Jump to content

Hate Crime or Hoax?


The_Dude

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 946
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This is making the rounds right now.

Black guy writes about how he was almost lynched and posts some videos of the encounter.

 

Could be true, could be bogus. If you read his account and then watch the video there's a clear incongruence. Looks like a run of the mill altercation.

 

But to read the comments this guy's account is the word of God and all the people on the other side are being doxxed.

 

This guy's a political activist, and he drops a link at the bottom for those who want to support his activism. Was he really "lynched" or is this a Smollettesque attempt to go viral and get exposure?

 

I don't know the answer, but I'd be real curious to hear the other side of the story.

 

 

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10222147157086001&id=1175677046

 

He also did a YouTube show about it.

 

 

Edited by Rob's House
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Thurmal34 said:

I didn't read thru, on what page of this thread did people start accusing Bubba Wallace of something? 1? 2?

 

You mean his hate crime hoax where he cried on TV because there was a garage door pull string in his garage?

 

I think that came later in the thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/8/2020 at 1:36 AM, Thurmal34 said:

I didn't read thru, on what page of this thread did people start accusing Bubba Wallace of something? 1? 2?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Would have been fitting if it were page 43 ;) 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/8/2020 at 1:01 AM, Rob's House said:

 

You mean his hate crime hoax where he cried on TV because there was a garage door pull string in his garage?

 

I think that came later in the thread.


Yes just a little bit later.  Like a year and a half. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/8/2020 at 2:52 AM, transplantbillsfan said:

I just remember how the OP of this thread got kicked off this board.

 

That was a real low point for this forum.

 

And that's really saying something for PPP.

 

You mean, the evil racists here got the guy thrown out?   When was the last time a wacked out socialist got called out by the "liberals" here? 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is modern journalism..............they haven't seen the letter, but report it anyway.

 

 

Personally, I found the 5-month-old boy who was wounded by being shot in the face in Chicago to be a little more "gut-wrenching,"

but maybe that's just me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

uh huh
 

Special prosecutor finds ‘substantial abuses of discretion’ in Jussie Smollett case as he concludes investigation
 

Special Prosecutor Dan Webb did not find evidence to support filing criminal charges against Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx or any other prosecutor.
 

Special Prosecutor Dan Webb laid out a series of “operational failures” — and several false statements by Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx — as he announced on Monday the end of his investigation into the handling of hate crime claims by actor Jussie Smollett.
 

Webb said Foxx and her staff made false or misleading statements about her declared recusal from the case, about how the Smollett case compared to others in the court system, about the certainty of a conviction for Smollett, and about her contacts with Smollett’s sister, actor Jurnee Smollett.
 

But Webb also said he did not find evidence that the case was improperly influenced by third parties such as Tina Tchen, the onetime chief of staff to former first lady Michelle Obama, nor did he find evidence that would support criminal charges.
 

</snip>


Still, there are more shoes left to potentially drop. Webb said Monday he would seek permission “as soon as possible” from Cook County Judge Michael Toomin to release a 60-page report that supports his findings with evidence. He also said he intends to forward the report to Illinois’ Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.
 

</snip>

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

More on the above:

 

The Trayvon Hoax.

So here’s the documentary itself. Please be patient, and I think your patience will be rewarded.

 

The importance of the Zimmerman/Martin case cannot be overemphasized. It’s the event that was the kickstarter for the organization BLM and the spreading of the leftist narrative about innocent blacks being killed in droves by cops.

 

That’s a bit ironic, because Zimmerman wasn’t a cop. But he was considered a quasi-cop (and a quasi-white, since he’s half Hispanic).

Video at link.

 

 

NEO: 

I missed some news that came out in late 2019, something I’m just coming across now. In the not-too-distant future, I hope to post a longer piece or two connected with it. It concerns allegations that are not only mind-blowing but could end up being important, if they ever get a proper airing and proper coverage. I’m talking about The Trayvon Hoax, which refers to the claim that the prosecution’s case against George Zimmerman was built almost entirely on a fraud in which they substituted a fake witness for the real one.

 

That seems preposterous, I know. It seems it should be impossible to get away with such a thing, especially with all the scrutiny the case received. The story is complicated and takes a while to set out and digest. The man who’s promoting this is a documentary filmmaker named Joel Gilbert, who’s been connected previously with some iffy theories. So he’s easily dismissed by the left, and hard to take all that seriously.

 

Until you watch the documentary or read his book, that is.

 

I haven’t done the latter, but I’ve done the former. The video is two hours long, and some of it could easily have been cut to tighten it up, which I think would be an improvement. Nevertheless, by the time I was finished watching, I felt that Gilbert had presented a remarkably compelling and comprehensive case, which was not my initial expectation at all.

 

Nor has anyone refuted it, although he started this tack in the fall so they’ve had plenty of time. Oh, they’ve excoriated him (and Zimmerman) plenty. But I could find nothing that dealt with the heart of the actual research he’s done and the allegations he’s making.

 

As I’ve said, I plan to write more about this. But I decided to put this post up rather quickly, to give you an idea of what I’m talking about, as well as an opportunity to watch the video if you’re not already familiar with it.

 

 

 

 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

More on the above:

 

The Trayvon Hoax.

So here’s the documentary itself. Please be patient, and I think your patience will be rewarded.

 

The importance of the Zimmerman/Martin case cannot be overemphasized. It’s the event that was the kickstarter for the organization BLM and the spreading of the leftist narrative about innocent blacks being killed in droves by cops.

 

That’s a bit ironic, because Zimmerman wasn’t a cop. But he was considered a quasi-cop (and a quasi-white, since he’s half Hispanic).

Video at link.

 

 

NEO: 

I missed some news that came out in late 2019, something I’m just coming across now. In the not-too-distant future, I hope to post a longer piece or two connected with it. It concerns allegations that are not only mind-blowing but could end up being important, if they ever get a proper airing and proper coverage. I’m talking about The Trayvon Hoax, which refers to the claim that the prosecution’s case against George Zimmerman was built almost entirely on a fraud in which they substituted a fake witness for the real one.

 

That seems preposterous, I know. It seems it should be impossible to get away with such a thing, especially with all the scrutiny the case received. The story is complicated and takes a while to set out and digest. The man who’s promoting this is a documentary filmmaker named Joel Gilbert, who’s been connected previously with some iffy theories. So he’s easily dismissed by the left, and hard to take all that seriously.

 

Until you watch the documentary or read his book, that is.

 

I haven’t done the latter, but I’ve done the former. The video is two hours long, and some of it could easily have been cut to tighten it up, which I think would be an improvement. Nevertheless, by the time I was finished watching, I felt that Gilbert had presented a remarkably compelling and comprehensive case, which was not my initial expectation at all.

 

Nor has anyone refuted it, although he started this tack in the fall so they’ve had plenty of time. Oh, they’ve excoriated him (and Zimmerman) plenty. But I could find nothing that dealt with the heart of the actual research he’s done and the allegations he’s making.

 

As I’ve said, I plan to write more about this. But I decided to put this post up rather quickly, to give you an idea of what I’m talking about, as well as an opportunity to watch the video if you’re not already familiar with it.

 

 

 

 

 

I followed the Trayvon Martin case quite closely as it was being played out. It seemed to me that the prosecution never had a case so I was waiting for the big shoe to drop (during the trial) that never came about. Nothing done by the prosecution would surprise me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doc said:

What told me it was a hoax was that Martin had the ability to just go home and avoid a confrontation.  He didn't.

Not to split hairs but he did go to his father's house but then returned to where GZ was parked. That blew apart the narrative that tried to make it as if GZ hunted down TM in order to harm him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...