Jump to content

Eagles searching for trade parter for G. Evan Mathis


Recommended Posts

actually if Williams designated Post June 1st its' a hair under $2 million we save. Buffalo has 2 designations per year, and haven't used any yet.

 

Agreed that Urbik doesn't make sense, and I don't think they would do that to him after he just agreed to a pay cut when you have Mario's contract you can renegotiate along with other players who could use pay cuts

Yes, we can gain an extra $1.75M cap, but that adds a $1.75M dead hit next season.

 

I can see us cutting Williams if(when) we sign a quality FA OG and post Juneing it.....but people should be aware that cutting him doesn't actually save us any real cap relief.

 

Due to the rollover cap rules, I have started looking at cap savings in two ways. Immediate cap savings....pertaining solely to the current cap. And real cap savings.....pertaining to the ongoing cap(multiple years).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This isn't Madden bro...get real.

 

Nobody is trading a 26 year old athletic TE reaching his prime for a 34 year old guard...unless you want to be fired on the spot

 

You would be hard pressed to find one personnel person in the NFL who could actually answer this question because they would be laughing so hysterically they couldn't talk...

Edited by matter2003
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't Madden bro...get real.

 

Nobody is trading a 26 year old athletic TE reaching his prime for a 34 year old guard...unless you want to be fired on the spot

 

You would be hard pressed to find one personnel person in the NFL who could actually answer this question because they would be laughing so hysterically they couldn't talk...

This!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, would this Off-season be epic if that happens! It's already been great, but this could be one for the ages.

with out a doubt Brother!!

But what if they are they trying to trade Nigel For Mathis and then get kiko back

 

Cutting Williams for sure.

 

Urbik took a paycut already and I think at his price he's worth it.

And Williams june1st or trade.urbik was a smart play

You should be banned.

repeatedly, and more than once

Idk philly still needs LBs I would see if they would bite on Manny Lawson, but I wouldn't offer much more than that.

i am okay with this. soory manny!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get on the phone Whaley.

 

CSN Philly's Geoff Mosher reports the Eagles may release LG Evan Mathis if they can't trade him.

 

PFF's No. 1 guard in 2013 and No. 2 guard last season, we're not sure why the Eagles are so inclined to get rid of Mathis. The Eagles are between $7-8 million under the cap, so they're not desperate for money. Shedding the 33-year-old would save $4.5 million. At 6'5/298, Mathis is an athletic guard and would ideally land in another zone-blocking scheme. Mathis could probably be had for a fifth-round pick. The Rams and Dolphins were linked to him earlier this month.
Edited by Buffalo Proud
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would trade a late rounder for him and maybe a low level player that Chip likes (Like Goodwin or some other marginal player with potential). I wouldn't deal the 3rd rounder for him but any other pick plus a late rounder next year or player seems like it would be a good price.

 

Only issue is, Mathis wants a pay increase, that's why the Eagles want to trade him. That's why I don't see it happening, the team is going to draft O-line round 2.

They have enough young offensive line bodies. They will draft DE, ILB, and S in rounds 2-4. Only offensive player might be a TE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know this guy but to me the thread title tells me everything i need to know. A lineman, particularly a guard, has to be willing to get dirty and play tough. A guy who calls himself G. Evan Mathis should probably be a lawyer or a consultant for a Wall Street firm. An NFL guard? I don't think so. Too snooty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Get on the phone Whaley.

 

 

CSN Philly's Geoff Mosher reports the Eagles may release LG Evan Mathis if they can't trade him.

 

PFF's No. 1 guard in 2013 and No. 2 guard last season, we're not sure why the Eagles are so inclined to get rid of Mathis. The Eagles are between $7-8 million under the cap, so they're not desperate for money. Shedding the 33-year-old would save $4.5 million. At 6'5/298, Mathis is an athletic guard and would ideally land in another zone-blocking scheme. Mathis could probably be had for a fifth-round pick. The Rams and Dolphins were linked to him earlier this month.

http://www.rotoworld.com/sports/nfl/football

I like Mathis and am in favor of Buffalo pursuing him; word of caution re PFF...Mathis gets paid to promote the site, so it's natural that he'd get a favorable grade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know this guy but to me the thread title tells me everything i need to know. A lineman, particularly a guard, has to be willing to get dirty and play tough. A guy who calls himself G. Evan Mathis should probably be a lawyer or a consultant for a Wall Street firm. An NFL guard? I don't think so. Too snooty.

Fitzgibbons went to Harvard. There's a lot of really smart guys that also play football....and G. Evan is a really good football player according to Joe B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just thinking out of the box. People like to insult Chip Kelly for making crazy moves, but at least he's being innovative. I suggest something that might seem crazy, but y'all just want to play it safe. Where has playing it safe gotten us? The longest current playoff drought in NFL history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just thinking out of the box. People like to insult Chip Kelly for making crazy moves, but at least he's being innovative. I suggest something that might seem crazy, but y'all just want to play it safe. Where has playing it safe gotten us? The longest current playoff drought in NFL history.

 

 

Define longest current drought in history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um, the 15 year drought we're in now. It's the longest current one in history. Meaning no team has currently gone longer than we have in the history of the league right now.

 

I have had the longest current headache in my history since 8:25 AM in the morning. Would you go with Advil or Tylenol?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just thinking out of the box. People like to insult Chip Kelly for making crazy moves, but at least he's being innovative. I suggest something that might seem crazy, but y'all just want to play it safe. Where has playing it safe gotten us? The longest current playoff drought in NFL history.

 

Father, why is this Pre-Season unlike all the other Pre-Seasons?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just thinking out of the box. People like to insult Chip Kelly for making crazy moves, but at least he's being innovative. I suggest something that might seem crazy, but y'all just want to play it safe. Where has playing it safe gotten us? The longest current playoff drought in NFL history.

 

Nothing says "thinking out of the box" like the cliche "thinking out of the box."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finding out today that the Eagles were interested in Woods for McCoy, they should call up Chip and offer Woods for Mathis.

I wouldn't trade Woods for Mathis but if they are planning on cutting Mathis, I would trade Hogan for him. Chip might be able to do something with Hogan as a 3 or 4. We would save a little money on Hogan so we can afford Mathis, and it would be much better to trade for him than to try to sign him as a FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't trade Woods for Mathis but if they are planning on cutting Mathis, I would trade Hogan for him. Chip might be able to do something with Hogan as a 3 or 4. We would save a little money on Hogan so we can afford Mathis, and it would be much better to trade for him than to try to sign him as a FA.

 

If they'd take Hogan, that's definitely the better deal for us, but I think I would be willing to offer up to Woods. We're deep enough at WR with Watkins, Harvin, and Clay, and I am not opposed to Hogan at 3 next year and drafting a receiver late this year or mid-range next year if Harvin doesn't work out, and the OL is in rough enough shape that a guard who only has 2 years left is worth it. Mathis has more ability to be contributing to whether "win now" works out more than Woods does as a strong #3 receiver on a run-first team.

 

i woudnt make that trade. Mathis is a decade older than woods. I would trade something for him, but not woods.

 

If we weren't cap strapped, I would say just trade whatever you need to. Trade the #2, to me, its about the same value since we're hoping to draft an immediate contributor to the OL at this point. By trading a player like Woods, you save that much cap room, and then you save more by cutting the redundant Chris Williams. Of course, this only makes sense if you stop trading picks for veterans because that is not a sustainable strategy to build a consistently winning team, but I don't think that is how Whaley or Rex or Pegula are thinking. They want to win now is all and it make sense and this would be the strongest way to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...