SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 3 hours ago, GunnerBill said: I'd have taken a Quarterback. This. They could have gotten any of them if they played their cards right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jokeman Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 6 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said: Just for fun: No doubt Barkley is having an incredible rookie season and proving worthy of such a high pick. But given the importance of the QB position and seeing Eli is pretty much done and knowing what we know now what would you do in a redraft? Would you still take Barkley #2 or take Allen (or other one of the QBs) instead? Do you go safe and take the beast at RB? Or gamble on the sky high upside Allen has been showing? Or do you go QB but take one of the other guys instead? Or is there another rookie you take instead? Remember this is for the Giants, not just who you like more. To answer my own question: It would be a tough choice for me, but I am a believer in Allen and I really think he is going to get there and be a special talent. I wouldn’t fault anyone who would choose Barkley either, Inmean he is just a beast out there. But just because it’s harder to find that special QB, I think I would gamble by going with Allens upside even though Barkley is already amongst the best at his position in the NFL. I love Barkley, so it’s a close call, just really have a lot of confidence in Allens future. Still Barkley as they can always draft a guy like Herbert or Lock in the forthcoming draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 Just now, The Jokeman said: Still Barkley as they can always draft a guy like Herbert or Lock in the forthcoming draft. They can sign a guy like Barkley right now, off the street, for nothing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 46 minutes ago, DCOrange said: the Broncos arguably have the better player. All the lols man. That’s just wrong 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 I live in giant territory and I go through this all the time. If I was the giants GM Before the draft you trade OBJ you probably get at least one 1st and something else decent you trade Eli. Before this season you would have gotten at worst a 2nd you have your own pick #2 in every round you could have rebuilt that team in 1 year. You also avoid paying OBJ a huge wasted contract, you could have moved back 3 spots got MORE 1’S and taken Barkley still. No you don’t stay at 2 abd take a RB. No matter how great he is it will never be worth it 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JinxedBill1 Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 I would have taken Darnold still. Look, if you need a QB it's already too late. Generational QBs are rare, have to take a swing and hope you hit it out of the park. To me Barkley is fantastic but can be replaced production wise by good backs. Good QB play is the rarest to find hence my decision. It's a game of numbers and when you have 4 potentials staring at you you take your favorite and not hope that one will be available next year for you. But hey I'm conservative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommonCents Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 Their GM should be fired. Barkley can become a HOFer and that still won’t be worth as much as getting the Darnold/Allen selection right. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCOrange Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 26 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: All the lols man. That’s just wrong My login for PFF isn't working at the moment, but I think Lindsay ranks ahead of Saquon in PFF Grade, DVOA, and Run Success Rate. It's definitely debatable who has been better as a rookie and the Broncos guy provides insanely better value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 1 minute ago, DCOrange said: My login for PFF isn't working at the moment, but I think Lindsay ranks ahead of Saquon in PFF Grade, DVOA, and Run Success Rate. It's definitely debatable who has been better as a rookie and the Broncos guy provides insanely better value. Don't bother with PFF, honestly. I value their input very little, at the most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 Barkley, then trade back up to get Lamar Jackson, who went two picks before their 2nd rounder. Jackson / Barkley / Odell / Engram / Sheppard, that's some potential Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillsGospel Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 7 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said: Just for fun: No doubt Barkley is having an incredible rookie season and proving worthy of such a high pick. But given the importance of the QB position and seeing Eli is pretty much done and knowing what we know now what would you do in a redraft? Would you still take Barkley #2 or take Allen (or other one of the QBs) instead? Do you go safe and take the beast at RB? Or gamble on the sky high upside Allen has been showing? Or do you go QB but take one of the other guys instead? Or is there another rookie you take instead? Remember this is for the Giants, not just who you like more. To answer my own question: It would be a tough choice for me, but I am a believer in Allen and I really think he is going to get there and be a special talent. I wouldn’t fault anyone who would choose Barkley either, Inmean he is just a beast out there. But just because it’s harder to find that special QB, I think I would gamble by going with Allens upside even though Barkley is already amongst the best at his position in the NFL. I