Jump to content

Russia Was Not a Democratic Hoax


Recommended Posts

 

 

 

 

Durham: Obama, Biden, Clinton, Comey, Lynch ALL knew ‘Trump/Russia collusion’ was BS from the start

 

In the last few years the Democrats and media have all been hyperventilating over “election interference” and “Russia collusion,” and it won’t surprise you to know that those claims about Trump/Republican election meddling were 100 percent pure projection.

 

 

 

 

https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2023/05/15/durham-obama-biden-clinton-comey-lynch-all-knew-trump-russia-collusion-was-bs-from-the-start/

  • Shocked 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wondering how badly Trump will pummel Demented Biden (if the Demented One lives that long) even more now.  What a big bunch of bull####.  Democrat liars.  What a mess.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Irv said:

I'm wondering how badly Trump will pummel Demented Biden (if the Demented One lives that long) even more now.  What a big bunch of bull####.  Democrat liars.  What a mess.  


You overestimate the intellectual curiosity of Americans and underestimate the ability of our media to craft a narrative and effectively propagandize the public. 
 

Have to hope something like this wakes up just enough normies to make a difference, but I have my doubts. 
 

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The Russia Hoax Really Was A Hoax

by Mark Wauck

 

So that’s the big news after all these years—the Russia Hoax really was a hoax. As if anyone with an IQ above room temperature ever doubted it.

 

According to Just the News, the report concludes that the FBI had no verified intelligence or evidence when it opened up an investigation into Donald Trump and his campaign in the summer of 2016. Durham placed blame on the FBI and DOJ for failing to follow their own standards in a probe which should have never taken place - including the agency's surveillance of an American citizen without basis.

 

https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/bull-durham-master-of-the-bleeding?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=473679&post_id=121655901&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What Durham proved 

 

 

Special counsel John Durham exposed Monday how the FBI and Justice Department plotted to rig the 2016 presidential election.

 

His 316-page report proves federal law enforcement was weaponized by shielding the Hillary Clinton campaign and persecuting the Donald Trump campaign.

Yet despite the damning evidence, most of the media are treating the Durham report as a “nothingburger.”

 

FBI racketeering repeatedly rescued Hillary Clinton.

 

The Clinton Foundation raked in hundreds of million dollars of squirrely foreign contributions while she was secretary of state and revving up her presidential campaign.

 

The Durham report found that “senior FBI and Department officials placed restrictions on how [the Clinton Foundation investigation was] handled such that essentially no investigative activities occurred for months leading up to the election.”

 

On top of that dereliction, “the FBI appears to have made no effort to investigate . . . the Clinton campaign’s purported acceptance of a [illegal] campaign contribution that was made by the FBI’s own long-term [confidential human source] on behalf of Insider-I and, ultimately, Foreign Government.”

 

Top FBI officials also saved Hillary Clinton by scorning the federal statute book and treating her pervasive, perpetual violations of federal laws on classified documents as a harmless, unintentional error.

 

Shortly after FBI chief James Comey announced no charges against Hillary, “Clinton allegedly approved a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to tie Trump to Russia as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server,” according to the Durham report.

 

CIA chief John Brennan briefed President Barack Obama and other top officials on “alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal . . . to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.”

 

The Clinton campaign helped bankroll the notorious Steele dossier, which made sweeping, unsubstantiated and salacious accusations against Trump.

 

https://nypost.com/2023/05/15/durham-proves-that-hillary-and-the-fbi-tried-to-rig-the-2016-election/

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Shocked 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

So frustrating I know, but the fact is it wasn’t proven Mueller’s report didn’t come away, proving anything with charges being brought
 

Much the same way Durham failed just like the Mueller report. The Durham report insinuates a lot, but there’s nothing there that’s criminally chargeable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

So frustrating I know, but the fact is it wasn’t proven Mueller’s report didn’t come away, proving anything with charges being brought
 

Much the same way Durham failed just like the Mueller report. The Durham report insinuates a lot, but there’s nothing there that’s criminally chargeable

We didn't need the Mueller report to prove Trump and Russia were working to the same ends. Anyone with a brain can see they were (are) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

We didn't need the Mueller report to prove Trump and Russia were working to the same ends. Anyone with a brain can see they were (are) 

I hear what you’re saying, but without actual proof, we’re just spreading conspiracies, and we’re no better than the people that do that when we start spreading things that we don’t have concrete evidence
 

There are enough bull#### things that Trump has done that are easily identifiable and provable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

I hear what you’re saying, but without actual proof, we’re just spreading conspiracies, and we’re no better than the people that do that when we start spreading things that we don’t have concrete evidence
 

There are enough bull#### things that Trump has done that are easily identifiable and provable

No, he was obviously taking help from the murderous terrorist Putin 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

No, he was obviously taking help from the murderous terrorist Putin 

What you are dealing with is called Cognitive dissidence.   its valid.

 

According to Frantz Fanon, cognitive dissonance occurs when “people hold a core belief that is very strong [and] when they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted [so] they will rationalize, ignore or even deny anything that doesn’t fit with that core belief” (Fanon 1952)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

What Durham proved 

 

 

Special counsel John Durham exposed Monday how the FBI and Justice Department plotted to rig the 2016 presidential election.

 

His 316-page report proves federal law enforcement was weaponized by shielding the Hillary Clinton campaign and persecuting the Donald Trump campaign.

Yet despite the damning evidence, most of the media are treating the Durham report as a “nothingburger.”

 

FBI racketeering repeatedly rescued Hillary Clinton.

 

The Clinton Foundation raked in hundreds of million dollars of squirrely foreign contributions while she was secretary of state and revving up her presidential campaign.

 

The Durham report found that “senior FBI and Department officials placed restrictions on how [the Clinton Foundation investigation was] handled such that essentially no investigative activities occurred for months leading up to the election.”

 

On top of that dereliction, “the FBI appears to have made no effort to investigate . . . the Clinton campaign’s purported acceptance of a [illegal] campaign contribution that was made by the FBI’s own long-term [confidential human source] on behalf of Insider-I and, ultimately, Foreign Government.”

 

Top FBI officials also saved Hillary Clinton by scorning the federal statute book and treating her pervasive, perpetual violations of federal laws on classified documents as a harmless, unintentional error.

 

Shortly after FBI chief James Comey announced no charges against Hillary, “Clinton allegedly approved a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to tie Trump to Russia as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server,” according to the Durham report.

 

CIA chief John Brennan briefed President Barack Obama and other top officials on “alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal . . . to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.”

 

The Clinton campaign helped bankroll the notorious Steele dossier, which made sweeping, unsubstantiated and salacious accusations against Trump.

 

https://nypost.com/2023/05/15/durham-proves-that-hillary-and-the-fbi-tried-to-rig-the-2016-election/

Just let me know when the charges will be brought

1 minute ago, Chris farley said:

What you are dealing with is called Cognitive dissidence.   its valid.

 

According to Frantz Fanon, cognitive dissonance occurs when “people hold a core belief that is very strong [and] when they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted [so] they will rationalize, ignore or even deny anything that doesn’t fit with that core belief” (Fanon 1952)

How about when evidence is not presented that goes along with your beliefs, so you start doing serious, mental gymnastics trying to twist it
 

The Durham report turned up basically nothing if they don’t have something to be able to charge anybody on it’s nothing

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

What you are dealing with is called Cognitive dissidence.   its valid.

 

According to Frantz Fanon, cognitive dissonance occurs when “people hold a core belief that is very strong [and] when they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted [so] they will rationalize, ignore or even deny anything that doesn’t fit with that core belief” (Fanon 1952)

That's called gaslighting 

 

Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which the abuser attempts to sow self-doubt and confusion in their victim's mind. Typically, gaslighters are seeking to gain power and control over the other person, by distorting reality and forcing them to question their own judgment and intuition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

That's called gaslighting 

 

Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which the abuser attempts to sow self-doubt and confusion in their victim's mind. Typically, gaslighters are seeking to gain power and control over the other person, by distorting reality and forcing them to question their own judgment and intuition.

 

Comes from an Ingrid Bergman movie called "Gaslight".

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

There are people who still believe such a massive deception is not possible...

 

Why do they still think that? 

 

Because conditioning is a hell of a thing... even in the face of overwhelming evidence. 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

There are people who still believe such a massive deception is not possible...

 

Why do they still think that? 

 

Because conditioning is a hell of a thing... even in the face of overwhelming evidence. 

 

 

.

I love wikkileaks! 

Trump tower meeting

Manafort 

I believe the mass murdering Putin over our intelligence agencies 

Russia if you are listening...

DNC hacked by Russia, used by Trump 

Hotel deal in Moscow during the campaign but kept secret 

Trump trashing NATO 

 

Ya, but you are telling me to ignore that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

There are people who still believe such a massive deception is not possible...

 

Why do they still think that? 

 

Because conditioning is a hell of a thing... even in the face of overwhelming evidence. 

 

 

.

Two reasons:

 

First, in today’s society nobody wants to admit they were duped. They’ll fight to the death for something rather than just say ‘my bad’. 

 

Second, they’ve been lied to for so long by a blatantly partisan media that it rocks their entire world view to think that’s even possible. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Two reasons:

 

First, in today’s society nobody wants to admit they were duped. They’ll fight to the death for something rather than just say ‘my bad’. 

 

Second, they’ve been lied to for so long by a blatantly partisan media that it rocks their entire world view to think that’s even possible. 

 

 

True.

 

I am so thankful that I grew up in a time where an "adult" was expected to admit a mistake.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

Two reasons:

 

First, in today’s society nobody wants to admit they were duped. They’ll fight to the death for something rather than just say ‘my bad’. 

 

Second, they’ve been lied to for so long by a blatantly partisan media that it rocks their entire world view to think that’s even possible. 


Everyone is waiting for just one cult member to admit they were duped.

