Jump to content

NBA 2017-18


Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Turk71 said:

With Irving and Hayward back, you would have to think they will be among the very top contenders.

The way it goes...if Hayward and Irving hadn't been hurt, some of these young guys might not have emerged. Their inexperience showed the last 2 games...but it will help them down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lebron came through like he always does, but if they play Golden State in the finals I highly doubt Curry and Thompson will go 3 for 22 from the three point line like Rozier and Brown did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Teddy KGB said:

Rip Scary Terry T shirts. 

 

Embarrassing performance.   0-10 from 3 

 

 

 

C's have a great future in potential.

 

Sometimes that works out.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still really like Rozier. He was a big reason they got as far as they did. The silver lining is it puts to rest the talk of trading Kyrie because “they have Rozier.” Kyrie would have won that game for them imo. They needed that guy’s experience last night. 

 

They are going to be so good next year. Irving and Hayward matter. And now Tatum has the big time experience of being The Man. He’s only 20. They have legit 3 star players going into next year plus budding stars like Jaylen Brown.

Edited by YoloinOhio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good: the injuries allowed Tatum and Brown to accelerate their development.

 

The bad: Hearing LeBroners talk like this was some great accomplishment. In betting circles it was almost 3/1 that the Cavs would win this series.

 

GO GS.

 

LeBron is not Jordan and the Lakers still suck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Commonsense said:

The good: the injuries allowed Tatum and Brown to accelerate their development.

 

The bad: Hearing LeBroners talk like this was some great accomplishment. In betting circles it was almost 3/1 that the Cavs would win this series.

 

GO GS.

 

LeBron is not Jordan and the Lakers still suck. 

 

 

I only hear ESPN trying to force the "greatest accomplishment" angle for his career, multiple times.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Commonsense said:

The good: the injuries allowed Tatum and Brown to accelerate their development.

 

The bad: Hearing LeBroners talk like this was some great accomplishment. In betting circles it was almost 3/1 that the Cavs would win this series.

 

GO GS.

 

LeBron is not Jordan and the Lakers still suck. 

I’m rooting for the West too. Obnoxious Cavs fans and media gotta take a damn seat.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

I’m rooting for the West too. Obnoxious Cavs fans and media gotta take a damn seat.

 

I hope for a good series where both teams are inspired to play their best before an elimination game

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/28/2018 at 9:48 AM, YoloinOhio said:

I still really like Rozier. He was a big reason they got as far as they did. The silver lining is it puts to rest the talk of trading Kyrie because “they have Rozier.” Kyrie would have won that game for them imo. They needed that guy’s experience last night. 

 

They are going to be so good next year. Irving and Hayward matter. And now Tatum has the big time experience of being The Man. He’s only 20. They have legit 3 star players going into next year plus budding stars like Jaylen Brown.

The real question will be can they keep Smart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, row_33 said:

What a master class that was 

 

D’Antoni still hadn’t done a damn thing worth 1 percent of his fake label as a genius.

 

 

 

 

He was horrible as a Lakers coach.....his fricken style of play I in part credit to Kobe having the major injury.......his squad was too old to run it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As good/great as Lebron is, do you think he makes his teammates better?  I contend that he is that good that he doesn't but gives the appearance he does.  He draws double and triple teams most of the times which leaves his teammates more open to make shots, drive, pass etc...  Asking because there is speculation that he has some passing interest in philly, and vice versa(moreso), and I think he would destroy the skills and playing ability of the young guns like Embiid, Fultz, Simmons, TLC, Saric, Korkmaz(potentially).  Lebron is capable of taking a team of 5 me's and him and making it deep into a playoff run, i don't think he makes those around him better.  Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The Poojer said:

As good/great as Lebron is, do you think he makes his teammates better?  I contend that he is that good that he doesn't but gives the appearance he does.  He draws double and triple teams most of the times which leaves his teammates more open to make shots, drive, pass etc...  Asking because there is speculation that he has some passing interest in philly, and vice versa(moreso), and I think he would destroy the skills and playing ability of the young guns like Embiid, Fultz, Simmons, TLC, Saric, Korkmaz(potentially).  Lebron is capable of taking a team of 5 me's and him and making it deep into a playoff run, i don't think he makes those around him better.  Thoughts?

I think that you are drunk. He elevates everyone around him. The exact opposite is true. LeBron could go to about half of the teams in the league and win a title immediately. This team he has in the finals now would win 25 games without him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he is playing 48 minutes a game because they need him to.  I think he is so overpowering and overwhelming with his talents that the play against him gives the illusion he makes players better.  I am NOT taking anything away from how awesome he is....  There's just something stuck in my 'craw' that doesn't believe he improves the players around him.

 

13 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I think that you are drunk. He elevates everyone around him. The exact opposite is true. LeBron could go to about half of the teams in the league and win a title immediately. This team he has in the finals now would win 25 games without him. 

 

 

Edited by The Poojer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John from Riverside said:

He was horrible as a Lakers coach.....his fricken style of play I in part credit to Kobe having the major injury.......his squad was too old to run it.

 

He breaks into some ****-eating grin when interviewed, the sign of a total psychotic.

 

Bobby Valentine was another who pulled this stunt.

 

 

D'Antoni was putting on quite a raindance the second half, maybe call off the 3 point barrage would have been wiser.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Poojer said:

But he is playing 48 minutes a game because they need him to.  I think he is so overpowering and overwhelming with his talents that the play against him gives the illusion he makes players better.  I am NOT taking anything away from how awesome he is....  There's just something stuck in my 'craw' that doesn't believe he improves the players around him.

 

 

 

Look at the team when he is off the floor...that will tell you everything that you need to know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...