Jump to content

Kamala Harris is the next VP


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, SlimShady'sSpaceForce said:

For what?   OMG   how blind are you?  

 

 

Are you really in the medical profession?   Are you not the guy from the D&C with the initials NM? 

 

Corruption, collusion, bribery to to start. 

 

Yeah.  I keep hearing the same old tired stuff everyday.  Wake me when it happens.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Doc said:

Notice how they're desperately trying to claim that criticizing Kam is sexist?  Sigh.


well, isn’t saying she slept and blew her way to the top a little sexist?  It doesn’t bother me and I’m not offended (who cares), but if people don’t want their criticism not giving rise to the sexist card...shouldn’t they keep their criticism substantive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Crayola64 said:

well, isn’t saying she slept and blew her way to the top a little sexist?  It doesn’t bother me and I’m not offended (who cares), but if people don’t want their criticism not giving rise to the sexist card...shouldn’t they keep their criticism substantive?

 

Not if it's true.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Crayola64 said:

is it?  I’m out of the loop and first heard these comments in the past day

 

It's been talked-about since he started running for President.  Someone else can clue you in on the sordid details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

well, isn’t saying she slept and blew her way to the top a little sexist?  It doesn’t bother me and I’m not offended (who cares), but if people don’t want their criticism not giving rise to the sexist card...shouldn’t they keep their criticism substantive?


MSM and others fat-shamed Sarah Huckabee Sanders mercilessly for years. Still do. Isn't that a little sexist, or is that "different" because "reasons?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

:beer: And, to be fair to @transplantbillsfan , that would be the best thing to do. It would not be fair to him if he wins our avatar bet, but then I'm gone for the year I'm supposed to be rocking it. 

 

Are you seriously telling me you made the avatar bet with me AND a bet that you'd leave for a year at the same time?

 

You do realize if you're gone for a year, you aren't abiding by the terms of our bet because you won't actually be here to sport my new lovely avatar for you, right?

 

So when you lose our bet in November, if your current bet with @Crayola64 is that you have to be gone for a year, then when you come back, you'll have to sport my new avatar.  I have no idea when the 2 of you made your bet, but I know you and I made ours over a year ago, so if you made your bet with him after we made ours, I'm sure you understand you would need to come back with a new avatar.  And if you made the bet with him before me and didn't tell me you'd be gone for a year anyway, that's shady.

Edited by transplantbillsfan
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Are you seriously telling me you made the avatar bet with me AND a bet that you'd leave for a year at the same time?

 

You do realize if you're gone for a year, you aren't abiding by the terms of our bet because you won't actually be here to sport my new lovely avatar for you, right?

 

So when you lose our bet in November, if your current bet with @Crayola64 is that you have to be gone for a year, then when you come back, you'll have to sport my new avatar.  I have no idea when the 2 of you made your bet, but I know you and I made ours over a year ago, so if you made your bet with him after we made ours, I'm sure you understand you would need to come back with a new avatar.  And if you made the bet with him before me and didn't tell me you'd be gone for a year anyway, that's shady.

 

Reading is hard. Especially for teachers. Try it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Golden Goat said:


MSM and others fat-shamed Sarah Huckabee Sanders mercilessly for years. Still do. Isn't that a little sexist, or is that "different" because "reasons?"


How is fat shaming sexist?  Don’t MSM and Dems also fat shame fat male republicans?

Edited by Crayola64
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Reading is hard. Especially for teachers. Try it again.

 

Note the operative "?" and word "if" posted multiple times

 

So how about answering the "?" first.  If you didn't make the bet, ignore everything after the "if"

 

 

 

Life is busy.  I'm not breaking down what the two of you did or did not agree upon and whether it was hypothetical or concrete.

Edited by transplantbillsfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Note the operative "?" and word "if"

 

So how about answering the "?" first.  If you didn't make the bet, ignore everything after the "if"

 

 

 

Life is busy.  I'm not breaking down what the two of you did or did not agree upon and whether it was hypothetical or concrete.

 

You're very dumb. 

 

What was written in the quote you chose was making the opposite point of your assumption. If you can't read and comprehend a simple sentence, maybe you should sit out trying to analyze complex political events ;) 

 

To make it VERY clear, I'll type slow: 

 

I was saying it would be unfair for me to be gone for the same year that I was supposed to be honoring your bet. I was, in fact, being honorable. You took it the exact opposite way because you don't think before you post. 


Try it some time. It'll improve your content by tenfold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

She is fat, so is trump.  Who cares.  

