Jump to content

Cleveland Hypocrites release DT


Dablitzkrieg

Recommended Posts

The Browns just won't allow a player with these kind of abuse against women allegation on the team.....wait I read that wrong it's anymore players with these allegations, they're at maximum capacity, one player seems to be taking up most of the space, whoever that is.

  • Haha (+1) 6
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not a defense of Watson at all but you can be a bigger scumbag if you are a top player than a guy who is a JAG. I am very happy our biggest issue I know of is Diggs, which is minor, if the Bills had Watson I don't think I would watch. 

Edited by Orlando Tim
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fleezoid said:

So, 30 is the threshold. The team can tolerate up to 30 women abused or threatened. But 31?........No way!!

 

They invested too much of their Abused Woman Cap space on one player.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Bulldog said:

The Chiefs might need some help on the DL - I'm sure that they wouldn't have any issue with signing this guy. 

 

I may have been wrong about the Chiefs - perhaps the Bengals are a better situation for him. Joe Mixon may need a roommate. Mixon would be a great influence on this young man - he would never hit a woman or a child (allegedly). The hypocrisy in the NFL sometimes shows no bounds ...    

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are fans really still this naive? Some people don’t realize that the more valuable you are, the more leeway you have? Why do you think Big Ben got so many chances? Or every politician? 
 

its bs but that’s the way things go. If Josh Allen (he won’t because he’s a saint) gets accused like Watson, think he’s getting cut? Meanwhile, Boogie is cut that day 

  • Agree 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TheWeatherMan said:

So why is Watson still on the roster? 

Dude was basically on the Josh Allen trajectory for a minute there, had a individually good year on an awful team, then took a full year off.... in no way am i rooting for the guy, but they had to expect that rust after 18mos off. From strictly a talent stand point, you cant evaluate him on a half season.... even if you could e v a l him, that deal is inexcapable for a looooooooong time.  They knew the risk they were taking on, they have no choice but to ride it out

image.thumb.png.ef64d2e91ea26abecbc9843a64bf48ae.png

 

EDIT: LOLZZZZ $220m dead cap hit...... cap is $225m..... obv not happening, but even if they were dead set on it, LITERALLY CAN NOT. they'd have to cut the rest of the team and hire from grocery store, except that doesnt account for the other 52 players dead cap hit. Haslem is pretty shady, maybe could hire a hitman?

Edited by BillsShredder83
  • Shocked 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WhoTom said:

Browns' front office: "Cut him. We have a reputation to protect."

 

I love the smell of irony in the morning.

 

I hear they knew they had to do something, and the room was fairly evenly split between cut him and give him an extension. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...