truth on hold Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 Now that he's already got guaranteed money maybe he will sign cheaper somewhere else.I read only $25k sign on was guaranteed. After tax that won't even cover his legal bills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 I read only $25k sign on was guaranteed. After tax that won't even cover his legal billsI don't think it was much but I thought there was a little. Ore to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 I don't think it was much but I thought there was a little. Ore to it.Just three weeks ago, Spikes signed a one-year, $1.1 million contract with the four-time Super Bowl champs. Only his $25,000 signing bonus is guaranteed should the club cut him. http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2015/06/police_want_to_know_if_brandon_spikes_abandoned_car_linked_to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4BillsintheBurgh Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 Deny, deny, deny. Whether it's deflating footballs or murdering people and everything in between. Once a Patriot always a Patriot. I can't believe I ever rooted for this guy.  1. Get drunk/high 2. Crash your Maybach into a family on their way home from grandma's house 3. Tell onstar you hit a deer and then flee the scene 4. Go sleep it off 5. Tell the cops you don't know who had borrowed your car that costs more than most people's house 6. Get away with it  I think there should be a much higher penalty for fleeing the scene of an accident since the only reason you would do so is to hide something from the authorities. If they can prove he was at fault then I hope he goes to jail for this Grandma must party like a rock star if the family can't get out of there before 3:30 am Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 sign him for the vet minimum. use him on 1st and 2nd down as a run stopper and it will give us the depth we need at ILB. it's a no brainer the only reason i could understand for us not signing him is that they want Brown and Bradham to flourish on their own and they don't want a strong personality like Spikes delaying or derailing their development Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted June 8, 2015 Author Share Posted June 8, 2015 sign him for the vet minimum. use him on 1st and 2nd down as a run stopper and it will give us the depth we need at ILB. it's a no brainer  the only reason i could understand for us not signing him is that they want Brown and Bradham to flourish on their own and they don't want a strong personality like Spikes delaying or derailing their development from what I could tell, they wanted to sign him as a backup. He wanted more of a role. The Pats are going for a front 7 designed to stop the run, and Hightower might not be healthy in time to start the season. I think they wanted him on the team but couldn't agree on role/terms and the Bills weren't willing to really negotiate. They like Ty Powell enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 sign him for the vet minimum. use him on 1st and 2nd down as a run stopper and it will give us the depth we need at ILB. it's a no brainer the only reason i could understand for us not signing him is that they want Brown and Bradham to flourish on their own and they don't want a strong personality like Spikes delaying or derailing their development Or they don't think Spikes is good enough to play in this D. Why is it a no-brainer? Spikes was on the bench a lot last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 sign him for the vet minimum. use him on 1st and 2nd down as a run stopper and it will give us the depth we need at ILB. it's a no brainer the only reason i could understand for us not signing him is that they want Brown and Bradham to flourish on their own and they don't want a strong personality like Spikes delaying or derailing their development  I don't think that phrase means what you think it means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 Or they don't think Spikes is good enough to play in this D. Why is it a no-brainer? Spikes was on the bench a lot last year. possibly the best run stuffer at his position in the whole league. even if they only play him on 1st down and short yardage i think he would be a bargain at the vet min Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 (edited) Cut from the Pats*? There goes his defense. Anyone on the team is presumed innocent before being assumed innocent. Â Obviously Roger Goodell is behind this. His campaign to discredit the Super Bowl Champs knows no bounds. Edited June 8, 2015 by PromoTheRobot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 possibly the best run stuffer at his position in the whole league. even if they only play him on 1st down and short yardage i think he would be a bargain at the vet min He obviously didn't re-sign with the Bills for the vet minimum which is why he signed with pats. I think the Bills have moved on...especially in light of this incident.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 Cut from the Pats*? There goes his defense. Anyone on the team is presumed innocent before being assumed innocent. Â Obviously Roger Goodell is behind this. His campaign to discredit the Super Bowl Champs knows no bounds. Maybe they should just reserve weekly hearings with goodell for current and former pats players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSBill Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 @AdamSchefter: Patriots released LB Brandon Spikes, per source. Wasted no time.... Â Not a surprise, the Pats are in no position to absorb bad PR, especially for a back-up role player type, innocent or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick in RaChaCha Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 ESPN reporting that 3 out 4 of Spikes tires were deflated and were not "Road Legal". Â Reports out of the PATS* camp - "There is no truth in the report that any of the tires were deflated and even if they were - it would have made no difference in the outcome of the crash" Â Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 Now it would be awesome if he were completely innocent. Although I truly doubt that is the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Landing Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 possibly the best run stuffer at his position in the whole league. even if they only play him on 1st down and short yardage i think he would be a bargain at the vet min That's really only the case if he's not guilty, or there isn't enough evidence to either convict him, or suspend him. A hit and run involving injury is a felony in California. Not sure about Mass. But, signing him now might very likely be tantamount to giving up a roster spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Nails Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 Spikes' call to OnStar was just released by state authorities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015  Reached out? Give me a break, if he weren't a wealthy dude the only way they would have "reached out" to him would have been with a pair of steel bracelets on the reaching hand  Wlecome to Murica. Home of the free...if you can pay enough for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 Tough break, but stupidity can cause those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted June 8, 2015 Share Posted June 8, 2015 Now it would be awesome if he were completely innocent. Although I truly doubt that is the case. id, at my own risk, assume that the pats security folks probably had intel that he was at a particular location in the particular car that night. making the "wasnt me" excuse not work. anything of course is possible but that seems most logical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts