Bakin Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 (edited) Trade for #16 with Atlanta Falcons give up #22 and #54 Select WR CeeDee Lamb. Yes or No? Edited February 8, 2020 by Bakin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nester Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 (edited) No we can get a great WR at 22 (or even 54) this year and a solid player at 54. A great WR class like this means you can get quality WRs later due to high supply. BB has been great making picks so far. Give him more picks, not less. Edited February 8, 2020 by Nester Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 The correct answer as always is, "unless you need a new QB, just say no to trade-ups' 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 As much as I love the player, I feel we have too many holes to fill.. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whorlnut Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 (edited) 16 hours ago, JaCrispy said: As much as I love the player, I feel we have too many holes to fill.. I disagree. I don’t think we have many “holes” at all. We need depth at certain positions, but we’re not devoid of talent. WR is a little different because we have our solid #2 and our slot guy. We need a 1. With that said, I think we should stay put at 22 and see who falls. If we go another position at 22 then a trade up in 2 is definitely on the table. Either way, we need to come away with a top receiver in the first 2 rounds. Edited February 9, 2020 by whorlnut 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 21 hours ago, Nester said: No we can get a great WR at 22 (or even 54) this year and a solid player at 54. A great WR class like this means you can get quality WRs later due to high supply. BB has been great making picks so far. Give him more picks, not less. ...certainly agree......Beane has assembled an impressive staff of 17+ (ALL on Pegula's nickel) to include several former VP's of Player Personnel and Directors of Pro Player Personnel from around the league..safe to say they have done a good job with their homework in the last two drafts......even late or UDFA.......they know their stuff IMO... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 If he falls to sixteen and Ruggs is gone, likely Jeudy will be as well, I'd hop on this.....So yes 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Man Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 For Jeudy I'd make that trade, not Lamb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCOrange Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 (edited) I'm not sure. Lamb is enough to test my "Never trade up" mantra and this trade doesn't seem all that bad. Having said that, the WR class is strong enough that I think I'd lean towards just staying at 22 or trading down. I'd understand if we did pull the trigger though. Edited February 9, 2020 by DCOrange Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimer1960 Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 I think no I would not trade up for Lamb. Pending FA, Bills will have a number of holes to fill including WR, OL, DE, possibly DT. i am all for trying to get top offensive play makers, but I don’t know that Lamb is so good that he justifies trading their 2nd pick for. Now, if they resign Jordan Phillips and Shaq Lawson and add to the OL in FA, then maybe trading up for a WR is a reasonable plan... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 I appreciate that Lamb is in the upper tier, but in this class I feel like you're better off taking a WR with 22 & 54, rather than packaging them for 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 On 2/9/2020 at 12:06 AM, JaCrispy said: As much as I love the player, I feel we have too many holes to fill.. Where? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said: Where? I think we need starters at WR, RT, SLB, CB, and possibly DE if we can find an upgrade... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBillsFan Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 39 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: I think we need starters at WR, RT, SLB, CB, and possibly DE if we can find an upgrade... 100% agree on all of those needs. Hey if you're from Schenectady is Mike's Hot Dogs still open? I haven't been there in 14-15 years. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 Yes. We need playmakers. Not just players. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaCrispy Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 24 minutes ago, BigBillsFan said: 100% agree on all of those needs. Hey if you're from Schenectady is Mike's Hot Dogs still open? I haven't been there in 14-15 years. Damn straight...I try to hit it up every few weeks...and the food is just as good as you remember...little extra traffic too, with the casino down the road. ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 1 hour ago, JaCrispy said: I think we need starters at WR, RT, SLB, CB, and possibly DE if we can find an upgrade... WR? Yeah, that’s why we’re trading up. RT? Well we just drafted Cody Ford so I guess you’re expecting a third round rookie to be better than him from the jump? We need to spend a high draft pick on a SLB who is gonna see the field <50% of snaps? CB? Were we bad at CB last year? Feel like we have a top 3 CB already and had a great pass defense. We also have a couple quality slot DBs. It’s hardly a desperate need. DE would be nice but it’s hard to draft an impact rookie at that position in the mid rounds. The bottom line is that this team doesn’t have a lot of needs when it comes to the modern NFL. Every team has “needs” that boil down “it’d be nice to have an upgrade.” We really “need” a WR and maybe a DE and that’s it. Every other position on top of that is just a bonus. 23 hours ago, OldTimer1960 said: I think no I would not trade up for Lamb. Pending FA, Bills will have a number of holes to fill including WR, OL, DE, possibly DT. i am all for trying to get top offensive play makers, but I don’t know that Lamb is so good that he justifies trading their 2nd pick for. Now, if they resign Jordan Phillips and Shaq Lawson and add to the OL in FA, then maybe trading up for a WR is a reasonable plan... Possibly DT???! How many DT’s do we need? We have Oliver and Phillips already! Are we really saying we should pass on a day one starter type player at WR because we need a rotational defensive tackle??? