Deranged Rhino Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1105833703027167232 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 5 minutes ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1105833703027167232 Who cares? It's not the reason any investigations were started. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Who cares? It's not the reason any investigations were started. are you high? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 39 minutes ago, Foxx said: are you high? Not yet 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1105887640879022080 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 9 minutes ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1105887640879022080 Let's she it in her own words then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulus Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Mueller is what is keeping the kids entertained, while the rest of the world is in a trade war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Let's she it in her own words then https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 1.pdf https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 2.pdf 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Let's she it in her own words then umm... you do know they released the transcript of her testimony, right? literally, her own words. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 15 minutes ago, Foxx said: umm... you do know they released the transcript of her testimony, right? literally, her own words. Post them then! The exact words, please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulus Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 This fruitbag is just like Q. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 35 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 1.pdf https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 2.pdf She said there was anti Clinton bias at FBI! Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 7 minutes ago, Tiberius said: She said there was anti Clinton bias at FBI! Thanks! ...Per her testimony, just the opposite was true at the DOJ. Who runs the FBI? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 (edited) 53 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Let's she it in her own words then in english again please Edited March 13, 2019 by /dev/null Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 How come Obama could order an end to the Thundercunt (Hillary) investigation, but if Trump tried that on the Mueller investigation that’d be some sort of crime? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 5 minutes ago, The_Dude said: How come Obama could order an end to the Thundercunt (Hillary) investigation, but if Trump tried that on the Mueller investigation that’d be some sort of crime? This is why nothing could have happened immediately upon Trump taking office in a legal sense. If the DOJ is compromised, if the courts are compromised, if the FBI is compromised in addition to Congress and the media - there's no way for equal justice to occur. Fast forward to 2019: Trump has set records with judicial nominations, reshaped SCOTUS, fired (or replaced/retired/demoted) the entire upper echelon of the FBI, DOJ, and USIC. Even more has been done at the State Department in terms of career bureaucrats being shown the door (7th floor State=Langley). And now Trump has a fully empowered AG for the first time in his administration. I stated in one (many?) of these threads in the early days of this that it would be a slow roll out of evidence into the open source, this was to relay information to the people while the cleanup behind the scenes was taking place and multiple year+ long investigations were launched by IG Horowitz, Huber, and Sessions. Those investigations are wrapping up - but had the DOJ, FBI and court not been cleaned out first there'd be nowhere for any of the cases to go. They'd never see the light of day, no one would get charged as we've seen happen time and time again (and why many expect the same to happen again). Now the battlefield has been prepped. Mueller's investigation is the last thing holding up the starting gun. Once he wraps, expect a flurry of action starting with the Declassification of the FISA information, Horowitz's second FISA report, and the big reveal of whatever it is Huber has been up to. The fun is about to begin. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: This is why nothing could have happened immediately upon Trump taking office in a legal sense. If the DOJ is compromised, if the courts are compromised, if the FBI is compromised in addition to Congress and the media - there's no way for equal justice to occur. I believe Trump is guilty of laundering money. I believe he’s committed “book keeping” felonies. And for the reasons you listed, I don’t care. The “Russia” investigation has NOTHING to do with the election. It was just the witch hunts excuse to pry into Trump’s book keeping. And I’m furious because it’s obvious that the DOJ is a 5th column of the DNC. And you know me, I mock “conspiracies.” But this is transparent bull####. I want an investigation into how the DOJ conducts and prioritizes it’s investigations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: ...Per her testimony, just the opposite was true at the DOJ. Who runs the FBI? The Federal Reserve? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Just now, The_Dude said: I believe Trump is guilty of laundering money. I believe he’s committed “book keeping” felonies. And for the reasons you listed, I don’t care. The “Russia” investigation has NOTHING to do with the election. It was just the witch hunts excuse to pry into Trump’s book keeping. And I’m furious because it’s obvious that the DOJ is a 5th column of the DNC. And you know me, I mock “conspiracies.” But this is transparent bull####. I want an investigation into how the DOJ conducts and prioritizes it’s investigations. I would offer two things to consider: 1) If they had a prosecutable money laundering case on 45, from any point of his life, they would have hit him with it already. There's a chance Mueller will discover something along those lines, but if he had found something it would have been more evident in the indictments/filings to date. Working in the world of construction/building in NYC makes it easy to imagine that Trump would have had to have been dirty in some way, just in order to survive - but I'm not certain that's the reality. My (limited) experience in construction tended to show me that the bigger general contractors were cleaner than their reps, and had to be due to the legal/public spotlight they operate under on multi million dollar builds. I really don't know for sure one way or the other, but your overall point about it being unrelated to the election is 100% correct. 2) While I know you hate conspiracies, I don't think it is one to suggest that the DOJ isn't a 5th column for the DNC, but rather the uniparty. In the past it has served both sides of the aisle - so long as the institutions themselves (including the uniparty) were protected and insulated. 4 minutes ago, Koko78 said: The Federal Reserve? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Dude Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I would offer two things to consider: 1) If they had a prosecutable money laundering case on 45, from any point of his life, they would have hit him with it already. There's a chance Mueller will discover something along those lines, but if he had found something it would have been more evident in the indictments/filings to date. Working in the world of construction/building in NYC makes it easy to imagine that Trump would have had to have been dirty in some way, just in order to survive - but I'm not certain that's the reality. My (limited) experience in construction tended to show me that the bigger general contractors were cleaner than their reps, and had to be due to the legal/public spotlight they operate under on multi million dollar builds. I really don't know for sure one way or the other, but your overall point about it being unrelated to the election is 100% correct. 2) While I know you hate conspiracies, I don't think it is one to suggest that the DOJ isn't a 5th column for the DNC, but rather the uniparty. In the past it has served both sides of the aisle - so long as the institutions themselves (including the uniparty) were protected and insulated. There is a silver lining. Lots of idiot liberals believe they didn’t lose the election because of their message. So they’re ramping up their leftward extremism and it’s gonna burn them good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 (not an idle tweet) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: Post them then! The exact words, please don't make me regret doing the leg work, Tibs. there is the 'insurance policy'. i will continue to read when i have time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 (edited) @Tiberius pau·ci·ty /ˈpôsədē/ noun the presence of something only in small or insufficient quantities or amounts; scarcity. "a paucity of information" synonyms: scarcity, sparseness, sparsity, dearth, shortage, rarity, rareness, poverty, insufficiency, deficiency, inadequacy, famine, lack, want, meagerness, limitedness, scantiness, skimpiness, paltriness, restrictedness, deficit, shortfall; rareexiguity "a paucity of evidence" Edited March 13, 2019 by Foxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Foxx said: @Tiberius But to be clear, at a minimum... Quote As I sort of explained, if he is not going to be President, then we don't need to burn longstanding sources and risk sort of the lost of future investigative outlets... They unquestionably let politics influence the course and scope of the investigation. Edited March 14, 2019 by DC Tom 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: But to be clear, at a minimum... They unquestionably let politics influence the course and scope of the investigation. Small typo in your quote, she said "if he is NOT going to be President ..." Normal people would realize it was a typo; Gator will use it as proof there was no insurance policy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 Just now, Taro T said: Small typo in your quote, she said "if he is NOT going to be President ..." Normal people would realize it was a typo; Gator will use it as proof there was no insurance policy. Fixed, thanks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 (edited) What will happen first, the Mueller Report release or the Bills winning a Super Bowl? Edited March 14, 2019 by row_33 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 22 minutes ago, row_33 said: What will happen first, the Mueller Report release or the Bills winning a Super Bowl? That's a brain freeze right there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 posting for the video linked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/confirmed-mueller-seeking-subpoena-contempt-citation-against-foreign-corporation (money's still on this being Orbis) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 10 hours ago, DC Tom said: But to be clear, at a minimum... They unquestionably let politics influence the course and scope of the investigation. The way I read that, and forgive me if this is your point, she’s saying that they have little evidence at that point (paucity) and don’t believe he will win, so based on those two things, they are not burning sources and using all tools to go after him. The “politics” is in the text where her human (not conspiratorial coup!) bias is that she compares a deeper investigation in the future with an insurance policy. That’s her personal politics and has been on display in her many loverboy texts. But no government worker is an automaton without biases against “the man,” whoever the man may be in any given election or appointment cycle. There was undisputed evidence that Russia was working to divide the electorate and Trump was the large beneficiary. Even Trump admits to Russian tampering (some days). They investigated. Good. No collusion with Trump (we assume). Very, very good. The rest is so much made up horsehockey by both sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 12 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Ok, now it's now officially a lie if Trump is tweeting about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 2 hours ago, BeginnersMind said: The way I read that, and forgive me if this is your point, she’s saying that they have little evidence at that point (paucity) and don’t believe he will win, so based on those two things, they are not burning sources and using all tools to go after him. The “politics” is in the text where her human (not conspiratorial coup!) bias is that she compares a deeper investigation in the future with an insurance policy. That’s her personal politics and has been on display in her many loverboy texts. But no government worker is an automaton without biases against “the man,” whoever the man may be in any given election or appointment cycle. There was undisputed evidence that Russia was working to divide the electorate and Trump was the large beneficiary. Even Trump admits to Russian tampering (some days). They investigated. Good. No collusion with Trump (we assume). Very, very good. The rest is so much made up horsehockey by both sides. Shirley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 11 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Shirley So you think there's collusion or a coup? Which one of these so-exciting narratives is your make-believe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 9 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: So you think there's collusion or a coup? Which one of these so-exciting narratives is your make-believe? What does the available data support? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 9 minutes ago, GG said: What does the available data support? The data overwhelmingly supports the position that BM is a disingenuous asshat. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts