Jump to content

Russia Was Not a Democratic Hoax


Recommended Posts


 

FBI Agents Working On Russia Probe Say Leaders Concealed Intelligence On Hillary’s Role

 

Order not to put anything in writing "was the most inappropriate operational or professional statement he had ever heard at the FBI," FBI lawyer said.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/betrayal-fbi-agents-working-on-russia-probe-say-leaders-concealed-intelligence-on-hillarys-role

 

  • Shocked 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My gut instinct throughout this whole Trump/Russia ordeal was that Trump wasn't competent enough to collude with Russia so it was likely a "democratic hoax."  It's a horrible look for the FBI, Hillary Clinton, and the media that pushed this.  I do wish more people were aware of the extent to how effed up this was.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, B-Man said:


 

FBI Agents Working On Russia Probe Say Leaders Concealed Intelligence On Hillary’s Role

 

Order not to put anything in writing "was the most inappropriate operational or professional statement he had ever heard at the FBI," FBI lawyer said.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/betrayal-fbi-agents-working-on-russia-probe-say-leaders-concealed-intelligence-on-hillarys-role

 

Most interesting was that the CIA knew in September 2016 that Russian intelligence knew back in August of 2016 abut the Clinton campaign teams plot and actions to present Trump as a Russian agent/asset. 

 

That the CIA did not inform Federal law enforcement or election officials of the Clinton campaign's illegal activities is telling.  And begs an explanation.  Why didn't the CIA inform the FBI which armed with this knowledge would have most likely shut down the investigation into Trump?   Sadly, expect none. 

 

But bigger is how did Russian intelligence know details about Clinton campaign activities?   Did they have sources inside the DNC or the Clinton campaign?  Did FusionGPS and Steele feed Russian agents with information from their meetings with the campaign on the dossier and the plan?  Or in reverse, did Russian intelligence feed Steele misinformation about Trump?  Was the entire Russia Hoax to discredit Trump a misdirection effort to distract from the true Russian objective of "helping" Clinton get elected?  Lots of questions but dead ends based on the report.

 

Unfortunately, the Durham investigation didn't drill down into these connections and relationships to get to the origins of the entire narrative and plot.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BillStime said:


yeah bro - so much winning 

Well you lost one here. The Russian Hoax has been proven to be just that, a hoax manufactured by the "Clinton Intelligence Plan" concocted by the 2016 campaign.  You got snookered into believing and spreading lies for almost 7 years.  There is no collaborating evidence of collusion.  The CIA and FBI know the plan originated with the Clinton campaign.  That can't feel good.     

 

To summarize:

  • There was no valid predicate for the investigation, and the FBI knew it.
  • The Trump campaign investigation was premised on “raw, un-analyzed and uncorroborated intelligence,” and U.S. intel agencies possessed no “actual evidence of collusion” when the probe began.
  • Stories published in the New York Times in February and March 2017 claiming Trump associates were in contact with Russian intelligence agents were false.
  • Durham was highly critical of the FBI’s “startling and inexplicable failure” to investigate the so-called “Clinton Intelligence Plan.”
  • The CIA knew of the Clinton Intelligence Plan and also knew Russian intelligence knew about the plan to discredit Trump.  But the CIA did not communicate that information to any agency such as the FBI nor did they stand up at any time to set the record straight, eliminate the need for the Mueller investigation, or contest anything published in news such as stories by the New York Times and the Washington Post.

Logic would suggest the leadership at the CIA and the FBI withheld information and carried out investigations that conflicted with facts because wanted Clinton to win the 2016 election.  Media outlets turned away from performing any real due diligence on their sources or stories, refused to investigate anything, and simply went along with the story because it supported their political views rather than the truth.  That's the actual 2016 election interference.  End of story.

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Well you lost one here. The Russian Hoax has been proven to be just that, a hoax manufactured by the "Clinton Intelligence Plan" concocted by the 2016 campaign.  You got snookered into believing and spreading lies for almost 7 years.  There is no collaborating evidence of collusion.  The CIA and FBI know the plan originated with the Clinton campaign.  That can't feel good.     

