DC Tom Posted October 13, 2018 Share Posted October 13, 2018 5 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: From your link: Let’s take a look at its errors, or at least the first four biggies: 1. Brakebill was not Justice Kavanaugh’s first ruling. If you so much as glance at the Court’s opinion, it’s hard to miss its second sentence: “JUSTICE KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.” Kavanaugh took no part in gang rapes, either...but he did nonetheless. 6 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: It's really, really important to retain the chairmanships in the House for investigative reasons and in the Senate for appointees. A lot of good work could be swept under the rug if the dems gain control. It's most important to retain the House because otherwise they'll try to impeach everyone, with Speaker Nancy Pelosi third in line for the White House. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 51 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Kavanaugh took no part in gang rapes, either...but he did nonetheless. It's most important to retain the House because otherwise they'll try to impeach everyone, with Speaker Nancy Pelosi third in line for the White House. The House can try to impeach people all they want but even if they do and send it to the Senate they'll never get the 67 votes. The Senate on the other hand still has a lot of lifetime judgeships to approve. During Trump's tenure he might even be able to flip the Ninth Circuit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 53 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: The House can try to impeach people all they want but even if they do and send it to the Senate they'll never get the 67 votes. The Senate on the other hand still has a lot of lifetime judgeships to approve. During Trump's tenure he might even be able to flip the Ninth Circuit. Doesn't matter if they don't get the votes in the Senate. What matters is the House votes to impeach Trump and Kavanaugh. So when the Democrats eventually return to power, they can say something something Trump impeached so something something something about Executive Orders and something something something about foreign policy and something something someting about those judges are illegitmate and something something something decisions they don't like that Kavanaugh voted for/against are illegitimate and something something shut up because you're a racist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 1 hour ago, /dev/null said: Doesn't matter if they don't get the votes in the Senate. What matters is the House votes to impeach Trump and Kavanaugh. So when the Democrats eventually return to power, they can say something something Trump impeached so something something something about Executive Orders and something something something about foreign policy and something something someting about those judges are illegitmate and something something something decisions they don't like that Kavanaugh voted for/against are illegitimate and something something shut up because you're a racist. Yes, this, pretty much. Hell, after the shitshow we just saw involving Kavanaugh, you really think it matters that the Senate won't convict? Senate Democrats will just throw accusation after innuendo after roadblock into the hearings to string out the "Trump's impeached, his presidency is illegitimate" narrative. Side note: have the Democrats realized yet they have "grounds" to impeach three judges? Kavanaugh, Thomas (for raping Anita Hill), and Gorsuch (as an illegal nomination who's in Garland's deserved seat.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 5 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: "Believe all women" was bulls hit from the beginning and it had nothing to do with Monica because that was proven to have happened and she was a willing adult participant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 1 hour ago, Doc said: "Believe all women" was bulls hit from the beginning and it had nothing to do with Monica because that was proven to have happened and she was a willing adult participant. Of course, if it's anyone other than a Democrat, soliciting sexual favors from your interns is a gross abuse of your authority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin in Va Beach Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 9 hours ago, B-Man said: Wonder what is happening with that 'GoFundMe' money... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 9 hours ago, KD in CA said: Of course, if it's anyone other than a Democrat, soliciting sexual favors from your interns is a gross abuse of your authority. And was viewed as such even back in the dark ages we now refer to as the 90's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 2 hours ago, Gavin in Va Beach said: Wonder what is happening with that 'GoFundMe' money... That was the payoff for her "coming forward". 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 Nevada is supposed to be Democrats #1 pickup opportunity for a Senate seat and it had been looking that way. They were up every single poll up until the Kavanaugh debacle. Now 3 polls in a row show Heller up with latest poll showing up 7. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 Just now, Magox said: Nevada is supposed to be Democrats #1 pickup opportunity for a Senate seat and it had been looking that way. They were up every single poll up until the Kavanaugh debacle. Now 3 polls in a row show Heller up with latest poll showing up 7. I would like to see the Ds take a bath. Maybe that would convince them that their all racism/all sexism/all xenophobia/all anti semetism/anti-transphobia/anti-gay ism/all the time strategy doesn't work. You'd think the 2016 election would have taught them that. I vote for Ds sometimes and I'd like to see them try to do something for their constituents as opposed to never ending investigations and name calling. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 (edited) 5 hours ago, reddogblitz said: I would like to see the Ds take a bath. Maybe that would convince them that their all racism/all sexism/all xenophobia/all anti semetism/anti-transphobia/anti-gay ism/all the time strategy doesn't work. You'd think the 2016 election would have taught them that. I vote for Ds sometimes and I'd like to see them try to do something for their constituents as opposed to never ending investigations and name calling. You sound like you're where I was a couple of decades ago. I used to lean toward the democrats when I was younger, partially because I was a bit more idealistic then, but also because they were big on national defense, were staunchly anti-communist, and were significantly more pragmatic with regard to the economy. They no longer even remotely resemble the democrat party I used to support, and I no longer vote for any of them, even in races where they run unopposed. Now that I think about it, it was more than 'a couple decades ago". It was more like four decades ago. &$#% I'm getting old. Edited October 16, 2018 by Azalin edited for accuracy 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 15, 2018 Share Posted October 15, 2018 1 hour ago, Magox said: Nevada is supposed to be Democrats #1 pickup opportunity for a Senate seat and it had been looking that way. They were up every single poll up until the Kavanaugh debacle. Now 3 polls in a row show Heller up with latest poll showing up 7. Welllllllllllllll I may have answered a few of those polls when I was at my MIL's house in Vegas, skewing things ever so slightly. What can I say? I never get poll calls in NYS, and I just wanted to participate (and screw with the pollsters). ? 