Buffalo_Gal Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 (edited) Top Mueller Prosecutor Stepping Down In Latest Clue Russia Inquiry May Be Ending </snip> The departure is the strongest sign yet that Mueller and his team have all but concluded their work. </snip> He's gonna go teach in NY (shocker). He's not going back to the DOJ --- his choice? Or "asked" to not return? Apparently, while he was at the DOJ during the 2016 election he was part of the chain of custody of the Steele dossier. Edited March 14, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 Ted Malloch: Nellie Ohr Appears to Have Had a Heavy Hand in the Creation of the Russia-Trump Dossier https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/ted-malloch-meet-the-ohrs/ " 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 Peter Strzok's testimony to Congress (June 27, 2018). Oh this is the private testimony, 312 pages long. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 49 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Top Mueller Prosecutor Stepping Down In Latest Clue Russia Inquiry May Be Ending </snip> The departure is the strongest sign yet that Mueller and his team have all but concluded their work. </snip> He's gonna go teach in NY (shocker). He's not going back to the DOJ --- his choice? Or "asked" to not return? Apparently, while he was at the DOJ during the 2016 election he was part of the chain of custody of the Steele dossier. This is the surest sign yet that Mueller is done. No more indictments coming, certainly not Trump's kids. If they had any high profile indictments left, Weissman would be running point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 Oh quick! Put the House of Representatives on the list of Deep State actors! Quote The House voted overwhelmingly and in bipartisan fashion to urge the Justice Department to publicly release the entirety of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s report into Russian interference in the 2016 election, once completed. The move is an attempt to “send a clear signal both to the American people and the Department of Justice” that lawmakers expect to see the full account of Mueller’s work, according to the House Judiciary Committee’s chairman, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.). The final vote count was 420 in favor, with no one voting no. Four lawmakers voted “present.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-overwhelmingly-bipartisan-vote-house-calls-for-mueller-report-to-be-made-public/2019/03/14/bed337fe-4660-11e9-90f0-0ccfeec87a61_story.html?utm_term=.d819ee09782f Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 More on Weissman leaving. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 3 hours ago, GG said: What does the available data support? Neither. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 Incorrect. But then again, someone who admits to not reading the material presented would have an incorrect opinion on what the data supports. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 12 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: Neither. Is that because you don't think there's data or there have been no legal actions taken on the data? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 3 minutes ago, GG said: Is that because you don't think there's data or there have been no legal actions taken on the data? Because he's told what to say. He's a sock monkey. Nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 9 minutes ago, westside said: Because he's told what to say. He's a sock monkey. Nothing more. Takes one to know one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 For the superstitious out there: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1106264456240095232 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 Death Of Russiagate: Mueller Team Tied To Mifsud’s Network 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 22 minutes ago, Foxx said: Death Of Russiagate: Mueller Team Tied To Mifsud’s Network And you wonder how it's possible to take this stuff seriously: Quote Zainab Ahmad, a member of Mueller’s legal team, is the former Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of New York. As pointed out by Blackburn, Ahmad attended a Global Center on Cooperative Security event in 2017. In recent days, Blackburn wrote via Twitter: “Zainab Ahmad is a major player in the Russiagate scandal at the DOJ. Does she work for SC Mueller? She was at a GCCS event in May 2017. Arvinder Sambei, a co-director of the [London Centre of International Law Practice], worked with Joseph Mifsud, [George Papadopoulos] and [Simona Mangiante]. She’s a GCCS consultant.” Blackburn told this author: “Zainab Ahmad was one of the first DOJ prosecutors to have seen the Steele dossier. In May 2017, she attended a counter-terrorism conference in New York with the Global Center on Cooperative Security (GCCS), an organization which Joseph Mifsud, the alleged Russian spy, had been working within London and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.” Random tenuous link = DEEP STATE! QED! Seriously, QED QED QED! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 Tying Mifsud to western intelligence is not a tenuous link. It's a fact - as much of one as you can find in the gray world of spooks. There's much more to tie him to western intelligence (especially British intelligence) than there ever has been to tie him to Russian IC. Yet that narrative went unquestioned for years... wonder why? But again, to understand why that matters, and how Mifsud fits in, requires someone to honestly read and assess the 100s of pages of evidence and documentation to support this which have been provided in this thread and others. Some refuse to do so. Because they're either here for reasons other than they admit, they're asshats, or they're suffering from crippling cognitive dissonance. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 just to clarify.... it could be all three. :p 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 Just now, Foxx said: just to clarify.... it could be all three. ? Truth 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 thread. https://twitter.com/adamgoldmanNYT/status/1106197912432853002 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1106187060350763010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1106187060350763010 I just got confirmation (outside of Q) that RR has finished his exit debrief as well. Things will really start to move once Mueller officially wraps. .... Just as this article drops (no coincidences) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I just got confirmation (outside of Q) that RR has finished his exit debrief as well. Things will really start to move once Mueller officially wraps. .... Just as this article drops (no coincidences) yeah, i saw one of the comments to one of these Twitter threads that RR was debriefed today. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 From the Solomon article above: My reporting suggests a much bigger scandal — the intentional misleading of the nation’s federal intelligence court — soon may eclipse the Russia narrative that has dominated the media the past two years. The fastest way to know if that storm is on the horizon is for President Trump to declassify the documents showing exactly how the FBI behaved in this case. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: For the superstitious out there: There's nothing superstitious about the number 666. It's easily the most misquoted and misunderstood number, but not superstitious or even applicable at the point of today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: There's nothing superstitious about the number 666. It's easily the most misquoted and misunderstood number, but not superstitious or even applicable at the point of today. other than, you know... today is the 666th day of the investigation. Edited March 14, 2019 by Foxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 37 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: There's nothing superstitious about the number 666. It's easily the most misquoted and misunderstood number, but not superstitious or even applicable at the point of today. lots of good reason to think twice about that number... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 14, 2019 Share Posted March 14, 2019 Steele's deposition is coming today as well as Kramer's (it's from the same law suit). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 15 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Steele's deposition is coming today as well as Kramer's (it's from the same law suit). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 Here's the Kramer depo in full - along with a longer thread worth reading: 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1106042761407619073 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 17 hours ago, Tiberius said: Takes one to know one? What are you his mother? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 2 hours ago, westside said: What are you his mother? You go too far, sir! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 2 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 At her weekly news conference, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said with obvious pride, “In the House, we voted to protect the truth for the American people. Overwhelmingly, I think over 400 votes — four voted present — everyone else voted for the Mueller resolution, which would ensure that the American people get the truth.” 420-0 ZERO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 7 minutes ago, Tiberius said: At her weekly news conference, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said with obvious pride, “In the House, we voted to protect the truth for the American people. Overwhelmingly, I think over 400 votes — four voted present — everyone else voted for the Mueller resolution, which would ensure that the American people get the truth.” 420-0 ZERO! The number of people who will agree with its conclusion are about 420/2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: The number of people who will agree with its conclusion are about 420/2. We have to see the conclusions to judge that. Historians will probably be debating its conclusions and everything else for centuries---if we last that long... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: We have to see the conclusions to judge that. Historians will probably be debating its conclusions and everything else for centuries---if we last that long... I’m confident that about half of the Congress will agree with its conclusions. Half won’t. But maybe they will all agree with it. Hahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts