Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/8/2018 at 3:39 PM, TheTruthHurts said:

I think questions that are sensitive should be fair game. NFL players are public figures and will experience much worse as a player. How they respond should be important. 

Expand  

 

problem is you can't ask an employee that so it could violate federal law

  • Like (+1) 7
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/8/2018 at 3:37 PM, HappyDays said:

 

 

Expand  

Remnants of the Neanderthal faction still in existence. If a person hasn't learned to adapt to the modern world and know what is appropriate or not at this point then they will never. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Doesn't this happen every year?

 

Phillip Rivers, who was drafted 14 years ago, said that teams intentionally try to get under your skin to see how you react to "adversity".

 

They inquired about Guice's mom hooking, ffs.

Posted

What kind of a moron asks someone something like this in a job interview. If Goodell was worth a lick, which IMHO he isn't, he'd find out right away who this was an make an example out of him. Pathetic.

Posted
  On 3/8/2018 at 3:51 PM, Chicken Boo said:

Doesn't this happen every year?

 

Phillip Rivers, who was drafted 14 years ago, said that teams intentionally try to get under your skin to see how you react to "adversity".

 

They inquired about Guice's mom hooking, ffs.

Expand  

 

If I found out this is how the Bills are testing a player's ability to test adversity I would feel really embarrassed. I don't know if this is strictly illegal but it is stupid.

  • Like (+1) 8
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/8/2018 at 3:53 PM, BuffaloBillsGospel said:

These are the same lines of questions our own police force uses as a way to see how you react out in the field. The psychological exam for State Trooper would ask you far worse questions than these.

Expand  

 

THIS. 

 

They ask these types of questions routinely to see how they react, not for their answer. 

Posted
  On 3/8/2018 at 3:39 PM, TheTruthHurts said:

I think questions that are sensitive should be fair game. NFL players are public figures and will experience much worse as a player. How they respond should be important. 

Expand  

 

WTF, man, if you can't get in someone's head without being offensive, you need to Get Out More.

  On 3/8/2018 at 3:52 PM, HappyDays said:

If I found out this is how the Bills are testing a player's ability to test adversity I would feel really embarrassed. I don't know if this is strictly illegal but it is stupid.

Expand  

 

I agree.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Besides being against the law for a potential employer to do, honestly who gives a sh*t? If my QB is a good player I could care less if he wants to marry a squid!

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
  On 3/8/2018 at 3:53 PM, BuffaloBillsGospel said:

These are the same lines of questions our own police force uses as a way to see how you react out in the field. The psychological exam for State Trooper would ask you far worse questions than these.

Expand  

What state are you describing here? What does asking someone of their sexuality or about their mothers prove? 

Posted
  On 3/8/2018 at 3:51 PM, Chicken Boo said:

Doesn't this happen every year?

Phillip Rivers, who was drafted 14 years ago, said that teams intentionally try to get under your skin to see how you react to "adversity".

They inquired about Guice's mom hooking, ffs.

Expand  

 

Getting under your skin is one thing, asking if you like men or your mom is a prostitute, is something else.  If you can't do the former without the latter, like I said you need to get out more.

  • Like (+1) 5
×
×
  • Create New...