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 The conventional wisdom is always no...until it's yes. This point in time is the exception to the rule, where it makes sense, given where we want Josh to go in year three... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victory Formation Posted February 14, 2020 Share Posted February 14, 2020 No. I want Justin Jefferson at 22. I also like KJ Hill like a lot a lot. He is projected as a second round pick. Aiyuk looks like could be good too. Way too many solid wide receivers to be going up for one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4BillsintheBurgh Posted February 16, 2020 Share Posted February 16, 2020 I think we need at least one go-to target for josh, so if we don't have one or two by then yes. I assume we will have fa"s filling that need by the time the draft rolls around because they will be better targets, knowing where they need to be, the checks, etc. Older guys whose contracts can be removed from the books when we need to pay josh and the other draft picks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beck Water Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 On 2/8/2020 at 10:14 AM, Bakin said: Trade for #16 with Atlanta Falcons give up #22 and #54 Select WR CeeDee Lamb. Yes or No? It seems to me the Bills have had bad experience trading up for WR, so I vote “no” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 14 hours ago, Beck Water said: It seems to me the Bills have had bad experience trading up for WR, so I vote “no” 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 Oof, this is a good question/thread. My general rule of thumb would say no, especially in a draft so deep at WR... but I'm just not sold on Higgins or Shenault. IMO, if we stay at 22 and assume we take Higgins or Shenault there, I'm also hoping the Bills take another WR later, like in the 4th round. So do we spend our 1st and 2nd picks on a top talent, or do we spend our 1st and 4th picks on "lesser" talent, but allow us to get another decent player of need in the 2nd?... Eff it, it's only February, I'm gonna get crazy and say make the trade. Just for Gugnys and Giggles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 Just now, DrDawkinstein said: Oof, this is a good question/thread. My general rule of thumb would say no, especially in a draft so deep at WR... but I'm just not sold on Higgins or Shenault. IMO, if we stay at 22 and assume we take Higgins or Shenault there, I'm also hoping the Bills take another WR later, like in the 4th round. So do we spend our 1st and 2nd picks on a top talent, or do we spend our 1st and 4th picks on "lesser" talent, but allow us to get another decent player of need in the 2nd?... Eff it, it's only February, I'm gonna get crazy and say make the trade. Just for Gugnys and Giggles. Obviously players bust, but man these 3 have such high ceilings and have produced and improved year over year - hard to see these 3 not working out unless they get stuck on a **** team like Jax or something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 Just now, Reed83HOF said: Obviously players bust, but man these 3 have such high ceilings and have produced and improved year over year - hard to see these 3 not working out unless they get stuck on a **** team like Jax or something Who are you referring to by "these 3"? Lamb, Shenault, and Higgins? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 Just now, DrDawkinstein said: Who are you referring to by "these 3"? Lamb, Shenault, and Higgins? top 3 in the draft Lamb Jeudy & Ruggs the other 2 scare me a bit - like Aiyuk better than both of them 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 2 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said: top 3 in the draft Lamb Jeudy & Ruggs the other 2 scare me a bit - like Aiyuk better than both of them ah yes, agreed. I think there is a fairly substantial drop-off from those 2 or 3 to the rest of the class. But what do I know. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 13 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said: ah yes, agreed. I think there is a fairly substantial drop-off from those 2 or 3 to the rest of the class. But what do I know. what do any of us know? LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 24 minutes ago, Reed83HOF said: what do any of us know? LOL I swore up and down this board for an entire offseason that Von Miller was too small and would be a bust. LOL. But I was right that Cam Newton would not bust. So I guess it's a wash. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said: I swore up and down this board for an entire offseason that Von Miller was too small and would be a bust. LOL. But I was right that Cam Newton would not bust. So I guess it's a wash. ? I coveted JJ that year, but hoped somehow that we would find a way to get Newton - we needed a QB dammit Edit: this is why I like Beane's approach - he fills the holes in FA, follows his board and grades and it wasn't so scatter shot like before trying to plug holes in the draft, which is where you get into trouble Edited February 18, 2020 by Reed83HOF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 15 hours ago, Reed83HOF said: top 3 in the draft Lamb Jeudy & Ruggs the other 2 scare me a bit - like Aiyuk better than both of them I think Aiyuk is a bit scheme specific. He is a decent fit in Buffalo potentially - playing a sort of Isaiah McKenzie role. He finds good gaps in zone and is a threat every time he has the ball in his hands. If he goes to one of the teams playing what I would call more traditional stretch zone schemes - think Vikings or Packers or Titans - I think he would struggle and get lost in the shuffle. He doesn't demonstrate the ability to separate consistently on tape on the sort of vertical routes you need an X to run and if you just line him up at the Z and ask him to run flats, comebacks and curls I'm not sure that is going to play best to his skillset either. It has to be a team who are willing to use him as an offensive weapon and not worry too much about pigeon holing him into a specific role. I'm still of the view that while he is considerably more raw than the top 3 the guy who is the next most likely to be a #1 receiver in the NFL is Tee Higgins. