Jump to content

Most possible depressing outcome


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

I can’t see how the bills end up with a qb from this draft outside of Jackson or Rudolph, both of whom would be a wasted pick. They just picked the wrong year to break the drought. Bad luck as always.

I know...making the playoffs was awful. I really hope we go another 10 years not making the playoffs again...

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

I can’t see how the bills end up with a qb from this draft outside of Jackson or Rudolph, both of whom would be a wasted pick. They just picked the wrong year to break the drought. Bad luck as always.

I don't like Jackson.... but sign me up for Rudolph and keeping all your picks.  The difference between the 1 - 6 QB's in the draft in minimal.  All have flaws and there is no lock.  Half will fail.  I don't want to do another Sammy Watkins deal.  If you look at the analytics of the QB class, Rudolph is 1 or 2 on a majority of categories.  For some of us Depressing would by trading away four picks for let's say Rosen, and he gets injured constantly.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO Rudolph is not a wasted pick,  I would be fine with Rudolph at 12. He is a pocket QB exactly what we have all wanted, not top 3 QB but IMO #4.  Sadly I can see some other team taking him and then being stuck with Allen/Jackson who are 2nd rounders IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BuffaloDave55 said:

I don't like Jackson.... but sign me up for Rudolph and keeping all your picks.  The difference between the 1 - 6 QB's in the draft in minimal.  All have flaws and there is no lock.  Half will fail.  I don't want to do another Sammy Watkins deal.  If you look at the analytics of the QB class, Rudolph is 1 or 2 on a majority of categories.  For some of us Depressing would by trading away four picks for let's say Rosen, and he gets injured constantly.

Well said. Keep your draft capital. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

I can’t see how the bills end up with a qb from this draft outside of Jackson or Rudolph, both of whom would be a wasted pick. They just picked the wrong year to break the drought. Bad luck as always.

 

Jackson's better than all of the others. I just don't understand why he's not considered a top five pick.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just let it play out. I want #2 as bad as anyone, but if it is meant to be it'll be. Really all we can do is wait at this point. Hopeully the panic induced yesterday wanes and we can just see what happens. The paranoia in acting like Beane has come out and said no way no how has to subside. Let it play out and save the ledge jumping for when we have a clear picture. Right now? Who knows. 3 might have been the target. 2 might have been it all along. Again-

Who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 1billsfan said:

 

Jackson's better than all of the others. I just don't understand why he's not considered a top five pick.

 

 

Toothpick legs and many fans are done with QBs that have similarities to Tyrod. IMO fans want a true pocket QB not a QB that will take off running first over waiting and take the hit in the pocket to make the throw. 

8 minutes ago, TheElectricCompany said:

Mason Rudolph at 12? 

Ugh - this is like preparing for a perfect 10 oz filet from the best steakhouse in town, and ending up with a chewy piece of brisket. 

We keep all are picks and get a very good pocket QB to sit and learn year one, it's a win, win IMO. Sadly IMO Cards want him and can jump the Bills to get him.

Edited by xRUSHx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, xRUSHx said:

IMO Rudolph is not a wasted pick,  I would be fine with Rudolph at 12. He is a pocket QB exactly what we have all wanted, not top 3 QB but IMO #4.  Sadly I can see some other team taking him and then being stuck with Allen/Jackson who are 2nd rounders IMO.

personally, i would not mind seeing the Bills take a flier on Falk at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[This is an automated response]As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A better title will help the community find information faster and make your topic more likely to be read. The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate.Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Foxx said:

personally, i would not mind seeing the Bills take a flier on Falk at some point.

If after all this the Bills only take a late rounder in Falk I think fans will jump off the falls. IMO they have no choice but to take a QB in round one. Now IMO if the Bills are taking two QBs in this draft then yes I agree grab Falk or White or Lauletta and bump Peterman to the PS or trade him

Edited by xRUSHx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

I can’t see how the bills end up with a qb from this draft outside of Jackson or Rudolph, both of whom would be a wasted pick. They just picked the wrong year to break the drought. Bad luck as always.

 

In reflection I don’t think you embraced the tank hard enough...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldnt be depressed at all. I think they go into the 3rd before picking a QB. They like Petterman  and picked ip AJ. This may give Nate two years to grow. They will draft one but I just would rather they took BPA at other positions of need in 1 and 2.

Edit: Look for Lauletta in round 3

Edited by fansince88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, xRUSHx said:

Toothpick legs and many fans are done with QBs that have similarities to Tyrod. IMO fans want a true pocket QB not a QB that will take off running first over waiting and take the hit in the pocket to make the throw. 

 

Yet Jackson doesn't have an injury history (that I've read about) and Rosen has concussions and shoulder problems. As for Tyrod comparisons, that's a false one. Jackson's an electric and dynamic playmaker in the mold of Watson. He's someone who trust his arm and Taylor never was that kind of a QB.

 

 

 

Edited by 1billsfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, xRUSHx said:

IMO Rudolph is not a wasted pick,  I would be fine with Rudolph at 12. He is a pocket QB exactly what we have all wanted, not top 3 QB but IMO #4.  Sadly I can see some other team taking him and then being stuck with Allen/Jackson who are 2nd rounders IMO.

