Jump to content

Bills Release WR Jeremy Kerley; Sign DT Robert Thomas from PS


26CornerBlitz

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said:

We were going to get beat 47-3 anyways. We could have started Kim Pegula at WR and saved the cap space. 

 

Kirby, you’re a guy with a lot of historical insight into the Bills, and X’s and O’s. Your posts are generally pretty level headed. I always appreciate them. 

 

It’s telling of this regime that you’ve been getting more and more angsty with their decisions. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said:

 

I know that I CAN be wrong and I will have no problem admitting it, but I don't think it's likely.

 

Jim Caldwell did an ok job with the Lions but there was never any true belief he'd lead them to a Super Bowl.  That's how I feel about McDermott.  He'll have some success, but it will be outweighed by his failures.

 

The signs are all around you.  These guys aren't it.

 

 

 

 

What is the parallel between Jim Caldwell and Sean McDermott that shows their careers will be the same? Jeremy Kerley played for both of them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mango said:

 

Kirby, you’re a guy with a lot of historical insight into the Bills, and X’s and O’s. Your posts are generally pretty level headed. I always appreciate them. 

 

It’s telling of this regime that you’ve been getting more and more angsty with their decisions. 

I was a late adopter to “the process.” All that I said at the time is let’s see what these guys do before we give them a key to the city. McDermott got the most out of a mediocore team last year. I think that he’s a decent coach but I don’t really trust him. He’s also an egomaniac and so set on his guys. I don’t believe that he values talent nearly enough. Twice, he was okay starting Nathan Peterman. He doesn’t belong in the league. 

 

I give Beane a little more rope at this point despite some obvious mistakes (ie keeping Kerley for a week allowing him to hit the cap). He had to tear it down to clean up the cap. His career will be dependent on Allen and the next offseason. We are either going to be in great shape or a disaster. This is a real crossroads for the franchise. It’s where the Sabres were when they hired Tim Murray. Everyone loved him at first and he ended up being one of the worst ever. We will see what happens I guess.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I was a late adopter to “the process.” All that I said at the time is let’s see what these guys do before we give them a key to the city. McDermott got the most out of a mediocore team last year. I think that he’s a decent coach but I don’t really trust him. He’s also an egomaniac and so set on his guys. I don’t believe that he values talent nearly enough. Twice, he was okay starting Nathan Peterman. He doesn’t belong in the league. 

 

I give Beane a little more rope at this point despite some obvious mistakes (ie keeping Kerley for a week allowing him to hit the cap). He had to tear it down to clean up the cap. His career will be dependent on Allen and the next offseason. We are either going to be in great shape or a disaster. This is a real crossroads for the franchise. It’s where the Sabres were when they hired Tim Murray. Everyone loved him at first and he ended up being one of the worst ever. We will see what happens I guess.

 

Im actually the opposite currently. I see most of these roster moves as Beane’s doing. I have little trust currently in his talent evaluation (pro or college). I don’t think we were in cap hell, but we are now. 

 

I do thibk if youre a good coach, you’re a better team than the day you showed up. If you’re a good GM, you have more talent than the day you showed up. Currently we are neither, and that’s concerning. 

 

It’s risky to tear down, because if you can’t replace, you’ve decimated a roster/franchise for 3-5 years minimum. He’s gotta be the best GM in the NFL next year in FA and the draft for this to pan out, because we released most of our top talent. 

 

I agree. If Allen pans out, Beane is fine for a while. He’s directly tied to his success at this point. 

Edited by Mango
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mango said:

 

Im actually the opposite currently. I see most of these roster moves as Beane’s doing. I have little trust currently in his talent evaluation (pro or college). I don’t think we were in cap hell, but we are now. 

 

I do thibk if youre a good coach, you’re a better team than the day you showed up. If you’re a good GM, you have more talent than the day you showed up. Currently we are neither, and that’s concerning. 

 

It’s risky to tear down, because if you can’t replace, you’ve decimated a roster/franchise for 3-5 years minimum. He’s gotta be the best GM in the NFL next year in FA and the draft for this to pan out, because we released most of our top talent. 

 

I agree. If Allen pans out, Beane is fine for a while. He’s directly tied to his success at this point. 

Yeah, I am not saying the Beane has done a good job at this point. I think it’s an “incomplete.” He has massive pressure now to get this right but he is operating with a clean slate. They are going to have to draft well and spend in FA. They have a lot of holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Domdab99 said:

 

Then explain why we picked up a punter they hadn't actually seen punt, who also happens to be an ordained minister? 

 

This is a correct statement. His priorities are obviously way out of whack. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mango said:

It’s risky to tear down, because if you can’t replace, you’ve decimated a roster/franchise for 3-5 years minimum. He’s gotta be the best GM in the NFL next year in FA and the draft for this to pan out, because we released most of our top talent. 

 

Problem with your complaint: Our "top talent" consisted of a decoy WR, a rotational DT and a LT who was chronically injured while with us.

 

So, not exactly top talent.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BobChalmers said:

 

"that would've paid the part of Cordy Glenn's salary we saved by trading him. "

 

Why do so many  - including "professional" media people - keep talking about the Glenn and Taylor TRADES as if they were only salary moves??

 

Without those two trades (for picks), the Bills don't have Allen and Edmunds right now - they are the future of this team.

You are astute and perspicacious. The Bills haven't had a franchise qb in over a generation. The organization did what they had to do to get an authentic franchise qb prospect. And yet some people are bothered by that. It makes no sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, JohnC said:

You are astute and perspicacious. The Bills haven't had a franchise qb in over a generation. The organization did what they had to do to get an authentic franchise qb prospect. And yet some people are bothered by that. It makes no sense. 

 

Because it’s not an acceptable excuse for every roster move 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, NoSaint said:

 

Because it’s not an acceptable excuse for every roster move 

Without the Cordy Glenn trade with the Bengals that moved us up the board the Bills would not have been able to draft Josh Allen. I would make that deal any day of the week. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NoSaint said:

 

Cordy, sure. Tyrod, less essential in this narrative

 

Have you called back on all the times you’ve called people out for being negative? It seems you just plow on to the next player/coach to hype and call fellow posters out on being skeptical of. 

As a matter of fact....yes I have.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...