Jump to content

Biden and the crises er challenge on the border


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

How does making the population dependent on the government for income lead to tyranny- that’s your question? 

let the people go hungry and see how long the governmnent lasts 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

That's my point, you screw up and let people starve and you end up with those types of governmnents, 

 

Socialist policies like Obamacare, medicare, social security just make us stronger 


 

you missed the point, Those types of governments were the ones that let people starve. They were 100% driven by socialist policies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


 

you missed the point, Those types of governments were the ones that let people starve. They were 100% driven by socialist policies. 

Only tibs can argue against and for socialism in the same post. Good stuff.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


 

you missed the point, Those types of governments were the ones that let people starve. They were 100% driven by socialist policies. 

Those people could not vote, we are a democracy, very different 

3 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Only tibs can argue against and for socialism in the same post. Good stuff.

Too complicated for you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

As the border crisis explodes, one thing’s grown crystal-clear, despite the lying Bidenites’ efforts to obfuscate:

 

Their only priority is to admit every illegal migrant they can.

 

The latest surrender: The administration is just letting everyone go in areas where holding facilities are overcrowded (how many aren’t, we wonder?), with a stern note telling them to report to some ICE office within a couple of months or maybe file an asylum claim by mail.

 

These “mass releases” began before the end of Title 42 removed the last real restraint.

 

They’re calling it “parole,” since “catch and release” doesn’t sound good on a press release.

 

Why not just stop the line at the border until you have room?

 

Only because waving everybody through is their goal.

 

Or witness Homeland Security boss Alejandro Mayorkas’ pique after Texas National Guardsmen erected barbed wire to block one popular illegal-crossing spot: “I’m going to leave it to our Department of Justice to speak to the lawfulness, or lack thereof, of those actions,” he huffed.

 

If he thought his job was to keep people from crossing illegally, a simple “Thanks!” would do.

 

That he instead all but called it illegal shows the reverse and reveals the perverse priorities of this administration.

 

This is why Mayorkas keeps insisting the border is “under control” — because for his purposes, it is.

 

From the outset, this shady administration’s only goal has been to admit as many people as stealthily and speedily as possible, while avoiding the “bad optics” of migrants held in detention facilities or under bridges.

 

They haven’t even got the courage to stand by their progressive principles of a completely open border.

 

The dishonesty is at the root of President Joe Biden’s flacks bragging about how he’s achieved “the largest expansion of lawful pathways” to enter “in decades.”

That’s because they are straining the laws to make it as easy as possible.

 

Same for the complaints that this mess is only because Congress won’t pass “immigration reform.”

 

What they mean is “mass legalization” to speed up the lines.

 

Certainly not, say, toughening the rules for claiming asylum or enforcing a secure border.

 

In fact, asylum provisions were never intended to allow the mass migration now under way.

 

Yet the left has gradually twisted them into a license for end-running every other immigration statute.

 

Time and time again, the Bidenites have insisted the law leaves them no choice.

 

The truth is, they just don’t want to own up to the disaster they blindly pursued.

 

https://nypost.com/2023/05/11/growing-crisis-proves-bidens-only-priority-is-to-admit-em-all/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, aristocrat said:


joe bout to lose that vote lol

 

And they're about to lose their voices.  Elections have consequences.  I'm sure none of them knew how terrible they would be though when they voted for Joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SCBills said:

 


Funny, they didn’t want to tweet the part that they were being transferred to another hotel.

Also ironic considering the GQP voted against a spending bill for veterans exposed to burn pits and currently wants to reduce spending on veterans by 22% 

 

You can’t make this up… 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Funny, they didn’t want to tweet the part that they were being transferred to another hotel.

Also ironic considering the GQP voted against a spending bill for veterans exposed to burn pits and currently wants to reduce spending on veterans by 22% 

 

You can’t make this up… 

 


Who transferred them?   The vets had to reach out to local advocates who found them other temporary housing. 
 

Why do they have to move?  Why can’t they simply find somewhere else for the migrants?

 

Also, this is NY .. why are you ranting on about House Republicans and the debt ceiling negotiations?

 

Edited by SCBills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Who transferred them?   The vets had to reach out to local advocates who found them other temporary housing. 
 

Why do they have to move?  Why can’t they simply find somewhere else for the migrants?

 

Also, this is NY .. why are you ranting on about House Republicans and the debt ceiling negotiations?

 


Is the hotel owned by the government?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Is the hotel owned by the government?


Clearly your “concern for vets” in other threads is simply performative when it benefits your views politically.

 

Glad we can clear that up. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, SCBills said:


Clearly your “concern for vets” in other threads is simply performative when it benefits your views politically.

 

Glad we can clear that up. 

He has no political views. It’s all just screaming about partisan crap day after day. He doesn’t know or remember what he’s screaming for anymore. Just totally  lost in the ‘my team’ matrix. Sad…he had such promise. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Chris farley said:

At this point, it's like that's the goal 


Ding ding ding. 
 

Watching conservatives here cry “incompetence” would be cute if it weren’t so incredible naïve. It’s like they’re incapable of entertaining the possibility that the left’s goals are completely different from what theirs would be in their position. 
 

“Why are they doing this?” To destroy the country, obviously. But that wouldn’t be the conservative’s goal, so they’re blind to it. 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

He has no political views. It’s all just screaming about partisan crap day after day. He doesn’t know or remember what he’s screaming for anymore. Just totally  lost in the ‘my team’ matrix. Sad…he had such promise. 

 

Sounds like a guy/gal that any reasonable person should have permanently residing on their ignore list.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, aristocrat said:

 

yep, keep voting democrat, idiots.

invasion
[ in-vey-zhuhn ]SHOW IPA


See synonyms for invasion on Thesaurus.com
📙 Middle School Level
noun
an act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, especially by an army.

 

the entrance or advent of anything troublesome or harmful, as disease.
entrance as if to take possession or overrun:

 

the annual invasion of the resort by tourists.
infringement by intrusion.

Edited by Unforgiven
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On cable news they reported businesses are hiring migrants in NYC as fast as they can. Construction , cleaning jobs , lawn care etc. Not sure if accurate but workers are needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ALF said:

On cable news they reported businesses are hiring migrants in NYC as fast as they can. Construction , cleaning jobs , lawn care etc. Not sure if accurate but workers are needed.


Good .. as a sanctuary city, they should continue to take them in and stop bussing them into Westchester. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...