Jump to content

Lift Every Voice disaster


Recommended Posts

I am flabbergasted by the fact that the NFL will play, and apparently broadcast, the *same* Lift Every Voice narrative/performance video before EACH GAME, ALL SEASON. Can you imagine how stale and meaningless this is going to be after 5, 10, 15, 20 weeks? This is truly unbelievable. And the players are going to be videoed each week as they feel the pressure to watch and react to the video as it's played in stadium. It's going to become a joke, especially as it is followed by a new, original national anthem rendition every single time. They couldn't do an original Lift Every Voice every week also because why?

 

This is to say nothing about the fact that it is performed by the incomparably annoying Alicia Keys, but that's a conversation for another day and has nothing to do with it.

 

https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/9448159/roc-nation-nfl-partnership-interview

 

"The 'Lift Every Voice' video with Keys and Mackie will be played before every NFL game this season..."

Edited by Giuseppe Tognarelli
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

Agreed - it's an empty gesture. 

 

 

Good Morning Wacky! We’ve actually found something we agree on. Organizations need to really plan ahead before making statements and gestures that last any predetermined length of time. Circumstances change fast and you can find yourself wondering ‘is this still a thing?’. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Alaska Darin said:

Ignore it, just like you do the National Anthem.

 

Speaking of ignoring things, I noticed that you still haven’t provided any evidence to support your wild accusations of a critical mass of in-person voter fraud that were levied a few days ago.  Just a reminder that, in the absence of such evidence, I’ll have no choice but to consider your voter fraud claims a hoax.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

Speaking of ignoring things, I noticed that you still haven’t provided any evidence to support your wild accusations of a critical mass of in-person voter fraud that were levied a few days ago.  Just a reminder that, in the absence of such evidence, I’ll have no choice but to consider your voter fraud claims a hoax.  

There isn't a word invented that accurately conveys how little I care about your opinion on that.  You can chose to pretend that it doesn't happen based on the government's reticence to admit it publically or the media's reasons for not seriously investigating it if you so desire. 

 

There's absolutely zero reason not to require a photo identification, other than it's easier to commit fraud.  The rest of it is the typical "soft poverty of low expectation" that is standard liberal bigotry.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Alaska Darin said:

There isn't a word invented that accurately conveys how little I care about your opinion on that.  You can chose to pretend that it doesn't happen based on the government's reticence to admit it publically or the media's reasons for not seriously investigating it if you so desire. 

 

There's absolutely zero reason not to require a photo identification, other than it's easier to commit fraud.  The rest of it is the typical "soft poverty of low expectation" that is standard liberal bigotry.

 

The only thing of lesser quantity than your care for my opinion is the evidence you have to support your contention with respect to a critical mass of in-person voter fraud.  Have a nice day sniping at yourself, hoaxer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alaska Darin said:

There isn't a word invented that accurately conveys how little I care about your opinion on that.  You can chose to pretend that it doesn't happen based on the government's reticence to admit it publically or the media's reasons for not seriously investigating it if you so desire. 

 

There's absolutely zero reason not to require a photo identification, other than it's easier to commit fraud.  The rest of it is the typical "soft poverty of low expectation" that is standard liberal bigotry.

So no evidence. Just made up 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Alaska Darin said:

One thousand votes says the WH, over a period of how many years where hundreds of millions of votes were cast? Lame 

The NYPost story is of someone who claims they did something on a grand scale of fraud, if that's true there should be evidence. 

 

The task of counting ballots is a different issue, but serious 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

This is where the leftists scan your list explain how you didn't prove your point because you referenced townhall.com.

 

 

Again...don't care.  Anyone who thinks the government and media doesn't cover up that stuff for specific reasons is out of their mind.

 

Liberals can only sell the "voter suppression" thing because their supporters will blindly follow them wherever they go. 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Alaska Darin said:

Again...don't care.  Anyone who thinks the government and media doesn't cover up that stuff for specific reasons is out of their mind.

 

Liberals can only sell the "voter suppression" thing because their supporters will blindly follow them wherever they go. 

 

Glad to have you posting here again.

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Alaska Darin said:

There isn't a word invented that accurately conveys how little I care about your opinion on that.  You can chose to pretend that it doesn't happen based on the government's reticence to admit it publically or the media's reasons for not seriously investigating it if you so desire. 

 

There's absolutely zero reason not to require a photo identification, other than it's easier to commit fraud.  The rest of it is the typical "soft poverty of low expectation" that is standard liberal bigotry.

A George W. Bush line! But it was "the soft bigotry of low expectations," and I'm not sure it applies here ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ll share my unpopular opinion...

 

If I’m going to ask ANYONE to hear my thoughts and perspectives, then I need to do even more to hear theirs.  If Alicia Keys voice helps any one player feel more included (while doing nothing to disparage others), then I will happily support it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Speaking of ignoring things, I noticed that you still haven’t provided any evidence to support your wild accusations of a critical mass of in-person voter fraud that were levied a few days ago.  Just a reminder that, in the absence of such evidence, I’ll have no choice but to consider your voter fraud claims a hoax.  

You still want others to be held to a higher standard than yourself and can't figure out why people don't respond to you too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

This is where the leftists scan your list explain how you didn't prove your point because you referenced townhall.com.

 

 


Nope.  This is where the links are called inapt because they deal principally with absentee balloting.  At issue is in-person balloting.  So just another @Alaska Darin hoax here.  Maybe he’ll be smiling at you from his balcony later today.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:


Nope.  This is where the links are called inapt because they deal principally with absentee balloting.  At issue is in-person balloting.  So just another @Alaska Darin hoax here.  Maybe he’ll be smiling at you from his balcony later today.  

 

You continue to prove your worth as a total liar who's rooting for dead bodies in the streets.  

 

There's very little difference between mail in voting and absentee ballots THIS year because absentee ballot requests are through the roof, at an unprecedented scale.  

 

Still, ADs links also reference this particular case, where votes were only through the mail.  Of course you know about this case, but are still being an obstinate ass.  

 

Have you had one positive contribution since you discovered this site?  Are you that much of a depraved human who revels at the bloodshed, because you don't like a fat orange man?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, GG said:

 

You continue to prove your worth as a total liar who's rooting for dead bodies in the streets.  

 

There's very little difference between mail in voting and absentee ballots THIS year because absentee ballot requests are through the roof, at an unprecedented scale.  

 

Still, ADs links also reference this particular case, where votes were only through the mail.  Of course you know about this case, but are still being an obstinate ass.  

 

Have you had one positive contribution since you discovered this site?  Are you that much of a depraved human who revels at the bloodshed, because you don't like a fat orange man?

 

 

You seem to have been triggered.  Sad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

You seem to have been triggered.  Sad. 

What's sadder is your bloodlust.   I recommend you read up on the Russian revolution and see what happened to the useless idiot elites. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...