Jump to content

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³πŸ‡·πŸ‡΄πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Biden's Corruption: $20M+ bribes. All the evidence that isn't evidence.


Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Β 

Hahahahahahahahahahaha.

Β 

Man, are they worried.

Β 

Β 

Β 

Β 

Β 

FzVtzwcXwAElwjr.png

This story is a clear case of continuously moving the goal posts.

Β 

The original contention from the Biden camp was Joe had no discussions about or knowledge of his son's business dealings.Β  But now that talking with and meeting them has been exposed the story changed to he's not involved in his son's business dealings.Β  Now Devon Archer will testify to the specifics of their business dealings which is expected to include testimony that will implicate Joe Biden in both knowledge and participation in his son's business dealings.Β 

Β 

So what's left might be an elderly gentleman "cannot recall the specifics of those discussions" defense.Β 

Β 

Yes they are worried.Β  But not for Joe.Β  The professional Washington insiders are all worried about themselves and the potential to expose their role in covering up and enabling the racket.Β  And potentially expose other rackets. Β 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

All that’s left now is for them to wake up Hilary so she can say β€œwe’ve been over all of this already”.Β 


Β 

β€œWhat difference does it make!”

Β 

Β 

The same morons upset and losing their **t over Trump’s taxes or some phony classified documents nonsense (bc national security!) are awfully quiet - and look pathetically hypocritical by not showing one iota of concern over the Biden’s corruption, pay to play, and cocaine in the White House.Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


Β 

β€œWhat difference does it make!”

Β 

Β 

The same morons upset and losing their **t over Trump’s taxes or some phony classified documents nonsense (bc national security!) are awfully quiet - and look pathetically hypocritical by not showing one iota of concern over the Biden’s corruption, pay to play, and cocaine in the White House.Β 

That’s because Washington no longer sees anything wrong with politicians padding their own wallets. They literally couldn’t care less. They’re all doing it.Β 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:


Β 

β€œWhat difference does it make!”

Β 

Β 

The same morons upset and losing their **t over Trump’s taxes or some phony classified documents nonsense (bc national security!) are awfully quiet - and look pathetically hypocritical by not showing one iota of concern over the Biden’s corruption, pay to play, and cocaine in the White House.Β 

That's because outrage is dependent on the actor rather than the act.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Β 

The democrats are correct:
Outside of the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners saying Joe is the β€œbrand,” the β€œbig guy,” and β€œthe chairman,” the two whistleblowers testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is NO evidence of Joe Biden being involved.

Β 

Β 

Β 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Β 

The democrats are correct:
Outside of the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners saying Joe is the β€œbrand,” the β€œbig guy,” and β€œthe chairman,” the two whistleblowers testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is NO evidence of Joe Biden being involved.

Β 

Β 

Β 

No actual evidence

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

I’ve gotta admit I don’t know what that means…but since he lives up the street from me, I guess I could go over ask him. πŸ˜‰

Β 

"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take."Β  And have you met him?Β  I drove by his winery in Niagara-on-the-lake a few weeks ago, but he wasn't there.

Β 

4 hours ago, aristocrat said:


classic fin idiotsΒ 

Β 

You mean like Slick talking to Loretta Lynch on the airplane or Hilly deleting only emails regarding Chels' impending nuptials?Β  Yeah, OK.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John from Riverside said:

Once again, just show the evidence that Joe Biden had anything to do with this
Β 

You can do whatever you want with Hunter that guys a screwup


Like @All_Pro_BillsΒ and now Fox News said - facts are irrelevant.Β 
Β 

May the best psyop win - right Karen?Β 
Β 

Β 

1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

Outside of the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners saying Joe is the β€œbrand,” the β€œbig guy,” and β€œthe chairman,” the two whistleblowers testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is NO evidence of Joe Biden being involved.


Has Dan shared todays transcript yet?

Β 

Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc said:

Β 

"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take."Β  And have you met him?Β  I drove by his winery in Niagara-on-the-lake a few weeks ago, but he wasn't there.

No, they live in a very small gated neighborhood, in suburban Los Angeles.Β 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BillStime said:

Β 

Talking points distributed - lmao

Β 

image.thumb.jpeg.d10c031a056f5a34aaa41e8ca175d344.jpeg

Β 

Β 

So ... why don't DR's fans just post there?

They claim to be frustrated, indignant, outraged by things they read here. Or worse, claiming to "ignore" people they disagree with. I understand all of the usual suspects post on that board too. So why not stay there?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Testimony UNDER oath. TESTIMONY under oath. Testimony under OATH!!

Β 

-- The King.....