Not at 12. If we’re not moving up to get a QB in the top 5 I want BPA at 12 and then take a chance at a QB at 22. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaBillsFanSince1973 said:

lay off the sauce OP, lets save the depression for after the draft. that is if it turns out depressing?

 

 

who knows?

 

 

anyone here gifted enough to prophesy ?

Only in spiritual things. LOL

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Don't stop billievein said:

Not at 12. If we’re not moving up to get a QB in the top 5 I want BPA at 12 and then take a chance at a QB at 22. 

IMO Rudolph will not last till 22, in fact Miami could take him 1 slot above us.

5 minutes ago, 1billsfan said:

 

Yet Jackson doesn't have an injury history (that I've read about) and Rosen has concussions and shoulder problems. As for Tyrod comparisons, that's a false one. Jackson's an electric and dynamic playmaker in the mold of Watson. He's someone who trust his arm and Taylor never was that kind of a QB.

 

 

 

He came out this year because they were very worried about him.

This has to be a major concern for Jackson and his family. The mobile quarterback is still rather thin, and with the physical style he plays, he’s always at risk to suffer an injury. If he comes back and gets hurt, his draft stock plummets, as does his signing bonus. Louisville opens against Alabama next season and also plays Clemson and Florida State among a full schedule of ACC opponents, all of whom will be gunning for him.

 

The case for staying in school another season

1. Jackson struggled Saturday. He did not help himself in the TaxSlayer Bowl against Mississippi State. As prolific as he was in the run game, he completed just 13 of 31 passes for 171 yards, two touchdowns and four interceptions. It was his worst outing of the season in completion percentage, the statistic he worked so hard to improve as a junior. With scouts from nine NFL teams credentialed and likely more watching on TV, Jackson’s mistakes may cost him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 1billsfan said:

 

Jackson's better than all of the others. I just don't understand why he's not considered a top five pick.

 

 

He's black and historically black QBs have not been very successful in the NFL. It's not really racism so much as pattern detection leading to bias.

 

I think Beane will give him a fair evaluation. He compared the shallow evaluations of Jackson to the shallow evaluations of Cam Newton coming into the NFL.

Edited by Fetou
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fetou said:

He's black and historically black QBs have not been very successful in the NFL. It's not really racism so much as pattern detection leading to bias.

 

I think Beane will give him a fair evaluation. He compared the shallow evaluations of Jackson to the shallow evaluations of Cam Newton coming into the NFL.

 

Good lord get real. We don't need crap like that on this board. I'd do cartwheels to have Watson, Cam, Wilson, Jamais or Dak. Christ what's wrong with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fetou said:

He's black and historically black QBs have not been very successful in the NFL. It's not really racism so much as pattern detection leading to bias.

 

I think Beane will give him a fair evaluation. He compared the shallow evaluations of Jackson to the shallow evaluations of Cam Newton coming into the NFL.

No, it’s racism. The success rate argument, which I’m not sure is accurate, is justification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DaBillsFanSince1973 said:

lay off the sauce OP, lets save the depression for after the draft. that is if it turns out depressing?

 

 

who knows?

 

 

anyone here gifted enough to prophesy ?

Dozens will say the Bills screwed up big time and that they have had enough.   

 

Signed 

Mz Cleo 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, DaBillsFanSince1973 said:

lay off the sauce OP, lets save the depression for after the draft. that is if it turns out depressing?

 

 

who knows?

 

 

anyone here gifted enough to prophesy ?

I think I’d be the closest.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Green Lightning said:

26 posts and already in a death spiral. It's a privilege to post to this board, don't flame out so quickly.

Actually 105 posts, already have 26 reputation. That appears to be very favorable compared to your ratio. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, chris heff said:

If the Bills drafted Watson last year this discussion wouldn’t be happening. You remember Watson, the guy who fell to number 12 in the draft, third QB taken. His skill set won’t transfer to the NFL.

Who is that, does he play wide receiver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1billsfan said:

 

Jackson's better than all of the others. I just don't understand why he's not considered a top five pick.

 

 

Maybe I'm the traditionalist here, but I don't like running QBs. The league has shown time and time again that they flame out and those offenses are pretty close to what we had with TT, just stay in the pocket and throw the damn ball. With his frame, the last thing you want is him running and getting smashed...he will get hurt...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1billsfan said:

 

Yet Jackson doesn't have an injury history (that I've read about) and Rosen has concussions and shoulder problems. As for Tyrod comparisons, that's a false one. Jackson's an electric and dynamic playmaker in the mold of Watson. He's someone who trust his arm and Taylor never was that kind of a QB.

 

 

 

Watson's accuracy is not great...The TT comparisons go back to the style of offense we would run....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Reed83HOF said:

Maybe I'm the traditionalist here, but I don't like running QBs. The league has shown time and time again that they flame out and those offenses are pretty close to what we had with TT, just stay in the pocket and throw the damn ball. With his frame, the last thing you want is him running and getting smashed...he will get hurt...

This.   How many games did TT get banged up this season alone? 

 

3, 4, 5 ?   

 

Id say he had 2 games where he could ha r had a borderline concussion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...