love Barkley, so it’s a close call, just really have a lot of confidence in Allens future. The Giants should have taken the safe route and drafted Darnold, this was an excellent crop of QB's in the 2018 draft, yes Barkley is a great player, maybe even elite but this is now a passing league, Darnold would have had a whole year or 2 under his belt learning from one of the better QB's in the league and how to be a pro at this level. To me that was a move that the Bills usually make, taking a RB in a passing league, yes running is still important but now look at the options for the Giants, there is no QB in this draft that should even go top 10 but Herbert and possibly another QB will because of desperation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FearLess Price Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 40 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said: All the lols man. That’s just wrong Lol Bro its everywhere. Why is everyone acting like Barkley is handing out surprise UDFA RB levels of production 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, FearLess Price said: Lol Bro its everywhere. Why is everyone acting like Barkley is handing out surprise UDFA RB levels of production As a Penn State fan, I can tell you I missed his production this year. The dude is electric. And I think Better than Hunt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 Barkely is an awesome player. It was dumb to pick a RB in a class with 5 first round QBs who all look like solid picks at the very least. The Chiefs cut last seasons leading rusher, started their 3rd string back last night against a good defense. He had 123 total yards. RBs don't matter 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCOrange Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 I don't think anybody would argue that Barkley isn't a good player. The issue is that if he's a top 10-15 RB, which is basically the highest you'll see him rated by any metric, he's underperforming relative to his contract. The Giants took the most valuable asset in football and punted on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in Chicago Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 A QB. They had a premium pick in a QB rich draft and blew it. Now they will be left with trying to trade up to get someone they like. As good as Barkley has been, a QB could have transitioned into behind Manning and kept that position solved for a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjt328 Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 Running Backs are never worth taking that high. Maybe 15-20 years ago. But not today. They don't have a big enough impact and their lifespans are too short. Now... It could still end up working well for the Giants. Early mocks have up to 4 quarterbacks being taken in the 1st Round (Herbert, Haskins, Lock and Grier), and the only real competition the Giants have right now in getting the top QB is in the Jaguars. Of course, a lot could happen between now and then. It's possible Herbert and/or Haskins return to school. It's possible the Raiders decide to move on from Derek Carr, in which case they immediately need a quarterback. The Broncos and Buccaneers could still end up drafting higher than the Giants, and may be interested in drafting a rookie. Even the Redskins could end up in the mix, with the outlook for Alex Smith looking bad. There also may be some "decent" veteran QBs available on the market this year, or at least guys teams would be willing to grab as a starter. Teddy Bridgewater. Nick Foles. Joe Flacco. Jameis Winston. Derek Carr. Eli Manning. Ryan Fitzpatrick. This could really create a situation of musical chairs with the QB-needy teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 2 hours ago, mannc said: Barkey’s “domination” has led the Giants to last place in the NFC East. No matter how good he is, the difference between him and a guy they could draft in round 2 or 3 won’t be huge. Hell, he’s not better than Kareem Hunt, who’s available now, free of charge! And the Giants won’t enjoy 4 years of a great young qb on a rookie deal—the best bargain in sports. If Allen or any of the other QBs become franchise QBs their franchises will be set for 10 years or more. Barkley is just a shiny fantasy foootball toy. Hows Darnold/Mayfield/Rosen/Allen's teams doing in the standings? The Giants arent losing because of Barkley and not passing on those 4 HOFers single handidly carrying their teams. They can still get a QB this year, or sign/trade for a veteran who can step right in with that team and help them right away, using picks to upgrade other spots. They got one of the best players in the draft at the #2 spot who is looking much more like an elite player in the league then any of the 4 QBs drafted this year have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 It all hinges on whether the Giants can find there guy this year or next year to pair with Barkely. And also whether or not Allen or Darnold become a franchise QB or are they just the next Mariotta/Winston? I think for the time being the Barkley pick looks like a good one. That can change in a hurry if either of Allen or Darnold become the real deal. But the answer to this question won't truly be known for another 4 years or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted December 14, 2018 Share Posted December 14, 2018 it was a huge blunder to pass on a QB for a RB, even a really good one....which is nice. They will go nowhere without a QB. Barkley is just racking up personal stats. Could have had Allen until they dump Manning. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts