Jump to content

Nathan Peterman to Start this Week.


26CornerBlitz

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Maine-iac said:

I see this all the time after loses.  Kind of the anti Taylor sing song.  Fact is the guy scored points to the tune of 25ppg.  If you are calling crappy running plays and end up in 3rd and 7 or 3rd and 12 every time then it makes the passing game look much harder than it should be.  If Dennison wasn't so awful at getting the running game going any QB, Peterman included, would look like Jim Kelly all over again.  Until our coaches get their crap straight and get an effective game plan the passing will suffer.  Look at other teams.  They scheme guys open and the throws are easy.  People here are bitching because Taylor isn't throwing it into double coverage.  It shouldn't be so hard.

You're wrong about that. Both Romo and Barber pointed out several times where Tyrod either had man coverage or had an open guy in soft spots in the zone. He wouldn't throw it and they said " you just have to throw the ball there". It's Taylor more than anything else. It's easy to stop the run when you have no fear of the QB even throwing the football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

 

 I have no problem with that, but I knew from the jump that it's not what this staff will do. As soon as the OL coach changed and the scheme as well you knew that running game was gone. They got rid of the deep threat Watkins as well. They just weren't going to be running last years O. Dennison is not the creative type that Roman was. They simply saw Tyrod and a bridge QB and gave him a prove it deal to show he could be a pocket passer. But McD watched those films I'm sure. He also knows what kind of defensive scheme they will see with Taylor going forward. He simply doesn't believe Tyrod can beat anyone from the pocket. How do you stop teams from playing the DL that way unless Taylor shows he can beat it? The team was at a crossroads and starting Taylor was just going to yield a loss at this point. 

I don’t disagree but that just further illustrates my point. That’s coaching. You undid a bunch of things that worked and replaced them with your way of doing things. That’s not smart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow....that was pretty quick.....this board is gonna explode from now up to game time...LOL.....okay, lets get this thing going and get a WC spot.....please more TD's than interceptions plus EVEN more IMPORTANTLY than this is FIX FIX FIX the friggin run D or all this will mean squat!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kirby Jackson said:

I don’t disagree but that just further illustrates my point. That’s coaching. You undid a bunch of things that worked and replaced them with your way of doing things. That’s not smart.

No, it's not smart. But it's what happened , and what often happens when you make a change at HC. It would have been good to keep the Roman offense and Kromer. Things might be different. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ProcessAccepted said:

Question for anyone who wanted Peterman to get the start. What are your predictions for his production at the Chargers? (Yards-Completions-TDs vs Ints)

 

 

Chargers have a good pass rush and some strong pieces in the secondary. They will also win TOP by a fair margain.

 

240 1td 2 picks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, The Avenger said:

 

Sadly these are the best, but not the only options for the Bills. I believe the most likely is that the Bills win a few more games and end up 7-9, this cementing our place in the middle of the pack for the upteenth year in a row.....

And we’ll have a qb controversy because e’ll want to see if Peterman develops next year instead of starting a 1st round draft pick. Way to treat a team captain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, matter2003 said:

Wonder if this has to do with Anthony Lynn knowing Tyrod very well and what his flaws and weaknesses are...

 

VERY good point IMO - he doesn't know a thing about Nate...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel please don't be jeff tuel 

  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Nate's come in, he's handled himself well. He handled himself well in the game the other day," McDermott said Wednesday. "He's poised, he's mature beyond his years, he's worked hard. ... The success that he's had to this point, he's ready. I wouldn't make this move if I didn't think he was ready."

 

"We are 5-4, I understand that. We're in the playoff hunt at this point," the coach said. "It is always and will forever, for the time that I'm here, it's about putting out the best team that we possibly can. We are made for more than 5-4."

 

McDermott continued: "This is about becoming better as a football team and see if this will make us a better team. As the decision-maker you have to be willing to take calculated risks to get to where we're trying to go. And I'm comfortable doing that."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I rewatched his game against Clemson and I'm going to watch it again tonight. This guy is a true competitor, gamer, gunslinger. I still have rookie expectations but I feel so much better about this game vs the Chargers.

 

The talent level of that Clemson team over Pitt was just rediculous. The major reason Pitt won was because of Peterman who looked like a QB possessed to get his team a victory.

 

Im hyped about this weeks game and a big shout out to McD for having big brass balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kirby Jackson said:

I don’t disagree but that just further illustrates my point. That’s coaching. You undid a bunch of things that worked and replaced them with your way of doing things. That’s not smart.

That's exactly it.

 

Here is an example. For my profession, I am a fitness professional who helps people with fat loss.

 

Every single one of my clients is different, and if I did the same thing for one client as I did the other, it simply would not work.

 

I have to have a different approach with every single person to get them towards their fat loss goals.

 

In this example? Dennison refused to do what worked best for Tyrod, and he is just sticking with a "One size fits all" type of deal. That is terrible coaching. 

 

Maybe his offence works with a prototypical pocket passer, but that's not who Tyrod is.  So until we find that person, he should have altered his stubborn approach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...