Jump to content

Browns restructure Watson, to free up $36 million. How do you restructure a fully guaranteed deal?


buffaloboyinATL

Recommended Posts

Seriously? How do you re-structure a fully guaranteed contract without adding years to the deal?  The article says they converted salary into a signing bonus, but if it was already fully guaranteed, why would that matter? I want them to choke on that contract, so I hate seeing that there are loopholes available to them.  Anyone get how this works?

 

https://news.yahoo.com/ap-source-browns-restructure-watson-134639003.html

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, buffaloboyinATL said:

Seriously? How do you re-structure a fully guaranteed contract without adding years to the deal?  The article says they converted salary into a signing bonus, but if it was already fully guaranteed, why would that matter? I want them to choke on that contract, so I hate seeing that there are loopholes available to them.  Anyone get how this works?

 

https://news.yahoo.com/ap-source-browns-restructure-watson-134639003.html

He has high base salary. The contract won’t be a problem for them unless Watson sucks and they want to move on from him in the next few years.

Edited by Buffalo_Stampede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, buffaloboyinATL said:

Seriously? How do you re-structure a fully guaranteed contract without adding years to the deal?  The article says they converted salary into a signing bonus, but if it was already fully guaranteed, why would that matter? I want them to choke on that contract, so I hate seeing that there are loopholes available to them.  Anyone get how this works?

 

https://news.yahoo.com/ap-source-browns-restructure-watson-134639003.html

He's just converting base salary to some type of bonus...  just a cap-maneuver to spread the hits to future years.  It doesn't change how much will be paid to Watson in TOTAL/Guaranteed, over life of his contract (unless he accepts a pay cut, highly unlikely)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

They better hope he doesn’t suck
 

He didn’t look that great last year whenever he came in

The ownership and management of the team deserves the worst possible quarterback they can get out of Deshaun Watson. The fans and the other players deserve so much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, buffaloboyinATL said:

Seriously? How do you re-structure a fully guaranteed contract without adding years to the deal?  The article says they converted salary into a signing bonus, but if it was already fully guaranteed, why would that matter? I want them to choke on that contract, so I hate seeing that there are loopholes available to them.  Anyone get how this works?

 

https://news.yahoo.com/ap-source-browns-restructure-watson-134639003.html

 

When you covert salary into a bonus, it spreads the bonus out evenly over the remaining years, plus over any added years.  So if you convert $30M into a bonus, and you have 4 years remaining, it would lower the 1st year by $22.5M, but add $7.5M to the other 3 years.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question is - why don’t nfl teams just “extend” a player for like 20 years. Makes the cap hit negligible year to year. Certainly will have dead cap for the last 10 years as player no longer w team or even playing in nfl - but by that time the cap limit will assuredly go up. There has to be some kind of rule

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, balln said:

My question is - why don’t nfl teams just “extend” a player for like 20 years. Makes the cap hit negligible year to year. Certainly will have dead cap for the last 10 years as player no longer w team or even playing in nfl - but by that time the cap limit will assuredly go up. There has to be some kind of rule

My guess is a player would never agree to that type of deal

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, balln said:

My question is - why don’t nfl teams just “extend” a player for like 20 years. Makes the cap hit negligible year to year. Certainly will have dead cap for the last 10 years as player no longer w team or even playing in nfl - but by that time the cap limit will assuredly go up. There has to be some kind of rule

 

If the player retires, it accelerates any bonus money amount to the immediate year.  So yeah, you could add $5M a year for 20 years to spread it out, but when the player retires after 10, you'd get $50M upfront onto your cap.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, balln said:

My question is - why don’t nfl teams just “extend” a player for like 20 years. Makes the cap hit negligible year to year. Certainly will have dead cap for the last 10 years as player no longer w team or even playing in nfl - but by that time the cap limit will assuredly go up. There has to be some kind of rule

Injuries. Way too risky. Plus the dead cap at the end would be killer. Only position you could possibly do a mega long term deal with is QB but you better hope he never gets hurt.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, buffaloboyinATL said:

Seriously? How do you re-structure a fully guaranteed contract without adding years to the deal?  The article says they converted salary into a signing bonus, but if it was already fully guaranteed, why would that matter? I want them to choke on that contract, so I hate seeing that there are loopholes available to them.  Anyone get how this works?

 

https://news.yahoo.com/ap-source-browns-restructure-watson-134639003.html

 

It works the same way as any other restructure.  You can always convert salary to signing bonus, and amortize it over the life of the contract which lowers the current cap hit.  The player gets his money up-front instead of paid weekly in 18 installments, so usually the player's finance guy does an NPV calculation and tells the player he doesn't care even though in a state like NY he'll pay more state taxes that way.

 

 

Edited by Beck Water
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cle23 said:

 

If the player retires, it accelerates any bonus money amount to the immediate year.  So yeah, you could add $5M a year for 20 years to spread it out, but when the player retires after 10, you'd get $50M upfront onto your cap.

Exactly!

 

Plus in a perfect world of no injuries, perhaps we'd see some of this (not 20 yr deals, but maybe 5 fake years)....but in the NFL, injuries obviously happen alot and a serious injury to said player basically screws this entire strategy.. 

 

Too risky and not guarantees a future season of being extremely handicapped against the cap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...