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 3 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Welllllllllllllll I may have answered a few of those polls when I was at my MIL's house in Vegas, skewing things ever so slightly. What can I say? I never get poll calls in NYS, and I just wanted to participate (and screw with the pollsters). ? That's the origin of my 73 yes old Vietnam vet black woman with 7 kids and a PhD. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 6 hours ago, Boyst62 said: That's the origin of my 73 yes old Vietnam vet black woman with 7 kids and a PhD. My elderly black lesbian Romney supporter would kick your 73 year old Vietnam vet black woman with 7 kids and a PhD's ass 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted October 16, 2018 Author Share Posted October 16, 2018 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 3 hours ago, Nanker said: That's too funny. I just watched that video yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 3 hours ago, Nanker said: While the video is pretty much right on there was one little tidbit that we need to keep from our resident North Carolina cattle rancher. Did you see the ratio of females to males enrolled in Palo Alto? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teddy KGB Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 14 minutes ago, Teddy KGB said: "Asterisk". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 46 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: "Asterisk". Nice try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 12 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Nice try. Why would I try to cover for that idiot? The audio was cut off rather suspiciously. Asterisk makes sense in context. Ass does not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 Just now, 3rdnlng said: Why would I try to cover for that idiot? The audio was cut off rather suspiciously. Asterisk makes sense in context. Ass does not. I meant "nice try" to whoever posted it originally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/7/mazie-hirono-says-brett-kavanaugh-enters-supreme-c/ “He’s going to be on the Supreme Court with a huge taint and a big asterisk after his name,” said Ms. Hirono on ABC’s “This Week.” “The partisanship that he showed was astounding.” 3 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: I meant "nice try" to whoever posted it originally. It was that Russian Teddy KGB trying to upset our midterms. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 (edited) 12 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/7/mazie-hirono-says-brett-kavanaugh-enters-supreme-c/ “He’s going to be on the Supreme Court with a huge taint and a big asterisk after his name,” said Ms. Hirono on ABC’s “This Week.” “The partisanship that he showed was astounding.” It's stuff like this that keeps me from taking these people seriously. this is far from an isolated case. they think I'm stupid and will believe whatever they tell me. Edited October 16, 2018 by reddogblitz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 16, 2018 Share Posted October 16, 2018 1 hour ago, reddogblitz said: It's stuff like this that keeps me from taking these people seriously. this is far from an isolated case. they think I'm stupid and will believe whatever they tell me. They don't think you're stupid. They think enough people are stupid to buy that story that they can win elections. And they're right. But they don't think that you're personally stupid. I can think you're stupid if you want, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 4 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/7/mazie-hirono-says-brett-kavanaugh-enters-supreme-c/ “He’s going to be on the Supreme Court with a huge taint and a big asterisk after his name,” said Ms. Hirono on ABC’s “This Week.” “The partisanship that he showed was astounding.” Hirono has no business calling anyone a sexual predator if she is simultaneously mocking the size of their taint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 Hirono defended Inouye from charges of sexual assault back in the early 90's. So chalk up another hypocrite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 17, 2018 Share Posted October 17, 2018 . 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 18, 2018 Share Posted October 18, 2018 Cocaine Mitch on a mission. Interesting article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 18, 2018 Share Posted October 18, 2018 3 hours ago, LABillzFan said: Cocaine Mitch on a mission. Interesting article. (it's almost like he knows there is going to be a busy docket soon) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted October 18, 2018 Author Share Posted October 18, 2018 3 hours ago, LABillzFan said: Cocaine Mitch on a mission. Interesting article. The comments are so over the top paranoid, and ill informed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Debra S. Katz, Lisa J. Banks, and Michael R. Bromwich for violating the rules of professional responsibility in their representation of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee during the hearings on the nomination of the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh.Dr. Ford’s lawyers neglected to inform their client that she could have been interviewed by female staffers at home, in private rather than the formal hearing in Washington, DC According to the Judicial Watch complaint, by not informing their client Dr. Ford that Sen. Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee offered in a letter to “fly female staff investigators to meet Dr. Ford… in California, or anywhere else, to obtain (her) testimony,” Katz, Banks, and Bromwich violated the following District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct: Rule l.4(a) – A lawyer shall keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. Rule 1.4(b) – A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation. Judicial Watch Files Bar Complaint Against Christine Blasey Ford’s Lawyers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Have they banned female reproductive rights abortion yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 2 hours ago, Gary M said: Have they banned female reproductive rights abortion yet? That's next week. This week the Court is focused on re-instituting slavery. November is take-away-grandma's-health-insurance month. The wholesale slaughter of women and blacks by the Court's executioners begins in the December term. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: That's next week. This week the Court is focused on re-instituting slavery. November is take-away-grandma's-health-insurance month. The wholesale slaughter of women and blacks by the Court's executioners begins in the December term. December is "Sterilize Gays" month. Slaughtering women isn't on the docket until March, after Kavanaugh rapes 'em all. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, DC Tom said: December is "Sterilize Gays" month. Slaughtering women isn't on the docket until March, after Kavanaugh rapes 'em all. Quickly, why would we need to sterilize gays? I could see genital mutilation and cauterization, but sterilization specifically doesn't make much sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts