME independent candidates in 2020. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts