Jump to content

TSW Mock Draft 2.0 - Complete!!


Virgil

Recommended Posts

  • Virgil changed the title to TSW Mock Draft 2.0 - The Panthers (Draconator) are on the clock

With the 1st pick in the TSW Mock Draft 2.0, the Carolina Panthers select

 

Bryce Young - QB - Alabama

 

The Panthers strongly considered Anthony Richardson with this pick but felt that Young would be the best fit and progress the most under Head Coach Frank Reich. 

 

The Texans @Alphadawg7are on the clock.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Draconator said:

With the 1st pick in the TSW Mock Draft 2.0, the Carolina Panthers select

 

Bryce Young - QB - Alabama

 

The Panthers strongly considered Anthony Richardson with this pick but felt that Young would be the best fit and progress the most under Head Coach Frank Reich. 

 

The Texans @Alphadawg7are on the clock.

 

 

Damn, I didn't even set my DVR yet.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Virgil changed the title to TSW Mock Draft 2.0 - The Texans (Alphadawg7) are on the clock

With the 2nd pick in the NFL draft, the Houston Texans select:  QB, CJ Stroud, Ohio State CLICK HERE FOR HIGHLIGHTS

 

We are excited to get our guy and who we believe will be the leader of our franchise for the foreseeable future.  CJ has everything we want in a QB and we believe his intangibles will translate into being a great passer at this next level. 
 

@manncand the Arizona Cardinals are now on the clock!  

Edited by Alphadawg7
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

Punter and kicker first two rounds.

 

I have genuinely wondered whether the play for the Packers is a good player at a low impact position. Because if Jordan Love is good, fine it wasn't the best use of a 1st, but you have a good player at a cheap price for 5 years. If Love is bad you haven't given him someone to artificially prop him up. And if we lose games this year we might be in touching distance of a better QB next year, and we can get rid of Matt LaFleur... which would be a big part of my plan if I was their GM for real. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I have genuinely wondered whether the play for the Packers is a good player at a low impact position. Because if Jordan Love is good, fine it wasn't the best use of a 1st, but you have a good player at a cheap price for 5 years. If Love is bad you haven't given him someone to artificially prop him up. And if we lose games this year we might be in touching distance of a better QB next year, and we can get rid of Matt LaFleur... which would be a big part of my plan if I was their GM for real. 

Lol I totally get that perspective because I’ve always thought Love was a huge reach and next year’s QB class is looking pretty special

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I have genuinely wondered whether the play for the Packers is a good player at a low impact position. Because if Jordan Love is good, fine it wasn't the best use of a 1st, but you have a good player at a cheap price for 5 years. If Love is bad you haven't given him someone to artificially prop him up. And if we lose games this year we might be in touching distance of a better QB next year, and we can get rid of Matt LaFleur... which would be a big part of my plan if I was their GM for real. 


They have put themselves in a tough spot because that 5th year option is coming up in 2024 already and its 20 million and Love hasn’t proven anything. They have to decide if they are picking that up in the next few weeks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:


They have put themselves in a tough spot because that 5th year option is coming up in 2024 already and its 20 million and Love hasn’t proven anything. They have to decide if they are picking that up in the next few weeks. 

 

When we do these I always try and take a team where I think the answers are not easy, because they are at a critical point of the build or the re-load or the tear down.... that is why Green Bay was on my list. They are in a tough spot. All five receivers on their current roster came out last year.... their own 2nd, 4th and 7th round picks, a 7th round pick that they plucked off the Seattle PS and an UDFA. It is going to be really hard to evaluate Jordan Love fairly or properly in that scenario and equally it is going to be hard to evaluate those young receivers fairly playing with Love as, essentially, a 4th season rookie. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Virgil changed the title to TSW Mock Draft 2.0 - The Cardinals (mannc) are on the clock

With the 3rd pick in the 2023 TSW Mock Draft 2.0, the Arizona Cardinals select Tyree Wilson, DE, Texas Tech.

 

Wilson is easily the top edge rusher in this class, with a much higher upside than Will Anderson, who was not even a consideration for us.  Wilson was double-teamed constantly at Texas Tech and still wreaked havoc. 6’6”, with an enormous wingspan and great athletic ability, Wilson reminds us of Julius Peppers.  (He even looks like Peppers.)
 

The Cards need help everywhere, so IRL, they would be seriously listening to offers for this pick, but in a no-trade mock, we’re going with the edge rusher with the most upside.

 

The Colts and @BarleyNY are on the clock.

Edited by mannc
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Virgil changed the title to TSW Mock Draft 2.0 - The Colts (BarelyNY) are on the clock
23 minutes ago, goober said:

Barely or Barly? 

Barley. I was a brewer (both home and professional) and certified beer judge.

With the fourth pick in the 2023 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts select Anthony Richardson, QB, Florida.

@NewEra is on the clock for the Seattle Seahawks.

Edited by BarleyNY
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Virgil changed the title to TSW Mock Draft 2.0 - The Seahawks (NewEra) are on the clock

Chargers are an interesting study....  I don't see any GLARING needs, but a collection of average needs at multiple positions.  Interesting.  Chargers could be a wildcard team with respect to taking players at positions the Bills need.  Just putting that out there for Bills fans to munch on.  This could go many directions.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Yantha said:

Chargers are an interesting study....  I don't see any GLARING needs, but a collection of average needs at multiple positions.  Interesting.  Chargers could be a wildcard team with respect to taking players at positions the Bills need.  Just putting that out there for Bills fans to munch on.  This could go many directions.

 

 

All the articles I see have them going WR, as they just can't seem to stay healthy in that area.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yantha said:

Chargers are an interesting study....  I don't see any GLARING needs, but a collection of average needs at multiple positions.  Interesting.  Chargers could be a wildcard team with respect to taking players at positions the Bills need.  Just putting that out there for Bills fans to munch on.  This could go many directions.

 

Kincaid all day.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...