Jump to content

The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Seems like just yesterday folks like Pelosi and Schumer called edited videos, propaganda.  but in this case, an ABC produced edited video, is evidence?  in a kangaroo court?

 

It's only OK (to them) when they do it.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Wow, Trump can cause strokes now? Oh wait you are still over a year behind the times and believe he died from the riot.

Looks like it. He stirs up a violent mob and causes injuries that killed a cop. 

 

 

You could care less. You are proud of running cover for this garbage 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

Looks like it. He stirs up a violent mob and causes injuries that killed a cop. 

 

 

You could care less. You are proud of running cover for this garbage 

The coroner says that the riot has nothing to do with his death but I like facts, what are you basing your on?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Looks like it. He stirs up a violent mob and causes injuries that killed a cop.

 

So did Dems in 2020.  Where is the committee on that? 

 

As for the cop, never happened.  You can't injure (and they didn't even do that) someone into a stroke caused by a blood clot.

Edited by Doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

ROGER KIMBALL: 

The ‘Get Trump’ Show: It is never the pretext—-putative Russian collusion or protests at the Capitol—-that is at issue but rather the ontological unacceptability of Trump and all he stands for. 

 

“The Democrats went all-out with this entertainment. I cannot, however, pronounce it an unqualified success. Nor did the public, which mostly reacted with a yawn.”

 

Plus: “The January 6 Committee has taken up where the Mueller show left off. The great difficulty for both shows is their utterly incredible premises. Donald Trump did not ‘collude’ with Russia or kowtow to Vladimir Putin. With every passing month we know with greater clarity that that entire $34 million entertainment was cooked up by Hillary Clinton and her agents. Which is why former Attorney General Bill Barr, no friend of Donald Trump, just opined on Glenn Beck’s podcast that Clinton might be guilty of sedition in her covert attack on Trump. . . . It’s the same with the January 6 jamboree. The whole raison d’être of the January 6 committee is to show that Donald Trump colluded with various nefarious forces—in this week’s episode, it’s the paramilitary group called the Proud Boys—to stage a ‘coup’ and ‘overturn’ the 2020 election.

 

The problem is that the unruly protest at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, was neither an ‘insurrection’ nor an attempted coup.”

 

https://amgreatness.com/2022/06/11/the-get-trump-show/

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

I am surprised it is Tibs and not Billstime using quotes like this. This is the whole quote "You can make the case, and I would agree, that he's politically, morally responsible for much of what has happened" he did not say Jan 6th and he was discussing the direction of the country 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Doc said:

Please, please, please try and indict Trump.  I dare you.

You dare who?   Go ahead and tell us the rest of your threat.

 

I have not followed this thread closely so perhaps this has been asked already but, why was the Stop the steal rally scheduled on a Wednesday morning?  Normally these type of  events are held over a weekend but this one coincided with the Congressional procedures to recognize the state electors to facilitate transition, right?

 

if taken alone the Jan 6 events could be, if one wanted to again give Trump the benefit of the doubt, just a rally that got out of hand.  Of course if taken as part of the sequence of events that happened after Trump learned he lost the 2020 election, clearly this was yet another try at retaining power.  

 

Trump will never be convicted of anything in this political environment, imo.  If proven to be involved with planning of the break in and interruption of the transition though, I think he should be indicted as that would be illegal.  If not proven to be involved, he shouldn’t be indicted.  Of course ‘proven’ is subjective and many who wear their orange robes are unable to fathom the leaders guilt in anything, so..... 

 

To advocate that he not be indicted when guilty would be to place him above the law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

You dare who?   Go ahead and tell us the rest of your threat.

 

I have not followed this thread closely so perhaps this has been asked already but, why was the Stop the steal rally scheduled on a Wednesday morning?  Normally these type of  events are held over a weekend but this one coincided with the Congressional procedures to recognize the state electors to facilitate transition, right?

 

if taken alone the Jan 6 events could be, if one wanted to again give Trump the benefit of the doubt, just a rally that got out of hand.  Of course if taken as part of the sequence of events that happened after Trump learned he lost the 2020 election, clearly this was yet another try at retaining power.  

 

Trump will never be convicted of anything in this political environment, imo.  If proven to be involved with planning of the break in and interruption of the transition though, I think he should be indicted as that would be illegal.  If not proven to be involved, he shouldn’t be indicted.  Of course ‘proven’ is subjective and many who wear their orange robes are unable to fathom the leaders guilt in anything, so..... 

 

To advocate that he not be indicted when guilty would be to place him above the law.

All very well said. So, Schumer is guilty as well then? No?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

All very well said. So, Schumer is guilty as well then? No?

Well, if Schumer is guilty, go ahead and indict him.  If there is proof of a crime, any person should be charged. What proof of what crime are you referencing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob in Mich said:

Well, if Schumer is guilty, go ahead and indict him.  If there is proof of a crime, any person should be charged. What proof of what crime are you referencing?

He publicly threatened Supreme Court justices….didn’t they cover that in Michigan?

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

You dare who?   Go ahead and tell us the rest of your threat.

 

I have not followed this thread closely so perhaps this has been asked already but, why was the Stop the steal rally scheduled on a Wednesday morning?  Normally these type of  events are held over a weekend but this one coincided with the Congressional procedures to recognize the state electors to facilitate transition, right?