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Joshin' Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 I am not sure you trade up for a WR. QB of course and OT or edge. A WR can be taken out of a game easily. I would let a WR fall to me in this draft class with the talent level at WR. As the fail rate is high on WRs and good ones are often low picks/undrafted, I might pick one in 1st and 3rd/4th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 5 hours ago, GunnerBill said: I think Aiyuk is a bit scheme specific. He is a decent fit in Buffalo potentially - playing a sort of Isaiah McKenzie role. He finds good gaps in zone and is a threat every time he has the ball in his hands. If he goes to one of the teams playing what I would call more traditional stretch zone schemes - think Vikings or Packers or Titans - I think he would struggle and get lost in the shuffle. He doesn't demonstrate the ability to separate consistently on tape on the sort of vertical routes you need an X to run and if you just line him up at the Z and ask him to run flats, comebacks and curls I'm not sure that is going to play best to his skillset either. It has to be a team who are willing to use him as an offensive weapon and not worry too much about pigeon holing him into a specific role. I'm still of the view that while he is considerably more raw than the top 3 the guy who is the next most likely to be a #1 receiver in the NFL is Tee Higgins. That's a good point, I have only been looking at players and how they would fit in with us. Part of what is clouding my judgement this year with looking at the incoming class, is how will they contribute to this team this year and make us better by giving us weapons Josh can trust and help us score more points. Higgins - I just don't like him that much as a prospect - inconsistent drops at times, not great at separation, limited route tree, not great at YAC, not a great route runner, gets dinged up and isn't as physical of a player as he should be. I'm only looking at the negatives (positive - he can make some damn good catches as well) and at pick#22 this causes some levels of concern that I'm not comfortable with the areas he needs to work on at that level of a pick. Obviously, if draft him I will be behind him as a player, but meh - not interested.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beck Water Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 5 hours ago, GunnerBill said: I think Aiyuk is a bit scheme specific. He is a decent fit in Buffalo potentially - playing a sort of Isaiah McKenzie role. He finds good gaps in zone and is a threat every time he has the ball in his hands. If he goes to one of the teams playing what I would call more traditional stretch zone schemes - think Vikings or Packers or Titans - I think he would struggle and get lost in the shuffle. He doesn't demonstrate the ability to separate consistently on tape on the sort of vertical routes you need an X to run and if you just line him up at the Z and ask him to run flats, comebacks and curls I'm not sure that is going to play best to his skillset either. It has to be a team who are willing to use him as an offensive weapon and not worry too much about pigeon holing him into a specific role. I'm still of the view that while he is considerably more raw than the top 3 the guy who is the next most likely to be a #1 receiver in the NFL is Tee Higgins. So here’s a question a bit off topic here: McKensie is a FA this year, right? Do you think McKensie is gone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 1 hour ago, Beck Water said: So here’s a question a bit off topic here: McKensie is a FA this year, right? Do you think McKensie is gone? I think he is a restricted FA in which case I expect they tender him but I might be wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 In light of other threads, I rescind my Yes vote in order to send the #54 overall to Minn for Diggs. I'd also like to re-sign McKenzie. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beck Water Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 9 hours ago, GunnerBill said: I think he is a restricted FA in which case I expect they tender him but I might be wrong. He is a restricted free agent, but since he was originally drafted in the 5th round, the only RFA tender the Bills can make and get compensation is $2.15M/1 yr They can also make him a league minimum offer, but if they do that they get no compensation if someone makes him a bigger offer and I’m not sure he must let them match I admit I find these rules complex and poorly explained, so I hope I have this right. Here’s an article I found So....what do you think McKenzie is worth? Should the Bills tender him, if the tender is $2M? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 3 hours ago, Beck Water said: He is a restricted free agent, but since he was originally drafted in the 5th round, the only RFA tender the Bills can make and get compensation is $2.15M/1 yr They can also make him a league minimum offer, but if they do that they get no compensation if someone makes him a bigger offer and I’m not sure he must let them match I admit I find these rules complex and poorly explained, so I hope I have this right. Here’s an article I found So....what do you think McKenzie is worth? Should the Bills tender him, if the tender is $2M? I think they will put the lowest tender on him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beck Water Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 15 hours ago, GunnerBill said: I think they will put the lowest tender on him. IIRC the lowest tender (1 year vet minimum) does allow them to match any offers he receives But We would not get any compensation if we don’t match I could be mistaken about it allowing us the chance to match though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.