 

To summarize:

  • There was no valid predicate for the investigation, and the FBI knew it.
  • The Trump campaign investigation was premised on “raw, un-analyzed and uncorroborated intelligence,” and U.S. intel agencies possessed no “actual evidence of collusion” when the probe began.
  • Stories published in the New York Times in February and March 2017 claiming Trump associates were in contact with Russian intelligence agents were false.
  • Durham was highly critical of the FBI’s “startling and inexplicable failure” to investigate the so-called “Clinton Intelligence Plan.”
  • The CIA knew of the Clinton Intelligence Plan and also knew Russian intelligence knew about the plan to discredit Trump.  But the CIA did not communicate that information to any agency such as the FBI nor did they stand up at any time to set the record straight, eliminate the need for the Mueller investigation, or contest anything published in news such as stories by the New York Times and the Washington Post.

Logic would suggest the leadership at the CIA and the FBI withheld information and carried out investigations that conflicted with facts because wanted Clinton to win the 2016 election.  Media outlets turned away from performing any real due diligence on their sources or stories, refused to investigate anything, and simply went along with the story because it supported their political views rather than the truth.  That's the actual 2016 election interference.  End of story.

 


Awe you try so hard.

 

Trump campaign meeting with the Russians 140+ times was not a HOAX.

 

Trump campaign sharing polling data with Russians was not a HOAX.

 

Trump campaign coordinating the DNC/Wikileaks with Russians was not a HOAX

 

Keep spinning all pro - you can never change history no matter how hard you try.

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With both Mueller and Durham we now have double confirmation based on two special counsel multi million dollar investigations that we live under a police state where the FBI will investigate people, based on absolutely zero evidence, in search of crimes instead of the other way around. 

 

We also know that the very same police state FBI will NOT investigate potential crimes tied to people who belong to the right political party.  See Biden family.

 

Has @ChiGoose been around yet to embarrass herself with another hand waving post?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

With both Mueller and Durham we now have double confirmation based on two special counsel multi million dollar investigations that we live under a police state where the FBI will investigate people, based on absolutely zero evidence, in search of crimes instead of the other way around. 

 

We also know that the very same police state FBI will NOT investigate potential crimes tied to people who belong to the right political party.  See Biden family.

 

Has @ChiGoose been around yet to embarrass herself with another hand waving post?

This isn’t about political party. Although on the surface it appears to be. Donald Trump didn’t need to be taken down because he was a Republican. He needed to be eliminated because he was an outsider. The goal was to send a message both to Trump and anyone else who might dare to shine a light into the status quo of these entrenched government bureaucracies.

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

This isn’t about political party. Although on the surface it appears to be. Donald Trump didn’t need to be taken down because he was a Republican. He needed to be eliminated because he was an outsider. The goal was to send a message both to Trump and anyone else who might dare to shine a light into the status quo of these entrenched government bureaucracies.


Um - no body brought Trump down but himself.

 

And the American people voted and eliminated the crook.

 

Deal with it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

This isn’t about political party. Although on the surface it appears to be. Donald Trump didn’t need to be taken down because he was a Republican. He needed to be eliminated because he was an outsider. The goal was to send a message both to Trump and anyone else who might dare to shine a light into the status quo of these entrenched government bureaucracies.

 

Trump was an "outsider" in name only.  He did all the same crap that has been going on for years.  He was just dumb enough to talk about it too.  His family profited the same as everyone else in office.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, cle23 said:

 

Trump was an "outsider" in name only.  He did all the same crap that has been going on for years.  He was just dumb enough to talk about it too.  His family profited the same as everyone else in office.


Anyone with over 3,000 lawsuits against should be nowhere near the White House.

 

But it is fun to watch the cult turn themselves into pretzels trying to defend Trump yet hold Biden to HIGHER standards.

 

Fn hypocrites 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

This isn’t about political party. Although on the surface it appears to be. Donald Trump didn’t need to be taken down because he was a Republican. He needed to be eliminated because he was an outsider. The goal was to send a message both to Trump and anyone else who might dare to shine a light into the status quo of these entrenched government bureaucracies.


this…. What this report really demonstrates is the deep state isn’t some mythical vast secret conspiracy. It’s an overt self fulfilling prophecy. All these bloated bureaucracies have one purpose- self preservation and stealing as much tax money as they can to grow their empires. Just like most every other company they are extremely political organizations too and have very transactional relationships with the politicians and the levers of power. 
 

it is part and parcel why big central government inherently flawed, inevitably destined for authoritarianism (the quiet kind or the overt kind).  The only mitigation  is division of power. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

This isn’t about political party. Although on the surface it appears to be. Donald Trump didn’t need to be taken down because he was a Republican. He needed to be eliminated because he was an outsider. The goal was to send a message both to Trump and anyone else who might dare to shine a light into the status quo of these entrenched government bureaucracies.

 

Agreed about Trump. He was a democrat back in the day after all.

 

Half of the GOP is complicit as well, however the only way you're going to get the FBI to look the other way for certain is if you're a connected member of the Washington elite with a D after your name. 

 

 

Edited by BillsFanNC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:


Awe you try so hard.

 

Trump campaign meeting with the Russians 140+ times was not a HOAX.

 

Trump campaign sharing polling data with Russians was not a HOAX.

 

Trump campaign coordinating the DNC/Wikileaks with Russians was not a HOAX

 

Keep spinning all pro - you can never change history no matter how hard you try.

Its all a hoax, you were duped,truth hurts

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

NOTHING.

 

NEXT QUESTION? 

 

What Happens to the Democrats Who Claimed They Had Evidence of Collusion?

 

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2023/05/16/what-happens-to-the-democrats-who-claimed-they-had-evidence-of-collusion-n1695845

 

 

The Trump tower meeting was collusion. There, you wanted evidence, there it is 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Agreed about Trump. He was a democrat back in the day after all.

 

Half of the GOP is complicit as well, however the only way you're going to get the FBI to look the other way for certain is if you're a connected member of the Washington elite with a D after your name. 

 

 

This isn’t complicated. The Democrats know how this game is played. Schumer warned Trump not to mess with the Police state. The government agencies are no different than anyone else. They have one mission, and that’s to expand their department in budget and staff. It’s their currency. They are NOT public servants. They’re career government workers and they need a severe haircut by the elected officials. 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BillStime said:


Awe you try so hard.

 

Trump campaign meeting with the Russians 140+ times was not a HOAX.

 

Trump campaign sharing polling data with Russians was not a HOAX.

 

Trump campaign coordinating the DNC/Wikileaks with Russians was not a HOAX

 

Keep spinning all pro - you can never change history no matter how hard you try.

Its was a hoax.  Nobody from the 2016 campaign met with Russians 140 times.  Nobody from the 2016 campaign shared campaign data with Russians.  Nobody from the 2016 campaign coordinated with Wikileaks.  Wikileaks didn't provide data directly to the campaign.  They posted vetted files on their site,  and also shared them with other news agencies such as the Times and the Post.    

 

Durham (and Mueller) performed a thorough and comprehensive investigation and found no proof of anything.  Instead, proof of a manufactured conspiracy by the Clinton campaign.  What I expect to follow will be dozens of civil suits against various actors from DNC and Clinton campaign.  And they won't be filed in the Southern District of NY or in the District of Columbia. Flushing all those cockroaches out of the dark and into the light of the truth will breath some fresh air into our democracy.

 

But if you want to then stick to the playbook.  Never admit you're wrong no matter how overwhelming the evidence and facts produced by two independent DOJ investigations each around 2 years long.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There never will be any type of criminal justice for anyone involved. Never.

 

The only solution is to begin firing people en masse who are entrenched in these bureaucracies on day one of a non commie Presendential term.

 

Anything less than that and it will just continue unabated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Its was a hoax.  Nobody from the 2016 campaign met with Russians 140 times.  Nobody from the 2016 campaign shared campaign data with Russians.  Nobody from the 2016 campaign coordinated with Wikileaks.  Wikileaks didn't provide data directly to the campaign.  They posted vetted files on their site,  and also shared them with other news agencies such as the Times and the Post.    

 

Durham (and Mueller) performed a thorough and comprehensive investigation and found no proof of anything.  Instead, proof of a manufactured conspiracy by the Clinton campaign.  What I expect to follow will be dozens of civil suits against various actors from DNC and Clinton campaign.  And they won't be filed in the Southern District of NY or in the District of Columbia. Flushing all those cockroaches out of the dark and into the light of the truth will breath some fresh air into our democracy.