 

if taken alone the Jan 6 events could be, if one wanted to again give Trump the benefit of the doubt, just a rally that got out of hand.  Of course if taken as part of the sequence of events that happened after Trump learned he lost the 2020 election, clearly this was yet another try at retaining power.  

 

Trump will never be convicted of anything in this political environment, imo.  If proven to be involved with planning of the break in and interruption of the transition though, I think he should be indicted as that would be illegal.  If not proven to be involved, he shouldn’t be indicted.  Of course ‘proven’ is subjective and many who wear their orange robes are unable to fathom the leaders guilt in anything, so..... 

 

To advocate that he not be indicted when guilty would be to place him above the law.

It was a busy week. Actual Trump calendar for the week in question:

 

Monday, 1/4/21

9am - 7pm    Tour of Moscow with V

 

Tuesday,  1/5/21 

9am - 1pm     Punch puppies at Pet Smart

1pm - 3pm     Tweet

3pm - 7pm     Coveffee with Melanie 

 

Wednesday, 1/6/21

 

OPEN

 

Thursday,  1/7/21

 

9am - 9pm    Discuss Kraken Unleashing w/ Rudy

 

Friday,  1/8/21 


Winter Break Begins 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

It was a busy week. Actual Trump calendar for the week in question:

 

Monday, 1/4/21

9am - 7pm    Tour of Moscow with V

 

Tuesday,  1/5/21 

9am - 1pm     Punch puppies at Pet Smart

1pm - 3pm     Tweet

3pm - 7pm     Coveffee with Melanie 

 

Wednesday, 1/6/21

 

OPEN

 

Thursday,  1/7/21

 

9am - 9pm    Discuss Kraken Unleashing w/ Rudy

 

Friday,  1/8/21 


Winter Break Begins 

 

 

Ah-ha! Smoking gun!!!    Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

He publicly threatened Supreme Court justices….didn’t they cover that in Michigan?

I am no lawyer but if what Schumer did is worthy of charging, then charge him.  From what I know, those don’t seem like equivalent actions but if so, charge him

 

See, that should be a simple decision. Those proven guilty should be punished.  No asking what tribe he is in or what that would mean politically.  

 

 

Edited by Bob in Mich
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

He publicly threatened Supreme Court justices….didn’t they cover that in Michigan?

 

It's amazing how quickly the right wing talking points are circulated across all channels online... gotta commend the cult when they need to quickly rally behind their new boogeyman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

 

It's amazing how quickly the right wing talking points are circulated across all channels online... gotta commend the cult when they need to quickly rally behind their new boogeyman.

I think its more likely the majority of posters here across the political and social spectrum are capable of producing their own conclusions generated through logic and critical thinking rather than sitting in front of the TV watching or websites and waiting for CNN. MSNBC, FOX, or some other outlet for their marching orders on narratives and "talking points".     

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

33 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

I think its more likely the majority of posters here across the political and social spectrum are capable of producing their own conclusions generated through logic and critical thinking rather than sitting in front of the TV watching or websites and waiting for CNN. MSNBC, FOX, or some other outlet for their marching orders on narratives and "talking points".     

 

 

That is correct.

 

 

 

 

January 6th Committee Previews Another Dud in the Second Hearing

 

da32a042-02ee-4285-be32-931d5268c3bb-860

 

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/06/13/january-6th-committee-previews-another-dud-in-the-second-hearing-n577933

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bob in Mich said:

I am no lawyer but if what Schumer did is worthy of charging, then charge him.  From what I know, those don’t seem like equivalent actions but if so, charge him

 

See, that should be a simple decision. Those proven guilty should be punished.  No asking what tribe he is in or what that would mean politically.  

 

 

And there in lies the difference. Under Pelosi the Democrats have turned politics into a true blood sport. I fear the Republicans are going to be forced to do the same. It’s not good.

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Was the election stolen in 2020? 

 

It very well may have been.  It was the least secure election in modern times, given the last-minute changes.  But since it's hard to prove fraud since ID isn't checked at a lot of places, we have to rely on changes to the election laws.  And despite all the histrionics by the Dems over "voter suppression!" they're actually doing the opposite.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sandy

@JAH14811221

“I try to do good in the world not out of fear for hell or reward of heaven, but because it feels better not to be an #######.”   a--hole

Edited by ALF
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

All very well said. So, Schumer is guilty as well then? No?

 

Dont respond to this douche turds WHATABOUTISM.

 

They cant stick to the topic so they spin and spin and spin.

 

 

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=define+whataboutism&oq=define+whataboutism&aqs=chrome..69i57.3279j1j7&client=ms-android-att-us-revc&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bob in Mich said:

I am no lawyer but if what Schumer did is worthy of charging, then charge him.  From what I know, those don’t seem like equivalent actions but if so, charge him

 

See, that should be a simple decision. Those proven guilty should be punished.  No asking what tribe he is in or what that would mean politically.  

 

 

Bob, where is anyone here saying that people who broke the law shouldn't be prosecuted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:

Bob, where is anyone here saying that people who broke the law shouldn't be prosecuted?

 

Well, without naming names, almost all of the folks minimizing the seriousness of the J6 event or denying the intended goal of that event are essentially advocating that we ignore the central players’ guilt in orchestrating the event. They don’t want an investigation in my opinion because they don’t want further accountability 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...