Β 

Β 

Devon Archer’s testimony today is bombshell:
β€’ Hunter Biden’s ex BFF testified that the value of adding Hunter Biden to Burisma’s board was β€œthe brand” and confirmed that then-Vice President Joe Biden brought the most value to β€œthe brand.” Archer also stated that Burisma would have gone under if not for β€œthe brand.”

Β 

Devon Archer’s testimony:
β€’In December 2015, Mykola Zlochevsky, the owner of Burisma, and Vadym Pozharski, an executive of Burisma, placed constant pressure on Hunter Biden to get help from D.C. regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor, Viktor Shokin. Shokin was investigating Burisma for corruption. Hunter Biden, along with Zlochevsky and Pozharski, β€œcalled D.C.” to discuss the matter. Biden, Zlochevsky, and Pozharski stepped away to take make the call.Β 

Β 

Devon Archer testified that Hunter Biden put then-Vice President Joe Biden on the speakerphone during business meetings, over 20 times. Archer testified that Joe Biden was put on the phone to sell β€œthe brand.” These phone calls include a dinner in Paris with a French energy company and in China with Jonathan Li of BHR.
β€’In spring of 2014, then-Vice President Joe Biden attended a business dinner with his son, Hunter, and his associates at CafΓ© Milano in Washington, D.C. Elena Baturina, a Russian oligarch who is the widow of the former mayor of Moscow, attended the dinner. Notably, the Biden Administration’s public sanctions list for Russian oligarchs does not contain Baturina… 
From a source familiar with the testimonyΒ 

Β 

Β 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

Actually, the problem for the Republicans as they just spent a three hour interview to find out that Biden discussed business with no one
Β 

Oh, well maybe the next witness

What the testimony showed is Joe Biden lied when he said he and his son never discussed his son's business dealings.Β  Now we know Joe not only discussed but participated as well.Β  But still no evidence.

Β 

My suggestion to anyone expecting House Oversight committee chairman Comer to step up to the microphone and proclaim "now we got him!" needs to temper their expectations here.Β  What we should expect is a series of criminal referrals to the DOJ, 10, 20, 50 counts of some criminal violation.Β  Against various participants.Β  What Comer is going to say to Garland is here is all the evidence and recommendations for criminal prosecution.Β  But everything I'm giving you is everything you already know,Β  The DOJ and the FBI already know about the extent of the Biden family bribery and payoff operation.Β  But you've done nothing.Β  Because you've been told to do nothing.Β  We both know this, everybody in Washington knows this too.Β  You've been ordered not to investigate or prosecute anything.Β  By some person or group of persons.Β  Given this, I suggest that nailing the Biden's here will accomplish little to nothing in the big scheme of things.Β  Take out Joe and another player steps up to the plate for their swing at the cash ball.Β  The real target is something entirely different.Β  Let me explain.

Β 

Let's start with the laptop. The DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, etc, all know the laptop and its contents are authentic and belonged to Hunter.Β  They know it was not a classic Russian disinformation operation.Β  They know the contents would be personally and professionally and legally damaging to Joe Biden and to his family.Β  Barr at DOJ knew it was authentic, Garland knows it's authentic, Comey at the FBI knew it was authentic, Wray knows this too.Β  So why did they bury the story and the machine in some basement storage room?Β  Why did they and 51 former IC members that signed a letter concluding it was Russian disinformation lie and continue to lie?Β  Why didn't the CIA and FBI step up and provide evidence during the Trump impeachment that would have confirmed the President had reasonable and probably cause to suspect wrongdoing by the Biden's in relation to Ukraine?Β Β 

Β 

More importantly, who gave these people the orders, and who continues to give orders such as the one to to bury that PC in that basement storage room and who told those IC members to lie?Β  What's the identity of the Wizard behind the curtain giving the orders to these people?Β  Who's running the swamp?Β  That's really it.Β  Who's running the protection racket that enables politicians, including the Biden's but so many more, to line their pockets?Β  Who gave the order to the IRS director telling them to stop IRS agents from investigating the tax returns of Hunter Biden and the financial transaction record of the Biden family?Β 

Β 

The goal isn't to just take down Biden.Β  Its to take down the mafia-like system that enables these kinds of operations to fester.Β  Its the system that provides protection, that calls out FBI SWAT teams in the middle of the night to harass people causing problems, initiates investigations and searches for legal transgressions against dissenters, buries evidence and proof of payoffs, and silences people asking too many questions.Β Β Its an organized system of corruption that permeates the leadership of our government.Β  It needs to be taken down to ensure the continuation of our Democracy and Constitution system of government.Β Β 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

What the testimony showed is Joe Biden lied when he said he and his son never discussed his son's business dealings.Β  Now we know Joe not only discussed but participated as well.Β  But still no evidence.