 

Cmon - you can do it 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Everyone is waiting for just one cult member to admit they were duped.

 

Cmon - you can do it 

 

Duped?

 

Did we not build a wall?

Did we not get lower taxes?

Did we enter into a stupid foreign conflict?   
 

Seems to me that I got what I voted for. 
I’m good! 
 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Duped?

 

Did we not build a wall?

Did we not get lower taxes?

Did we enter into a stupid foreign conflict?   
 

Seems to me that I got what I voted for. 
I’m good!

 

LOL!  "Duped."  Russian collusion, the phone call, insurrection, bounties, being able to "shut down the virus."  No duping going on there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

LOL!  "Duped."  Russian collusion, the phone call, insurrection, bounties, being able to "shut down the virus."  No duping going on there!

Be gentle with him. His entire world was just shattered yesterday. He’s yet to come to grips with the fact that he’s spent hundreds and hundreds of hours on here propagating a flat out lie told to him by people that he should’ve been able to trust. I’m actually very sympathetic of these folks today. But, my sympathy, like my patience, is going to last for so long. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Be gentle with him. His entire world was just shattered yesterday. He’s yet to come to grips with the fact that he’s spent hundreds and hundreds of hours on here propagating a flat out lie told to him by people that he should’ve been able to trust. I’m actually very sympathetic of these folks today. But, my sympathy, like my patience, is going to last for so long. 

 

She is/they are in a fully insulated bubble.  There's a lot of pathology associated with that, namely intense denial. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

She is/they are in a fully insulated bubble.  There's a lot of pathology associated with that, namely intense denial. 

I’d imagine it’s something like finding out you were conceived out of wedlock. Everything you thought you knew turned out to be false. And the people you expected to tell you the truth purposely lied to you primarily for their own good, not yours. It’s got to be an incredible gut punch. I’m willing to give it some time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

Be gentle with him. His entire world was just shattered yesterday. He’s yet to come to grips with the fact that he’s spent hundreds and hundreds of hours on here propagating a flat out lie told to him by people that he should’ve been able to trust. I’m actually very sympathetic of these folks today. But, my sympathy, like my patience, is going to last for so long. 

 

1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

She is/they are in a fully insulated bubble.  There's a lot of pathology associated with that, namely intense denial. 

 

Are you freaks forgetting that Russia broke into the DNC's server?

 

Really? No collusion?

 

LMAO

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

Are you freaks forgetting that Russia broke into the DNC's server?

 

Really? No collusion?

 

LMAO

 

 

 

 

Keep it up. This is getting funnier and more desperate by the hour. But if I may suggest, after you come down from your obvious but understandable implosion, maybe you can come back here and tell everyone that you now realize you were flat out lied to by all of your hopefully former heroes. 
Again…we’ll still luv ya!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Keep it up. This is getting funnier and more desperate by the hour. But if I may suggest, after you come down from your obvious but understandable implosion, maybe you can come back here and tell everyone that you now realize you were flat out lied to by all of your hopefully former heroes. 
Again…we’ll still luv ya!

 

Yup.  The DNC server that the DNC refused to let even the FBI and DHS examine, only giving it to CrowdStrike, who was working for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Keep it up. This is getting funnier and more desperate by the hour. But if I may suggest, after you come down from your obvious but understandable implosion, maybe you can come back here and tell everyone that you now realize you were flat out lied to by all of your hopefully former heroes. 
Again…we’ll still luv ya!

 

 

10 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yup.  The DNC server that the DNC refused to let even the FBI and DHS examine, only giving it to CrowdStrike, who was working for them.


LMAO - I didn’t lose anything. You’re the ones who continue to absorb blow after blow after blow.

 

Trump lost the House, the Senate and the White House.

 

Trump, deservedly impeached twice, incited an insurrection.

 

His “stand down and stand by” cult is going to jail for seditious conspiracy.

 

Trump was found liable for raping a woman.

 

Trump has issues with Georgia and classified docs.

 

And last - no matter how hard you wish it away - no one is going to forget about the 140+ meetings the Trump campaign had with Russians. Or the Trump campaign manager sharing non public polling data with the Russians. Or the Trump campaign coordinate Wikileaks dumps with the Russia.

 

SO

MUCH

WINNING

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 


LMAO - I didn’t lose anything. You’re the ones who continue to absorb blow after blow after blow.

 

Trump lost the House, the Senate and the White House.

 

Trump, deservedly impeached twice, incited an insurrection.

 

His “stand down and stand by” cult is going to jail for seditious conspiracy.

 

Trump was found liable for raping a woman.

 

Trump has issues with Georgia and classified docs.

 

And last - no matter how hard you wish it away - no one is going to forget about the 140+ meetings the Trump campaign had with Russians. Or the Trump campaign manager sharing non public polling data with the Russians. Or the Trump campaign coordinate Wikileaks dumps with the Russia.

 

SO

MUCH

WINNING

 

 

Go ahead. Get it all out. This is over! Your life’s work in absolute tatters on the floor. It must be devastating. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...