 

What if Tucker Carlson said that Stacey Abrams looked like she swallowed the Epcot Ball? He'd be out of a job in negative two seconds.

 

I don't care about the fat shaming. I care about the double standard.

  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You're very dumb. 

 

What was written in the quote you chose was making the opposite point of your assumption. If you can't read and comprehend a simple sentence, maybe you should sit out trying to analyze complex political events ;) 

 

To make it VERY clear, I'll type slow: 

 

I was saying it would be unfair for me to be gone for the same year that I was supposed to be honoring your bet. I was, in fact, being honorable. You took it the exact opposite way because you don't think before you post. 


Try it some time. It'll improve your content by tenfold. 

 

Don't be a dick.  Your simple sentence says absolutely nothing about what you actually will do. It makes a statement about "fair" vs. "unfair."

 

As long as you abide by our bet, but...

 

On 8/12/2020 at 8:59 AM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You're still the liar -- the bet was for a year, not to leave for good. ;) But bet's on. When Trump wins you're gone for a year -- and all your alts. If he loses, I'll do the same. 

 

Now, find that disability quote and really prove me wrong... still waiting on that one. 

 

On 8/12/2020 at 9:00 AM, Crayola64 said:

 

Lol at you calling me a liar over this, cant you ever admit you were wrong?  You said you didn't make a bet with you over the election, and we did.  And you are still calling me a liar about it???

 

For ONCE, own up to being wrong  

 

Wrong.

 

On 8/12/2020 at 9:02 AM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I admit we made a bet for a year, yes. I was wrong. And the bet is on. 

 

 

Does that mean that you will leave the board the year after you sport my new avatar?

 

After all, you say you're honorable, right?  Don't you have to also abide by the bet you made with @Crayola64?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

 

 

Uncle Joe had 5 deferments. Same number as Trump and Uncle Dick.

 

Quote

According to the documents, Biden, 65, received several deferments while he was an undergraduate at the University of Delaware and later as a law student at Syracuse University. A month after a physical exam in April 1968, Biden received a Selective Service classification of 1-Y, meaning he was available for service only in the event of national emergency.

 

"As a result of a physical exam on April 5, 1968, Joe Biden was classified 1-Y and disqualified from service because of asthma as a teenager," said David Wade, a campaign spokesman.

 

In "Promises to Keep," a memoir that was published last year, Biden never mentions his asthma, recounting an active childhood, work as a lifeguard and football exploits in high school.

 

https://www.newsday.com/news/nation/biden-got-5-draft-deferments-during-nam-as-did-cheney-1.884250

Edited by reddogblitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

Don't be a dick.  Your simple sentence says absolutely nothing about what you actually will do. It makes a statement about "fair" vs. "unfair."

 

As long as you abide by our bet, but...

 

 

 

 

Does that mean that you will leave the board the year after you sport my new avatar?

 

After all, you say you're honorable, right?  Don't you have to also abide by the bet you made with @Crayola64?


You wrote all that to prove you’re not dumb. 
 

You failed. 
 

:lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Golden Goat said:

 

What if Tucker Carlson said that Stacey Abrams looked like she swallowed the Epcot Ball? He'd be out of a job in negative two seconds.

 

I don't care about the fat shaming. I care about the double standard.

 

Actually, his ratings would probably go even higher, but the left would be hypocritically hysterical about it for a few days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

Actually, his ratings would probably go even higher, but the left would be hypocritically hysterical about it for a few days.

 

 

...so as a respected posting Cali man, give us your assessment of the hometown pick, Kamala the Thrillah...............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Crayola64 said:


is it?  I’m out of the loop and first heard these comments in the past day

I lived in CA and moved back to wNY i 2014. I heard it before I left that cesspool. Willie Brown hasn't denied it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I suggest you take a reading class then. 

 

Evidently you're oblivious to how to answer a "yes/no" question.

 

Let me help you, it's either "yes" or "no."


The answer is clear in the terms of the bet and the conversation about it. Hence: reading is hard. ;)  

 

You can put it together, I have faith in you. Sound out the big words you have to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:


The answer is clear in the terms of the bet and the conversation about it. Hence: reading is hard. ;)  

 

You can put it together, I have faith in you. Sound out the big words you have to. 

 

Not reading a conversation separate from those 3 posts, which clearly say something you're now denying.

 

Why would I waste my time?

 

I don’t care if you made that bet, I just want assurance you'll abide by our bet by being here with a beautiful new avatar.

 

You seem to be saying you will be.

 

So we're good for now :beer:

Edited by transplantbillsfan
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...