Jump to content

Carolina, 9-3, then...the "good" loss?


Recommended Posts

We all know that loss was the obvious lynch pin for them to say, "OK, we were dreadful on offense (still) and we are going to continue to get pummeled very soon if we don't change things up."

 

If Zay and TT connect on that pass in the Carolina game, and we start 2-0, I honestly think this team really could be 2-2 now as they would have likely stayed the course at that point.

 

What say you?

 

 

Edited by dollars 2 donuts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To say we should have won that game must say Atlanta should have won that game. That's the way the dice roll. Good teams don't let those chances come up. Atlanta is a good team and we saw what happened when the dice were rolled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know that loss was the obvious lynch pin for them to say, "OK, we were dreadful on offense (still) and we are going to continue to get pummeled very soon if we don't change things up."

 

If Zay and TT connect on that pass in the Carolina game, and we start 2-0, I honestly think this team really could be 2-2 now as they would have likely stayed the course at that point.

 

What say you?

 

 

If they had no desire to improve from one game to the next you might have a point about being 2-2 but since they always look for ways to get better I would say no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know that loss was the obvious lynch pin for them to say, "OK, we were dreadful on offense (still) and we are going to continue to get pummeled very soon if we don't change things up."

 

If Zay and TT connect on that pass in the Carolina game, and we start 2-0, I honestly think this team really could be 2-2 now as they would have likely stayed the course at that point.

 

What say you?

 

 

 

Hypothetical's really are just that. But regardless for the sake of fun no I don't think they are 2-2 they are 3-1 or 4-0. McD and Dennison have said each week is its own gameplan and how they dictate their plan is based off each opponent. Dennison straight up said they wanted to take shots and be aggressive this week because it was to their benefit and against DEN Tyrod was better in a 7 step drop then a 3 with that pass rush. Even if they won that CAR game changes on O were needed anyway with how poor the O played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to the question, which I should have made clearer...I should have put it in the title...oh wait...

 

Was the loss to Carolina a good loss, in that it changed our offense?

Taylor took what the opposition gave him and protected the football in all 4 games.

 

 

The Bills O is a work in progress and will continue to improve over time in my humble opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree w the OP. The week leading up to Denver there probably was a more critical eye on the offensive gameplan, and you could see the play calling step shift toward TTs strengths (rolling out, play action, short / intermediate drag routes).

 

Maybe they would have done that anyways bc opponent dictates it, but I think if we were 2-0 they would have thought "if it aint broke dont fix it" rather than "we need to change it up". Have no idea if that would have meant we win or lose the next games, too many variables to guess at that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we don't have Stephen Hauschka then we are 1-3. That guy has been money. I think we are getting spoiled. People now expect him to hit from 55+ every time and that's asking a lot

 

What do you mean "if we don't have"? We do have him and he's made important kicks. What exactly is your point when pointing to an if that isn't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he makes that catch, then the Bills fly out of there feeling lucky, but there's no way they could be complacent about the offense after such a dismal performance. In short, if he makes the catch, we'd be a 4-0 team that deserves to be 3-1, and I'm pretty sure McD sees it the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we don't have Stephen Hauschka then we are 1-3. That guy has been money. I think we are getting spoiled. People now expect him to hit from 55+ every time and that's asking a lot

It certainly is. Hes Hau$ch though. Anyone miss DC yet? haha. Loved this pickup from day 1. Hell I might end up with his jersey he continues like this.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the nihilism and defeatism is deeply ingrained into Bills fans now. So much so that after a 3-1 start there's way less celebrating and way, way more "yes, but" and "we won, but" and "this isn't sustainable" It's like, how do you even enjoy anything anymore?

 

You don't until they make playoffs ... then complain about the performance in playoff games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to the question, which I should have made clearer...I should have put it in the title...oh wait...

 

Was the loss to Carolina a good loss, in that it changed our offense?

If it took that loss for Denison to figure out TT and the offense, then God help us. Did they not watch the tape of the last 32 games? Probably not, because they traded away the only deep threat.

Clay is playing great. Contract year?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we don't have Stephen Hauschka then we are 1-3. That guy has been money. I think we are getting spoiled. People now expect him to hit from 55+ every time and that's asking a lot

 

Tbf Carpenter was like that the 9-7 season. That game winner in Detroit was a massive kick... 58 yarder I think. Something happened to him the following pre-season when he had a niggling injury an missed a couple of kicks and Rex called him out on it in a presser and his confidence just never recovered... it was downhill from thereon in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...