 

But if you want to then stick to the playbook.  Never admit you're wrong no matter how overwhelming the evidence and facts produced by two independent DOJ investigations each around 2 years long.  


So the Mueller Report and the GOP Select Committee on Russian interference all lied.

 

What a world you live in 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, BillStime said:


So the Mueller Report and the GOP Select Committee on Russian interference all lied.

 

What a world you live in 

“With his world in tatters all around his feet one lonely soldier continues to man his post, ever on guard for the enemy at the door.” Unfortunately he’s yet to discover that the war is now officially OVER and it turns out he’s been guarding the wrong door. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

“With his world in tatters all around his feet one lonely soldier continues to man his post, ever on guard for the enemy at the door.” Unfortunately he’s yet to discover that the war is now officially OVER and it turns out he’s been guarding the wrong door. 


Durham had one job - disprove Russian collusion - and he failed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

 

Are you freaks forgetting that Russia broke into the DNC's server?

 

Really? No collusion?

 

LMAO

 

 

 

 

Well. if the Hildaveast would have used a Mac server with a firewall on the computer in HER BATHROOM, the real Russians wouldn't gave been able  to access her files using password1234.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Durham had one job - disprove Russian collusion - and he failed.

 

 

And now the goalposts are officially…moved. 
Keep it up. It’s getting more comical with each passing day. You do realize that your sthick has lost any semblance of the steam that only you thought it ever had. 
Take a much deserved rest. You’ve earned it. You fought the good fight and it was entertaining while it latest but it’s gone beyond the ‘Hail Mary’ stage now. You were lied to. You can admit it. 
We still luv ya. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

And now the goalposts are officially…moved. 
Keep it up. It’s getting more comical with each passing day. You do realize that your sthick has lost any semblance of the steam that only you thought it ever had. 
Take a much deserved rest. You’ve earned it. You fought the good fight and it was entertaining while it latest but it’s gone beyond the ‘Hail Mary’ stage now. You were lied to. You can admit it. 
We still luv ya. 

 

Can you explain how the goalposts moved?

 

You're the ones who said this was bigger than 9/11.

 

You ALL exclaimed that DURHAM coming would uncover this great conspiracy and people would end up in jail.

 

He failed, Deek. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Can you explain how the goalposts moved?

 

You're the ones who said this was bigger than 9/11.

 

You ALL exclaimed that DURHAM coming would uncover this great conspiracy and people would end up in jail.

 

He failed, Deek. 

 

 

I don’t recall ever having said any of those things. I pretty much figured it’d be a simple finding of facts …at best. Durham never seemed like a drama guy to me.  None of what you just said however changes the fact that your entire world just crumbled. Again, I’m so sorry you wasted so much of the one life you have on a total purposeful fiction. Try not to be pissed at us. You should however be utterly furious at those in the cabal that left you hanging out there for years…lying to you day after day. I don’t blame you personally. I’m guessing you don’t actually know any of those folks or have an ounce intimate knowledge of this entire yarn. But…now…it’s time to let it go while you still have time restore any semblance of dignity…or not. 

Edited by SoCal Deek
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

I don’t recall ever having said any of those things. I pretty much figured it’d be a simple finding of facts …at best. Durham never seemed like a drama guy to me.  None of what you just said however changes the fact that your entire world just crumbled. Again, I’m so sorry you wasted so much of the one life you have on a total purposeful fiction. Try not to be pissed at us. You should however be utterly furious at those in the cabal that left you hanging out there for years…lying to you day after day. I don’t blame you personally. I’m guessing you don’t actually know any of those folks or have an ounce intimate knowledge of this entire yarn. But…now…it’s time to let it go while you still have time restore any semblance of dignity…or not. 

 

I'll take NOHING on my BURGER, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

We gotta winner:

 

 

Reading is obviously not your strong suit. What this says is that Putin, just like the majority of Americans, thought Hillary would make a terrible President. It doesn’t say or claim ANYTHING about the actions of Trump. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...