Β 

My suggestion to anyone expecting House Oversight committee chairman Comer to step up to the microphone and proclaim "now we got him!" needs to temper their expectations here.Β  What we should expect is a series of criminal referrals to the DOJ, 10, 20, 50 counts of some criminal violation.Β  Against various participants.Β  What Comer is going to say to Garland is here is all the evidence and recommendations for criminal prosecution.Β  But everything I'm giving you is everything you already know,Β  The DOJ and the FBI already know about the extent of the Biden family bribery and payoff operation.Β  But you've done nothing.Β  Because you've been told to do nothing.Β  We both know this, everybody in Washington knows this too.Β  You've been ordered not to investigate or prosecute anything.Β  By some person or group of persons.Β  Given this, I suggest that nailing the Biden's here will accomplish little to nothing in the big scheme of things.Β  Take out Joe and another player steps up to the plate for their swing at the cash ball.Β  The real target is something entirely different.Β  Let me explain.

Β 

Let's start with the laptop. The DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, etc, all know the laptop and its contents are authentic and belonged to Hunter.Β  They know it was not a classic Russian disinformation operation.Β  They know the contents would be personally and professionally and legally damaging to Joe Biden and to his family.Β  Barr at DOJ knew it was authentic, Garland knows it's authentic, Comey at the FBI knew it was authentic, Wray knows this too.Β  So why did they bury the story and the machine in some basement storage room?Β  Why did they and 51 former IC members that signed a letter concluding it was Russian disinformation lie and continue to lie?Β  Why didn't the CIA and FBI step up and provide evidence during the Trump impeachment that would have confirmed the President had reasonable and probably cause to suspect wrongdoing by the Biden's in relation to Ukraine?Β Β 

Β 

More importantly, who gave these people the orders, and who continues to give orders such as the one to to bury that PC in that basement storage room and who told those IC members to lie?Β  What's the identity of the Wizard behind the curtain giving the orders to these people?Β  Who's running the swamp?Β  That's really it.Β  Who's running the protection racket that enables politicians, including the Biden's but so many more, to line their pockets?Β  Who gave the order to the IRS director telling them to stop IRS agents from investigating the tax returns of Hunter Biden and the financial transaction record of the Biden family?Β 

Β 

The goal isn't to just take down Biden.Β  Its to take down the mafia-like system that enables these kinds of operations to fester.Β  Its the system that provides protection, that calls out FBI SWAT teams in the middle of the night to harass people causing problems, initiates investigations and searches for legal transgressions against dissenters, buries evidence and proof of payoffs, and silences people asking too many questions.Β Β Its an organized system of corruption that permeates the leadership of our government.Β  It needs to be taken down to ensure the continuation of our Democracy and Constitution system of government.Β Β 

Not according to them. the MSM sites said the hearing was a dud and nothing was proven. so that's what they run with as fact.

Β 

Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

So ... why don't DR's fans just post there?

They claim to be frustrated, indignant, outraged by things they read here. Or worse, claiming to "ignore" people they disagree with. I understand all of the usual suspects post on that board too. So why not stay there?


I agree but… they are lonely and crave attention to distract from their pathetic lives and bad choices.Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Β 

Here you go. He talked to his son about his foreign business dealings because he's a loving family man...

Β 

:lol:

Β 

Β 

Yikes. Joe Biden partnering with Hunter in significant business deals is actually evidence of his deep commitment to his critically ill son.Β 
Β 

God bless Hunter for finding a way to help his father deal with things.Β 

  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Β 

If anyone still believes in Joe's innocence at this point they're either lying to themselves or incapable of rational thought.Β  But then again these are the same folks that believe Trump sold nuclear top secrets.Β  Even though not a single charge mentioned it.Β  And absent a shred of evidence or proof.Β  But they heard it from Joe Scarborough.Β  So it must be true!Β  And they insist the other guys are in a cult.Β  Comical.Β  Just comical. Β  Β Β 

  • Awesome! (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking as a guy who worked with public elected officials for over FORTY years; the minute Joe got brought into any one of those phone calls he should have immediately said β€œI can’t be involved here” and gotten off the call. Then…he should’ve told his son to NEVER do that again.Β 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Speaking as a guy who worked with public elected officials for over FORTY years; the minute Joe got brought into any one of those phone calls he should have immediately said β€œI can’t be involved here” and gotten off the call. Then…he should’ve told his son to NEVER do that again.Β 

Agreed.

I've been saying for months that Hunter should be investigated. And these congressional investigations, even though "political" (hey, it's an elected branch), have yielded some important information.

Now here's the dividing line. We can all agree that getting Joe on the line was inappropriate, unbecoming, unsavory. As I understand it though, this was after he was out of office, before he was running again. So "unsavory" is not the same as "illegal."

What happened before 2017 is really the key here. We shall see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...