Jump to content

Isaiah Mckenzie Re-signed!!


Rubes

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

I don't think so.  Beane isn't using another 1st rounder on WR.  They will address it next year in regards to the age stuff.

CB and DE in the 1st 2 rounds would be my bet.


I don’t think Beane is eliminating the possibility of using a late 1st on a WR just because of what he gave up to get Diggs. 
 

WRs typically don’t put up big numbers as rookies. Wouldn’t be a bad idea to take on in the first few rounds to develop behind vets like Beasley, Sanders and Diggs rather than just throwing them in the fire because we have nobody else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GunnerBill said:

Love me some McKenzie. Can't wait for the training camp threads where the next UDFA 6ft4 receiver who can't run is getting love from fans who want McKenzie cut. 

Really? Wonder why some wanted him cut? Kinda weird....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, OutOfBubbleGum said:

Resigned is an adjective that means having an accepting, unresisting attitude or in a state of submission. A person who is resigned is often in a state of realization that the negative situation that is happening to them will continue to happen and that they can't do anything to stop it.

 

lol had too.  Re-signed

 

 

I ought to know better, but when I saw the post the first thing I thought of was "Isaiah McKenzie retired? Is it because of concussion risk, etc."

Glad to see that missing hyphen didn't mean anything like that.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need our hyphenate.

 

And when I say hyphenate, I don't mean that he's a WR - gadget guy - returner.

 

I mean he re-signed. With a hyphen. 

 

Unless he decides to leave a job at some point, which would be resigning. I know, I know, who cares, right? But it's a whole different word.

Edited by Thurman#1
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Bangarang said:


I’m not so sure. Sanders is only here for a year and Beasley isn’t getting any younger. 
 

We have Davis and not much else in terms of young WR talent. 

I'd say Diggs should still qualify as young but maybe I'm wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Victory Formation said:

Figured as much.

Much like last season, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...